Sunrun Inc.
Sunrun Inc. RUN Peers
See (RUN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Solar Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUN | $11.16 | +6.69% | 2.5B | -0.91 | -$12.21 | N/A |
| FSLR | $179.99 | +0.93% | 19.3B | 15.29 | $11.77 | N/A |
| NXT | $62.10 | +0.93% | 9.2B | 17.90 | $3.47 | N/A |
| ENPH | $42.50 | +7.16% | 5.6B | 38.99 | $1.09 | N/A |
| SEDG | $31.86 | +10.51% | 1.9B | -1.04 | -$30.59 | N/A |
| ARRY | $7.06 | +3.52% | 1.1B | -3.80 | -$1.86 | N/A |
| SHLS | $6.00 | +6.38% | 1B | 54.55 | $0.11 | N/A |
| CSIQ | $13.46 | +4.34% | 901.4M | -39.59 | -$0.34 | N/A |
| JKS | $24.78 | +5.72% | 319.9M | -4.93 | -$5.02 | +11.16% |
| SPWR | $1.82 | +2.82% | 146.1M | -1.84 | -$0.99 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RUN vs FSLR Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FSLR has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while FSLR trades at $179.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas FSLR's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to FSLR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to FSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs NXT Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NXT has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while NXT trades at $62.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas NXT's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to NXT's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to NXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs ENPH Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ENPH has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while ENPH trades at $42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas ENPH's P/E ratio is 38.99. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ENPH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ENPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SEDG Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SEDG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while SEDG trades at $31.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas SEDG's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SEDG's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SEDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs ARRY Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ARRY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while ARRY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas ARRY's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ARRY's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ARRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SHLS Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHLS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while SHLS trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas SHLS's P/E ratio is 54.55. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SHLS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SHLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs CSIQ Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CSIQ has a market cap of 901.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while CSIQ trades at $13.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas CSIQ's P/E ratio is -39.59. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CSIQ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to CSIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs JKS Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, JKS has a market cap of 319.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while JKS trades at $24.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas JKS's P/E ratio is -4.93. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to JKS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to JKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SPWR Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SPWR has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while SPWR trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas SPWR's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SPWR's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs CSLR Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CSLR has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while CSLR trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas CSLR's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CSLR's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to CSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs ZEOWW Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ZEOWW has a market cap of 132.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while ZEOWW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas ZEOWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ZEOWW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ZEOWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs TOYO Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TOYO has a market cap of 122.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while TOYO trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas TOYO's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to TOYO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to TOYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs ZEO Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ZEO has a market cap of 119.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while ZEO trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas ZEO's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ZEO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to ZEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SOL Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SOL has a market cap of 98.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while SOL trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas SOL's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SOL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs PN Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PN has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while PN trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas PN's P/E ratio is 155.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs TYGO Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TYGO has a market cap of 78.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while TYGO trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas TYGO's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to TYGO's ROE of -2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to TYGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs MAXN Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MAXN has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while MAXN trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas MAXN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to MAXN's ROE of +3.76%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to MAXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs FTCI Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FTCI has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while FTCI trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas FTCI's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to FTCI's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to FTCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs VVPR Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VVPR has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while VVPR trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas VVPR's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to VVPR's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VVPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SMXT Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SMXT has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while SMXT trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas SMXT's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SMXT's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SMXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs BEEM Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BEEM has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while BEEM trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas BEEM's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to BEEM's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to BEEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs NOVA Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NOVA has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while NOVA trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas NOVA's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to NOVA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to NOVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SPRU Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SPRU has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while SPRU trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas SPRU's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SPRU's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SPRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SPWRW Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SPWRW has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while SPWRW trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas SPWRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SPWRW's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to SPWRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SPI Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SPI has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while SPI trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas SPI's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SPI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs PEGY Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PEGY has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while PEGY trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas PEGY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to PEGY's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to PEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs ASTI Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ASTI has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while ASTI trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas ASTI's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ASTI's ROE of -2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to ASTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs TURB Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TURB has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while TURB trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas TURB's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to TURB's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is more volatile compared to TURB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs VSTE Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VSTE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while VSTE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas VSTE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to VSTE's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs SUNW Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SUNW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while SUNW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas SUNW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SUNW's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to SUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs ISUN Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ISUN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while ISUN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas ISUN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ISUN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to ISUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs BEEMW Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BEEMW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while BEEMW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas BEEMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to BEEMW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to BEEMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.
RUN vs VSTEW Comparison
RUN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUN stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VSTEW has a market cap of 954.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RUN is priced at $11.16, while VSTEW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas VSTEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUN's ROE is -0.69%, compared to VSTEW's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUN is less volatile compared to VSTEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUN.