D-Wave Quantum Inc.
D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QBTS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBTS | $17.58 | +2.36% | 5.2B | -25.59 | -$0.66 | N/A |
| ANET | $138.78 | -0.36% | 174.8B | 54.58 | $2.55 | N/A |
| STRC | $97.00 | -0.60% | 108.6B | -21.62 | -$4.51 | N/A |
| DELL | $128.14 | -4.32% | 93.4B | 20.64 | $6.67 | +1.41% |
| STX | $147.27 | -0.56% | 32B | 22.22 | $6.77 | +1.91% |
| SMCI | $46.79 | +0.26% | 26.6B | 26.55 | $1.68 | N/A |
| WDC | $73.78 | -0.89% | 26.2B | 16.66 | $4.50 | +0.13% |
| HPQ | $25.01 | -1.34% | 24.5B | 10.05 | $2.60 | +4.39% |
| CAJ | $21.63 | -0.14% | 22B | 12.43 | $1.74 | N/A |
| NTAP | $103.33 | -0.50% | 21.3B | 18.63 | $5.70 | +1.97% |
Stock Comparison
QBTS vs ANET Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 174.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while ANET trades at $138.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 54.58. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check ANET's competition here
QBTS vs STRC Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 108.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while STRC trades at $97.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -21.62. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to STRC's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check STRC's competition here
QBTS vs DELL Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 93.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while DELL trades at $128.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to DELL's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check DELL's competition here
QBTS vs STX Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while STX trades at $147.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to STX's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check STX's competition here
QBTS vs SMCI Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while SMCI trades at $46.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 26.55. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check SMCI's competition here
QBTS vs WDC Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while WDC trades at $73.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check WDC's competition here
QBTS vs HPQ Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while HPQ trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check HPQ's competition here
QBTS vs CAJ Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check CAJ's competition here
QBTS vs NTAP Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while NTAP trades at $103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check NTAP's competition here
QBTS vs PSTG Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while PSTG trades at $57.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 154.18. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check PSTG's competition here
QBTS vs LOGI Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while LOGI trades at $94.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check LOGI's competition here
QBTS vs IONQ Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while IONQ trades at $41.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -20.33. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check IONQ's competition here
QBTS vs IONQ-WT Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while IONQ-WT trades at $30.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check IONQ-WT's competition here
QBTS vs SNDKV Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check SNDKV's competition here
QBTS vs QBTS-WT Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while QBTS-WT trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check QBTS-WT's competition here
QBTS vs RGTIW Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while RGTIW trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check RGTIW's competition here
QBTS vs RGTI Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while RGTI trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -19.81. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check RGTI's competition here
QBTS vs QUBT Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while QUBT trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -29.87. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check QUBT's competition here
QBTS vs CRCT Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while CRCT trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check CRCT's competition here
QBTS vs MKFG-WT Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check MKFG-WT's competition here
QBTS vs CRSR Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 955.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while CRSR trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check CRSR's competition here
QBTS vs SSYS Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 929.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while SSYS trades at $10.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check SSYS's competition here
QBTS vs RCAT Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 918.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while RCAT trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -18.29. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check RCAT's competition here
QBTS vs NNDM Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 289M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while NNDM trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check NNDM's competition here
QBTS vs DDD Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while DDD trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to DDD's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check DDD's competition here
QBTS vs CAN Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 210.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while CAN trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check CAN's competition here
QBTS vs TIO Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check TIO's competition here
QBTS vs DM Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to DM's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check DM's competition here
QBTS vs OSS Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 118.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while OSS trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to OSS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check OSS's competition here
QBTS vs MICT Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check MICT's competition here
QBTS vs MKFG Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check MKFG's competition here
QBTS vs ALOT Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 85.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while ALOT trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check ALOT's competition here
QBTS vs INVE Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 84.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while INVE trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to INVE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check INVE's competition here
QBTS vs YIBO Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while YIBO trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to YIBO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check YIBO's competition here
QBTS vs UAVS Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 67.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while UAVS trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check UAVS's competition here
QBTS vs ZSPC Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while ZSPC trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check ZSPC's competition here
QBTS vs QMCO Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while QMCO trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check QMCO's competition here
QBTS vs TACT Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while TACT trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check TACT's competition here
QBTS vs FATH Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check FATH's competition here
QBTS vs KTCC Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while KTCC trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check KTCC's competition here
QBTS vs EBON Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while EBON trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check EBON's competition here
QBTS vs SGE Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check SGE's competition here
QBTS vs VLD Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to VLD's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check VLD's competition here
QBTS vs SCKT Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while SCKT trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check SCKT's competition here
QBTS vs VJET Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check VJET's competition here
QBTS vs STRCW Comparison August 2025
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $17.58, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -25.59, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -1.19%, compared to STRCW's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check STRCW's competition here