Sunrun Inc.
Sunrun Inc. RUN Peers
See (RUN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Solar Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUN | $7.43 | -4.13% | 1.7B | -0.61 | -$12.21 | N/A |
| FSLR | $152.14 | -2.24% | 16.3B | 12.93 | $11.77 | N/A |
| NXT | $58.32 | -0.44% | 8.5B | 16.81 | $3.47 | N/A |
| ENPH | $40.88 | -4.92% | 5.4B | 37.50 | $1.09 | N/A |
| SEDG | $19.80 | -1.32% | 1.2B | -0.65 | -$30.59 | N/A |
| ARRY | $6.44 | -0.92% | 982.4M | -3.46 | -$1.86 | N/A |
| SHLS | $4.73 | -3.07% | 790.7M | 43.00 | $0.11 | N/A |
| CSIQ | $11.33 | +1.71% | 758.8M | -33.32 | -$0.34 | N/A |
| JKS | $21.64 | +4.69% | 278.7M | -4.31 | -$5.01 | +6.85% |
| ZEOWW | $0.06 | +22.31% | 188.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RUN vs FSLR Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FSLR has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while FSLR trades at $152.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas FSLR's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to FSLR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to FSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs NXT Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NXT has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while NXT trades at $58.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas NXT's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to NXT's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to NXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs ENPH Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ENPH has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while ENPH trades at $40.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas ENPH's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ENPH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ENPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SEDG Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SEDG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while SEDG trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas SEDG's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SEDG's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SEDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs ARRY Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ARRY has a market cap of 982.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while ARRY trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas ARRY's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ARRY's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to ARRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SHLS Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SHLS has a market cap of 790.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while SHLS trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas SHLS's P/E ratio is 43.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SHLS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SHLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs CSIQ Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CSIQ has a market cap of 758.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while CSIQ trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas CSIQ's P/E ratio is -33.32. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CSIQ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to CSIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs JKS Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JKS has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while JKS trades at $21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas JKS's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to JKS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to JKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs ZEOWW Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZEOWW has a market cap of 188.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while ZEOWW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas ZEOWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ZEOWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ZEOWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs ZEO Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZEO has a market cap of 148.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while ZEO trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas ZEO's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ZEO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to ZEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SPWR Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SPWR has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while SPWR trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas SPWR's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SPWR's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs CSLR Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CSLR has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while CSLR trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas CSLR's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CSLR's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to CSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs TOYO Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TOYO has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while TOYO trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas TOYO's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to TOYO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to TOYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SOL Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SOL has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while SOL trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas SOL's P/E ratio is -18.70. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SOL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs TYGO Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TYGO has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while TYGO trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas TYGO's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to TYGO's ROE of -2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to TYGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs PN Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PN has a market cap of 70.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while PN trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas PN's P/E ratio is 130.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs FTCI Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FTCI has a market cap of 58M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while FTCI trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas FTCI's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to FTCI's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to FTCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs MAXN Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MAXN has a market cap of 51.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while MAXN trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas MAXN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to MAXN's ROE of +3.76%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to MAXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SMXT Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SMXT has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while SMXT trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas SMXT's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SMXT's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SMXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs VVPR Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VVPR has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while VVPR trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas VVPR's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to VVPR's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to VVPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SPRU Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SPRU has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while SPRU trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas SPRU's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SPRU's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SPRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs NOVA Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NOVA has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while NOVA trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas NOVA's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to NOVA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to NOVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs BEEM Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BEEM has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while BEEM trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas BEEM's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to BEEM's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to BEEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SPI Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SPI has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while SPI trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas SPI's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SPI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SPWRW Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SPWRW has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while SPWRW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas SPWRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SPWRW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SPWRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs PEGY Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PEGY has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while PEGY trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas PEGY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to PEGY's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to PEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs ASTI Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ASTI has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while ASTI trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas ASTI's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ASTI's ROE of -2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ASTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs TURB Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TURB has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while TURB trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas TURB's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to TURB's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to TURB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs VSTE Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VSTE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while VSTE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas VSTE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to VSTE's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SUNW Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SUNW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while SUNW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas SUNW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SUNW's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs ISUN Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ISUN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while ISUN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas ISUN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ISUN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ISUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs BEEMW Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BEEMW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while BEEMW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas BEEMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to BEEMW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to BEEMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs VSTEW Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VSTEW has a market cap of 954.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $7.43, while VSTEW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.61, whereas VSTEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to VSTEW's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VSTEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.