QTS Realty Trust, Inc.
QTS Realty Trust, Inc. QTS Peers
See (QTS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Industrial Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTS | $77.98 | +0.08% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PLD | $108.31 | +1.62% | 100.5B | 27.01 | $4.01 | +3.68% |
| PSA-PK | $19.11 | +0.42% | 52.5B | 1.86 | $10.29 | +4.02% |
| PSA-PH | $22.85 | +1.33% | 52.3B | 2.22 | $10.29 | +4.02% |
| PSA | $297.10 | -0.33% | 52.2B | 29.52 | $10.07 | +4.02% |
| EXR | $151.78 | +0.85% | 32.2B | 35.36 | $4.29 | +4.30% |
| LSI | $133.10 | -0.76% | 11.3B | 30.95 | $4.30 | N/A |
| LINE | $43.74 | +1.13% | 10B | -16.20 | -$2.70 | +3.63% |
| CUBE | $43.02 | +0.96% | 9.8B | 25.44 | $1.69 | +4.84% |
| EGP | $169.86 | +1.14% | 8.9B | 37.11 | $4.58 | +3.32% |
Stock Comparison
QTS vs PLD Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PLD has a market cap of 100.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PLD trades at $108.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLD's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PLD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs PSA-PK Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PK has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PK trades at $19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PK's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs PSA-PH Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PH has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PH trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PH's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs PSA Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA trades at $297.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs EXR Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, EXR has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while EXR trades at $151.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXR's P/E ratio is 35.36. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EXR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to EXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs LSI Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, LSI has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while LSI trades at $133.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSI's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to LSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs LINE Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, LINE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while LINE trades at $43.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LINE's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LINE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to LINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs CUBE Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, CUBE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while CUBE trades at $43.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUBE's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CUBE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to CUBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs EGP Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, EGP has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while EGP trades at $169.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGP's P/E ratio is 37.11. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EGP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to EGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs REXR Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, REXR has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while REXR trades at $37.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REXR's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REXR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to REXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs REXR-PB Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, REXR-PB has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while REXR-PB trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REXR-PB's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REXR-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to REXR-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs STAG Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, STAG has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while STAG trades at $36.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAG's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STAG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to STAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs FR Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, FR has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while FR trades at $49.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FR's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to FR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs TRNO Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, TRNO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while TRNO trades at $56.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRNO's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRNO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to TRNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs REXR-PC Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, REXR-PC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while REXR-PC trades at $21.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REXR-PC's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REXR-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to REXR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs COLD Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, COLD has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while COLD trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COLD's P/E ratio is -40.45. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COLD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to COLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs NSA-PA Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, NSA-PA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while NSA-PA trades at $22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSA-PA's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NSA-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to NSA-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs PSA-PF Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PF trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PF's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs PSA-PG Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PG trades at $20.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PG's P/E ratio is 1.98. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs PSA-PI Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PI trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PI's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs PSA-PJ Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PJ has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PJ trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs PSA-PL Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PL trades at $18.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PL's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs GRP-UN Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, GRP-UN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while GRP-UN trades at $51.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRP-UN's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRP-UN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to GRP-UN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs PSA-PM Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PM trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PM's P/E ratio is 1.63. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs PSA-PS Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PS trades at $16.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PS's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs PSA-PP Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PP trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PP's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs PSA-PR Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PR trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PR's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs PSA-PQ Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PQ has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PQ trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PQ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs PSA-PO Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PO trades at $15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PO's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs PSA-PN Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PN trades at $15.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PN's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs LXP Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, LXP has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while LXP trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LXP's P/E ratio is 42.00. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LXP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to LXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs NSA Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, NSA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while NSA trades at $32.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSA's P/E ratio is 53.23. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NSA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to NSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs LXP-PC Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, LXP-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while LXP-PC trades at $46.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LXP-PC's P/E ratio is 38.04. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LXP-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to LXP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs IIPR-PA Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, IIPR-PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while IIPR-PA trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIPR-PA's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IIPR-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to IIPR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs IIPR Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, IIPR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while IIPR trades at $57.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIPR's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IIPR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to IIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs PMTU Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PMTU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PMTU trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PMTU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PMTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs SCCD Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, SCCD has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while SCCD trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCCD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to SCCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs DHCNI Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, DHCNI has a market cap of 912.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while DHCNI trades at $16.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHCNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DHCNI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to DHCNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs SCCE Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, SCCE has a market cap of 909.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while SCCE trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCCE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to SCCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs RCC Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, RCC has a market cap of 784M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while RCC trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RCC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to RCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs PLYM Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PLYM has a market cap of 740.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PLYM trades at $16.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLYM's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PLYM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PLYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs LANDO Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, LANDO has a market cap of 702M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while LANDO trades at $19.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LANDO's P/E ratio is -67.36. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LANDO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to LANDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs TFSA Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, TFSA has a market cap of 566.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while TFSA trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TFSA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to TFSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs TPTA Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, TPTA has a market cap of 488.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while TPTA trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TPTA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to TPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs NHPAP Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, NHPAP has a market cap of 441.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while NHPAP trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHPAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NHPAP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to NHPAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs LAND Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, LAND has a market cap of 385.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while LAND trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAND's P/E ratio is -42.60. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to LAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs LANDM Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, LANDM has a market cap of 373.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while LANDM trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LANDM's P/E ratio is -225.45. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LANDM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to LANDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs ILPT Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, ILPT has a market cap of 304.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while ILPT trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILPT's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ILPT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to ILPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs LPA Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, LPA has a market cap of 227.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while LPA trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPA's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LPA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to LPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs PLYM-PA Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PLYM-PA has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PLYM-PA trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLYM-PA's P/E ratio is -27.36. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PLYM-PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is more volatile compared to PLYM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs AJXA Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, AJXA has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while AJXA trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AJXA's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AJXA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to AJXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs SCCB Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, SCCB has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while SCCB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCCB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is more volatile compared to SCCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs SACC Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, SACC has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while SACC trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SACC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is more volatile compared to SACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs SELF Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, SELF has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while SELF trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SELF's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to SELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs SCCF Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, SCCF has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while SCCF trades at $19.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCCF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to SCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs PW-PA Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PW-PA has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PW-PA trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PW-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PW-PA's ROE of -3.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs DRE Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, DRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while DRE trades at $48.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRE's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to DRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs QTS-PA Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, QTS-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while QTS-PA trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTS-PA's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QTS-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to QTS-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs MNR-PC Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, MNR-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while MNR-PC trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNR-PC's P/E ratio is 81.65. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MNR-PC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to MNR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs QTS-PB Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, QTS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while QTS-PB trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTS-PB's P/E ratio is -387.38. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QTS-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to QTS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.
QTS vs CONE Comparison
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, CONE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while CONE trades at $90.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CONE's P/E ratio is 451.80. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CONE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is more volatile compared to CONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.