Public Storage

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PLD has a market cap of 97.74B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PLD trades at $105.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PLD's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to PLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PSA-PK has a market cap of 52.47B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PSA-PK trades at $18.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PSA-PK's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to PSA-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PSA-PH has a market cap of 52.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PSA-PH trades at $22.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PSA-PH's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to PSA-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PLDGP has a market cap of 41.70B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PLDGP trades at $54.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PLDGP's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLDGP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to PLDGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, EXR has a market cap of 31.70B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while EXR trades at $149.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas EXR's P/E ratio is 37.07. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EXR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to EXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, SEGXF has a market cap of 12.98B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while SEGXF trades at $9.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas SEGXF's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SEGXF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to SEGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, LSI has a market cap of 11.33B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while LSI trades at $133.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas LSI's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to LSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, LINE has a market cap of 10.12B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while LINE trades at $44.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas LINE's P/E ratio is -12.54. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LINE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to LINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, CUBE has a market cap of 9.81B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while CUBE trades at $42.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas CUBE's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CUBE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to CUBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, EGP has a market cap of 8.76B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while EGP trades at $166.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas EGP's P/E ratio is 35.79. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EGP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to EGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, REXR-PB has a market cap of 8.17B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while REXR-PB trades at $23.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas REXR-PB's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REXR-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to REXR-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, REXR has a market cap of 8.11B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while REXR trades at $34.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas REXR's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REXR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to REXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, FNCDY has a market cap of 6.76B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while FNCDY trades at $15.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas FNCDY's P/E ratio is 84.72. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FNCDY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to FNCDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, FR has a market cap of 6.47B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while FR trades at $48.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas FR's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to FR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, STAG has a market cap of 6.29B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while STAG trades at $33.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas STAG's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STAG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to STAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, TRNO has a market cap of 5.86B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while TRNO trades at $56.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas TRNO's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TRNO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to TRNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, FBBPF has a market cap of 5.81B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while FBBPF trades at $3.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas FBBPF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FBBPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to FBBPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, WDPSF has a market cap of 5.48B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while WDPSF trades at $24.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas WDPSF's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WDPSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to WDPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, COLD has a market cap of 5.33B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while COLD trades at $18.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas COLD's P/E ratio is -56.71. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to COLD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to COLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, REXR-PC has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while REXR-PC trades at $22.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas REXR-PC's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REXR-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to REXR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, NSA-PA has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while NSA-PA trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas NSA-PA's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NSA-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to NSA-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, MAPIF has a market cap of 4.93B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while MAPIF trades at $1.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas MAPIF's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MAPIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to MAPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, NPONF has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while NPONF trades at $1,408.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas NPONF's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NPONF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to NPONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, MAPGF has a market cap of 4.29B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while MAPGF trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas MAPGF's P/E ratio is 28.20. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MAPGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to MAPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PSA-PF has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PSA-PF trades at $20.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PSA-PF's P/E ratio is 2.01. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to PSA-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PSA-PG has a market cap of 3.61B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PSA-PG trades at $20.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PSA-PG's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to PSA-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PSA-PI has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PSA-PI trades at $19.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PSA-PI's P/E ratio is 1.90. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to PSA-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PSA-PJ has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PSA-PJ trades at $18.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PSA-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to PSA-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PSA-PL has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PSA-PL trades at $18.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PSA-PL's P/E ratio is 1.82. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to PSA-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PSA-PM has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PSA-PM trades at $16.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PSA-PM's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to PSA-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, NSA has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while NSA trades at $37.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas NSA's P/E ratio is 33.13. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NSA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to NSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PSA-PS has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PSA-PS trades at $16.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PSA-PS's P/E ratio is 1.58. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to PSA-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, GRP-UN has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while GRP-UN trades at $45.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas GRP-UN's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GRP-UN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to GRP-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PSA-PP has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PSA-PP trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PSA-PP's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to PSA-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PSA-PR has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PSA-PR trades at $15.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PSA-PR's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to PSA-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PSA-PN has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PSA-PN trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PSA-PN's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to PSA-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PSA-PQ has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PSA-PQ trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PSA-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PQ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to PSA-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PSA-PO has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PSA-PO trades at $15.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PSA-PO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to PSA-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, BYLOF has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while BYLOF trades at $13.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas BYLOF's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BYLOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to BYLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, LXP-PC has a market cap of 2.41B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while LXP-PC trades at $45.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas LXP-PC's P/E ratio is 37.27. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LXP-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to LXP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, LXP has a market cap of 2.38B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while LXP trades at $8.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas LXP's P/E ratio is 40.30. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LXP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to LXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, FRLOF has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while FRLOF trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas FRLOF's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FRLOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to FRLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, LXILF has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while LXILF trades at $1.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas LXILF's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LXILF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to LXILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, BUNNF has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while BUNNF trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas BUNNF's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BUNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to BUNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, DREUF has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while DREUF trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas DREUF's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DREUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to DREUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, GRFFF has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while GRFFF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas GRFFF's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GRFFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to GRFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, SFSHF has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while SFSHF trades at $8.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas SFSHF's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SFSHF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to SFSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, IIPR-PA has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while IIPR-PA trades at $24.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas IIPR-PA's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IIPR-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to IIPR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, IIPR has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while IIPR trades at $54.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas IIPR's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IIPR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to IIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, CBAOF has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while CBAOF trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas CBAOF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CBAOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to CBAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, SCCD has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while SCCD trades at $21.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas SCCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SCCD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to SCCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, DBMBF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while DBMBF trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas DBMBF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DBMBF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to DBMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PMTU has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PMTU trades at $25.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PMTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PMTU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to PMTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, SCCE has a market cap of 931.72M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while SCCE trades at $19.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas SCCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SCCE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to SCCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, RCC has a market cap of 770.23M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while RCC trades at $24.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas RCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RCC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to RCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, LANDO has a market cap of 752.64M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while LANDO trades at $20.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas LANDO's P/E ratio is -72.22. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LANDO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to LANDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PLYM has a market cap of 698.02M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PLYM trades at $15.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PLYM's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLYM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to PLYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PCILF has a market cap of 697.17M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PCILF trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PCILF's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PCILF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to PCILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, EPCFF has a market cap of 630.80M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while EPCFF trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas EPCFF's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EPCFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to EPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, TFSA has a market cap of 591.37M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while TFSA trades at $24.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas TFSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TFSA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to TFSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, DHCNI has a market cap of 489.95M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while DHCNI trades at $13.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas DHCNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DHCNI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to DHCNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, TPTA has a market cap of 431.25M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while TPTA trades at $17.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas TPTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TPTA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to TPTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, NHPAP has a market cap of 400.39M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while NHPAP trades at $14.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas NHPAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NHPAP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to NHPAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, EFRTF has a market cap of 358.39M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while EFRTF trades at $5.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas EFRTF's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EFRTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to EFRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, LANDM has a market cap of 355.88M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while LANDM trades at $24.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas LANDM's P/E ratio is -224.55. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LANDM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to LANDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, LAND has a market cap of 348.82M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while LAND trades at $9.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas LAND's P/E ratio is -33.24. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to LAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, SBBSF has a market cap of 262.14M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while SBBSF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas SBBSF's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SBBSF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to SBBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, LPA has a market cap of 213.45M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while LPA trades at $6.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas LPA's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LPA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to LPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, ILPT has a market cap of 189.83M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while ILPT trades at $2.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas ILPT's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILPT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to ILPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PLYM-PA has a market cap of 186.61M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PLYM-PA trades at $24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PLYM-PA's P/E ratio is -27.36. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLYM-PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to PLYM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, CGIUF has a market cap of 153.27M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while CGIUF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas CGIUF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGIUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to CGIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, LVVP has a market cap of 146.76M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while LVVP trades at $7.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas LVVP's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LVVP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to LVVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, AJXA has a market cap of 140.85M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while AJXA trades at $25.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas AJXA's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AJXA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to AJXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, SCCB has a market cap of 116.72M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while SCCB trades at $24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas SCCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SCCB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to SCCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, SACC has a market cap of 99.02M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while SACC trades at $24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas SACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SACC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to SACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, DOLHF has a market cap of 69.11M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while DOLHF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas DOLHF's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DOLHF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to DOLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, SELF has a market cap of 58.96M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while SELF trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas SELF's P/E ratio is 27.37. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SELF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to SELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, SCCF has a market cap of 48.41M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while SCCF trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas SCCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SCCF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to SCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, RGGLF has a market cap of 29.58M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while RGGLF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas RGGLF's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RGGLF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to RGGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, PW-PA has a market cap of 3.98M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while PW-PA trades at $3.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas PW-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PW-PA's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to PW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, QTS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while QTS trades at $77.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas QTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QTS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to QTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, SMMCF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while SMMCF trades at $17.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas SMMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMMCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to SMMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, MNR-PC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while MNR-PC trades at $25.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas MNR-PC's P/E ratio is 81.65. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MNR-PC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to MNR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, DRE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while DRE trades at $48.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas DRE's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is less volatile compared to DRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, CONE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while CONE trades at $90.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas CONE's P/E ratio is 451.80. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CONE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to CONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, QTS-PA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while QTS-PA trades at $25.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas QTS-PA's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QTS-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to QTS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.

PSA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA stands at 52.67B. In comparison, QTS-PB comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PSA is priced at $300.26, while QTS-PB trades at $172.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.76, whereas QTS-PB's P/E ratio is -387.38. In terms of profitability, PSA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QTS-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA is more volatile compared to QTS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA.