Quantum Battery Metals Corp.

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, TECK-B.TO has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while TECK-B.TO trades at CA$68.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas TECK-B.TO's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TECK-B.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to TECK-B.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check TECK-B.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, TECK-A.TO has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while TECK-A.TO trades at CA$68.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas TECK-A.TO's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TECK-A.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to TECK-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check TECK-A.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, IVN.TO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while IVN.TO trades at CA$11.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas IVN.TO's P/E ratio is 42.81. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IVN.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to IVN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check IVN.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, AKE.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while AKE.TO trades at CA$8.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas AKE.TO's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AKE.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to AKE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check AKE.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, AII.TO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while AII.TO trades at CA$19.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas AII.TO's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AII.TO's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to AII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check AII.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, USA.TO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while USA.TO trades at CA$6.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas USA.TO's P/E ratio is -20.05. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to USA.TO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to USA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check USA.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, NGEX.TO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while NGEX.TO trades at CA$23.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas NGEX.TO's P/E ratio is -38.67. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NGEX.TO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to NGEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check NGEX.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, SKE.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while SKE.TO trades at CA$38.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas SKE.TO's P/E ratio is -24.08. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SKE.TO's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to SKE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check SKE.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, FIL.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while FIL.TO trades at CA$32.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas FIL.TO's P/E ratio is -31.01. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FIL.TO's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to FIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check FIL.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, FOM.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while FOM.TO trades at CA$5.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas FOM.TO's P/E ratio is -106.80. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FOM.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to FOM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check FOM.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, AOT-H.NE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while AOT-H.NE trades at CA$1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas AOT-H.NE's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AOT-H.NE's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN and AOT-H.NE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AOT-H.NE's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, ERD.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while ERD.TO trades at CA$6.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ERD.TO's P/E ratio is -46.77. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ERD.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to ERD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check ERD.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, ALS.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while ALS.TO trades at CA$46.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ALS.TO's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ALS.TO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to ALS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check ALS.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, VZLA.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while VZLA.TO trades at CA$4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas VZLA.TO's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VZLA.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to VZLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check VZLA.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, LAR.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while LAR.TO trades at CA$9.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas LAR.TO's P/E ratio is -13.35. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LAR.TO's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to LAR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check LAR.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, MDI.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while MDI.TO trades at CA$15.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas MDI.TO's P/E ratio is 86.39. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MDI.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to MDI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check MDI.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, LAC.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while LAC.TO trades at CA$5.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas LAC.TO's P/E ratio is -7.88. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LAC.TO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to LAC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check LAC.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, NDM.TO has a market cap of 994.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while NDM.TO trades at CA$1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas NDM.TO's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NDM.TO's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to NDM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check NDM.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, TMQ.TO has a market cap of 804.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while TMQ.TO trades at CA$4.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas TMQ.TO's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TMQ.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to TMQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check TMQ.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, PMET.TO has a market cap of 769.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while PMET.TO trades at CA$4.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas PMET.TO's P/E ratio is -139.67. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PMET.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to PMET.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check PMET.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, ARA.TO has a market cap of 750.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while ARA.TO trades at CA$3.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ARA.TO's P/E ratio is -56.83. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ARA.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to ARA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check ARA.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, OM.TO has a market cap of 717.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while OM.TO trades at CA$1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas OM.TO's P/E ratio is -14.62. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OM.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to OM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check OM.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, WRN.TO has a market cap of 672.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while WRN.TO trades at CA$3.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas WRN.TO's P/E ratio is -166.50. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WRN.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to WRN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check WRN.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, MNO.TO has a market cap of 657.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while MNO.TO trades at CA$1.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas MNO.TO's P/E ratio is -19.62. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MNO.TO's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to MNO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check MNO.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, LAAC.TO has a market cap of 633.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while LAAC.TO trades at CA$3.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas LAAC.TO's P/E ratio is -39.10. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LAAC.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to LAAC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check LAAC.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, FVL.TO has a market cap of 628.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while FVL.TO trades at CA$1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas FVL.TO's P/E ratio is -110.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FVL.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to FVL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check FVL.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, TLO.TO has a market cap of 605.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while TLO.TO trades at CA$6.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas TLO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TLO.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to TLO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check TLO.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, PRYM.TO has a market cap of 599.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while PRYM.TO trades at CA$3.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas PRYM.TO's P/E ratio is -32.64. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PRYM.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to PRYM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check PRYM.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, ECOR.TO has a market cap of 598.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while ECOR.TO trades at CA$2.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ECOR.TO's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ECOR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to ECOR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check ECOR.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, LIRC.TO has a market cap of 577.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while LIRC.TO trades at CA$10.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas LIRC.TO's P/E ratio is -95.64. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LIRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to LIRC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check LIRC.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, POM.TO has a market cap of 552.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while POM.TO trades at CA$2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas POM.TO's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to POM.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to POM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check POM.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, TLG.TO has a market cap of 549.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while TLG.TO trades at CA$1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas TLG.TO's P/E ratio is -10.54. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TLG.TO's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to TLG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check TLG.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, ETG.TO has a market cap of 458.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while ETG.TO trades at CA$2.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ETG.TO's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ETG.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to ETG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check ETG.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, SOLG.TO has a market cap of 405.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while SOLG.TO trades at CA$0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas SOLG.TO's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SOLG.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to SOLG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check SOLG.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, TI.TO has a market cap of 372.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while TI.TO trades at CA$3.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas TI.TO's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TI.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to TI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check TI.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, LUCA.V has a market cap of 353.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while LUCA.V trades at CA$1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas LUCA.V's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LUCA.V's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to LUCA.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check LUCA.V's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, CDPR.V has a market cap of 335.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while CDPR.V trades at CA$0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas CDPR.V's P/E ratio is 3.09. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CDPR.V's ROE of +4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to CDPR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check CDPR.V's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, LIFT.CN has a market cap of 276M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while LIFT.CN trades at CA$7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas LIFT.CN's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LIFT.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to LIFT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check LIFT.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, FAR.TO has a market cap of 257.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while FAR.TO trades at CA$2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas FAR.TO's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FAR.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to FAR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check FAR.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, SAU.TO has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while SAU.TO trades at CA$0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas SAU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SAU.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN and SAU.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAU.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, SMT.TO has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while SMT.TO trades at CA$1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas SMT.TO's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SMT.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to SMT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check SMT.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, NCF.TO has a market cap of 232.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while NCF.TO trades at CA$0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas NCF.TO's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NCF.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN and NCF.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NCF.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, GLO.TO has a market cap of 225.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while GLO.TO trades at CA$0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas GLO.TO's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GLO.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to GLO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check GLO.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, MOLY.NE has a market cap of 202.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while MOLY.NE trades at CA$1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas MOLY.NE's P/E ratio is -51.33. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MOLY.NE's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to MOLY.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check MOLY.NE's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, TSK.TO has a market cap of 198.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while TSK.TO trades at CA$1.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas TSK.TO's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TSK.TO's ROE of -3.74%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to TSK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check TSK.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, LAM.TO has a market cap of 178.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while LAM.TO trades at CA$0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas LAM.TO's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LAM.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to LAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check LAM.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, VROY.V has a market cap of 161.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while VROY.V trades at CA$2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas VROY.V's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VROY.V's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to VROY.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check VROY.V's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, FURY.TO has a market cap of 151.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while FURY.TO trades at CA$0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas FURY.TO's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FURY.TO's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to FURY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check FURY.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, GENM.TO has a market cap of 150.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while GENM.TO trades at CA$0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas GENM.TO's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GENM.TO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to GENM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check GENM.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, IBAT.CN has a market cap of 146.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while IBAT.CN trades at CA$0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas IBAT.CN's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IBAT.CN's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN and IBAT.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IBAT.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, GEO.TO has a market cap of 138.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while GEO.TO trades at CA$3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas GEO.TO's P/E ratio is -73.25. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GEO.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to GEO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check GEO.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, GMX.TO has a market cap of 130.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while GMX.TO trades at CA$2.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas GMX.TO's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GMX.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to GMX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check GMX.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, CDPR.CN has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while CDPR.CN trades at CA$0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas CDPR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CDPR.CN's ROE of +4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to CDPR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check CDPR.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, NB.TO has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while NB.TO trades at CA$3.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas NB.TO's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NB.TO's ROE of -9.93%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to NB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check NB.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, NEXM.V has a market cap of 114.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while NEXM.V trades at CA$3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas NEXM.V's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NEXM.V's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to NEXM.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check NEXM.V's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, ARS.CN has a market cap of 113.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while ARS.CN trades at CA$0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ARS.CN's P/E ratio is -44.50. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ARS.CN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to ARS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check ARS.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, RUA.V has a market cap of 111.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while RUA.V trades at CA$1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas RUA.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RUA.V's ROE of -3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to RUA.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check RUA.V's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, SLR.TO has a market cap of 101.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while SLR.TO trades at CA$1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas SLR.TO's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SLR.TO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to SLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check SLR.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, LGO.TO has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while LGO.TO trades at CA$1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas LGO.TO's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LGO.TO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to LGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check LGO.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, S.TO has a market cap of 99.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while S.TO trades at CA$0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas S.TO's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to S.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to S.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check S.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, WM.TO has a market cap of 97.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while WM.TO trades at CA$0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas WM.TO's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to WM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check WM.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, FSY.TO has a market cap of 84.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while FSY.TO trades at CA$0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas FSY.TO's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FSY.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to FSY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check FSY.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, MAXX.CN has a market cap of 84M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while MAXX.CN trades at CA$1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas MAXX.CN's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MAXX.CN's ROE of -4.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to MAXX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check MAXX.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, FLCN.V has a market cap of 83.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while FLCN.V trades at CA$0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas FLCN.V's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FLCN.V's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN and FLCN.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLCN.V's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, AOT-H.V has a market cap of 82.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while AOT-H.V trades at CA$1.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas AOT-H.V's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AOT-H.V's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to AOT-H.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check AOT-H.V's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, AOT.TO has a market cap of 81.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while AOT.TO trades at CA$0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas AOT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AOT.TO's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to AOT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check AOT.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, PM.CN has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while PM.CN trades at CA$0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas PM.CN's P/E ratio is -16.75. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PM.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to PM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check PM.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, AMC.TO has a market cap of 68.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while AMC.TO trades at CA$0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas AMC.TO's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AMC.TO's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to AMC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check AMC.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, RTG.TO has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while RTG.TO trades at CA$0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas RTG.TO's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RTG.TO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN and RTG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTG.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, OGD.TO has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while OGD.TO trades at CA$1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas OGD.TO's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OGD.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to OGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check OGD.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, FOX.CN has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while FOX.CN trades at CA$0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas FOX.CN's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FOX.CN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN and FOX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FOX.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, NVLH.CN has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while NVLH.CN trades at CA$0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas NVLH.CN's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NVLH.CN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN and NVLH.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NVLH.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, FT.TO has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while FT.TO trades at CA$0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas FT.TO's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FT.TO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to FT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check FT.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, SCD.V has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while SCD.V trades at CA$0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas SCD.V's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SCD.V's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to SCD.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check SCD.V's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, AAN.V has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while AAN.V trades at CA$0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas AAN.V's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AAN.V's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN and AAN.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AAN.V's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, SAM.TO has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while SAM.TO trades at CA$0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas SAM.TO's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SAM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to SAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check SAM.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, NEXT.TO has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while NEXT.TO trades at CA$0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas NEXT.TO's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NEXT.TO's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to NEXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check NEXT.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, MMET.CN has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while MMET.CN trades at CA$0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas MMET.CN's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MMET.CN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to MMET.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check MMET.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, AVL.TO has a market cap of 50.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while AVL.TO trades at CA$0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas AVL.TO's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AVL.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN and AVL.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVL.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, TOC.CN has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while TOC.CN trades at CA$0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas TOC.CN's P/E ratio is -74.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TOC.CN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN and TOC.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOC.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, M.CN has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while M.CN trades at CA$0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas M.CN's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to M.CN's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to M.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check M.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, MIN.TO has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while MIN.TO trades at CA$0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas MIN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MIN.TO's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN and MIN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIN.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, TN.CN has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while TN.CN trades at CA$0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas TN.CN's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TN.CN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to TN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check TN.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, RUA.CN has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while RUA.CN trades at CA$0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas RUA.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RUA.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to RUA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check RUA.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, VALU.CN has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while VALU.CN trades at CA$0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas VALU.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VALU.CN's ROE of +10.59%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN and VALU.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VALU.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, LFLR.CN has a market cap of 39.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while LFLR.CN trades at CA$0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas LFLR.CN's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LFLR.CN's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to LFLR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check LFLR.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, BKI.TO has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while BKI.TO trades at CA$0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas BKI.TO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BKI.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to BKI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check BKI.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, INTR.V has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while INTR.V trades at CA$0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas INTR.V's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to INTR.V's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to INTR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check INTR.V's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, EGFV.CN has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while EGFV.CN trades at CA$2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas EGFV.CN's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EGFV.CN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN and EGFV.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EGFV.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, NICO.CN has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while NICO.CN trades at CA$0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas NICO.CN's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NICO.CN's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN and NICO.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NICO.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, AMPS.CN has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while AMPS.CN trades at CA$0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas AMPS.CN's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AMPS.CN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN and AMPS.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMPS.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, EMET.CN has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while EMET.CN trades at CA$0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas EMET.CN's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EMET.CN's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to EMET.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check EMET.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, HTRC.CN has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while HTRC.CN trades at CA$0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas HTRC.CN's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HTRC.CN's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN and HTRC.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HTRC.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, CXC.CN has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while CXC.CN trades at CA$0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas CXC.CN's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CXC.CN's ROE of -17.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN and CXC.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CXC.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, CTV.V has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while CTV.V trades at CA$0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas CTV.V's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CTV.V's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to CTV.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check CTV.V's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, URNM.CN has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while URNM.CN trades at CA$0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas URNM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to URNM.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN and URNM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check URNM.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, TICO.CN has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while TICO.CN trades at CA$0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas TICO.CN's P/E ratio is -94.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TICO.CN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to TICO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check TICO.CN's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, EXN.TO has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while EXN.TO trades at CA$0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas EXN.TO's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EXN.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAT.CN is less volatile compared to EXN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAT.CN.Check EXN.TO's competition here

QBAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAT.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, LVL.CN has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAT.CN is priced at CA$0.42, while LVL.CN trades at CA$0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas LVL.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, QBAT.CN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LVL.CN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. QBAT.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check LVL.CN's competition here