Sunrun Inc.

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FSLR has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while FSLR trades at $180.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas FSLR's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to FSLR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to FSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check FSLR's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NXT has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while NXT trades at $53.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas NXT's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to NXT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to NXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check NXT's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ENPH has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while ENPH trades at $32.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas ENPH's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ENPH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ENPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ENPH's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SEDG has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while SEDG trades at $25.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas SEDG's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SEDG's ROE of -2.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SEDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SEDG's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ARRY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while ARRY trades at $6.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas ARRY's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ARRY's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to ARRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ARRY's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SHLS has a market cap of 868.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while SHLS trades at $4.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas SHLS's P/E ratio is 43.25. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SHLS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SHLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SHLS's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CSIQ has a market cap of 840.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while CSIQ trades at $11.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas CSIQ's P/E ratio is -36.91. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to CSIQ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to CSIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check CSIQ's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JKS has a market cap of 297.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while JKS trades at $21.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas JKS's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to JKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to JKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check JKS's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TOYO has a market cap of 164.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while TOYO trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas TOYO's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to TOYO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to TOYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check TOYO's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ZEOWW has a market cap of 139.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while ZEOWW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas ZEOWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ZEOWW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to ZEOWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ZEOWW's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SPWR has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while SPWR trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas SPWR's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SPWR's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SPWR's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CSLR has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while CSLR trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas CSLR's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to CSLR's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to CSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check CSLR's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ZEO has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while ZEO trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas ZEO's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ZEO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ZEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ZEO's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SOL has a market cap of 96.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while SOL trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas SOL's P/E ratio is -18.85. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SOL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SOL's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FTCI has a market cap of 82.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while FTCI trades at $4.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas FTCI's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to FTCI's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to FTCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check FTCI's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TYGO has a market cap of 82.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while TYGO trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas TYGO's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to TYGO's ROE of -4.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to TYGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check TYGO's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MAXN has a market cap of 67.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while MAXN trades at $3.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas MAXN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to MAXN's ROE of +3.76%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to MAXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check MAXN's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VVPR has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while VVPR trades at $5.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas VVPR's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to VVPR's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VVPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check VVPR's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SMXT has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while SMXT trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas SMXT's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SMXT's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SMXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SMXT's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BEEM has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while BEEM trades at $2.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas BEEM's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to BEEM's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to BEEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check BEEM's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PN has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while PN trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas PN's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check PN's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NOVA has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while NOVA trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas NOVA's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to NOVA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to NOVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check NOVA's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SPRU has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while SPRU trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas SPRU's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SPRU's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SPRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SPRU's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SPI has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while SPI trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas SPI's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SPI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SPI's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SPWRW has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while SPWRW trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas SPWRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SPWRW's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SPWRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SPWRW's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ASTI has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while ASTI trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas ASTI's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ASTI's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to ASTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ASTI's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PEGY has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while PEGY trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas PEGY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to PEGY's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to PEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check PEGY's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TURB has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while TURB trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas TURB's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to TURB's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to TURB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check TURB's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VSTE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while VSTE trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas VSTE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to VSTE's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check VSTE's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SUNW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while SUNW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas SUNW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SUNW's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check SUNW's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ISUN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while ISUN trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas ISUN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ISUN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ISUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check ISUN's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BEEMW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while BEEMW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas BEEMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to BEEMW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to BEEMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check BEEMW's competition here

RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VSTEW has a market cap of 954.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $10.48, while VSTEW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas VSTEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.77%, compared to VSTEW's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VSTEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.Check VSTEW's competition here