Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (NASDAQ: LEE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (NASDAQ: LEE) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 45.6M. In comparison, NYT has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $7.47 on the NASDAQ, while NYT trades at $71.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas NYT's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to NYT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to NYT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check NYT's competition here

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (NASDAQ: LEE) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 45.6M. In comparison, PSO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $7.47 on the NASDAQ, while PSO trades at $16.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas PSO's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PSO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to PSO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check PSO's competition here

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (NASDAQ: LEE) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 45.6M. In comparison, MDP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $7.47 on the NASDAQ, while MDP trades at $59.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas MDP's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MDP's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to MDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check MDP's competition here

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (NASDAQ: LEE) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 45.6M. In comparison, WLYB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $7.47 on the NASDAQ, while WLYB trades at $50.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas WLYB's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WLYB's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to WLYB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check WLYB's competition here

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (NASDAQ: LEE) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 45.6M. In comparison, WLY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $7.47 on the NASDAQ, while WLY trades at $49.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas WLY's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WLY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to WLY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check WLY's competition here

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (NASDAQ: LEE) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 45.6M. In comparison, TDAY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $7.47 on the NASDAQ, while TDAY trades at $8.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas TDAY's P/E ratio is 69.92. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TDAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to TDAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check TDAY's competition here

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (NASDAQ: LEE) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 45.6M. In comparison, SCHL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $7.47 on the NASDAQ, while SCHL trades at $43.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas SCHL's P/E ratio is 56.04. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SCHL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is less volatile compared to SCHL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check SCHL's competition here

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (NASDAQ: LEE) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 45.6M. In comparison, GCI has a market cap of 872.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $7.47 on the NASDAQ, while GCI trades at $5.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas GCI's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to GCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check GCI's competition here

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (NASDAQ: LEE) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 45.6M. In comparison, DALN has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $7.47 on the NASDAQ, while DALN trades at $16.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas DALN's P/E ratio is -17.02. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DALN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to DALN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check DALN's competition here

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (NASDAQ: LEE) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 45.6M. In comparison, GAMB has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $7.47 on the NASDAQ, while GAMB trades at $1.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas GAMB's P/E ratio is 2.04. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GAMB's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to GAMB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check GAMB's competition here

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (NASDAQ: LEE) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 45.6M. In comparison, AHC has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $7.47 on the NASDAQ, while AHC trades at $7.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas AHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to AHC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to AHC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check AHC's competition here

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (NASDAQ: LEE) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 45.6M. In comparison, EDUC has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $7.47 on the NASDAQ, while EDUC trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas EDUC's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to EDUC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to EDUC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check EDUC's competition here

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (NASDAQ: LEE) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 45.6M. In comparison, IDW has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $7.47 on the NASDAQ, while IDW trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas IDW's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to IDW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is less volatile compared to IDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check IDW's competition here

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (NASDAQ: LEE) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 45.6M. In comparison, TNMG has a market cap of 477.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $7.47 on the NASDAQ, while TNMG trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas TNMG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TNMG's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is less volatile compared to TNMG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check TNMG's competition here

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (NASDAQ: LEE) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 45.6M. In comparison, JW-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $7.47 on the NASDAQ, while JW-B trades at $53.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas JW-B's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to JW-B's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to JW-B. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check JW-B's competition here

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (NASDAQ: LEE) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 45.6M. In comparison, JW-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $7.47 on the NASDAQ, while JW-A trades at $53.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas JW-A's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to JW-A's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to JW-A. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check JW-A's competition here

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (NASDAQ: LEE) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 45.6M. In comparison, TPCO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $7.47 on the NASDAQ, while TPCO trades at $17.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas TPCO's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TPCO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to TPCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check TPCO's competition here