QTS Realty Trust, Inc.
QTS Realty Trust, Inc. QTS-PA Peers
See (QTS-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Industrial Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTS-PA | $25.18 | +0.04% | 0 | -48.33 | -$0.52 | N/A |
| PLD | $105.12 | -0.47% | 97.5B | 26.21 | $4.01 | +3.77% |
| PSA-PK | $18.92 | +0.53% | 51.9B | 1.83 | $10.29 | +4.09% |
| PSA | $293.42 | +1.22% | 51.5B | 29.14 | $10.07 | +4.09% |
| PSA-PH | $22.42 | -0.84% | 51.3B | 2.18 | $10.29 | +4.09% |
| EXR | $147.44 | +1.08% | 31.3B | 34.37 | $4.29 | +4.42% |
| LSI | $133.10 | -0.76% | 11.3B | 30.95 | $4.30 | N/A |
| LINE | $43.52 | -1.29% | 9.9B | -16.12 | -$2.70 | +3.63% |
| CUBE | $42.50 | +0.31% | 9.7B | 25.15 | $1.69 | +4.87% |
| EGP | $167.12 | -0.26% | 8.8B | 36.50 | $4.58 | +3.38% |
Stock Comparison
QTS-PA vs PLD Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PLD has a market cap of 97.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PLD trades at $105.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PLD's P/E ratio is 26.21. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PLD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs PSA-PK Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PK has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PK trades at $18.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PK's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs PSA Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA trades at $293.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA's P/E ratio is 29.14. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs PSA-PH Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PH has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PH trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PH's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs EXR Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, EXR has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while EXR trades at $147.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas EXR's P/E ratio is 34.37. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EXR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to EXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs LSI Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, LSI has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while LSI trades at $133.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas LSI's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to LSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs LINE Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, LINE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while LINE trades at $43.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas LINE's P/E ratio is -16.12. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LINE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to LINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs CUBE Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, CUBE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while CUBE trades at $42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas CUBE's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CUBE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to CUBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs EGP Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, EGP has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while EGP trades at $167.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas EGP's P/E ratio is 36.50. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EGP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to EGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs REXR-PB Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, REXR-PB has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while REXR-PB trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas REXR-PB's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REXR-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to REXR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs REXR Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, REXR has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while REXR trades at $35.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas REXR's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REXR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to REXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs STAG Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, STAG has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while STAG trades at $36.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas STAG's P/E ratio is 27.26. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STAG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to STAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs FR Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, FR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while FR trades at $48.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas FR's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to FR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs TRNO Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, TRNO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while TRNO trades at $56.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas TRNO's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRNO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to TRNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs REXR-PC Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, REXR-PC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while REXR-PC trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas REXR-PC's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REXR-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to REXR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs COLD Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, COLD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while COLD trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas COLD's P/E ratio is -39.56. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COLD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to COLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs NSA-PA Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, NSA-PA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while NSA-PA trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas NSA-PA's P/E ratio is 21.81. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NSA-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to NSA-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs PSA-PF Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PF trades at $20.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PF's P/E ratio is 1.98. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs PSA-PG Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PG trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PG's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs PSA-PI Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PI trades at $19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PI's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs PSA-PJ Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PJ has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PJ trades at $18.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.79. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs PSA-PL Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PL trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PL's P/E ratio is 1.78. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs GRP-UN Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, GRP-UN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while GRP-UN trades at $50.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas GRP-UN's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRP-UN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to GRP-UN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs PSA-PM Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PM trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PM's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs PSA-PS Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PS trades at $16.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PS's P/E ratio is 1.58. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs PSA-PP Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PP trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PP's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs PSA-PR Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PR trades at $15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PR's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs PSA-PQ Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PQ has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PQ trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PQ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs PSA-PO Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PO trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PO's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs PSA-PN Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PN trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PN's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs LXP-PC Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, LXP-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while LXP-PC trades at $46.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas LXP-PC's P/E ratio is 38.04. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LXP-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to LXP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs NSA Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, NSA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while NSA trades at $31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas NSA's P/E ratio is 52.44. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NSA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to NSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs LXP Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, LXP has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while LXP trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas LXP's P/E ratio is 41.30. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LXP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to LXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs IIPR-PA Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, IIPR-PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while IIPR-PA trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas IIPR-PA's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IIPR-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to IIPR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs IIPR Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, IIPR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while IIPR trades at $55.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas IIPR's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IIPR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to IIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs PMTU Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PMTU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PMTU trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PMTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PMTU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PMTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs SCCD Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, SCCD has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while SCCD trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas SCCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCCD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to SCCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs SCCE Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, SCCE has a market cap of 914.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while SCCE trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas SCCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCCE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to SCCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs DHCNI Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, DHCNI has a market cap of 869.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while DHCNI trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas DHCNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DHCNI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to DHCNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs RCC Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, RCC has a market cap of 778.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while RCC trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas RCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RCC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to RCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs PLYM Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PLYM has a market cap of 731M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PLYM trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PLYM's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PLYM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PLYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs LANDO Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, LANDO has a market cap of 696.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while LANDO trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas LANDO's P/E ratio is -66.88. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LANDO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to LANDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs TFSA Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, TFSA has a market cap of 566.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while TFSA trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas TFSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TFSA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to TFSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs TPTA Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, TPTA has a market cap of 457.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while TPTA trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas TPTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TPTA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to TPTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs NHPAP Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, NHPAP has a market cap of 424.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while NHPAP trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas NHPAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NHPAP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to NHPAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs LANDM Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, LANDM has a market cap of 372.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while LANDM trades at $24.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas LANDM's P/E ratio is -225.09. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LANDM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to LANDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs LAND Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, LAND has a market cap of 368M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while LAND trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas LAND's P/E ratio is -40.68. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to LAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs ILPT Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, ILPT has a market cap of 300.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while ILPT trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas ILPT's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ILPT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to ILPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs LPA Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, LPA has a market cap of 215.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while LPA trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas LPA's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LPA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to LPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs PLYM-PA Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PLYM-PA has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PLYM-PA trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PLYM-PA's P/E ratio is -27.36. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PLYM-PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to PLYM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs AJXA Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, AJXA has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while AJXA trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas AJXA's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AJXA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to AJXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs SCCB Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, SCCB has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while SCCB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas SCCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCCB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to SCCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs SACC Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, SACC has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while SACC trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas SACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SACC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to SACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs SELF Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, SELF has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while SELF trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas SELF's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to SELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs SCCF Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, SCCF has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while SCCF trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas SCCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCCF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to SCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs PW-PA Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PW-PA has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PW-PA trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PW-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PW-PA's ROE of -3.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs DRE Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, DRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while DRE trades at $48.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas DRE's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to DRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs QTS-PB Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, QTS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while QTS-PB trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas QTS-PB's P/E ratio is -387.38. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QTS-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to QTS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs QTS Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, QTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while QTS trades at $77.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas QTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QTS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to QTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs CONE Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, CONE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while CONE trades at $90.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas CONE's P/E ratio is 451.80. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CONE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to CONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.
QTS-PA vs MNR-PC Comparison
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, MNR-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while MNR-PC trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas MNR-PC's P/E ratio is 81.65. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MNR-PC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to MNR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.