Sunrun Inc. (RUN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RUN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Solar Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUN | $11.76 | -12.67% | 3B | 5.92 | $2.13 | N/A |
| FSLR | $251.19 | -8.79% | 28.2B | 16.93 | $15.49 | N/A |
| ENPH | $50.84 | -10.63% | 7.1B | 52.98 | $1.01 | N/A |
| SEDG | $54.78 | -14.34% | 3.5B | -9.43 | -$6.13 | N/A |
| SHLS | $9.35 | -14.06% | 1.6B | 48.15 | $0.20 | N/A |
| ARRY | $7.03 | -10.39% | 1.1B | -8.82 | -$0.84 | N/A |
| CSIQ | $15.46 | -9.27% | 1.1B | -6.40 | -$2.52 | N/A |
| SOL | $1.94 | +0.52% | 995.6M | -10.78 | -$0.18 | N/A |
| DQ | $14.68 | -5.75% | 969M | -5.38 | -$2.66 | N/A |
| TOYO | $12.31 | -6.39% | 474.7M | 6.63 | $1.95 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RUN vs FSLR Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, FSLR has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while FSLR trades at $251.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas FSLR's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FSLR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to FSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check FSLR's competition here
RUN vs ENPH Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, ENPH has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while ENPH trades at $50.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas ENPH's P/E ratio is 52.98. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ENPH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to ENPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ENPH's competition here
RUN vs SEDG Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, SEDG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while SEDG trades at $54.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas SEDG's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SEDG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SEDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SEDG's competition here
RUN vs SHLS Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, SHLS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while SHLS trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas SHLS's P/E ratio is 48.15. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SHLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SHLS's competition here
RUN vs ARRY Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, ARRY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while ARRY trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas ARRY's P/E ratio is -8.82. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARRY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ARRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ARRY's competition here
RUN vs CSIQ Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, CSIQ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while CSIQ trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas CSIQ's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CSIQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to CSIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check CSIQ's competition here
RUN vs SOL Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, SOL has a market cap of 995.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while SOL trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas SOL's P/E ratio is -10.78. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SOL's competition here
RUN vs DQ Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 969M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while DQ trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check DQ's competition here
RUN vs TOYO Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, TOYO has a market cap of 474.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while TOYO trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas TOYO's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TOYO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to TOYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check TOYO's competition here
RUN vs TYGO Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, TYGO has a market cap of 239.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while TYGO trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas TYGO's P/E ratio is 52.67. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TYGO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to TYGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check TYGO's competition here
RUN vs JKS Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, JKS has a market cap of 239.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while JKS trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas JKS's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JKS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to JKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check JKS's competition here
RUN vs CSLR Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, CSLR has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while CSLR trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas CSLR's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CSLR's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to CSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check CSLR's competition here
RUN vs ZEOWW Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, ZEOWW has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while ZEOWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas ZEOWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZEOWW's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to ZEOWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ZEOWW's competition here
RUN vs VIVO Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, VIVO has a market cap of 79.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while VIVO trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas VIVO's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VIVO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VIVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check VIVO's competition here
RUN vs SPWR Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, SPWR has a market cap of 78.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while SPWR trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas SPWR's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPWR's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SPWR's competition here
RUN vs FTCI Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, FTCI has a market cap of 71.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while FTCI trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas FTCI's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FTCI's ROE of +3.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to FTCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check FTCI's competition here
RUN vs SPRU Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, SPRU has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while SPRU trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas SPRU's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPRU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SPRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SPRU's competition here
RUN vs ZEO Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, ZEO has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while ZEO trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas ZEO's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZEO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ZEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ZEO's competition here
RUN vs VVPR Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, VVPR has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while VVPR trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas VVPR's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VVPR's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VVPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check VVPR's competition here
RUN vs NOVA Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, NOVA has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while NOVA trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas NOVA's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NOVA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to NOVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check NOVA's competition here
RUN vs SPI Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, SPI has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while SPI trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas SPI's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SPI's competition here
RUN vs ASTI Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, ASTI has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while ASTI trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas ASTI's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASTI's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ASTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ASTI's competition here
RUN vs SMXT Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, SMXT has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while SMXT trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas SMXT's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMXT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SMXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SMXT's competition here
RUN vs BEEM Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, BEEM has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while BEEM trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas BEEM's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BEEM's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to BEEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check BEEM's competition here
RUN vs SPWRW Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, SPWRW has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while SPWRW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas SPWRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPWRW's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SPWRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SPWRW's competition here
RUN vs MAXN Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, MAXN has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while MAXN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas MAXN's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MAXN's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to MAXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check MAXN's competition here
RUN vs PEGY Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, PEGY has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while PEGY trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas PEGY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PEGY's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to PEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check PEGY's competition here
RUN vs PN Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, PN has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while PN trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas PN's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check PN's competition here
RUN vs VSTE Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, VSTE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while VSTE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas VSTE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VSTE's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check VSTE's competition here
RUN vs SUNW Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, SUNW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while SUNW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas SUNW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SUNW's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SUNW's competition here
RUN vs TURB Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, TURB has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while TURB trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas TURB's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TURB's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to TURB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check TURB's competition here
RUN vs ISUN Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, ISUN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while ISUN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas ISUN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ISUN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ISUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ISUN's competition here
RUN vs BEEMW Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, BEEMW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while BEEMW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas BEEMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BEEMW's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to BEEMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check BEEMW's competition here
RUN vs VSTEW Comparison June 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3B. In comparison, VSTEW has a market cap of 960.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.76, while VSTEW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.92, whereas VSTEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VSTEW's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VSTEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check VSTEW's competition here