Redstone Resources Limited

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, OZL.AX has a market cap of 9.51B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while OZL.AX trades at $28.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OZL.AX's P/E ratio is 45.47. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OZL.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to OZL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, CSC.AX has a market cap of 5.86B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while CSC.AX trades at $7.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSC.AX's P/E ratio is -33.43. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CSC.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to CSC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, SFR.AX has a market cap of 4.71B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while SFR.AX trades at $10.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFR.AX's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SFR.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to SFR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, WA1.AX has a market cap of 788.89M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while WA1.AX trades at $11.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WA1.AX's P/E ratio is -194.17. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WA1.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to WA1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, C6C.AX has a market cap of 598.13M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while C6C.AX trades at $2.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C6C.AX's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to C6C.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to C6C.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, GRX.AX has a market cap of 215.51M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while GRX.AX trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRX.AX's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GRX.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to GRX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, CVV.AX has a market cap of 89.40M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while CVV.AX trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVV.AX's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CVV.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to CVV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, HGO.AX has a market cap of 88.78M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while HGO.AX trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGO.AX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HGO.AX's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to HGO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, AR1.AX has a market cap of 84.35M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while AR1.AX trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AR1.AX's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AR1.AX's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to AR1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, HCH.AX has a market cap of 71.25M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while HCH.AX trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCH.AX's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HCH.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to HCH.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, CYM.AX has a market cap of 43.34M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while CYM.AX trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYM.AX's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CYM.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to CYM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, CSE.AX has a market cap of 20.81M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while CSE.AX trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSE.AX's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CSE.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to CSE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, CCZ.AX has a market cap of 15.99M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while CCZ.AX trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCZ.AX's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CCZ.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX and CCZ.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, SLM.AX has a market cap of 10.26M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while SLM.AX trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLM.AX's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SLM.AX's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to SLM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, KCC.AX has a market cap of 9.04M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while KCC.AX trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KCC.AX's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KCC.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to KCC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, RRR.AX has a market cap of 8.84M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while RRR.AX trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RRR.AX's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RRR.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to RRR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, NRX.AX has a market cap of 8.36M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while NRX.AX trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRX.AX's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NRX.AX's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX and NRX.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, ALM.AX has a market cap of 6.35M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while ALM.AX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ALM.AX's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX and ALM.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, REC.AX has a market cap of 4.11M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while REC.AX trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REC.AX's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to REC.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX and REC.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, CPO.AX has a market cap of 2.61M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while CPO.AX trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPO.AX's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CPO.AX's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to CPO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.

RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 4.63M. In comparison, NTM.AX has a market cap of 2.42M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at $0.01, while NTM.AX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NTM.AX's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to NTM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.