Restaurant Brands International Inc.

QSR.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 31.13B. In comparison, MCDS.NE has a market cap of 309.31B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at $95.00, while MCDS.NE trades at $26.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas MCDS.NE's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MCDS.NE's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is more volatile compared to MCDS.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.

QSR.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 31.13B. In comparison, SBUX.NE has a market cap of 135.91B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at $95.00, while SBUX.NE trades at $24.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas SBUX.NE's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SBUX.NE's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is less volatile compared to SBUX.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.

QSR.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 31.13B. In comparison, QSP-UN.TO has a market cap of 43.38B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at $95.00, while QSP-UN.TO trades at $93.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas QSP-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to QSP-UN.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is more volatile compared to QSP-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.

QSR.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 31.13B. In comparison, MTY.TO has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at $95.00, while MTY.TO trades at $45.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas MTY.TO's P/E ratio is 123.49. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MTY.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is less volatile compared to MTY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.

QSR.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 31.13B. In comparison, AW.TO has a market cap of 784.97M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at $95.00, while AW.TO trades at $32.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas AW.TO's P/E ratio is 48.82. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AW.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is less volatile compared to AW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.

QSR.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 31.13B. In comparison, AW-UN.TO has a market cap of 538.65M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at $95.00, while AW-UN.TO trades at $36.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas AW-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AW-UN.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is less volatile compared to AW-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.

QSR.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 31.13B. In comparison, BPF-UN.TO has a market cap of 397.48M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at $95.00, while BPF-UN.TO trades at $18.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas BPF-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BPF-UN.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is more volatile compared to BPF-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.

QSR.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 31.13B. In comparison, PZA.TO has a market cap of 364.84M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at $95.00, while PZA.TO trades at $14.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas PZA.TO's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PZA.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is more volatile compared to PZA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.

QSR.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 31.13B. In comparison, KEG-UN.TO has a market cap of 207.37M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at $95.00, while KEG-UN.TO trades at $18.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas KEG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to KEG-UN.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is more volatile compared to KEG-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.

QSR.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 31.13B. In comparison, SRV-UN.TO has a market cap of 110.31M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at $95.00, while SRV-UN.TO trades at $13.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas SRV-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SRV-UN.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is more volatile compared to SRV-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.

QSR.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 31.13B. In comparison, FRII.TO has a market cap of 68.41M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at $95.00, while FRII.TO trades at $2.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas FRII.TO's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FRII.TO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is more volatile compared to FRII.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.