FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FTCI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Solar Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTCI | $4.98 | -1.97% | 79.7M | -1.21 | -$4.12 | N/A |
| FSLR | $232.08 | -1.64% | 24.9B | 14.99 | $15.48 | N/A |
| ENPH | $46.84 | -4.87% | 6.2B | 16.91 | $2.77 | N/A |
| SEDG | $56.00 | -4.18% | 3.4B | -33.14 | -$1.69 | N/A |
| RUN | $13.11 | -2.02% | 3.1B | 6.15 | $2.13 | N/A |
| SHLS | $10.12 | +2.22% | 1.7B | 25.95 | $0.39 | N/A |
| ARRY | $7.17 | -3.24% | 1.1B | 11.95 | $0.60 | N/A |
| CSIQ | $15.65 | -2.31% | 1.1B | -4.50 | -$3.48 | N/A |
| SOL | $1.94 | +0.52% | 995.6M | -10.78 | -$0.18 | N/A |
| DQ | $12.70 | -5.15% | 860M | -4.57 | -$2.78 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FTCI vs FSLR Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, FSLR has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while FSLR trades at $232.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas FSLR's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to FSLR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to FSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check FSLR's competition here
FTCI vs ENPH Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, ENPH has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while ENPH trades at $46.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas ENPH's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to ENPH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to ENPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check ENPH's competition here
FTCI vs SEDG Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, SEDG has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while SEDG trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas SEDG's P/E ratio is -33.14. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to SEDG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to SEDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SEDG's competition here
FTCI vs RUN Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, RUN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while RUN trades at $13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas RUN's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to RUN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to RUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check RUN's competition here
FTCI vs SHLS Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, SHLS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while SHLS trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas SHLS's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to SHLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to SHLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SHLS's competition here
FTCI vs ARRY Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, ARRY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while ARRY trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas ARRY's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to ARRY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to ARRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check ARRY's competition here
FTCI vs CSIQ Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, CSIQ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while CSIQ trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas CSIQ's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to CSIQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to CSIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check CSIQ's competition here
FTCI vs SOL Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, SOL has a market cap of 995.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while SOL trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas SOL's P/E ratio is -10.78. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to SOL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to SOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SOL's competition here
FTCI vs DQ Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 860M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while DQ trades at $12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check DQ's competition here
FTCI vs TOYO Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, TOYO has a market cap of 252.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while TOYO trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas TOYO's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to TOYO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to TOYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check TOYO's competition here
FTCI vs JKS Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, JKS has a market cap of 212M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while JKS trades at $16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas JKS's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to JKS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to JKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check JKS's competition here
FTCI vs CSLR Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, CSLR has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while CSLR trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas CSLR's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to CSLR's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to CSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check CSLR's competition here
FTCI vs ZEOWW Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, ZEOWW has a market cap of 90.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while ZEOWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas ZEOWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to ZEOWW's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to ZEOWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check ZEOWW's competition here
FTCI vs VIVO Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, VIVO has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while VIVO trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas VIVO's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to VIVO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to VIVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check VIVO's competition here
FTCI vs SPWRW Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, SPWRW has a market cap of 71.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while SPWRW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas SPWRW's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to SPWRW's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to SPWRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SPWRW's competition here
FTCI vs SPWR Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, SPWR has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while SPWR trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas SPWR's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to SPWR's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to SPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SPWR's competition here
FTCI vs SPRU Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, SPRU has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while SPRU trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas SPRU's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to SPRU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to SPRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SPRU's competition here
FTCI vs ZEO Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, ZEO has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while ZEO trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas ZEO's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to ZEO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to ZEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check ZEO's competition here
FTCI vs NOVA Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, NOVA has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while NOVA trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas NOVA's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to NOVA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to NOVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check NOVA's competition here
FTCI vs SPI Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, SPI has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while SPI trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas SPI's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to SPI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to SPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SPI's competition here
FTCI vs BEEM Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, BEEM has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while BEEM trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas BEEM's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to BEEM's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to BEEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check BEEM's competition here
FTCI vs SMXT Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, SMXT has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while SMXT trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas SMXT's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to SMXT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to SMXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SMXT's competition here
FTCI vs ASTI Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, ASTI has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while ASTI trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas ASTI's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to ASTI's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to ASTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check ASTI's competition here
FTCI vs PEGY Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, PEGY has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while PEGY trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas PEGY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to PEGY's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to PEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check PEGY's competition here
FTCI vs PN Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, PN has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while PN trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas PN's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to PN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check PN's competition here
FTCI vs VSTE Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, VSTE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while VSTE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas VSTE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to VSTE's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to VSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check VSTE's competition here
FTCI vs MAXN Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, MAXN has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while MAXN trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas MAXN's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to MAXN's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to MAXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check MAXN's competition here
FTCI vs SUNW Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, SUNW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while SUNW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas SUNW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to SUNW's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to SUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SUNW's competition here
FTCI vs TURB Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, TURB has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while TURB trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas TURB's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to TURB's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to TURB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check TURB's competition here
FTCI vs ISUN Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, ISUN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while ISUN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas ISUN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to ISUN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to ISUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check ISUN's competition here
FTCI vs BEEMW Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, BEEMW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while BEEMW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas BEEMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to BEEMW's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to BEEMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check BEEMW's competition here
FTCI vs VSTEW Comparison July 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 79.7M. In comparison, VSTEW has a market cap of 960.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.98, while VSTEW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.21, whereas VSTEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +3.17%, compared to VSTEW's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to VSTEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check VSTEW's competition here