Alten S.A.
Alten S.A. (ATE.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ATE.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATE.PA | €57.50 | -1.20% | 2B | 13.40 | €4.29 | +2.58% |
| IBMA.BR | €145.00 | -0.24% | 132.1B | 61.70 | €2.35 | N/A |
| CAP.PA | €102.70 | +3.44% | 17.2B | 11.25 | €9.13 | +3.42% |
| SOP.PA | €134.00 | +17.54% | 2.6B | 8.84 | €15.16 | +4.08% |
| SII.PA | €70.10 | +0.14% | 1.4B | 15.61 | €4.49 | N/A |
| WAVE.PA | €45.75 | +1.89% | 1.1B | 14.21 | €3.22 | +1.02% |
| SNC.LS | €2.98 | +0.68% | 911.2M | 11.04 | €0.27 | +0.95% |
| NRO.PA | €35.95 | +0.84% | 874.4M | 16.80 | €2.14 | +3.65% |
| GYQ.IR | €28.60 | +0.00% | 665.1M | -25.77 | -€1.11 | N/A |
| ATO.PA | €32.66 | -2.80% | 634M | -0.44 | -€73.83 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ATE.PA vs IBMA.BR Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, IBMA.BR has a market cap of 132.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while IBMA.BR trades at €145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas IBMA.BR's P/E ratio is 61.70. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IBMA.BR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is less volatile compared to IBMA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check IBMA.BR's competition here
ATE.PA vs CAP.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, CAP.PA has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while CAP.PA trades at €102.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas CAP.PA's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAP.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to CAP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check CAP.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs SOP.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, SOP.PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while SOP.PA trades at €134.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas SOP.PA's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOP.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is less volatile compared to SOP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check SOP.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs SII.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, SII.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while SII.PA trades at €70.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas SII.PA's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SII.PA's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to SII.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check SII.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs WAVE.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, WAVE.PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while WAVE.PA trades at €45.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas WAVE.PA's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WAVE.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to WAVE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check WAVE.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs SNC.LS Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, SNC.LS has a market cap of 911.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while SNC.LS trades at €2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas SNC.LS's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNC.LS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to SNC.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check SNC.LS's competition here
ATE.PA vs NRO.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, NRO.PA has a market cap of 874.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while NRO.PA trades at €35.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas NRO.PA's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NRO.PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to NRO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check NRO.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs GYQ.IR Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, GYQ.IR has a market cap of 665.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while GYQ.IR trades at €28.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas GYQ.IR's P/E ratio is -25.77. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GYQ.IR's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to GYQ.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check GYQ.IR's competition here
ATE.PA vs ATO.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, ATO.PA has a market cap of 634M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while ATO.PA trades at €32.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas ATO.PA's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATO.PA's ROE of +3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is less volatile compared to ATO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check ATO.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs AUB.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, AUB.PA has a market cap of 614.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while AUB.PA trades at €48.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas AUB.PA's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AUB.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to AUB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check AUB.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs NEDAP.AS Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, NEDAP.AS has a market cap of 538.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while NEDAP.AS trades at €81.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas NEDAP.AS's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NEDAP.AS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to NEDAP.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check NEDAP.AS's competition here
ATE.PA vs ORDI.AS Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, ORDI.AS has a market cap of 513.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while ORDI.AS trades at €5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas ORDI.AS's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ORDI.AS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to ORDI.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check ORDI.AS's competition here
ATE.PA vs NBA.LS Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, NBA.LS has a market cap of 339.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while NBA.LS trades at €9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas NBA.LS's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NBA.LS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to NBA.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check NBA.LS's competition here
ATE.PA vs SQI.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, SQI.PA has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while SQI.PA trades at €54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas SQI.PA's P/E ratio is 55.10. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SQI.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to SQI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check SQI.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs INF.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, INF.PA has a market cap of 242.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while INF.PA trades at €35.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas INF.PA's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INF.PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to INF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check INF.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs ECONB.BR Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, ECONB.BR has a market cap of 236M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while ECONB.BR trades at €1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas ECONB.BR's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ECONB.BR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to ECONB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check ECONB.BR's competition here
ATE.PA vs MLCNT.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, MLCNT.PA has a market cap of 132.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while MLCNT.PA trades at €60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas MLCNT.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLCNT.PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is less volatile compared to MLCNT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check MLCNT.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs MLCHE.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, MLCHE.PA has a market cap of 131.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while MLCHE.PA trades at €57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas MLCHE.PA's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLCHE.PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to MLCHE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check MLCHE.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs ALKEY.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, ALKEY.PA has a market cap of 112.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while ALKEY.PA trades at €7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas ALKEY.PA's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALKEY.PA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to ALKEY.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check ALKEY.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs GLINT.LS Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, GLINT.LS has a market cap of 102.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while GLINT.LS trades at €1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas GLINT.LS's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLINT.LS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to GLINT.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check GLINT.LS's competition here
ATE.PA vs ALMIC.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, ALMIC.PA has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while ALMIC.PA trades at €3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas ALMIC.PA's P/E ratio is 312.00. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALMIC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to ALMIC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check ALMIC.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs S30.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, S30.PA has a market cap of 66.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while S30.PA trades at €0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas S30.PA's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to S30.PA's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to S30.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check S30.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs ALMII.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, ALMII.PA has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while ALMII.PA trades at €8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas ALMII.PA's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALMII.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to ALMII.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check ALMII.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs CTAC.AS Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, CTAC.AS has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while CTAC.AS trades at €2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas CTAC.AS's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTAC.AS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is less volatile compared to CTAC.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check CTAC.AS's competition here
ATE.PA vs ALITL.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, ALITL.PA has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while ALITL.PA trades at €15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas ALITL.PA's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALITL.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to ALITL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check ALITL.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs AMUND.AS Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, AMUND.AS has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while AMUND.AS trades at €1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas AMUND.AS's P/E ratio is -18.67. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMUND.AS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to AMUND.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check AMUND.AS's competition here
ATE.PA vs ALHIT.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, ALHIT.PA has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while ALHIT.PA trades at €12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas ALHIT.PA's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALHIT.PA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to ALHIT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check ALHIT.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs FPG.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, FPG.PA has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while FPG.PA trades at €0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas FPG.PA's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FPG.PA's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to FPG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check FPG.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs MLLOI.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, MLLOI.PA has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while MLLOI.PA trades at €11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas MLLOI.PA's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLLOI.PA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to MLLOI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check MLLOI.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs RED.LS Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, RED.LS has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while RED.LS trades at €0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas RED.LS's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RED.LS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to RED.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check RED.LS's competition here
ATE.PA vs ALUMS.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, ALUMS.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while ALUMS.PA trades at €17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas ALUMS.PA's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALUMS.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to ALUMS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check ALUMS.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs OPN.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, OPN.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while OPN.PA trades at €33.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas OPN.PA's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPN.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to OPN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check OPN.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs NOVI.AS Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, NOVI.AS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while NOVI.AS trades at €1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas NOVI.AS's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NOVI.AS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to NOVI.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check NOVI.AS's competition here
ATE.PA vs TES.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, TES.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while TES.PA trades at €168.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas TES.PA's P/E ratio is 46.37. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TES.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to TES.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check TES.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs AKA.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, AKA.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while AKA.PA trades at €48.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas AKA.PA's P/E ratio is -85.70. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AKA.PA's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to AKA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check AKA.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs MUN.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, MUN.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while MUN.PA trades at €1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas MUN.PA's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MUN.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to MUN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check MUN.PA's competition here
ATE.PA vs DVT.PA Comparison April 2026
ATE.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATE.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, DVT.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATE.PA is priced at €57.50, while DVT.PA trades at €168.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.40, whereas DVT.PA's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, ATE.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DVT.PA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATE.PA is more volatile compared to DVT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATE.PA.Check DVT.PA's competition here