NatWest Group plc
NatWest Group plc (RBSPF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RBSPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBSPF | $7.43 | -0.27% | 59.7B | 8.33 | $0.90 | +4.37% |
| BACRP | $302.00 | +1.00% | 2.2T | N/A | N/A | +2.34% |
| CICHY | $20.55 | +2.04% | 352.3B | 5.36 | $3.77 | +4.16% |
| IDCBF | $0.81 | +0.00% | 288.7B | 5.79 | $0.14 | +5.31% |
| IDCBY | $16.50 | +3.22% | 286.9B | 5.61 | $2.87 | +4.01% |
| HBCYF | $15.60 | -3.26% | 270.6B | 13.13 | $1.20 | +4.75% |
| ACGBY | $16.34 | -0.24% | 261B | 5.77 | $2.83 | +3.86% |
| ACGBF | $0.67 | +0.00% | 234.5B | 6.09 | $0.11 | +5.14% |
| CICHF | $0.98 | -2.20% | 233.2B | 5.11 | $0.19 | +5.49% |
| CMWAY | $123.84 | +2.04% | 201.9B | 27.50 | $4.39 | +2.73% |
Stock Comparison
RBSPF vs BACRP Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while BACRP trades at $302.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BACRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BACRP's competition here
RBSPF vs CICHY Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 352.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while CICHY trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check CICHY's competition here
RBSPF vs IDCBF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 288.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while IDCBF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to IDCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check IDCBF's competition here
RBSPF vs IDCBY Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 286.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while IDCBY trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check IDCBY's competition here
RBSPF vs HBCYF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 270.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while HBCYF trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to HBCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check HBCYF's competition here
RBSPF vs ACGBY Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 261B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while ACGBY trades at $16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ACGBY's competition here
RBSPF vs ACGBF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 234.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while ACGBF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ACGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ACGBF's competition here
RBSPF vs CICHF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 233.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while CICHF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to CICHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check CICHF's competition here
RBSPF vs CMWAY Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 201.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while CMWAY trades at $123.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check CMWAY's competition here
RBSPF vs CBAUF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 200.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while CBAUF trades at $119.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to CBAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check CBAUF's competition here
RBSPF vs MBFJF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 195.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while MBFJF trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check MBFJF's competition here
RBSPF vs BACHY Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 172.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while BACHY trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BACHY's competition here
RBSPF vs BACHF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 169.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while BACHF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BACHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BACHF's competition here
RBSPF vs BCDRF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 163.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while BCDRF trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BCDRF's competition here
RBSPF vs SMFNF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 122.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while SMFNF trades at $32.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check SMFNF's competition here
RBSPF vs BBVXF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 122.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while BBVXF trades at $20.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BBVXF's competition here
RBSPF vs NABZY Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while NABZY trades at $16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check NABZY's competition here
RBSPF vs WEBNF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 95.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while WEBNF trades at $28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check WEBNF's competition here
RBSPF vs NAUBF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 94B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while NAUBF trades at $30.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to NAUBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check NAUBF's competition here
RBSPF vs ANZGY Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while ANZGY trades at $26.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ANZGY's competition here
RBSPF vs BKFCF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while BKFCF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BKFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BKFCF's competition here
RBSPF vs INGVF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while INGVF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to INGVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check INGVF's competition here
RBSPF vs BCLYF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 73.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while BCLYF trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BCLYF's competition here
RBSPF vs BCMXY Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while BCMXY trades at $20.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to BCMXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BCMXY's competition here
RBSPF vs ANEWF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ANEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ANEWF's competition here
RBSPF vs NTIOF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while NTIOF trades at $132.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check NTIOF's competition here
RBSPF vs SCBFF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while SCBFF trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check SCBFF's competition here
RBSPF vs SCBFY Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while SCBFY trades at $41.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check SCBFY's competition here
RBSPF vs TDBKF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check TDBKF's competition here
RBSPF vs SVNLF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while SVNLF trades at $14.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check SVNLF's competition here
RBSPF vs FANDY Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while FANDY trades at $54.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to FANDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check FANDY's competition here
RBSPF vs FANDF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while FANDF trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to FANDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check FANDF's competition here
RBSPF vs ABMRF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while ABMRF trades at $34.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ABMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ABMRF's competition here
RBSPF vs SVNLY Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while SVNLY trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check SVNLY's competition here
RBSPF vs AAVMY Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while AAVMY trades at $31.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check AAVMY's competition here
RBSPF vs RBCPF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check RBCPF's competition here
RBSPF vs BNSPF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BNSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BNSPF's competition here
RBSPF vs BNDSF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while BNDSF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BNDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BNDSF's competition here
RBSPF vs BNDSY Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while BNDSY trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BNDSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BNDSY's competition here
RBSPF vs WFCNP Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while WFCNP trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to WFCNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check WFCNP's competition here
RBSPF vs EFGXY Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, EFGXY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while EFGXY trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas EFGXY's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EFGXY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to EFGXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check EFGXY's competition here
RBSPF vs ALORY Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while ALORY trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ALORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ALORY's competition here
RBSPF vs EFGIF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, EFGIF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while EFGIF trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas EFGIF's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EFGIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to EFGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check EFGIF's competition here
RBSPF vs NBKCF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while NBKCF trades at $19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check NBKCF's competition here
RBSPF vs CSGKF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to CSGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check CSGKF's competition here
RBSPF vs VUPPF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, VUPPF has a market cap of 613M. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while VUPPF trades at $109.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas VUPPF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VUPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to VUPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check VUPPF's competition here
RBSPF vs PRRCF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, PRRCF has a market cap of 549.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while PRRCF trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas PRRCF's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRRCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to PRRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check PRRCF's competition here
RBSPF vs BCSO Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while BCSO trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to BCSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BCSO's competition here
RBSPF vs TNTTF Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check TNTTF's competition here
RBSPF vs ANZBY Comparison March 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.7B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.43, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.33, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ANZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ANZBY's competition here