Pearson plc
Pearson plc (PSO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PSO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Publishing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSO | $14.47 | +0.21% | 8.8B | 21.27 | $0.68 | +2.36% |
| RELX | $36.53 | +1.12% | 65.9B | 24.20 | $1.51 | +2.37% |
| NYT | $80.89 | +0.57% | 13.1B | 38.69 | $2.09 | +0.95% |
| MDP | $59.07 | +0.12% | 2.7B | 10.05 | $5.88 | N/A |
| WLYB | $41.20 | +0.00% | 2.2B | 14.41 | $2.86 | +3.45% |
| WLY | $41.07 | -0.62% | 2.2B | 14.36 | $2.86 | +3.46% |
| TDAY | $7.29 | +0.48% | 1.1B | 728.50 | $0.01 | N/A |
| SCHL | $40.34 | -4.09% | 1B | 16.74 | $2.41 | +1.99% |
| GCI | $5.93 | -0.34% | 872.4M | 8.85 | $0.67 | N/A |
| DALN | $16.51 | +0.06% | 88.4M | -17.02 | -$0.97 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PSO vs RELX Comparison April 2026
PSO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSO stands at 8.8B. In comparison, RELX has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PSO is priced at $14.47, while RELX trades at $36.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.27, whereas RELX's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, PSO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RELX's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, PSO is less volatile compared to RELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSO.Check RELX's competition here
PSO vs NYT Comparison April 2026
PSO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSO stands at 8.8B. In comparison, NYT has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSO is priced at $14.47, while NYT trades at $80.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.27, whereas NYT's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, PSO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PSO is less volatile compared to NYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSO.Check NYT's competition here
PSO vs MDP Comparison April 2026
PSO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSO stands at 8.8B. In comparison, MDP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PSO is priced at $14.47, while MDP trades at $59.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.27, whereas MDP's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, PSO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDP's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PSO is more volatile compared to MDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSO.Check MDP's competition here
PSO vs WLYB Comparison April 2026
PSO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSO stands at 8.8B. In comparison, WLYB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSO is priced at $14.47, while WLYB trades at $41.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.27, whereas WLYB's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, PSO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WLYB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PSO is more volatile compared to WLYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSO.Check WLYB's competition here
PSO vs WLY Comparison April 2026
PSO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSO stands at 8.8B. In comparison, WLY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSO is priced at $14.47, while WLY trades at $41.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.27, whereas WLY's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, PSO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WLY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PSO is less volatile compared to WLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSO.Check WLY's competition here
PSO vs TDAY Comparison April 2026
PSO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSO stands at 8.8B. In comparison, TDAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSO is priced at $14.47, while TDAY trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.27, whereas TDAY's P/E ratio is 728.50. In terms of profitability, PSO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSO is less volatile compared to TDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSO.Check TDAY's competition here
PSO vs SCHL Comparison April 2026
PSO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSO stands at 8.8B. In comparison, SCHL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSO is priced at $14.47, while SCHL trades at $40.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.27, whereas SCHL's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, PSO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCHL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSO is less volatile compared to SCHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSO.Check SCHL's competition here
PSO vs GCI Comparison April 2026
PSO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSO stands at 8.8B. In comparison, GCI has a market cap of 872.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSO is priced at $14.47, while GCI trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.27, whereas GCI's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, PSO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GCI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSO is less volatile compared to GCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSO.Check GCI's competition here
PSO vs DALN Comparison April 2026
PSO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSO stands at 8.8B. In comparison, DALN has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSO is priced at $14.47, while DALN trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.27, whereas DALN's P/E ratio is -17.02. In terms of profitability, PSO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DALN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSO is more volatile compared to DALN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSO.Check DALN's competition here
PSO vs LEE Comparison April 2026
PSO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSO stands at 8.8B. In comparison, LEE has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PSO is priced at $14.47, while LEE trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.27, whereas LEE's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, PSO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LEE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PSO is less volatile compared to LEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSO.Check LEE's competition here
PSO vs AHC Comparison April 2026
PSO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSO stands at 8.8B. In comparison, AHC has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSO is priced at $14.47, while AHC trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.27, whereas AHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSO is less volatile compared to AHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSO.Check AHC's competition here
PSO vs EDUC Comparison April 2026
PSO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSO stands at 8.8B. In comparison, EDUC has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSO is priced at $14.47, while EDUC trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.27, whereas EDUC's P/E ratio is 3.02. In terms of profitability, PSO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EDUC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PSO is less volatile compared to EDUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSO.Check EDUC's competition here
PSO vs IDW Comparison April 2026
PSO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSO stands at 8.8B. In comparison, IDW has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSO is priced at $14.47, while IDW trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.27, whereas IDW's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, PSO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSO is less volatile compared to IDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSO.Check IDW's competition here
PSO vs TNMG Comparison April 2026
PSO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSO stands at 8.8B. In comparison, TNMG has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSO is priced at $14.47, while TNMG trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.27, whereas TNMG's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PSO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNMG's ROE of -2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PSO is less volatile compared to TNMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSO.Check TNMG's competition here
PSO vs JW-B Comparison April 2026
PSO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSO stands at 8.8B. In comparison, JW-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PSO is priced at $14.47, while JW-B trades at $53.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.27, whereas JW-B's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, PSO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JW-B's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PSO is more volatile compared to JW-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSO.Check JW-B's competition here
PSO vs TPCO Comparison April 2026
PSO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSO stands at 8.8B. In comparison, TPCO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PSO is priced at $14.47, while TPCO trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.27, whereas TPCO's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, PSO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TPCO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PSO is more volatile compared to TPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSO.Check TPCO's competition here
PSO vs JW-A Comparison April 2026
PSO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSO stands at 8.8B. In comparison, JW-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PSO is priced at $14.47, while JW-A trades at $53.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.27, whereas JW-A's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, PSO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JW-A's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PSO is less volatile compared to JW-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSO.Check JW-A's competition here