Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See PULZ.NS's competitors and their performance on the NSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for PULZ.NS and its NSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PULZ.NS | ₹21.35 | -5.32% | 477.6M | 41.32 | ₹0.53 | N/A |
| AMBER.NS | ₹7,350.00 | +1.77% | 256B | 88.13 | ₹82.36 | N/A |
| AMBER.BO | ₹7,350.00 | +1.77% | 255.9B | 87.92 | ₹82.63 | N/A |
| ASAHIINDIA.NS | ₹962.80 | +2.51% | 237.4B | 68.32 | ₹13.63 | +0.21% |
| CROMPTON.BO | ₹244.90 | -0.45% | 159.8B | 32.37 | ₹7.61 | +1.22% |
| CROMPTON.NS | ₹244.80 | -1.41% | 158.7B | 32.39 | ₹7.61 | +1.22% |
| WHIRLPOOL.NS | ₹769.00 | -1.27% | 98.6B | 40.78 | ₹19.06 | +0.64% |
| WHIRLPOOL.BO | ₹768.65 | -1.34% | 98.5B | 40.84 | ₹19.00 | +0.64% |
| EUREKAFORB.BO | ₹432.55 | -2.42% | 83.8B | 43.49 | ₹9.95 | N/A |
| EUREKAFORB.NS | ₹431.95 | -2.44% | 83.6B | 54.18 | ₹7.97 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Amber Enterprises India Limited (NSE: AMBER.NS)
PULZ.NS vs AMBER.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, AMBER.NS has a market cap of 256B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while AMBER.NS trades at ₹7,350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas AMBER.NS's P/E ratio is 88.13. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AMBER.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to AMBER.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check AMBER.NS's competition here
Amber Enterprises India Limited (BSE: AMBER.BO)
PULZ.NS vs AMBER.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, AMBER.BO has a market cap of 255.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while AMBER.BO trades at ₹7,350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas AMBER.BO's P/E ratio is 87.92. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AMBER.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to AMBER.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check AMBER.BO's competition here
Asahi India Glass Limited (NSE: ASAHIINDIA.NS)
PULZ.NS vs ASAHIINDIA.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, ASAHIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 237.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while ASAHIINDIA.NS trades at ₹962.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas ASAHIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 68.32. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASAHIINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to ASAHIINDIA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check ASAHIINDIA.NS's competition here
Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Limited (BSE: CROMPTON.BO)
PULZ.NS vs CROMPTON.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, CROMPTON.BO has a market cap of 159.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while CROMPTON.BO trades at ₹244.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas CROMPTON.BO's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CROMPTON.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to CROMPTON.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check CROMPTON.BO's competition here
Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Limited (NSE: CROMPTON.NS)
PULZ.NS vs CROMPTON.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, CROMPTON.NS has a market cap of 158.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while CROMPTON.NS trades at ₹244.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas CROMPTON.NS's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CROMPTON.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to CROMPTON.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check CROMPTON.NS's competition here
Whirlpool of India Limited (NSE: WHIRLPOOL.NS)
PULZ.NS vs WHIRLPOOL.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, WHIRLPOOL.NS has a market cap of 98.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while WHIRLPOOL.NS trades at ₹769.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas WHIRLPOOL.NS's P/E ratio is 40.78. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to WHIRLPOOL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check WHIRLPOOL.NS's competition here
Whirlpool of India Limited (BSE: WHIRLPOOL.BO)
PULZ.NS vs WHIRLPOOL.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, WHIRLPOOL.BO has a market cap of 98.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while WHIRLPOOL.BO trades at ₹768.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas WHIRLPOOL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.84. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to WHIRLPOOL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to WHIRLPOOL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check WHIRLPOOL.BO's competition here
Eureka Forbes Limited (BSE: EUREKAFORB.BO)
PULZ.NS vs EUREKAFORB.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, EUREKAFORB.BO has a market cap of 83.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while EUREKAFORB.BO trades at ₹432.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas EUREKAFORB.BO's P/E ratio is 43.49. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EUREKAFORB.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to EUREKAFORB.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check EUREKAFORB.BO's competition here
Eureka Forbes Ltd. (NSE: EUREKAFORB.NS)
PULZ.NS vs EUREKAFORB.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, EUREKAFORB.NS has a market cap of 83.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while EUREKAFORB.NS trades at ₹431.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas EUREKAFORB.NS's P/E ratio is 54.18. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EUREKAFORB.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to EUREKAFORB.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check EUREKAFORB.NS's competition here
Cello World Limited (BSE: CELLO.BO)
PULZ.NS vs CELLO.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, CELLO.BO has a market cap of 82.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while CELLO.BO trades at ₹362.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas CELLO.BO's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CELLO.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to CELLO.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check CELLO.BO's competition here
Cello World Limited (NSE: CELLO.NS)
PULZ.NS vs CELLO.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, CELLO.NS has a market cap of 81.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while CELLO.NS trades at ₹362.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas CELLO.NS's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CELLO.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to CELLO.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check CELLO.NS's competition here
TTK Prestige Limited (NSE: TTKPRESTIG.NS)
PULZ.NS vs TTKPRESTIG.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, TTKPRESTIG.NS has a market cap of 81.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while TTKPRESTIG.NS trades at ₹594.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas TTKPRESTIG.NS's P/E ratio is 45.20. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TTKPRESTIG.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to TTKPRESTIG.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check TTKPRESTIG.NS's competition here
TTK Prestige Limited (BSE: TTKPRESTIG.BO)
PULZ.NS vs TTKPRESTIG.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, TTKPRESTIG.BO has a market cap of 81.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while TTKPRESTIG.BO trades at ₹593.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas TTKPRESTIG.BO's P/E ratio is 45.13. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TTKPRESTIG.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to TTKPRESTIG.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check TTKPRESTIG.BO's competition here
Sheela Foam Limited (NSE: SFL.NS)
PULZ.NS vs SFL.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, SFL.NS has a market cap of 76.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while SFL.NS trades at ₹668.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas SFL.NS's P/E ratio is 35.64. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SFL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to SFL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check SFL.NS's competition here
Sheela Foam Limited (BSE: SFL.BO)
PULZ.NS vs SFL.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, SFL.BO has a market cap of 76.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while SFL.BO trades at ₹668.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas SFL.BO's P/E ratio is 35.63. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SFL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to SFL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check SFL.BO's competition here
Cera Sanitaryware Limited (NSE: CERA.NS)
PULZ.NS vs CERA.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, CERA.NS has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while CERA.NS trades at ₹5,792.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas CERA.NS's P/E ratio is 36.53. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CERA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to CERA.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check CERA.NS's competition here
IFB Industries Limited (NSE: IFBIND.NS)
PULZ.NS vs IFBIND.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, IFBIND.NS has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while IFBIND.NS trades at ₹1,416.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas IFBIND.NS's P/E ratio is 38.02. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to IFBIND.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to IFBIND.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check IFBIND.NS's competition here
IFB Industries Ltd (BSE: IFBIND.BO)
PULZ.NS vs IFBIND.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, IFBIND.BO has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while IFBIND.BO trades at ₹1,415.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas IFBIND.BO's P/E ratio is 41.30. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to IFBIND.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to IFBIND.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check IFBIND.BO's competition here
Bosch Home Comfort India Limited (NSE: BOSCH-HCIL.NS)
PULZ.NS vs BOSCH-HCIL.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, BOSCH-HCIL.NS has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while BOSCH-HCIL.NS trades at ₹1,732.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas BOSCH-HCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 1000.24. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BOSCH-HCIL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to BOSCH-HCIL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check BOSCH-HCIL.NS's competition here
Bosch Home Comfort India Limited (BSE: BOSCH-HCIL.BO)
PULZ.NS vs BOSCH-HCIL.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, BOSCH-HCIL.BO has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while BOSCH-HCIL.BO trades at ₹1,734.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas BOSCH-HCIL.BO's P/E ratio is -1545.27. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BOSCH-HCIL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to BOSCH-HCIL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check BOSCH-HCIL.BO's competition here
Symphony Limited (BSE: SYMPHONY.BO)
PULZ.NS vs SYMPHONY.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, SYMPHONY.BO has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while SYMPHONY.BO trades at ₹615.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas SYMPHONY.BO's P/E ratio is 36.53. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SYMPHONY.BO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to SYMPHONY.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check SYMPHONY.BO's competition here
Symphony Limited (NSE: SYMPHONY.NS)
PULZ.NS vs SYMPHONY.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, SYMPHONY.NS has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while SYMPHONY.NS trades at ₹615.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas SYMPHONY.NS's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SYMPHONY.NS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to SYMPHONY.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check SYMPHONY.NS's competition here
Wakefit Innovations Ltd. (NSE: WAKEFIT.NS)
PULZ.NS vs WAKEFIT.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, WAKEFIT.NS has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while WAKEFIT.NS trades at ₹131.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas WAKEFIT.NS's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to WAKEFIT.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to WAKEFIT.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check WAKEFIT.NS's competition here
Bajaj Electricals Limited (NSE: BAJAJELEC.NS)
PULZ.NS vs BAJAJELEC.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, BAJAJELEC.NS has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while BAJAJELEC.NS trades at ₹355.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas BAJAJELEC.NS's P/E ratio is -176.08. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BAJAJELEC.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJELEC.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check BAJAJELEC.NS's competition here
Bajaj Electricals Limited (BSE: BAJAJELEC.BO)
PULZ.NS vs BAJAJELEC.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, BAJAJELEC.BO has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while BAJAJELEC.BO trades at ₹355.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas BAJAJELEC.BO's P/E ratio is -176.11. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BAJAJELEC.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJELEC.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check BAJAJELEC.BO's competition here
Orient Electric Limited (NSE: ORIENTELEC.NS)
PULZ.NS vs ORIENTELEC.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, ORIENTELEC.NS has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while ORIENTELEC.NS trades at ₹184.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas ORIENTELEC.NS's P/E ratio is 35.50. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ORIENTELEC.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTELEC.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check ORIENTELEC.NS's competition here
Orient Electric Limited (BSE: ORIENTELEC.BO)
PULZ.NS vs ORIENTELEC.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, ORIENTELEC.BO has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while ORIENTELEC.BO trades at ₹184.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas ORIENTELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 35.55. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ORIENTELEC.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTELEC.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check ORIENTELEC.BO's competition here
Johnson Controls-Hitachi Air Conditioning India Limited (NSE: JCHAC.NS)
PULZ.NS vs JCHAC.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, JCHAC.NS has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while JCHAC.NS trades at ₹1,432.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas JCHAC.NS's P/E ratio is 138.91. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JCHAC.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to JCHAC.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check JCHAC.NS's competition here
Johnson Controls-Hitachi Air Conditioning India Limited (BSE: JCHAC.BO)
PULZ.NS vs JCHAC.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, JCHAC.BO has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while JCHAC.BO trades at ₹1,427.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas JCHAC.BO's P/E ratio is 137.83. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JCHAC.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to JCHAC.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check JCHAC.BO's competition here
Carysil Limited (BSE: CARYSIL.BO)
PULZ.NS vs CARYSIL.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, CARYSIL.BO has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while CARYSIL.BO trades at ₹1,180.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas CARYSIL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CARYSIL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to CARYSIL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check CARYSIL.BO's competition here
Carysil Limited (NSE: CARYSIL.NS)
PULZ.NS vs CARYSIL.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, CARYSIL.NS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while CARYSIL.NS trades at ₹1,181.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas CARYSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.73. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CARYSIL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to CARYSIL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check CARYSIL.NS's competition here
Borosil Limited (NSE: BOROLTD.NS)
PULZ.NS vs BOROLTD.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, BOROLTD.NS has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while BOROLTD.NS trades at ₹250.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas BOROLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 39.17. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BOROLTD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to BOROLTD.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check BOROLTD.NS's competition here
Borosil Limited (BSE: BOROLTD.BO)
PULZ.NS vs BOROLTD.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, BOROLTD.BO has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while BOROLTD.BO trades at ₹249.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas BOROLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 39.21. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BOROLTD.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to BOROLTD.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check BOROLTD.BO's competition here
Nilkamal Limited (BSE: NILKAMAL.BO)
PULZ.NS vs NILKAMAL.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, NILKAMAL.BO has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while NILKAMAL.BO trades at ₹1,831.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas NILKAMAL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NILKAMAL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to NILKAMAL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check NILKAMAL.BO's competition here
Nilkamal Limited (NSE: NILKAMAL.NS)
PULZ.NS vs NILKAMAL.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, NILKAMAL.NS has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while NILKAMAL.NS trades at ₹1,846.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas NILKAMAL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NILKAMAL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to NILKAMAL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check NILKAMAL.NS's competition here
Stove Kraft Limited (BSE: STOVEKRAFT.BO)
PULZ.NS vs STOVEKRAFT.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, STOVEKRAFT.BO has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while STOVEKRAFT.BO trades at ₹774.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas STOVEKRAFT.BO's P/E ratio is 50.91. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to STOVEKRAFT.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to STOVEKRAFT.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check STOVEKRAFT.BO's competition here
Stove Kraft Limited (NSE: STOVEKRAFT.NS)
PULZ.NS vs STOVEKRAFT.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, STOVEKRAFT.NS has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while STOVEKRAFT.NS trades at ₹774.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas STOVEKRAFT.NS's P/E ratio is 50.75. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to STOVEKRAFT.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to STOVEKRAFT.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check STOVEKRAFT.NS's competition here
La Opala RG Limited (NSE: LAOPALA.NS)
PULZ.NS vs LAOPALA.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, LAOPALA.NS has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while LAOPALA.NS trades at ₹189.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas LAOPALA.NS's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LAOPALA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to LAOPALA.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check LAOPALA.NS's competition here
La Opala RG Limited (BSE: LAOPALA.BO)
PULZ.NS vs LAOPALA.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, LAOPALA.BO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while LAOPALA.BO trades at ₹189.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas LAOPALA.BO's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LAOPALA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to LAOPALA.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check LAOPALA.BO's competition here
EPACK Durable Limited (NSE: EPACK.NS)
PULZ.NS vs EPACK.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, EPACK.NS has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while EPACK.NS trades at ₹209.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas EPACK.NS's P/E ratio is 110.14. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EPACK.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to EPACK.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check EPACK.NS's competition here
Wonder Electricals Ltd. (NSE: WEL.NS)
PULZ.NS vs WEL.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, WEL.NS has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while WEL.NS trades at ₹146.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas WEL.NS's P/E ratio is 214.32. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to WEL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to WEL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check WEL.NS's competition here
Wonder Electricals Limited (BSE: WEL.BO)
PULZ.NS vs WEL.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, WEL.BO has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while WEL.BO trades at ₹146.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas WEL.BO's P/E ratio is 112.52. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to WEL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to WEL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check WEL.BO's competition here
Hindware Home Innovation Limited (NSE: HINDWAREAP.NS)
PULZ.NS vs HINDWAREAP.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, HINDWAREAP.NS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while HINDWAREAP.NS trades at ₹199.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas HINDWAREAP.NS's P/E ratio is -256.66. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HINDWAREAP.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to HINDWAREAP.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check HINDWAREAP.NS's competition here
Greenlam Industries Limited (BSE: GRNLAMIND.BO)
PULZ.NS vs GRNLAMIND.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, GRNLAMIND.BO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while GRNLAMIND.BO trades at ₹556.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas GRNLAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GRNLAMIND.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to GRNLAMIND.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check GRNLAMIND.BO's competition here
Onida Electronics Limited (NSE: MIRCELECTR.NS)
PULZ.NS vs MIRCELECTR.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, MIRCELECTR.NS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while MIRCELECTR.NS trades at ₹35.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas MIRCELECTR.NS's P/E ratio is -14.66. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MIRCELECTR.NS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to MIRCELECTR.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check MIRCELECTR.NS's competition here
Butterfly Gandhimathi Appliances Limited (BSE: BUTTERFLY.BO)
PULZ.NS vs BUTTERFLY.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, BUTTERFLY.BO has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while BUTTERFLY.BO trades at ₹652.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas BUTTERFLY.BO's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BUTTERFLY.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to BUTTERFLY.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check BUTTERFLY.BO's competition here
Butterfly Gandhimathi Appliances Limited (NSE: BUTTERFLY.NS)
PULZ.NS vs BUTTERFLY.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, BUTTERFLY.NS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while BUTTERFLY.NS trades at ₹656.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas BUTTERFLY.NS's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BUTTERFLY.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to BUTTERFLY.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check BUTTERFLY.NS's competition here
Saint-Gobain Sekurit India Limited (BSE: SAINTGOBAIN.BO)
PULZ.NS vs SAINTGOBAIN.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, SAINTGOBAIN.BO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while SAINTGOBAIN.BO trades at ₹113.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas SAINTGOBAIN.BO's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SAINTGOBAIN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to SAINTGOBAIN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check SAINTGOBAIN.BO's competition here
Onida Electronics Limited (BSE: MIRCELECTR.BO)
PULZ.NS vs MIRCELECTR.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, MIRCELECTR.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while MIRCELECTR.BO trades at ₹35.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas MIRCELECTR.BO's P/E ratio is -52.87. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MIRCELECTR.BO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to MIRCELECTR.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check MIRCELECTR.BO's competition here
Parin Enterprises Ltd. (NSE: PARIN.NS)
PULZ.NS vs PARIN.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, PARIN.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while PARIN.NS trades at ₹725.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas PARIN.NS's P/E ratio is 103.33. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PARIN.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to PARIN.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check PARIN.NS's competition here
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd. (NSE: STANLEY.NS)
PULZ.NS vs STANLEY.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, STANLEY.NS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while STANLEY.NS trades at ₹135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas STANLEY.NS's P/E ratio is 64.46. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to STANLEY.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to STANLEY.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check STANLEY.NS's competition here
Cellecor Gadgets Ltd. (NSE: CELLECOR.NS)
PULZ.NS vs CELLECOR.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, CELLECOR.NS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while CELLECOR.NS trades at ₹32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas CELLECOR.NS's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CELLECOR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to CELLECOR.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check CELLECOR.NS's competition here
Universus Photo Imagings Limited (NSE: UNIVPHOTO.NS)
PULZ.NS vs UNIVPHOTO.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, UNIVPHOTO.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while UNIVPHOTO.NS trades at ₹468.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas UNIVPHOTO.NS's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to UNIVPHOTO.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to UNIVPHOTO.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check UNIVPHOTO.NS's competition here
Singer India Limited (BSE: SINGER.BO)
PULZ.NS vs SINGER.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, SINGER.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while SINGER.BO trades at ₹78.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas SINGER.BO's P/E ratio is 46.75. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SINGER.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to SINGER.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check SINGER.BO's competition here
Universus Photo Imagings Ltd (BSE: UNIVPHOTO.BO)
PULZ.NS vs UNIVPHOTO.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, UNIVPHOTO.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while UNIVPHOTO.BO trades at ₹455.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas UNIVPHOTO.BO's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to UNIVPHOTO.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to UNIVPHOTO.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check UNIVPHOTO.BO's competition here
Wim Plast Limited (BSE: WIMPLAST.BO)
PULZ.NS vs WIMPLAST.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, WIMPLAST.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while WIMPLAST.BO trades at ₹334.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas WIMPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to WIMPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to WIMPLAST.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check WIMPLAST.BO's competition here
Bhatia Communications & Retail (India) Limited (BSE: BHATIA.BO)
PULZ.NS vs BHATIA.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, BHATIA.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while BHATIA.BO trades at ₹28.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas BHATIA.BO's P/E ratio is 32.84. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BHATIA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to BHATIA.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check BHATIA.BO's competition here
Bella Casa Fashion & Retail Ltd. (BSE: BELLACASA.BO)
PULZ.NS vs BELLACASA.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, BELLACASA.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while BELLACASA.BO trades at ₹221.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas BELLACASA.BO's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BELLACASA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to BELLACASA.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check BELLACASA.BO's competition here
Videocon Industries Ltd. (NSE: VIDEOIND.NS)
PULZ.NS vs VIDEOIND.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, VIDEOIND.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while VIDEOIND.NS trades at ₹7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas VIDEOIND.NS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VIDEOIND.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to VIDEOIND.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check VIDEOIND.NS's competition here
Sonam Limited (NSE: SONAMLTD.NS)
PULZ.NS vs SONAMLTD.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, SONAMLTD.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while SONAMLTD.NS trades at ₹60.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas SONAMLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SONAMLTD.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to SONAMLTD.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check SONAMLTD.NS's competition here
Maruti Interior Products Limit (BSE: SPITZE.BO)
PULZ.NS vs SPITZE.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, SPITZE.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while SPITZE.BO trades at ₹31.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas SPITZE.BO's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SPITZE.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to SPITZE.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check SPITZE.BO's competition here
Pil Italica Lifestyle Limited (NSE: PILITA.NS)
PULZ.NS vs PILITA.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, PILITA.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while PILITA.NS trades at ₹8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas PILITA.NS's P/E ratio is 43.17. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PILITA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to PILITA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check PILITA.NS's competition here
Pil Italica Lifestyle Limited (BSE: PILITA.BO)
PULZ.NS vs PILITA.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, PILITA.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while PILITA.BO trades at ₹8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas PILITA.BO's P/E ratio is 43.54. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PILITA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to PILITA.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check PILITA.BO's competition here
Sonam Clock Limited (NSE: SONAMCLOCK.NS)
PULZ.NS vs SONAMCLOCK.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, SONAMCLOCK.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while SONAMCLOCK.NS trades at ₹81.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas SONAMCLOCK.NS's P/E ratio is 40.88. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SONAMCLOCK.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to SONAMCLOCK.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check SONAMCLOCK.NS's competition here
Inflame Appliances Limited (BSE: INFLAME.BO)
PULZ.NS vs INFLAME.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, INFLAME.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while INFLAME.BO trades at ₹217.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas INFLAME.BO's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to INFLAME.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to INFLAME.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check INFLAME.BO's competition here
Prima Plastics Limited (BSE: PRIMAPLA.BO)
PULZ.NS vs PRIMAPLA.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, PRIMAPLA.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while PRIMAPLA.BO trades at ₹129.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas PRIMAPLA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PRIMAPLA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to PRIMAPLA.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check PRIMAPLA.BO's competition here
Greenchef Appliances Ltd. (NSE: GREENCHEF.NS)
PULZ.NS vs GREENCHEF.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, GREENCHEF.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while GREENCHEF.NS trades at ₹52.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas GREENCHEF.NS's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GREENCHEF.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to GREENCHEF.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check GREENCHEF.NS's competition here
Avro India Limited (BSE: AVROIND.BO)
PULZ.NS vs AVROIND.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, AVROIND.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while AVROIND.BO trades at ₹8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas AVROIND.BO's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AVROIND.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to AVROIND.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check AVROIND.BO's competition here
Avro India Limited (NSE: AVROIND.NS)
PULZ.NS vs AVROIND.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, AVROIND.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while AVROIND.NS trades at ₹8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas AVROIND.NS's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AVROIND.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to AVROIND.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check AVROIND.NS's competition here
Fonebox Retail Ltd. (NSE: FONEBOX.NS)
PULZ.NS vs FONEBOX.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, FONEBOX.NS has a market cap of 990.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while FONEBOX.NS trades at ₹96.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas FONEBOX.NS's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to FONEBOX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to FONEBOX.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check FONEBOX.NS's competition here
Texel Industries Ltd (BSE: TEXELIN.BO)
PULZ.NS vs TEXELIN.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, TEXELIN.BO has a market cap of 935.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while TEXELIN.BO trades at ₹64.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas TEXELIN.BO's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TEXELIN.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to TEXELIN.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check TEXELIN.BO's competition here
Khaitan (India) Limited (NSE: KHAITANLTD.NS)
PULZ.NS vs KHAITANLTD.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, KHAITANLTD.NS has a market cap of 698.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while KHAITANLTD.NS trades at ₹148.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas KHAITANLTD.NS's P/E ratio is -67.23. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KHAITANLTD.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to KHAITANLTD.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check KHAITANLTD.NS's competition here
Newjaisa Technologies Ltd. (NSE: NEWJAISA.NS)
PULZ.NS vs NEWJAISA.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, NEWJAISA.NS has a market cap of 636.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while NEWJAISA.NS trades at ₹17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas NEWJAISA.NS's P/E ratio is -27.05. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NEWJAISA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to NEWJAISA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check NEWJAISA.NS's competition here
Sacheta Metals Limited (BSE: SACHEMT.BO)
PULZ.NS vs SACHEMT.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, SACHEMT.BO has a market cap of 475M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while SACHEMT.BO trades at ₹3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas SACHEMT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SACHEMT.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to SACHEMT.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check SACHEMT.BO's competition here
Priti International Limited (NSE: PRITI.NS)
PULZ.NS vs PRITI.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, PRITI.NS has a market cap of 461.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while PRITI.NS trades at ₹34.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas PRITI.NS's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PRITI.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to PRITI.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check PRITI.NS's competition here
Tirupati Foam Ltd. (BSE: TIRUFOAM.BO)
PULZ.NS vs TIRUFOAM.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, TIRUFOAM.BO has a market cap of 457.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while TIRUFOAM.BO trades at ₹103.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas TIRUFOAM.BO's P/E ratio is 43.47. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TIRUFOAM.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to TIRUFOAM.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check TIRUFOAM.BO's competition here
M M Rubber Company Limited (BSE: MMRUBBR-B.BO)
PULZ.NS vs MMRUBBR-B.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, MMRUBBR-B.BO has a market cap of 360.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while MMRUBBR-B.BO trades at ₹58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas MMRUBBR-B.BO's P/E ratio is -29.99. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MMRUBBR-B.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to MMRUBBR-B.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check MMRUBBR-B.BO's competition here
Comrade Appliances Ltd (BSE: COMRADE.BO)
PULZ.NS vs COMRADE.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, COMRADE.BO has a market cap of 330.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while COMRADE.BO trades at ₹42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas COMRADE.BO's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to COMRADE.BO's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to COMRADE.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check COMRADE.BO's competition here
Jai Mata Glass Limited (BSE: JAIMATAG.BO)
PULZ.NS vs JAIMATAG.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, JAIMATAG.BO has a market cap of 325M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while JAIMATAG.BO trades at ₹3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas JAIMATAG.BO's P/E ratio is -242.90. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JAIMATAG.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to JAIMATAG.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check JAIMATAG.BO's competition here
Cell Point (India) Ltd. (NSE: CELLPOINT.NS)
PULZ.NS vs CELLPOINT.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, CELLPOINT.NS has a market cap of 318.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while CELLPOINT.NS trades at ₹16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas CELLPOINT.NS's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CELLPOINT.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to CELLPOINT.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check CELLPOINT.NS's competition here
Gujarat Raffia Industries Limited (BSE: GUJRAFIA.BO)
PULZ.NS vs GUJRAFIA.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, GUJRAFIA.BO has a market cap of 300.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while GUJRAFIA.BO trades at ₹55.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas GUJRAFIA.BO's P/E ratio is 94.24. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GUJRAFIA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to GUJRAFIA.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check GUJRAFIA.BO's competition here
Gorani Industries Limited (BSE: GORANIN.BO)
PULZ.NS vs GORANIN.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, GORANIN.BO has a market cap of 236M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while GORANIN.BO trades at ₹46.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas GORANIN.BO's P/E ratio is 37.61. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GORANIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to GORANIN.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check GORANIN.BO's competition here
Jaipan Industries Limited (BSE: JAIPAN.BO)
PULZ.NS vs JAIPAN.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, JAIPAN.BO has a market cap of 231.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while JAIPAN.BO trades at ₹37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas JAIPAN.BO's P/E ratio is 69.07. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JAIPAN.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to JAIPAN.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check JAIPAN.BO's competition here
Milestone Furniture Limited (BSE: MILEFUR.BO)
PULZ.NS vs MILEFUR.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, MILEFUR.BO has a market cap of 226.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while MILEFUR.BO trades at ₹23.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas MILEFUR.BO's P/E ratio is -60.87. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MILEFUR.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to MILEFUR.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check MILEFUR.BO's competition here
AVI Products India Limited (BSE: APIL.BO)
PULZ.NS vs APIL.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, APIL.BO has a market cap of 173.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while APIL.BO trades at ₹52.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas APIL.BO's P/E ratio is -873.33. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to APIL.BO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to APIL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check APIL.BO's competition here
Seasons Textiles Limited (BSE: SEASONST.BO)
PULZ.NS vs SEASONST.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, SEASONST.BO has a market cap of 136.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while SEASONST.BO trades at ₹17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas SEASONST.BO's P/E ratio is -58.68. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SEASONST.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to SEASONST.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check SEASONST.BO's competition here
Kuwer Industries Limited (BSE: KUWERIN.BO)
PULZ.NS vs KUWERIN.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, KUWERIN.BO has a market cap of 95.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while KUWERIN.BO trades at ₹10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas KUWERIN.BO's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KUWERIN.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to KUWERIN.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check KUWERIN.BO's competition here
Photoquip India Limited (BSE: PHOTOQUP.BO)
PULZ.NS vs PHOTOQUP.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, PHOTOQUP.BO has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while PHOTOQUP.BO trades at ₹14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas PHOTOQUP.BO's P/E ratio is -8.01. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PHOTOQUP.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to PHOTOQUP.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check PHOTOQUP.BO's competition here
MPL Plastics Limited (BSE: MPL.BO)
PULZ.NS vs MPL.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, MPL.BO has a market cap of 79.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while MPL.BO trades at ₹5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas MPL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MPL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to MPL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check MPL.BO's competition here
Golden Carpets Limited (BSE: GOLCA.BO)
PULZ.NS vs GOLCA.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, GOLCA.BO has a market cap of 70.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while GOLCA.BO trades at ₹10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas GOLCA.BO's P/E ratio is -43.72. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GOLCA.BO's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to GOLCA.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check GOLCA.BO's competition here
JIK Industries Limited (NSE: JIKIND.NS)
PULZ.NS vs JIKIND.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, JIKIND.NS has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while JIKIND.NS trades at ₹0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas JIKIND.NS's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JIKIND.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to JIKIND.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check JIKIND.NS's competition here
Wonder Fibromats Limited (NSE: WFL.NS)
PULZ.NS vs WFL.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, WFL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while WFL.NS trades at ₹269.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas WFL.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to WFL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to WFL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check WFL.NS's competition here
Acrysil Limited (NSE: ACRYSIL.NS)
PULZ.NS vs ACRYSIL.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, ACRYSIL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while ACRYSIL.NS trades at ₹494.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas ACRYSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ACRYSIL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to ACRYSIL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check ACRYSIL.NS's competition here
Hindware Home Innovation Limited (NSE: SHIL.NS)
PULZ.NS vs SHIL.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, SHIL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while SHIL.NS trades at ₹272.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas SHIL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHIL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to SHIL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check SHIL.NS's competition here
Eastern Logica Infoway Limited (BSE: ELIL.BO)
PULZ.NS vs ELIL.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, ELIL.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while ELIL.BO trades at ₹202.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas ELIL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ELIL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is more volatile compared to ELIL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check ELIL.BO's competition here
AGI Greenpac Limited (NSE: HSIL.NS)
PULZ.NS vs HSIL.NS Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, HSIL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while HSIL.NS trades at ₹298.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas HSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HSIL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to HSIL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check HSIL.NS's competition here
Eureka Forbes Limited (BSE: EUREKAFORBE.BO)
PULZ.NS vs EUREKAFORBE.BO Comparison August 2026
Pulz Electronics Ltd. (NSE: PULZ.NS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULZ.NS stands at 477.6M. In comparison, EUREKAFORBE.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PULZ.NS is priced at ₹21.35 on the NSE, while EUREKAFORBE.BO trades at ₹502.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULZ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.32, whereas EUREKAFORBE.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PULZ.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EUREKAFORBE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PULZ.NS is less volatile compared to EUREKAFORBE.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULZ.NS.Check EUREKAFORBE.BO's competition here