Reditus, Sociedade Gestora de Participações Sociais, S.A.
Reditus, Sociedade Gestora de Participações Sociais, S.A. (RED.LS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RED.LS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RED.LS | €0.04 | +20.00% | 1M | 0.30 | €0.12 | N/A |
| IBMA.BR | €145.00 | -0.24% | 132.1B | 61.70 | €2.35 | N/A |
| CAP.PA | €103.65 | +4.40% | 17.2B | 11.25 | €9.13 | +3.31% |
| SOP.PA | €134.20 | +17.72% | 2.6B | 8.84 | €15.16 | +3.47% |
| ATE.PA | €57.05 | -1.98% | 2B | 13.40 | €4.29 | +2.61% |
| SII.PA | €70.10 | +0.14% | 1.4B | 15.61 | €4.49 | N/A |
| WAVE.PA | €45.80 | +2.00% | 1.1B | 14.21 | €3.22 | +1.01% |
| SNC.LS | €2.92 | -1.35% | 911.2M | 11.04 | €0.27 | +0.94% |
| NRO.PA | €35.80 | +0.42% | 874.4M | 16.80 | €2.14 | +3.62% |
| GYQ.IR | €28.60 | +0.00% | 665.1M | -25.77 | -€1.11 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RED.LS vs IBMA.BR Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, IBMA.BR has a market cap of 132.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while IBMA.BR trades at €145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas IBMA.BR's P/E ratio is 61.70. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to IBMA.BR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is less volatile compared to IBMA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check IBMA.BR's competition here
RED.LS vs CAP.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, CAP.PA has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while CAP.PA trades at €103.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas CAP.PA's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CAP.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is less volatile compared to CAP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check CAP.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs SOP.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, SOP.PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while SOP.PA trades at €134.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas SOP.PA's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SOP.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to SOP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check SOP.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs ATE.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, ATE.PA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while ATE.PA trades at €57.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas ATE.PA's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ATE.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to ATE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check ATE.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs SII.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, SII.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while SII.PA trades at €70.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas SII.PA's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SII.PA's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to SII.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check SII.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs WAVE.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, WAVE.PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while WAVE.PA trades at €45.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas WAVE.PA's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WAVE.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to WAVE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check WAVE.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs SNC.LS Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, SNC.LS has a market cap of 911.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while SNC.LS trades at €2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas SNC.LS's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SNC.LS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to SNC.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check SNC.LS's competition here
RED.LS vs NRO.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, NRO.PA has a market cap of 874.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while NRO.PA trades at €35.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas NRO.PA's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NRO.PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to NRO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check NRO.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs GYQ.IR Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, GYQ.IR has a market cap of 665.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while GYQ.IR trades at €28.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas GYQ.IR's P/E ratio is -25.77. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GYQ.IR's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is less volatile compared to GYQ.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check GYQ.IR's competition here
RED.LS vs ATO.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, ATO.PA has a market cap of 634M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while ATO.PA trades at €33.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas ATO.PA's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ATO.PA's ROE of +3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is less volatile compared to ATO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check ATO.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs AUB.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, AUB.PA has a market cap of 614.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while AUB.PA trades at €49.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas AUB.PA's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AUB.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is less volatile compared to AUB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check AUB.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs NEDAP.AS Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, NEDAP.AS has a market cap of 538.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while NEDAP.AS trades at €84.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas NEDAP.AS's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NEDAP.AS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is less volatile compared to NEDAP.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check NEDAP.AS's competition here
RED.LS vs ORDI.AS Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, ORDI.AS has a market cap of 513.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while ORDI.AS trades at €5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas ORDI.AS's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ORDI.AS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to ORDI.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check ORDI.AS's competition here
RED.LS vs NBA.LS Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, NBA.LS has a market cap of 339.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while NBA.LS trades at €8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas NBA.LS's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NBA.LS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to NBA.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check NBA.LS's competition here
RED.LS vs SQI.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, SQI.PA has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while SQI.PA trades at €54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas SQI.PA's P/E ratio is 55.10. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SQI.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to SQI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check SQI.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs INF.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, INF.PA has a market cap of 242.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while INF.PA trades at €34.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas INF.PA's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to INF.PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is less volatile compared to INF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check INF.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs ECONB.BR Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, ECONB.BR has a market cap of 236M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while ECONB.BR trades at €1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas ECONB.BR's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ECONB.BR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to ECONB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check ECONB.BR's competition here
RED.LS vs MLCNT.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, MLCNT.PA has a market cap of 132.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while MLCNT.PA trades at €60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas MLCNT.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MLCNT.PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is less volatile compared to MLCNT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check MLCNT.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs MLCHE.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, MLCHE.PA has a market cap of 131.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while MLCHE.PA trades at €56.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas MLCHE.PA's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MLCHE.PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to MLCHE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check MLCHE.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs ALKEY.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, ALKEY.PA has a market cap of 112.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while ALKEY.PA trades at €7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas ALKEY.PA's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ALKEY.PA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is less volatile compared to ALKEY.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check ALKEY.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs GLINT.LS Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, GLINT.LS has a market cap of 102.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while GLINT.LS trades at €1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas GLINT.LS's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GLINT.LS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to GLINT.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check GLINT.LS's competition here
RED.LS vs ALMIC.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, ALMIC.PA has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while ALMIC.PA trades at €3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas ALMIC.PA's P/E ratio is 312.00. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ALMIC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to ALMIC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check ALMIC.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs S30.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, S30.PA has a market cap of 66.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while S30.PA trades at €0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas S30.PA's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to S30.PA's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is less volatile compared to S30.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check S30.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs ALMII.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, ALMII.PA has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while ALMII.PA trades at €8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas ALMII.PA's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ALMII.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to ALMII.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check ALMII.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs CTAC.AS Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, CTAC.AS has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while CTAC.AS trades at €2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas CTAC.AS's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CTAC.AS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is less volatile compared to CTAC.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check CTAC.AS's competition here
RED.LS vs ALITL.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, ALITL.PA has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while ALITL.PA trades at €15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas ALITL.PA's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ALITL.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to ALITL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check ALITL.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs AMUND.AS Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, AMUND.AS has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while AMUND.AS trades at €1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas AMUND.AS's P/E ratio is -18.67. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AMUND.AS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to AMUND.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check AMUND.AS's competition here
RED.LS vs ALHIT.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, ALHIT.PA has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while ALHIT.PA trades at €12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas ALHIT.PA's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ALHIT.PA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to ALHIT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check ALHIT.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs FPG.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, FPG.PA has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while FPG.PA trades at €0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas FPG.PA's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FPG.PA's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to FPG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check FPG.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs MLLOI.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, MLLOI.PA has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while MLLOI.PA trades at €11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas MLLOI.PA's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MLLOI.PA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to MLLOI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check MLLOI.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs OPN.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, OPN.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while OPN.PA trades at €33.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas OPN.PA's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to OPN.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to OPN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check OPN.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs NOVI.AS Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, NOVI.AS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while NOVI.AS trades at €1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas NOVI.AS's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NOVI.AS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is less volatile compared to NOVI.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check NOVI.AS's competition here
RED.LS vs TES.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, TES.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while TES.PA trades at €168.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas TES.PA's P/E ratio is 46.37. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TES.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to TES.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check TES.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs MUN.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, MUN.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while MUN.PA trades at €1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas MUN.PA's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MUN.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to MUN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check MUN.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs ALUMS.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, ALUMS.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while ALUMS.PA trades at €17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas ALUMS.PA's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ALUMS.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to ALUMS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check ALUMS.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs AKA.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, AKA.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while AKA.PA trades at €48.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas AKA.PA's P/E ratio is -85.70. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AKA.PA's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to AKA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check AKA.PA's competition here
RED.LS vs DVT.PA Comparison April 2026
RED.LS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RED.LS stands at 1M. In comparison, DVT.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RED.LS is priced at €0.04, while DVT.PA trades at €168.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RED.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas DVT.PA's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, RED.LS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DVT.PA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RED.LS is more volatile compared to DVT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RED.LS.Check DVT.PA's competition here