Sunrun Inc.
Sunrun Inc. RUN Peers
See (RUN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Solar Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUN | $8.51 | +1.55% | 1.9B | -0.70 | -$12.21 | N/A |
| FSLR | $166.35 | +1.53% | 17.8B | 14.13 | $11.77 | N/A |
| NXT | $58.92 | +2.19% | 8.6B | 16.98 | $3.47 | N/A |
| ENPH | $41.15 | -0.36% | 5.4B | 37.75 | $1.09 | N/A |
| ARRY | $7.50 | +1.35% | 1.1B | -4.03 | -$1.86 | N/A |
| SEDG | $18.19 | +2.54% | 1.1B | -0.59 | -$30.59 | N/A |
| SHLS | $5.16 | +4.45% | 862.6M | 46.91 | $0.11 | N/A |
| CSIQ | $11.24 | +1.03% | 752.4M | -33.04 | -$0.34 | N/A |
| JKS | $18.93 | +2.21% | 244.4M | -3.79 | -$5.00 | +7.92% |
| ZEO | $2.72 | -2.16% | 134.1M | -4.69 | -$0.58 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RUN vs FSLR Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FSLR has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while FSLR trades at $166.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas FSLR's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to FSLR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to FSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs NXT Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NXT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while NXT trades at $58.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas NXT's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to NXT's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to NXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs ENPH Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ENPH has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while ENPH trades at $41.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ENPH's P/E ratio is 37.75. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ENPH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to ENPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs ARRY Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ARRY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while ARRY trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ARRY's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ARRY's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to ARRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SEDG Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SEDG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while SEDG trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas SEDG's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SEDG's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SEDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SHLS Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SHLS has a market cap of 862.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while SHLS trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas SHLS's P/E ratio is 46.91. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SHLS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SHLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs CSIQ Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CSIQ has a market cap of 752.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while CSIQ trades at $11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas CSIQ's P/E ratio is -33.04. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CSIQ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to CSIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs JKS Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, JKS has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while JKS trades at $18.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas JKS's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to JKS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to JKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs ZEO Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZEO has a market cap of 134.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while ZEO trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ZEO's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ZEO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to ZEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs CSLR Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CSLR has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while CSLR trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas CSLR's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CSLR's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to CSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs TOYO Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TOYO has a market cap of 114.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while TOYO trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas TOYO's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to TOYO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to TOYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SOL Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SOL has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while SOL trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas SOL's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SOL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs PN Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PN has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while PN trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas PN's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs TYGO Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TYGO has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while TYGO trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas TYGO's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to TYGO's ROE of -2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to TYGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs VVPR Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VVPR has a market cap of 62.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while VVPR trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas VVPR's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to VVPR's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VVPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs FTCI Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FTCI has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while FTCI trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas FTCI's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to FTCI's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to FTCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SMXT Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SMXT has a market cap of 53.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while SMXT trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas SMXT's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SMXT's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SMXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs MAXN Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MAXN has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while MAXN trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas MAXN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to MAXN's ROE of +3.76%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to MAXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SPRU Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SPRU has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while SPRU trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas SPRU's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SPRU's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SPRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs NOVA Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NOVA has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while NOVA trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas NOVA's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to NOVA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to NOVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SPI Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SPI has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while SPI trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas SPI's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SPI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs BEEM Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BEEM has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while BEEM trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas BEEM's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to BEEM's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to BEEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SPWRW Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SPWRW has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while SPWRW trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas SPWRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SPWRW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SPWRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SPWR Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SPWR has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while SPWR trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas SPWR's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SPWR's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs PEGY Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PEGY has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while PEGY trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas PEGY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to PEGY's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to PEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs TURB Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TURB has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while TURB trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas TURB's P/E ratio is -6.65. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to TURB's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to TURB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs VSTE Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VSTE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while VSTE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas VSTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to VSTE's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SUNW Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SUNW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while SUNW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas SUNW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SUNW's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs ASTI Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ASTI has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while ASTI trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ASTI's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ASTI's ROE of -2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to ASTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs ISUN Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ISUN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while ISUN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ISUN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ISUN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ISUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs BEEMW Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BEEMW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while BEEMW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas BEEMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to BEEMW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to BEEMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs ZEOWW Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZEOWW has a market cap of 979.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while ZEOWW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ZEOWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ZEOWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ZEOWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs VSTEW Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VSTEW has a market cap of 954.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $8.51, while VSTEW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas VSTEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to VSTEW's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VSTEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.