Lee Enterprises, Incorporated
Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (LEE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LEE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Publishing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEE | $9.40 | -0.53% | 57.3M | -4.45 | -$2.11 | N/A |
| NYT | $74.96 | +0.94% | 12.1B | 32.17 | $2.33 | +1.04% |
| PSO | $15.19 | +0.40% | 9.2B | 22.35 | $0.68 | +2.27% |
| MDP | $59.07 | +0.12% | 2.7B | 10.05 | $5.88 | N/A |
| WLY | $42.34 | +1.12% | 2.2B | 14.80 | $2.86 | +3.38% |
| WLYB | $41.80 | +1.43% | 2.2B | 14.62 | $2.86 | +3.40% |
| TDAY | $7.56 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 42.00 | $0.18 | N/A |
| SCHL | $40.71 | +1.42% | 1B | 16.90 | $2.41 | +2.01% |
| GCI | $5.93 | -0.34% | 872.4M | 8.85 | $0.67 | N/A |
| DALN | $16.51 | +0.06% | 88.4M | -17.02 | -$0.97 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LEE vs NYT Comparison May 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 57.3M. In comparison, NYT has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.40, while NYT trades at $74.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.45, whereas NYT's P/E ratio is 32.17. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to NYT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to NYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check NYT's competition here
LEE vs PSO Comparison May 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 57.3M. In comparison, PSO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.40, while PSO trades at $15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.45, whereas PSO's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PSO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to PSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check PSO's competition here
LEE vs MDP Comparison May 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 57.3M. In comparison, MDP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.40, while MDP trades at $59.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.45, whereas MDP's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MDP's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to MDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check MDP's competition here
LEE vs WLY Comparison May 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 57.3M. In comparison, WLY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.40, while WLY trades at $42.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.45, whereas WLY's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WLY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to WLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check WLY's competition here
LEE vs WLYB Comparison May 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 57.3M. In comparison, WLYB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.40, while WLYB trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.45, whereas WLYB's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WLYB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to WLYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check WLYB's competition here
LEE vs TDAY Comparison May 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 57.3M. In comparison, TDAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.40, while TDAY trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.45, whereas TDAY's P/E ratio is 42.00. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TDAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to TDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check TDAY's competition here
LEE vs SCHL Comparison May 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 57.3M. In comparison, SCHL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.40, while SCHL trades at $40.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.45, whereas SCHL's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SCHL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to SCHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check SCHL's competition here
LEE vs GCI Comparison May 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 57.3M. In comparison, GCI has a market cap of 872.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.40, while GCI trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.45, whereas GCI's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to GCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check GCI's competition here
LEE vs DALN Comparison May 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 57.3M. In comparison, DALN has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.40, while DALN trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.45, whereas DALN's P/E ratio is -17.02. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DALN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to DALN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check DALN's competition here
LEE vs AHC Comparison May 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 57.3M. In comparison, AHC has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.40, while AHC trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.45, whereas AHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to AHC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to AHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check AHC's competition here
LEE vs EDUC Comparison May 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 57.3M. In comparison, EDUC has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.40, while EDUC trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.45, whereas EDUC's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to EDUC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to EDUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check EDUC's competition here
LEE vs IDW Comparison May 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 57.3M. In comparison, IDW has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.40, while IDW trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.45, whereas IDW's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to IDW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is less volatile compared to IDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check IDW's competition here
LEE vs TNMG Comparison May 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 57.3M. In comparison, TNMG has a market cap of 932.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.40, while TNMG trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.45, whereas TNMG's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TNMG's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is less volatile compared to TNMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check TNMG's competition here
LEE vs JW-A Comparison May 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 57.3M. In comparison, JW-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.40, while JW-A trades at $53.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.45, whereas JW-A's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to JW-A's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to JW-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check JW-A's competition here
LEE vs TPCO Comparison May 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 57.3M. In comparison, TPCO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.40, while TPCO trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.45, whereas TPCO's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TPCO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to TPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check TPCO's competition here
LEE vs JW-B Comparison May 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 57.3M. In comparison, JW-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.40, while JW-B trades at $53.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.45, whereas JW-B's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to JW-B's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to JW-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check JW-B's competition here