AVI Products India Limited
AVI Products India Limited (APIL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (APIL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APIL.BO | ₹45.28 | +0.00% | 149.7M | -11.04 | -₹4.10 | N/A |
| AMBER.NS | ₹8,111.50 | +4.62% | 285.5B | 174.37 | ₹46.52 | N/A |
| AMBER.BO | ₹8,107.80 | +4.39% | 285.3B | 174.40 | ₹46.49 | N/A |
| CENTURYPLY.NS | ₹791.50 | +1.22% | 175.8B | 74.46 | ₹10.63 | +0.13% |
| CROMPTON.NS | ₹258.68 | +3.38% | 166.6B | 36.13 | ₹7.16 | +1.20% |
| CROMPTON.BO | ₹258.40 | +2.99% | 166.4B | 36.14 | ₹7.15 | +1.20% |
| WHIRLPOOL.NS | ₹995.70 | +4.53% | 126.3B | 37.96 | ₹26.23 | +0.52% |
| WHIRLPOOL.BO | ₹995.55 | +4.81% | 126.3B | 36.04 | ₹27.62 | +0.52% |
| EUREKAFORB.BO | ₹508.10 | -0.43% | 98.3B | 61.44 | ₹8.27 | N/A |
| EUREKAFORB.NS | ₹507.90 | -0.42% | 98.3B | 61.41 | ₹8.27 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
APIL.BO vs AMBER.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, AMBER.NS has a market cap of 285.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while AMBER.NS trades at ₹8,111.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas AMBER.NS's P/E ratio is 174.37. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AMBER.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to AMBER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check AMBER.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs AMBER.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, AMBER.BO has a market cap of 285.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while AMBER.BO trades at ₹8,107.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas AMBER.BO's P/E ratio is 174.40. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AMBER.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to AMBER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check AMBER.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs CENTURYPLY.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, CENTURYPLY.NS has a market cap of 175.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while CENTURYPLY.NS trades at ₹791.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas CENTURYPLY.NS's P/E ratio is 74.46. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CENTURYPLY.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to CENTURYPLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check CENTURYPLY.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs CROMPTON.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, CROMPTON.NS has a market cap of 166.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while CROMPTON.NS trades at ₹258.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas CROMPTON.NS's P/E ratio is 36.13. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CROMPTON.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to CROMPTON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check CROMPTON.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs CROMPTON.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, CROMPTON.BO has a market cap of 166.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while CROMPTON.BO trades at ₹258.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas CROMPTON.BO's P/E ratio is 36.14. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CROMPTON.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to CROMPTON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check CROMPTON.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs WHIRLPOOL.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, WHIRLPOOL.NS has a market cap of 126.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while WHIRLPOOL.NS trades at ₹995.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas WHIRLPOOL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.96. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to WHIRLPOOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check WHIRLPOOL.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs WHIRLPOOL.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, WHIRLPOOL.BO has a market cap of 126.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while WHIRLPOOL.BO trades at ₹995.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas WHIRLPOOL.BO's P/E ratio is 36.04. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WHIRLPOOL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to WHIRLPOOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check WHIRLPOOL.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs EUREKAFORB.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, EUREKAFORB.BO has a market cap of 98.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while EUREKAFORB.BO trades at ₹508.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas EUREKAFORB.BO's P/E ratio is 61.44. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EUREKAFORB.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to EUREKAFORB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check EUREKAFORB.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs EUREKAFORB.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, EUREKAFORB.NS has a market cap of 98.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while EUREKAFORB.NS trades at ₹507.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas EUREKAFORB.NS's P/E ratio is 61.41. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EUREKAFORB.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to EUREKAFORB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check EUREKAFORB.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs CELLO.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, CELLO.BO has a market cap of 94.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while CELLO.BO trades at ₹428.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas CELLO.BO's P/E ratio is 30.68. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CELLO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to CELLO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check CELLO.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs CELLO.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, CELLO.NS has a market cap of 94.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while CELLO.NS trades at ₹428.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas CELLO.NS's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CELLO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to CELLO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check CELLO.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs TTKPRESTIG.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, TTKPRESTIG.NS has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while TTKPRESTIG.NS trades at ₹525.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas TTKPRESTIG.NS's P/E ratio is 86.22. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TTKPRESTIG.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to TTKPRESTIG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check TTKPRESTIG.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs TTKPRESTIG.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, TTKPRESTIG.BO has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while TTKPRESTIG.BO trades at ₹525.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas TTKPRESTIG.BO's P/E ratio is 86.22. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TTKPRESTIG.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to TTKPRESTIG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check TTKPRESTIG.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs AVL.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, AVL.BO has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while AVL.BO trades at ₹517.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas AVL.BO's P/E ratio is 60.34. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AVL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to AVL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check AVL.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs SYMPHONY.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, SYMPHONY.BO has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while SYMPHONY.BO trades at ₹854.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas SYMPHONY.BO's P/E ratio is 34.68. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SYMPHONY.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to SYMPHONY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check SYMPHONY.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs SYMPHONY.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, SYMPHONY.NS has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while SYMPHONY.NS trades at ₹854.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas SYMPHONY.NS's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SYMPHONY.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to SYMPHONY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check SYMPHONY.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs GREENLAM.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, GREENLAM.BO has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while GREENLAM.BO trades at ₹224.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas GREENLAM.BO's P/E ratio is 339.70. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GREENLAM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to GREENLAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check GREENLAM.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs GREENLAM.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, GREENLAM.NS has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while GREENLAM.NS trades at ₹224.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas GREENLAM.NS's P/E ratio is 334.33. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GREENLAM.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to GREENLAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check GREENLAM.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs SFL.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, SFL.BO has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while SFL.BO trades at ₹525.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas SFL.BO's P/E ratio is 64.90. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SFL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to SFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check SFL.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs SFL.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, SFL.NS has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while SFL.NS trades at ₹525.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas SFL.NS's P/E ratio is 64.78. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SFL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to SFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check SFL.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs IFBIND.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, IFBIND.NS has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while IFBIND.NS trades at ₹1,189.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas IFBIND.NS's P/E ratio is 40.29. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to IFBIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to IFBIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check IFBIND.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs IFBIND.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, IFBIND.BO has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while IFBIND.BO trades at ₹1,188.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas IFBIND.BO's P/E ratio is 40.18. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to IFBIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to IFBIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check IFBIND.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs WAKEFIT.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, WAKEFIT.NS has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while WAKEFIT.NS trades at ₹145.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas WAKEFIT.NS's P/E ratio is 115.28. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WAKEFIT.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to WAKEFIT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check WAKEFIT.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs BAJAJELEC.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, BAJAJELEC.BO has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while BAJAJELEC.BO trades at ₹397.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas BAJAJELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 42.59. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BAJAJELEC.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to BAJAJELEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check BAJAJELEC.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs BAJAJELEC.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, BAJAJELEC.NS has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while BAJAJELEC.NS trades at ₹397.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas BAJAJELEC.NS's P/E ratio is 127.72. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BAJAJELEC.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to BAJAJELEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check BAJAJELEC.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs ORIENTELEC.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, ORIENTELEC.NS has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while ORIENTELEC.NS trades at ₹193.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas ORIENTELEC.NS's P/E ratio is 47.42. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ORIENTELEC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTELEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check ORIENTELEC.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs ORIENTELEC.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, ORIENTELEC.BO has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while ORIENTELEC.BO trades at ₹193.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas ORIENTELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 47.48. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ORIENTELEC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTELEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check ORIENTELEC.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs JCHAC.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, JCHAC.NS has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while JCHAC.NS trades at ₹1,432.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas JCHAC.NS's P/E ratio is 138.91. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to JCHAC.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to JCHAC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check JCHAC.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs JCHAC.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, JCHAC.BO has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while JCHAC.BO trades at ₹1,427.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas JCHAC.BO's P/E ratio is 137.83. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to JCHAC.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to JCHAC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check JCHAC.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs BOSCH-HCIL.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, BOSCH-HCIL.NS has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while BOSCH-HCIL.NS trades at ₹1,420.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas BOSCH-HCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 315.01. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BOSCH-HCIL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to BOSCH-HCIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check BOSCH-HCIL.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs BOSCH-HCIL.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, BOSCH-HCIL.BO has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while BOSCH-HCIL.BO trades at ₹1,420.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas BOSCH-HCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 311.45. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BOSCH-HCIL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to BOSCH-HCIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check BOSCH-HCIL.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs STYLAMIND.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, STYLAMIND.NS has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while STYLAMIND.NS trades at ₹2,239.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas STYLAMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to STYLAMIND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to STYLAMIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check STYLAMIND.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs STYLAMIND.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, STYLAMIND.BO has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while STYLAMIND.BO trades at ₹2,239.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas STYLAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to STYLAMIND.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to STYLAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check STYLAMIND.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs BOROLTD.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, BOROLTD.NS has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while BOROLTD.NS trades at ₹256.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas BOROLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 40.80. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BOROLTD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to BOROLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check BOROLTD.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs BOROLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, BOROLTD.BO has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while BOROLTD.BO trades at ₹255.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas BOROLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 40.62. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BOROLTD.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to BOROLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check BOROLTD.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs CARYSIL.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, CARYSIL.NS has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while CARYSIL.NS trades at ₹913.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas CARYSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CARYSIL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to CARYSIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check CARYSIL.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs CARYSIL.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, CARYSIL.BO has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while CARYSIL.BO trades at ₹912.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas CARYSIL.BO's P/E ratio is 28.91. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CARYSIL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to CARYSIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check CARYSIL.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs GREENPANEL.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, GREENPANEL.NS has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while GREENPANEL.NS trades at ₹211.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas GREENPANEL.NS's P/E ratio is -2640.37. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GREENPANEL.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to GREENPANEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check GREENPANEL.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs LAOPALA.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, LAOPALA.BO has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while LAOPALA.BO trades at ₹180.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas LAOPALA.BO's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LAOPALA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to LAOPALA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check LAOPALA.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs LAOPALA.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, LAOPALA.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while LAOPALA.NS trades at ₹180.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas LAOPALA.NS's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LAOPALA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to LAOPALA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check LAOPALA.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs NILKAMAL.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, NILKAMAL.BO has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while NILKAMAL.BO trades at ₹1,338.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas NILKAMAL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NILKAMAL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to NILKAMAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check NILKAMAL.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs NILKAMAL.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, NILKAMAL.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while NILKAMAL.NS trades at ₹1,337.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas NILKAMAL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NILKAMAL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to NILKAMAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check NILKAMAL.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs HINDWAREAP.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, HINDWAREAP.NS has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while HINDWAREAP.NS trades at ₹223.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas HINDWAREAP.NS's P/E ratio is -33.26. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HINDWAREAP.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to HINDWAREAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check HINDWAREAP.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs HINDWAREAP.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, HINDWAREAP.BO has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while HINDWAREAP.BO trades at ₹223.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas HINDWAREAP.BO's P/E ratio is -33.14. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HINDWAREAP.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to HINDWAREAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check HINDWAREAP.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs STOVEKRAFT.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, STOVEKRAFT.BO has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while STOVEKRAFT.BO trades at ₹542.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas STOVEKRAFT.BO's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to STOVEKRAFT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to STOVEKRAFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check STOVEKRAFT.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs STOVEKRAFT.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, STOVEKRAFT.NS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while STOVEKRAFT.NS trades at ₹542.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas STOVEKRAFT.NS's P/E ratio is 47.98. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to STOVEKRAFT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to STOVEKRAFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check STOVEKRAFT.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs WEL.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, WEL.NS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while WEL.NS trades at ₹106.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas WEL.NS's P/E ratio is 105.15. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WEL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to WEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check WEL.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs WEL.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, WEL.BO has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while WEL.BO trades at ₹106.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas WEL.BO's P/E ratio is 78.59. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to WEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check WEL.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs GRNLAMIND.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, GRNLAMIND.BO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while GRNLAMIND.BO trades at ₹556.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas GRNLAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GRNLAMIND.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to GRNLAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check GRNLAMIND.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs BUTTERFLY.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, BUTTERFLY.BO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while BUTTERFLY.BO trades at ₹606.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas BUTTERFLY.BO's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BUTTERFLY.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to BUTTERFLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check BUTTERFLY.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs BUTTERFLY.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, BUTTERFLY.NS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while BUTTERFLY.NS trades at ₹606.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas BUTTERFLY.NS's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BUTTERFLY.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to BUTTERFLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check BUTTERFLY.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs SAINTGOBAIN.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, SAINTGOBAIN.BO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while SAINTGOBAIN.BO trades at ₹113.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas SAINTGOBAIN.BO's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SAINTGOBAIN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to SAINTGOBAIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check SAINTGOBAIN.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs MIRCELECTR.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, MIRCELECTR.BO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while MIRCELECTR.BO trades at ₹33.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas MIRCELECTR.BO's P/E ratio is -48.63. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MIRCELECTR.BO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to MIRCELECTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check MIRCELECTR.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs MIRCELECTR.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, MIRCELECTR.NS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while MIRCELECTR.NS trades at ₹33.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas MIRCELECTR.NS's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MIRCELECTR.NS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to MIRCELECTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check MIRCELECTR.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs ROBU.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, ROBU.BO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while ROBU.BO trades at ₹879.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas ROBU.BO's P/E ratio is 44.02. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ROBU.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to ROBU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check ROBU.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs STANLEY.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, STANLEY.NS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while STANLEY.NS trades at ₹143.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas STANLEY.NS's P/E ratio is 34.24. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to STANLEY.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to STANLEY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check STANLEY.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs CELLECOR.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, CELLECOR.NS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while CELLECOR.NS trades at ₹36.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas CELLECOR.NS's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CELLECOR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to CELLECOR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check CELLECOR.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs PARIN.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, PARIN.NS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while PARIN.NS trades at ₹636.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas PARIN.NS's P/E ratio is 92.21. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PARIN.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to PARIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check PARIN.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs FOCUS.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, FOCUS.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while FOCUS.NS trades at ₹78.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas FOCUS.NS's P/E ratio is 110.63. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FOCUS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to FOCUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check FOCUS.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs RUSHIL.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, RUSHIL.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while RUSHIL.BO trades at ₹17.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas RUSHIL.BO's P/E ratio is 52.09. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RUSHIL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to RUSHIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check RUSHIL.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs RUSHIL.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, RUSHIL.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while RUSHIL.NS trades at ₹17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas RUSHIL.NS's P/E ratio is 51.97. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RUSHIL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to RUSHIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check RUSHIL.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs WIMPLAST.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, WIMPLAST.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while WIMPLAST.BO trades at ₹382.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas WIMPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WIMPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to WIMPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check WIMPLAST.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs SINGER.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, SINGER.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while SINGER.BO trades at ₹73.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas SINGER.BO's P/E ratio is 41.41. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SINGER.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to SINGER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check SINGER.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs BELLACASA.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, BELLACASA.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while BELLACASA.BO trades at ₹264.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas BELLACASA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BELLACASA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to BELLACASA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check BELLACASA.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs BHATIA.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, BHATIA.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while BHATIA.BO trades at ₹22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas BHATIA.BO's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BHATIA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to BHATIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check BHATIA.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs VIDEOIND.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, VIDEOIND.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while VIDEOIND.NS trades at ₹7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas VIDEOIND.NS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VIDEOIND.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to VIDEOIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check VIDEOIND.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs SONAMLTD.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, SONAMLTD.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while SONAMLTD.NS trades at ₹51.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas SONAMLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 32.85. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SONAMLTD.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to SONAMLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check SONAMLTD.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs INFLAME.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, INFLAME.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while INFLAME.BO trades at ₹260.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas INFLAME.BO's P/E ratio is 33.62. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to INFLAME.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to INFLAME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check INFLAME.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs PILITA.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, PILITA.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while PILITA.BO trades at ₹8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas PILITA.BO's P/E ratio is 44.61. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PILITA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to PILITA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check PILITA.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs PILITA.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, PILITA.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while PILITA.NS trades at ₹7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas PILITA.NS's P/E ratio is 44.28. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PILITA.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to PILITA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check PILITA.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs AVROIND.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, AVROIND.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while AVROIND.BO trades at ₹130.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas AVROIND.BO's P/E ratio is 48.55. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AVROIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to AVROIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check AVROIND.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs AVROIND.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, AVROIND.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while AVROIND.NS trades at ₹129.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas AVROIND.NS's P/E ratio is 48.08. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AVROIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to AVROIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check AVROIND.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs SONAMCLOCK.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, SONAMCLOCK.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while SONAMCLOCK.NS trades at ₹81.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas SONAMCLOCK.NS's P/E ratio is 40.88. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SONAMCLOCK.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to SONAMCLOCK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check SONAMCLOCK.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs AIROLAM.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, AIROLAM.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while AIROLAM.NS trades at ₹84.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas AIROLAM.NS's P/E ratio is 46.91. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AIROLAM.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to AIROLAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check AIROLAM.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs SPITZE.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, SPITZE.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while SPITZE.BO trades at ₹80.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas SPITZE.BO's P/E ratio is 69.81. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SPITZE.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO and SPITZE.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPITZE.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs GREENCHEF.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, GREENCHEF.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while GREENCHEF.NS trades at ₹50.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas GREENCHEF.NS's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GREENCHEF.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to GREENCHEF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check GREENCHEF.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs FOCUS.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, FOCUS.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while FOCUS.BO trades at ₹159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas FOCUS.BO's P/E ratio is 98.76. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FOCUS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO and FOCUS.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FOCUS.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs TEXELIN.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, TEXELIN.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while TEXELIN.BO trades at ₹77.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas TEXELIN.BO's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TEXELIN.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to TEXELIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check TEXELIN.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs PRIMAPLA.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, PRIMAPLA.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while PRIMAPLA.BO trades at ₹93.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas PRIMAPLA.BO's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PRIMAPLA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to PRIMAPLA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check PRIMAPLA.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs NEWJAISA.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, NEWJAISA.NS has a market cap of 898.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while NEWJAISA.NS trades at ₹25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas NEWJAISA.NS's P/E ratio is -38.18. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NEWJAISA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to NEWJAISA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check NEWJAISA.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs FONEBOX.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, FONEBOX.NS has a market cap of 677.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while FONEBOX.NS trades at ₹66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas FONEBOX.NS's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FONEBOX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to FONEBOX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check FONEBOX.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs KHAITANLTD.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, KHAITANLTD.NS has a market cap of 652M. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while KHAITANLTD.NS trades at ₹137.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas KHAITANLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KHAITANLTD.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to KHAITANLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check KHAITANLTD.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs KHAITANLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, KHAITANLTD.BO has a market cap of 648.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while KHAITANLTD.BO trades at ₹136.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas KHAITANLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KHAITANLTD.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to KHAITANLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check KHAITANLTD.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs PRITI.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, PRITI.NS has a market cap of 620.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while PRITI.NS trades at ₹46.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas PRITI.NS's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PRITI.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to PRITI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check PRITI.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs PULZ.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, PULZ.NS has a market cap of 547.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while PULZ.NS trades at ₹25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas PULZ.NS's P/E ratio is 47.36. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PULZ.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to PULZ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check PULZ.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs SACHEMT.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, SACHEMT.BO has a market cap of 496.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while SACHEMT.BO trades at ₹3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas SACHEMT.BO's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SACHEMT.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to SACHEMT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check SACHEMT.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs ADL.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, ADL.BO has a market cap of 438.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while ADL.BO trades at ₹78.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas ADL.BO's P/E ratio is 2623.33. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ADL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO and ADL.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADL.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs ADL.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, ADL.NS has a market cap of 417.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while ADL.NS trades at ₹75.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas ADL.NS's P/E ratio is 2502.00. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ADL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to ADL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check ADL.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs TIRUFOAM.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, TIRUFOAM.BO has a market cap of 374.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while TIRUFOAM.BO trades at ₹85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas TIRUFOAM.BO's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TIRUFOAM.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO and TIRUFOAM.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIRUFOAM.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs CELLPOINT.NS Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, CELLPOINT.NS has a market cap of 318.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while CELLPOINT.NS trades at ₹17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas CELLPOINT.NS's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CELLPOINT.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO and CELLPOINT.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CELLPOINT.NS's competition here
APIL.BO vs GUJRAFIA.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, GUJRAFIA.BO has a market cap of 300.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while GUJRAFIA.BO trades at ₹55.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas GUJRAFIA.BO's P/E ratio is 94.24. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GUJRAFIA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to GUJRAFIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check GUJRAFIA.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs GORANIN.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, GORANIN.BO has a market cap of 282.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while GORANIN.BO trades at ₹52.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas GORANIN.BO's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GORANIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to GORANIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check GORANIN.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs MILEFUR.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, MILEFUR.BO has a market cap of 277.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while MILEFUR.BO trades at ₹29.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas MILEFUR.BO's P/E ratio is -74.70. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MILEFUR.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to MILEFUR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check MILEFUR.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs JAIMATAG.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, JAIMATAG.BO has a market cap of 190M. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while JAIMATAG.BO trades at ₹1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas JAIMATAG.BO's P/E ratio is -27.14. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to JAIMATAG.BO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to JAIMATAG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check JAIMATAG.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs JAIPAN.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, JAIPAN.BO has a market cap of 153.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while JAIPAN.BO trades at ₹25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas JAIPAN.BO's P/E ratio is 64.59. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to JAIPAN.BO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to JAIPAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check JAIPAN.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs SEASONST.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, SEASONST.BO has a market cap of 153.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while SEASONST.BO trades at ₹20.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas SEASONST.BO's P/E ratio is -204.40. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SEASONST.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO is less volatile compared to SEASONST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APIL.BO.Check SEASONST.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs KAHAN.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, KAHAN.BO has a market cap of 114.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while KAHAN.BO trades at ₹42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas KAHAN.BO's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KAHAN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO and KAHAN.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KAHAN.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs KUWERIN.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, KUWERIN.BO has a market cap of 111.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while KUWERIN.BO trades at ₹12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas KUWERIN.BO's P/E ratio is 136.67. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KUWERIN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO and KUWERIN.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KUWERIN.BO's competition here
APIL.BO vs PHOTOQUP.BO Comparison April 2026
APIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APIL.BO stands at 149.7M. In comparison, PHOTOQUP.BO has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APIL.BO is priced at ₹45.28, while PHOTOQUP.BO trades at ₹15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas PHOTOQUP.BO's P/E ratio is 53.10. In terms of profitability, APIL.BO's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PHOTOQUP.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APIL.BO and PHOTOQUP.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHOTOQUP.BO's competition here