Sunrun Inc. (RUN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RUN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Solar Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUN | $13.49 | -0.81% | 3.2B | 6.33 | $2.13 | N/A |
| FSLR | $239.07 | -3.85% | 25.7B | 15.44 | $15.48 | N/A |
| ENPH | $47.58 | +0.78% | 6.3B | 17.18 | $2.77 | N/A |
| SEDG | $51.75 | -0.25% | 3.1B | -30.62 | -$1.69 | N/A |
| SHLS | $9.00 | -8.72% | 1.5B | 23.08 | $0.39 | N/A |
| ARRY | $7.12 | -7.41% | 1.1B | 11.87 | $0.60 | N/A |
| CSIQ | $15.39 | -2.72% | 1B | -4.42 | -$3.48 | N/A |
| SOL | $1.94 | +0.52% | 995.6M | -10.78 | -$0.18 | N/A |
| DQ | $12.84 | -2.13% | 868.8M | -4.62 | -$2.78 | N/A |
| TOYO | $7.26 | -1.63% | 266.5M | 8.52 | $0.85 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RUN vs FSLR Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FSLR has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while FSLR trades at $239.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas FSLR's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FSLR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to FSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check FSLR's competition here
RUN vs ENPH Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ENPH has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while ENPH trades at $47.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas ENPH's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ENPH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ENPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ENPH's competition here
RUN vs SEDG Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SEDG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while SEDG trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas SEDG's P/E ratio is -30.62. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SEDG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SEDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SEDG's competition here
RUN vs SHLS Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SHLS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while SHLS trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas SHLS's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SHLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SHLS's competition here
RUN vs ARRY Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ARRY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while ARRY trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas ARRY's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARRY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ARRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ARRY's competition here
RUN vs CSIQ Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CSIQ has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while CSIQ trades at $15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas CSIQ's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CSIQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to CSIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check CSIQ's competition here
RUN vs SOL Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SOL has a market cap of 995.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while SOL trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas SOL's P/E ratio is -10.78. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SOL's competition here
RUN vs DQ Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 868.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while DQ trades at $12.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check DQ's competition here
RUN vs TOYO Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TOYO has a market cap of 266.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while TOYO trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas TOYO's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TOYO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to TOYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check TOYO's competition here
RUN vs JKS Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JKS has a market cap of 213.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while JKS trades at $16.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas JKS's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JKS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to JKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check JKS's competition here
RUN vs CSLR Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CSLR has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while CSLR trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas CSLR's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CSLR's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to CSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check CSLR's competition here
RUN vs VIVO Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VIVO has a market cap of 96.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while VIVO trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas VIVO's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VIVO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VIVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check VIVO's competition here
RUN vs ZEOWW Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ZEOWW has a market cap of 93.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while ZEOWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas ZEOWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZEOWW's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to ZEOWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ZEOWW's competition here
RUN vs FTCI Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FTCI has a market cap of 76.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while FTCI trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas FTCI's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FTCI's ROE of +3.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to FTCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check FTCI's competition here
RUN vs SPWR Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SPWR has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while SPWR trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas SPWR's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPWR's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SPWR's competition here
RUN vs SPWRW Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SPWRW has a market cap of 57.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while SPWRW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas SPWRW's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPWRW's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SPWRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SPWRW's competition here
RUN vs SPRU Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SPRU has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while SPRU trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas SPRU's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPRU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SPRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SPRU's competition here
RUN vs ZEO Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ZEO has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while ZEO trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas ZEO's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZEO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ZEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ZEO's competition here
RUN vs NOVA Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NOVA has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while NOVA trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas NOVA's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NOVA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to NOVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check NOVA's competition here
RUN vs SPI Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SPI has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while SPI trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas SPI's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SPI's competition here
RUN vs BEEM Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BEEM has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while BEEM trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas BEEM's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BEEM's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to BEEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check BEEM's competition here
RUN vs SMXT Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SMXT has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while SMXT trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas SMXT's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMXT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SMXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SMXT's competition here
RUN vs ASTI Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ASTI has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while ASTI trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas ASTI's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASTI's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ASTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ASTI's competition here
RUN vs MAXN Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MAXN has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while MAXN trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas MAXN's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MAXN's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to MAXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check MAXN's competition here
RUN vs PEGY Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PEGY has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while PEGY trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas PEGY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PEGY's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to PEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check PEGY's competition here
RUN vs PN Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PN has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while PN trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas PN's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check PN's competition here
RUN vs VSTE Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VSTE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while VSTE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas VSTE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VSTE's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check VSTE's competition here
RUN vs TURB Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TURB has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while TURB trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas TURB's P/E ratio is -14.55. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TURB's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to TURB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check TURB's competition here
RUN vs SUNW Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SUNW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while SUNW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas SUNW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SUNW's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SUNW's competition here
RUN vs ISUN Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ISUN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while ISUN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas ISUN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ISUN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ISUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ISUN's competition here
RUN vs BEEMW Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BEEMW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while BEEMW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas BEEMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BEEMW's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to BEEMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check BEEMW's competition here
RUN vs VSTEW Comparison July 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VSTEW has a market cap of 960.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.49, while VSTEW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.33, whereas VSTEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VSTEW's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VSTEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check VSTEW's competition here