Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (LEE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 55.3M. In comparison, NYT has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.06, while NYT trades at $74.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.29, whereas NYT's P/E ratio is 31.96. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to NYT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to NYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check NYT's competition here

LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 55.3M. In comparison, PSO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.06, while PSO trades at $15.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.29, whereas PSO's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PSO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to PSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check PSO's competition here

LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 55.3M. In comparison, MDP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.06, while MDP trades at $59.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.29, whereas MDP's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MDP's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to MDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check MDP's competition here

LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 55.3M. In comparison, WLYB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.06, while WLYB trades at $45.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.29, whereas WLYB's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WLYB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to WLYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check WLYB's competition here

LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 55.3M. In comparison, WLY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.06, while WLY trades at $45.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.29, whereas WLY's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WLY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to WLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check WLY's competition here

LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 55.3M. In comparison, TDAY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.06, while TDAY trades at $7.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.29, whereas TDAY's P/E ratio is 44.11. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TDAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to TDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check TDAY's competition here

LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 55.3M. In comparison, SCHL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.06, while SCHL trades at $42.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.29, whereas SCHL's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SCHL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to SCHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check SCHL's competition here

LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 55.3M. In comparison, GCI has a market cap of 872.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.06, while GCI trades at $5.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.29, whereas GCI's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to GCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check GCI's competition here

LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 55.3M. In comparison, DALN has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.06, while DALN trades at $16.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.29, whereas DALN's P/E ratio is -17.02. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DALN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to DALN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check DALN's competition here

LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 55.3M. In comparison, AHC has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.06, while AHC trades at $7.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.29, whereas AHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to AHC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to AHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check AHC's competition here

LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 55.3M. In comparison, EDUC has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.06, while EDUC trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.29, whereas EDUC's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to EDUC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to EDUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check EDUC's competition here

LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 55.3M. In comparison, IDW has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.06, while IDW trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.29, whereas IDW's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to IDW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to IDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check IDW's competition here

LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 55.3M. In comparison, TNMG has a market cap of 738.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.06, while TNMG trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.29, whereas TNMG's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TNMG's ROE of -4.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to TNMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check TNMG's competition here

LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 55.3M. In comparison, JW-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.06, while JW-A trades at $53.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.29, whereas JW-A's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to JW-A's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to JW-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check JW-A's competition here

LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 55.3M. In comparison, JW-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.06, while JW-B trades at $53.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.29, whereas JW-B's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to JW-B's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to JW-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check JW-B's competition here

LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 55.3M. In comparison, TPCO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $9.06, while TPCO trades at $17.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.29, whereas TPCO's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TPCO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to TPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check TPCO's competition here