Pizza Pizza Royalty Corp.

PZA.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PZA.TO stands at 369.5M. In comparison, MCDS.NE has a market cap of 279.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PZA.TO is priced at CA$14.97, while MCDS.NE trades at CA$25.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PZA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas MCDS.NE's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, PZA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MCDS.NE's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PZA.TO is less volatile compared to MCDS.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZA.TO.

PZA.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PZA.TO stands at 369.5M. In comparison, SBUX.NE has a market cap of 141.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PZA.TO is priced at CA$14.97, while SBUX.NE trades at CA$26.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PZA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas SBUX.NE's P/E ratio is 32.75. In terms of profitability, PZA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBUX.NE's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PZA.TO is more volatile compared to SBUX.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZA.TO.

PZA.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PZA.TO stands at 369.5M. In comparison, QSP-UN.TO has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PZA.TO is priced at CA$14.97, while QSP-UN.TO trades at CA$91.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PZA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas QSP-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, PZA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QSP-UN.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PZA.TO is more volatile compared to QSP-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZA.TO.

PZA.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PZA.TO stands at 369.5M. In comparison, QSR.TO has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PZA.TO is priced at CA$14.97, while QSR.TO trades at CA$91.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PZA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas QSR.TO's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, PZA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QSR.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PZA.TO is less volatile compared to QSR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZA.TO.

PZA.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PZA.TO stands at 369.5M. In comparison, MTY.TO has a market cap of 971M. Regarding current trading prices, PZA.TO is priced at CA$14.97, while MTY.TO trades at CA$42.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PZA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas MTY.TO's P/E ratio is 114.86. In terms of profitability, PZA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTY.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PZA.TO is less volatile compared to MTY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZA.TO.

PZA.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PZA.TO stands at 369.5M. In comparison, AW.TO has a market cap of 892.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PZA.TO is priced at CA$14.97, while AW.TO trades at CA$37.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PZA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas AW.TO's P/E ratio is 55.51. In terms of profitability, PZA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AW.TO's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PZA.TO is less volatile compared to AW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZA.TO.

PZA.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PZA.TO stands at 369.5M. In comparison, AW-UN.TO has a market cap of 538.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PZA.TO is priced at CA$14.97, while AW-UN.TO trades at CA$36.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PZA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas AW-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, PZA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AW-UN.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PZA.TO is less volatile compared to AW-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZA.TO.

PZA.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PZA.TO stands at 369.5M. In comparison, BPF-UN.TO has a market cap of 420.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PZA.TO is priced at CA$14.97, while BPF-UN.TO trades at CA$19.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PZA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas BPF-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, PZA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BPF-UN.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PZA.TO is less volatile compared to BPF-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZA.TO.

PZA.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PZA.TO stands at 369.5M. In comparison, KEG-UN.TO has a market cap of 211.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PZA.TO is priced at CA$14.97, while KEG-UN.TO trades at CA$18.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PZA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas KEG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, PZA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEG-UN.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PZA.TO is more volatile compared to KEG-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZA.TO.

PZA.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PZA.TO stands at 369.5M. In comparison, SRV-UN.TO has a market cap of 111.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PZA.TO is priced at CA$14.97, while SRV-UN.TO trades at CA$13.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PZA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas SRV-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, PZA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRV-UN.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PZA.TO is less volatile compared to SRV-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZA.TO.

PZA.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PZA.TO stands at 369.5M. In comparison, FRII.TO has a market cap of 68.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PZA.TO is priced at CA$14.97, while FRII.TO trades at CA$2.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PZA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas FRII.TO's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, PZA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRII.TO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PZA.TO is more volatile compared to FRII.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZA.TO.

PZA.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PZA.TO stands at 369.5M. In comparison, RECP.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PZA.TO is priced at CA$14.97, while RECP.TO trades at CA$20.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PZA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas RECP.TO's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, PZA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RECP.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PZA.TO is more volatile compared to RECP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZA.TO.