Sunrun Inc.
Sunrun Inc. (RUN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RUN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Solar Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUN | $13.09 | +2.78% | 3.1B | 7.62 | $1.71 | N/A |
| FSLR | $196.74 | +1.54% | 21.2B | 13.91 | $14.20 | N/A |
| ENPH | $34.88 | -2.50% | 4.6B | 27.32 | $1.29 | N/A |
| SEDG | $44.86 | -2.12% | 2.9B | -7.12 | -$6.65 | N/A |
| SHLS | $7.65 | -3.58% | 1.3B | 39.00 | $0.20 | N/A |
| ARRY | $7.84 | -3.39% | 1.2B | -10.92 | -$0.73 | N/A |
| SOL | $1.94 | +0.52% | 995.6M | -10.78 | -$0.18 | N/A |
| CSIQ | $14.89 | +5.45% | 945.4M | -5.58 | -$2.50 | N/A |
| TOYO | $11.00 | -5.58% | 414.1M | 9.98 | $1.13 | N/A |
| TYGO | $4.89 | -2.40% | 379.3M | -166.67 | -$0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RUN vs FSLR Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FSLR has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while FSLR trades at $196.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas FSLR's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FSLR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to FSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check FSLR's competition here
RUN vs ENPH Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ENPH has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while ENPH trades at $34.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ENPH's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENPH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to ENPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ENPH's competition here
RUN vs SEDG Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SEDG has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while SEDG trades at $44.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SEDG's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SEDG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SEDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SEDG's competition here
RUN vs SHLS Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SHLS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while SHLS trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SHLS's P/E ratio is 39.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SHLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SHLS's competition here
RUN vs ARRY Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ARRY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while ARRY trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ARRY's P/E ratio is -10.92. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARRY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to ARRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ARRY's competition here
RUN vs SOL Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SOL has a market cap of 995.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while SOL trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SOL's P/E ratio is -10.78. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SOL's competition here
RUN vs CSIQ Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CSIQ has a market cap of 945.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while CSIQ trades at $14.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas CSIQ's P/E ratio is -5.58. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSIQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to CSIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check CSIQ's competition here
RUN vs TOYO Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TOYO has a market cap of 414.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while TOYO trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas TOYO's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TOYO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to TOYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check TOYO's competition here
RUN vs TYGO Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TYGO has a market cap of 379.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while TYGO trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas TYGO's P/E ratio is -166.67. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TYGO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to TYGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check TYGO's competition here
RUN vs JKS Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, JKS has a market cap of 287.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while JKS trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas JKS's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JKS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to JKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check JKS's competition here
RUN vs CSLR Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CSLR has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while CSLR trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas CSLR's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSLR's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to CSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check CSLR's competition here
RUN vs ZEOWW Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZEOWW has a market cap of 105.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while ZEOWW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ZEOWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZEOWW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ZEOWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ZEOWW's competition here
RUN vs SPWR Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SPWR has a market cap of 78.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while SPWR trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SPWR's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPWR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SPWR's competition here
RUN vs FTCI Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FTCI has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while FTCI trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas FTCI's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FTCI's ROE of +10.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to FTCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check FTCI's competition here
RUN vs SPRU Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SPRU has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while SPRU trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SPRU's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPRU's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SPRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SPRU's competition here
RUN vs VIVO Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, VIVO has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while VIVO trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas VIVO's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VIVO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VIVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check VIVO's competition here
RUN vs ZEO Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZEO has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while ZEO trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ZEO's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZEO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ZEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ZEO's competition here
RUN vs SMXT Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SMXT has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while SMXT trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SMXT's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMXT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SMXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SMXT's competition here
RUN vs BEEM Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BEEM has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while BEEM trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas BEEM's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BEEM's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to BEEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check BEEM's competition here
RUN vs VVPR Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, VVPR has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while VVPR trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas VVPR's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VVPR's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VVPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check VVPR's competition here
RUN vs NOVA Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NOVA has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while NOVA trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas NOVA's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NOVA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to NOVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check NOVA's competition here
RUN vs SPI Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SPI has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while SPI trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SPI's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SPI's competition here
RUN vs MAXN Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MAXN has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while MAXN trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas MAXN's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAXN's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to MAXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check MAXN's competition here
RUN vs ASTI Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ASTI has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while ASTI trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ASTI's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASTI's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ASTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ASTI's competition here
RUN vs SPWRW Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SPWRW has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while SPWRW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SPWRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPWRW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SPWRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SPWRW's competition here
RUN vs PEGY Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PEGY has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while PEGY trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas PEGY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PEGY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to PEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check PEGY's competition here
RUN vs TURB Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TURB has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while TURB trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas TURB's P/E ratio is -8.22. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TURB's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to TURB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check TURB's competition here
RUN vs VSTE Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, VSTE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while VSTE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas VSTE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VSTE's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check VSTE's competition here
RUN vs SUNW Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SUNW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while SUNW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SUNW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNW's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SUNW's competition here
RUN vs PN Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PN has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while PN trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas PN's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check PN's competition here
RUN vs ISUN Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ISUN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while ISUN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ISUN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ISUN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ISUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ISUN's competition here
RUN vs BEEMW Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BEEMW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while BEEMW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas BEEMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BEEMW's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to BEEMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check BEEMW's competition here
RUN vs VSTEW Comparison April 2026
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, VSTEW has a market cap of 960.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $13.09, while VSTEW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas VSTEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VSTEW's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VSTEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check VSTEW's competition here