Recharge Metals Limited
Recharge Metals Limited (REC.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (REC.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REC.AX | A$0.03 | +0.00% | 8.1M | -2.90 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| OZL.AX | A$28.19 | +0.00% | 9.5B | 45.47 | A$0.62 | +0.28% |
| CSC.AX | A$11.51 | -1.62% | 8.8B | 19.84 | A$0.58 | N/A |
| SFR.AX | A$16.58 | -1.49% | 7.7B | 39.48 | A$0.42 | N/A |
| MAC.AX | A$18.52 | +0.00% | 1.5B | -23.74 | -A$0.78 | N/A |
| WA1.AX | A$13.33 | -7.30% | 990M | -166.62 | -A$0.08 | N/A |
| C6C.AX | A$2.79 | +1.45% | 598.1M | -9.62 | -A$0.29 | N/A |
| KCC.AX | A$0.99 | -3.88% | 288.8M | -8.25 | -A$0.12 | N/A |
| GRX.AX | A$0.86 | -3.37% | 267.2M | -43.00 | -A$0.02 | N/A |
| HCH.AX | A$1.43 | -2.39% | 215.2M | -20.36 | -A$0.07 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
REC.AX vs OZL.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, OZL.AX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while OZL.AX trades at A$28.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas OZL.AX's P/E ratio is 45.47. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OZL.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to OZL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check OZL.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs CSC.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, CSC.AX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while CSC.AX trades at A$11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas CSC.AX's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CSC.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to CSC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check CSC.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs SFR.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, SFR.AX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while SFR.AX trades at A$16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas SFR.AX's P/E ratio is 39.48. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SFR.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to SFR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check SFR.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs MAC.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, MAC.AX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while MAC.AX trades at A$18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas MAC.AX's P/E ratio is -23.74. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MAC.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to MAC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check MAC.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs WA1.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, WA1.AX has a market cap of 990M. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while WA1.AX trades at A$13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas WA1.AX's P/E ratio is -166.62. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WA1.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to WA1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check WA1.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs C6C.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, C6C.AX has a market cap of 598.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while C6C.AX trades at A$2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas C6C.AX's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to C6C.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to C6C.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check C6C.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs KCC.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, KCC.AX has a market cap of 288.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while KCC.AX trades at A$0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas KCC.AX's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KCC.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to KCC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check KCC.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs GRX.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, GRX.AX has a market cap of 267.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while GRX.AX trades at A$0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas GRX.AX's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GRX.AX's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to GRX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check GRX.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs HCH.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, HCH.AX has a market cap of 215.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while HCH.AX trades at A$1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas HCH.AX's P/E ratio is -20.36. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HCH.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to HCH.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check HCH.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs CVV.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, CVV.AX has a market cap of 187.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while CVV.AX trades at A$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas CVV.AX's P/E ratio is -33.50. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CVV.AX's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to CVV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check CVV.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs HGO.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, HGO.AX has a market cap of 101.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while HGO.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas HGO.AX's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HGO.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to HGO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check HGO.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs CYM.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, CYM.AX has a market cap of 68.4M. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while CYM.AX trades at A$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas CYM.AX's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CYM.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to CYM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check CYM.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs TNC.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, TNC.AX has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while TNC.AX trades at A$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas TNC.AX's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TNC.AX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to TNC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check TNC.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs AR1.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, AR1.AX has a market cap of 43.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while AR1.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas AR1.AX's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AR1.AX's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to AR1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check AR1.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs RRR.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, RRR.AX has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while RRR.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas RRR.AX's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RRR.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to RRR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check RRR.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs ALM.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, ALM.AX has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while ALM.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas ALM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALM.AX's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to ALM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check ALM.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs CSE.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, CSE.AX has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while CSE.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas CSE.AX's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CSE.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to CSE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check CSE.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs CCZ.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, CCZ.AX has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while CCZ.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas CCZ.AX's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CCZ.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX and CCZ.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCZ.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs NFM.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, NFM.AX has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while NFM.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas NFM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NFM.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to NFM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check NFM.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs NRX.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, NRX.AX has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while NRX.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas NRX.AX's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NRX.AX's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to NRX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check NRX.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs CPO.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, CPO.AX has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while CPO.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas CPO.AX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CPO.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to CPO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check CPO.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs SLM.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, SLM.AX has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while SLM.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas SLM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SLM.AX's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to SLM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check SLM.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs NTM.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, NTM.AX has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while NTM.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas NTM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NTM.AX's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX is less volatile compared to NTM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REC.AX.Check NTM.AX's competition here
REC.AX vs RDS.AX Comparison March 2026
REC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REC.AX stands at 8.1M. In comparison, RDS.AX has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REC.AX is priced at A$0.03, while RDS.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.90, whereas RDS.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REC.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RDS.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REC.AX and RDS.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RDS.AX's competition here