Sunrun Inc.

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FSLR has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while FSLR trades at $233.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas FSLR's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to FSLR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to FSLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check FSLR's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ENPH has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while ENPH trades at $44.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas ENPH's P/E ratio is 36.09. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to ENPH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ENPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ENPH's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SEDG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while SEDG trades at $34.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas SEDG's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to SEDG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SEDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SEDG's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SHLS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while SHLS trades at $10.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas SHLS's P/E ratio is 55.84. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to SHLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SHLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SHLS's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ARRY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while ARRY trades at $10.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas ARRY's P/E ratio is -18.41. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to ARRY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ARRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ARRY's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CSIQ has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while CSIQ trades at $19.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas CSIQ's P/E ratio is -105.53. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CSIQ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to CSIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check CSIQ's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SOL has a market cap of 995.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while SOL trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas SOL's P/E ratio is -10.78. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to SOL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SOL's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, JKS has a market cap of 341.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while JKS trades at $26.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas JKS's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to JKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to JKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check JKS's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TOYO has a market cap of 269M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while TOYO trades at $8.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas TOYO's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to TOYO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to TOYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check TOYO's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TYGO has a market cap of 237.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while TYGO trades at $3.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas TYGO's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to TYGO's ROE of -6.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to TYGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check TYGO's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CSLR has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while CSLR trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas CSLR's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CSLR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to CSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check CSLR's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ZEOWW has a market cap of 122.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while ZEOWW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas ZEOWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to ZEOWW's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to ZEOWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ZEOWW's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FTCI has a market cap of 122.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while FTCI trades at $8.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas FTCI's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to FTCI's ROE of -7.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to FTCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check FTCI's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SPWR has a market cap of 121M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while SPWR trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas SPWR's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to SPWR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SPWR's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SPRU has a market cap of 75.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while SPRU trades at $4.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas SPRU's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to SPRU's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SPRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SPRU's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ZEO has a market cap of 71.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while ZEO trades at $0.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas ZEO's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to ZEO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ZEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ZEO's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, MAXN has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while MAXN trades at $2.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas MAXN's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to MAXN's ROE of +1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to MAXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check MAXN's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SMXT has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while SMXT trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas SMXT's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to SMXT's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SMXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SMXT's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NOVA has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while NOVA trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas NOVA's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to NOVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to NOVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check NOVA's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SPI has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while SPI trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas SPI's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to SPI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SPI's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BEEM has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while BEEM trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas BEEM's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to BEEM's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to BEEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check BEEM's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, VVPR has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while VVPR trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas VVPR's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to VVPR's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VVPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check VVPR's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ASTI has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while ASTI trades at $5.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas ASTI's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to ASTI's ROE of -2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ASTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ASTI's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SPWRW has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while SPWRW trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas SPWRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to SPWRW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SPWRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SPWRW's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PN has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while PN trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas PN's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to PN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check PN's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PEGY has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while PEGY trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas PEGY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to PEGY's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to PEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check PEGY's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, VSTE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while VSTE trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas VSTE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to VSTE's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check VSTE's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SUNW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while SUNW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas SUNW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to SUNW's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SUNW's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ISUN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while ISUN trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas ISUN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to ISUN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ISUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ISUN's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TURB has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while TURB trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas TURB's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to TURB's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to TURB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check TURB's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BEEMW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while BEEMW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas BEEMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to BEEMW's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to BEEMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check BEEMW's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 4.7B. In comparison, VSTEW has a market cap of 960.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $20.04, while VSTEW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas VSTEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.89%, compared to VSTEW's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VSTEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check VSTEW's competition here