Ryobi Limited
Ryobi Limited (RYBIF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RYBIF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RYBIF | $15.78 | +0.00% | 501.8M | 7.17 | $2.20 | +4.21% |
| BEKAY | $4.94 | +0.00% | 24.1B | 30.88 | $0.16 | +4.32% |
| TKAMY | $12.55 | +2.37% | 7.8B | 40.48 | $0.31 | +1.41% |
| TYEKF | $12.10 | +1.26% | 7.5B | 39.03 | $0.31 | +1.46% |
| BEKSF | $42.70 | +0.00% | 2.1B | 10.89 | $3.92 | +5.00% |
| RMGNF | $42.01 | +0.00% | 2B | 12.58 | $3.34 | +4.91% |
| MUEL | $442.00 | +0.45% | 571.1M | 2.57 | $172.06 | +0.27% |
| NOEJF | $16.90 | +0.00% | 538.5M | -8.67 | -$1.95 | +2.65% |
| ADFJF | $7.12 | -3.39% | 203.2M | 10.46 | $0.68 | +0.41% |
| LQMT | $0.15 | +0.14% | 131.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RYBIF vs BEKAY Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, BEKAY has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while BEKAY trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas BEKAY's P/E ratio is 30.88. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BEKAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is more volatile compared to BEKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check BEKAY's competition here
RYBIF vs TKAMY Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, TKAMY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while TKAMY trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas TKAMY's P/E ratio is 40.48. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TKAMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is more volatile compared to TKAMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check TKAMY's competition here
RYBIF vs TYEKF Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, TYEKF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while TYEKF trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas TYEKF's P/E ratio is 39.03. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TYEKF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is more volatile compared to TYEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check TYEKF's competition here
RYBIF vs BEKSF Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, BEKSF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while BEKSF trades at $42.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas BEKSF's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BEKSF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is less volatile compared to BEKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check BEKSF's competition here
RYBIF vs RMGNF Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, RMGNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while RMGNF trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas RMGNF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RMGNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is less volatile compared to RMGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check RMGNF's competition here
RYBIF vs MUEL Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, MUEL has a market cap of 571.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while MUEL trades at $442.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas MUEL's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUEL's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is more volatile compared to MUEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check MUEL's competition here
RYBIF vs NOEJF Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, NOEJF has a market cap of 538.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while NOEJF trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas NOEJF's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NOEJF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is less volatile compared to NOEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check NOEJF's competition here
RYBIF vs ADFJF Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, ADFJF has a market cap of 203.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while ADFJF trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas ADFJF's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADFJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is more volatile compared to ADFJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check ADFJF's competition here
RYBIF vs LQMT Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, LQMT has a market cap of 131.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while LQMT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas LQMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LQMT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is more volatile compared to LQMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check LQMT's competition here
RYBIF vs ARCW Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, ARCW has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while ARCW trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas ARCW's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARCW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is more volatile compared to ARCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check ARCW's competition here
RYBIF vs OLNCF Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, OLNCF has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while OLNCF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas OLNCF's P/E ratio is 111.00. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OLNCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is more volatile compared to OLNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check OLNCF's competition here
RYBIF vs IAALF Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, IAALF has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while IAALF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas IAALF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IAALF's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is more volatile compared to IAALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check IAALF's competition here
RYBIF vs CYMHF Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, CYMHF has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while CYMHF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas CYMHF's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CYMHF's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is less volatile compared to CYMHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check CYMHF's competition here
RYBIF vs RMTO Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, RMTO has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while RMTO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas RMTO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RMTO's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is more volatile compared to RMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check RMTO's competition here
RYBIF vs ERILF Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, ERILF has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while ERILF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas ERILF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ERILF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is more volatile compared to ERILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check ERILF's competition here
RYBIF vs THRR Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, THRR has a market cap of 100K. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while THRR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas THRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THRR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is less volatile compared to THRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check THRR's competition here
RYBIF vs MTRT Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, MTRT has a market cap of 41.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while MTRT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas MTRT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTRT's ROE of +10.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is less volatile compared to MTRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check MTRT's competition here
RYBIF vs TIMNF Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, TIMNF has a market cap of 19.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while TIMNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas TIMNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TIMNF's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is less volatile compared to TIMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check TIMNF's competition here
RYBIF vs RIVT Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, RIVT has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while RIVT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas RIVT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RIVT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is less volatile compared to RIVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check RIVT's competition here
RYBIF vs ELNX Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, ELNX has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while ELNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas ELNX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELNX's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is less volatile compared to ELNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check ELNX's competition here
RYBIF vs AMGY Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, AMGY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while AMGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas AMGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMGY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is less volatile compared to AMGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check AMGY's competition here
RYBIF vs TDYT Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, TDYT has a market cap of 629. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while TDYT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas TDYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TDYT's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is less volatile compared to TDYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check TDYT's competition here
RYBIF vs CHTM Comparison May 2026
RYBIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYBIF stands at 501.8M. In comparison, CHTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RYBIF is priced at $15.78, while CHTM trades at $1,452.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas CHTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHTM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYBIF is more volatile compared to CHTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYBIF.Check CHTM's competition here