QTS Realty Trust, Inc.
QTS Realty Trust, Inc. (QTS-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QTS-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Industrial Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTS-PA | $25.18 | +0.04% | 0 | -48.33 | -$0.52 | N/A |
| PLD | $112.28 | +3.59% | 104.2B | 30.26 | $3.71 | +3.50% |
| PSA | $293.71 | +2.42% | 51.5B | 32.00 | $9.18 | +4.08% |
| PSA-PK | $19.61 | +0.82% | 49.6B | 1.91 | $10.29 | +4.08% |
| PSA-PH | $23.85 | +0.34% | 49.3B | 2.32 | $10.29 | +4.08% |
| EXR | $142.75 | +2.68% | 30.3B | 31.04 | $4.60 | +4.53% |
| LSI | $133.10 | -0.76% | 11.3B | 30.95 | $4.30 | N/A |
| REXR | $40.42 | +3.48% | 9.6B | 30.17 | $1.34 | +4.18% |
| CUBE | $41.09 | +2.67% | 9.4B | 25.07 | $1.64 | +5.04% |
| LINE | $40.28 | +3.04% | 9.2B | -16.78 | -$2.40 | +4.88% |
Stock Comparison
QTS-PA vs PLD Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PLD has a market cap of 104.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PLD trades at $112.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PLD's P/E ratio is 30.26. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PLD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check PLD's competition here
QTS-PA vs PSA Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA trades at $293.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check PSA's competition here
QTS-PA vs PSA-PK Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PK has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PK trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PK's P/E ratio is 1.91. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check PSA-PK's competition here
QTS-PA vs PSA-PH Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PH has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PH trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PH's P/E ratio is 2.32. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check PSA-PH's competition here
QTS-PA vs EXR Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, EXR has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while EXR trades at $142.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas EXR's P/E ratio is 31.04. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EXR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to EXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check EXR's competition here
QTS-PA vs LSI Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, LSI has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while LSI trades at $133.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas LSI's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to LSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check LSI's competition here
QTS-PA vs REXR Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, REXR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while REXR trades at $40.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas REXR's P/E ratio is 30.17. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REXR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to REXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check REXR's competition here
QTS-PA vs CUBE Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, CUBE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while CUBE trades at $41.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas CUBE's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CUBE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to CUBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check CUBE's competition here
QTS-PA vs LINE Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, LINE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while LINE trades at $40.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas LINE's P/E ratio is -16.78. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LINE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to LINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check LINE's competition here
QTS-PA vs EGP Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, EGP has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while EGP trades at $169.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas EGP's P/E ratio is 36.63. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EGP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to EGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check EGP's competition here
QTS-PA vs REXR-PB Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, REXR-PB has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while REXR-PB trades at $22.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas REXR-PB's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REXR-PB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to REXR-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check REXR-PB's competition here
QTS-PA vs STAG Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, STAG has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while STAG trades at $36.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas STAG's P/E ratio is 28.94. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STAG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to STAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check STAG's competition here
QTS-PA vs FR Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, FR has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while FR trades at $51.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas FR's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to FR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check FR's competition here
QTS-PA vs TRNO Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, TRNO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while TRNO trades at $57.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas TRNO's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRNO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to TRNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check TRNO's competition here
QTS-PA vs REXR-PC Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, REXR-PC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while REXR-PC trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas REXR-PC's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REXR-PC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to REXR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check REXR-PC's competition here
QTS-PA vs COLD Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, COLD has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while COLD trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas COLD's P/E ratio is -78.61. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COLD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to COLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check COLD's competition here
QTS-PA vs PSA-PF Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PF trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check PSA-PF's competition here
QTS-PA vs PSA-PG Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PG trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PG's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check PSA-PG's competition here
QTS-PA vs GRP-UN Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, GRP-UN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while GRP-UN trades at $59.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas GRP-UN's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRP-UN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to GRP-UN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check GRP-UN's competition here
QTS-PA vs PSA-PI Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PI has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PI trades at $20.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PI's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check PSA-PI's competition here
QTS-PA vs PSA-PJ Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PJ has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PJ trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check PSA-PJ's competition here
QTS-PA vs PSA-PL Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PL trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PL's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check PSA-PL's competition here
QTS-PA vs PSA-PM Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PM trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PM's P/E ratio is 1.65. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check PSA-PM's competition here
QTS-PA vs PSA-PS Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PS trades at $16.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PS's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check PSA-PS's competition here
QTS-PA vs PSA-PP Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PP trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PP's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check PSA-PP's competition here
QTS-PA vs PSA-PR Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PR trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PR's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check PSA-PR's competition here
QTS-PA vs PSA-PQ Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PQ has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PQ trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.57. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PQ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check PSA-PQ's competition here
QTS-PA vs PSA-PO Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PO trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PO's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check PSA-PO's competition here
QTS-PA vs PSA-PN Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PSA-PN trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PSA-PN's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check PSA-PN's competition here
QTS-PA vs LXP Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, LXP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while LXP trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas LXP's P/E ratio is 32.63. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to LXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check LXP's competition here
QTS-PA vs LXP-PC Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, LXP-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while LXP-PC trades at $47.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas LXP-PC's P/E ratio is 39.10. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LXP-PC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to LXP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check LXP-PC's competition here
QTS-PA vs NSA Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, NSA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while NSA trades at $32.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas NSA's P/E ratio is 51.87. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NSA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to NSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check NSA's competition here
QTS-PA vs NSA-PA Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, NSA-PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while NSA-PA trades at $22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas NSA-PA's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NSA-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to NSA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check NSA-PA's competition here
QTS-PA vs IIPR-PA Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, IIPR-PA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while IIPR-PA trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas IIPR-PA's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IIPR-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to IIPR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check IIPR-PA's competition here
QTS-PA vs IIPR Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, IIPR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while IIPR trades at $54.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas IIPR's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IIPR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to IIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check IIPR's competition here
QTS-PA vs SCCD Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, SCCD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while SCCD trades at $23.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas SCCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCCD's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to SCCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check SCCD's competition here
QTS-PA vs PMTU Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PMTU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PMTU trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PMTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PMTU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to PMTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check PMTU's competition here
QTS-PA vs SCCE Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, SCCE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while SCCE trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas SCCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCCE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to SCCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check SCCE's competition here
QTS-PA vs PLYM Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PLYM has a market cap of 941.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PLYM trades at $21.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PLYM's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PLYM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PLYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check PLYM's competition here
QTS-PA vs DHCNI Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, DHCNI has a market cap of 852.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while DHCNI trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas DHCNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DHCNI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to DHCNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check DHCNI's competition here
QTS-PA vs LANDO Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, LANDO has a market cap of 699.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while LANDO trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas LANDO's P/E ratio is -67.12. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LANDO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to LANDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check LANDO's competition here
QTS-PA vs RCC Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, RCC has a market cap of 644.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while RCC trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas RCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RCC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to RCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check RCC's competition here
QTS-PA vs TFSA Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, TFSA has a market cap of 603M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while TFSA trades at $24.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas TFSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TFSA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to TFSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check TFSA's competition here
QTS-PA vs TPTA Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, TPTA has a market cap of 547.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while TPTA trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas TPTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TPTA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to TPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check TPTA's competition here
QTS-PA vs NHPAP Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, NHPAP has a market cap of 523.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while NHPAP trades at $18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas NHPAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NHPAP's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to NHPAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check NHPAP's competition here
QTS-PA vs ILPT Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, ILPT has a market cap of 406.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while ILPT trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas ILPT's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ILPT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to ILPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check ILPT's competition here
QTS-PA vs LAND Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, LAND has a market cap of 330.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while LAND trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas LAND's P/E ratio is -20.77. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LAND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to LAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check LAND's competition here
QTS-PA vs LANDM Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, LANDM has a market cap of 325.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while LANDM trades at $24.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas LANDM's P/E ratio is -226.36. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LANDM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to LANDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check LANDM's competition here
QTS-PA vs LPA Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, LPA has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while LPA trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas LPA's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LPA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to LPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check LPA's competition here
QTS-PA vs PLYM-PA Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PLYM-PA has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PLYM-PA trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PLYM-PA's P/E ratio is -27.36. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PLYM-PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to PLYM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check PLYM-PA's competition here
QTS-PA vs AJXA Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, AJXA has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while AJXA trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas AJXA's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AJXA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to AJXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check AJXA's competition here
QTS-PA vs SCCB Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, SCCB has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while SCCB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas SCCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCCB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to SCCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check SCCB's competition here
QTS-PA vs SACC Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, SACC has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while SACC trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas SACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SACC's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to SACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check SACC's competition here
QTS-PA vs SELF Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, SELF has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while SELF trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas SELF's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to SELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check SELF's competition here
QTS-PA vs SCCF Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, SCCF has a market cap of 53.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while SCCF trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas SCCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCCF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to SCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check SCCF's competition here
QTS-PA vs PW-PA Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PW-PA has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while PW-PA trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas PW-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PW-PA's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to PW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check PW-PA's competition here
QTS-PA vs QTS-PB Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, QTS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while QTS-PB trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas QTS-PB's P/E ratio is -387.38. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QTS-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to QTS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check QTS-PB's competition here
QTS-PA vs CONE Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, CONE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while CONE trades at $90.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas CONE's P/E ratio is 451.80. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CONE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to CONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check CONE's competition here
QTS-PA vs DRE Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, DRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while DRE trades at $48.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas DRE's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is less volatile compared to DRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check DRE's competition here
QTS-PA vs QTS Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, QTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while QTS trades at $77.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas QTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QTS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to QTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check QTS's competition here
QTS-PA vs MNR-PC Comparison August 2025
QTS-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS-PA stands at 0. In comparison, MNR-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTS-PA is priced at $25.18, while MNR-PC trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -48.33, whereas MNR-PC's P/E ratio is 81.65. In terms of profitability, QTS-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MNR-PC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS-PA is more volatile compared to MNR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS-PA.Check MNR-PC's competition here