Husqvarna AB (publ)
Husqvarna AB (publ) (HUSQF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HUSQF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUSQF | $4.50 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 12.16 | $0.37 | +2.39% |
| TTNDF | $17.45 | +12.40% | 31.9B | 26.85 | $0.65 | +1.78% |
| TTNDY | $75.17 | -7.05% | 28.5B | 23.80 | $3.27 | +2.01% |
| SKUFF | $26.19 | +0.00% | 11.9B | 27.28 | $0.96 | +1.66% |
| SKFRY | $23.98 | -5.05% | 11.5B | 28.44 | $0.89 | +1.70% |
| MKEWF | $37.90 | -3.17% | 10.1B | 19.95 | $1.90 | +1.93% |
| MKTAY | $35.68 | -2.03% | 9.2B | 18.62 | $1.91 | +1.48% |
| MSSMY | $10.10 | -10.38% | 5.6B | 22.14 | $0.48 | +2.38% |
| MSUXF | $16.67 | +0.00% | 4.4B | 22.23 | $0.75 | +2.05% |
| HUQVF | $6.53 | +0.00% | 3.7B | 29.69 | $0.22 | +1.64% |
Stock Comparison
HUSQF vs TTNDF Comparison May 2026
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TTNDF has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $4.50, while TTNDF trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.16, whereas TTNDF's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTNDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to TTNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check TTNDF's competition here
HUSQF vs TTNDY Comparison May 2026
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TTNDY has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $4.50, while TTNDY trades at $75.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.16, whereas TTNDY's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTNDY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to TTNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check TTNDY's competition here
HUSQF vs SKUFF Comparison May 2026
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SKUFF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $4.50, while SKUFF trades at $26.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.16, whereas SKUFF's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKUFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF and SKUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKUFF's competition here
HUSQF vs SKFRY Comparison May 2026
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SKFRY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $4.50, while SKFRY trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.16, whereas SKFRY's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKFRY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to SKFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check SKFRY's competition here
HUSQF vs MKEWF Comparison May 2026
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MKEWF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $4.50, while MKEWF trades at $37.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.16, whereas MKEWF's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MKEWF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF and MKEWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MKEWF's competition here
HUSQF vs MKTAY Comparison May 2026
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MKTAY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $4.50, while MKTAY trades at $35.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.16, whereas MKTAY's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MKTAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to MKTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check MKTAY's competition here
HUSQF vs MSSMY Comparison May 2026
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MSSMY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $4.50, while MSSMY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.16, whereas MSSMY's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSSMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF and MSSMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MSSMY's competition here
HUSQF vs MSUXF Comparison May 2026
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MSUXF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $4.50, while MSUXF trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.16, whereas MSUXF's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSUXF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF and MSUXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MSUXF's competition here
HUSQF vs HUQVF Comparison May 2026
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HUQVF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $4.50, while HUQVF trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.16, whereas HUQVF's P/E ratio is 29.69. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUQVF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF and HUQVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUQVF's competition here
HUSQF vs HSQVY Comparison May 2026
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HSQVY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $4.50, while HSQVY trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.16, whereas HSQVY's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HSQVY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to HSQVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check HSQVY's competition here
HUSQF vs MRSKF Comparison May 2026
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MRSKF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $4.50, while MRSKF trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.16, whereas MRSKF's P/E ratio is 72.45. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRSKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to MRSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check MRSKF's competition here
HUSQF vs OSGCF Comparison May 2026
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 2.6B. In comparison, OSGCF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $4.50, while OSGCF trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.16, whereas OSGCF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OSGCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to OSGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check OSGCF's competition here
HUSQF vs QEPC Comparison May 2026
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 2.6B. In comparison, QEPC has a market cap of 156.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $4.50, while QEPC trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.16, whereas QEPC's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QEPC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to QEPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check QEPC's competition here
HUSQF vs SCXLB Comparison May 2026
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SCXLB has a market cap of 95.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $4.50, while SCXLB trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.16, whereas SCXLB's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCXLB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to SCXLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check SCXLB's competition here
HUSQF vs DMFG Comparison May 2026
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 2.6B. In comparison, DMFG has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $4.50, while DMFG trades at $59.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.16, whereas DMFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DMFG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF and DMFG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DMFG's competition here
HUSQF vs FSCR Comparison May 2026
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 2.6B. In comparison, FSCR has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $4.50, while FSCR trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.16, whereas FSCR's P/E ratio is -14.46. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FSCR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF and FSCR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FSCR's competition here
HUSQF vs PERT Comparison May 2026
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PERT has a market cap of 56.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $4.50, while PERT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.16, whereas PERT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PERT's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF and PERT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PERT's competition here
HUSQF vs PRTR Comparison May 2026
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PRTR has a market cap of 14.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $4.50, while PRTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.16, whereas PRTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRTR's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to PRTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check PRTR's competition here