Public Storage

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PLD has a market cap of 96.98B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PLD trades at $104.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PLD's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to PLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PSA-PH has a market cap of 52.67B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PSA-PH trades at $22.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PSA-PH's P/E ratio is 2.20. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to PSA-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PSA-PK has a market cap of 52.56B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PSA-PK trades at $18.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PSA-PK's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to PSA-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PSA has a market cap of 52.25B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PSA trades at $297.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PSA's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to PSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PLDGP has a market cap of 41.71B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PLDGP trades at $54.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PLDGP's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLDGP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to PLDGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, EXR has a market cap of 31.24B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while EXR trades at $147.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas EXR's P/E ratio is 34.15. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EXR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to EXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, SEGXF has a market cap of 12.85B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while SEGXF trades at $9.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas SEGXF's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SEGXF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to SEGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, LSI has a market cap of 11.33B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while LSI trades at $133.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas LSI's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to LSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, LINE has a market cap of 10.01B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while LINE trades at $43.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas LINE's P/E ratio is -16.21. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LINE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to LINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, CUBE has a market cap of 9.62B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while CUBE trades at $42.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas CUBE's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CUBE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to CUBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, EGP has a market cap of 8.68B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while EGP trades at $165.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas EGP's P/E ratio is 35.47. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EGP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to EGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, REXR-PB has a market cap of 8.10B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while REXR-PB trades at $23.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas REXR-PB's P/E ratio is 26.55. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REXR-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to REXR-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, REXR has a market cap of 7.98B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while REXR trades at $33.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas REXR's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REXR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to REXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, FNCDY has a market cap of 6.86B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while FNCDY trades at $15.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas FNCDY's P/E ratio is 85.94. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FNCDY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to FNCDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, FR has a market cap of 6.43B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while FR trades at $48.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas FR's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to FR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, STAG has a market cap of 6.19B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while STAG trades at $33.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas STAG's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STAG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to STAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, FBBPF has a market cap of 5.81B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while FBBPF trades at $3.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas FBBPF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FBBPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to FBBPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, TRNO has a market cap of 5.80B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while TRNO trades at $56.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas TRNO's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TRNO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to TRNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, WDPSF has a market cap of 5.48B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while WDPSF trades at $24.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas WDPSF's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WDPSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to WDPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, REXR-PC has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while REXR-PC trades at $22.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas REXR-PC's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REXR-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to REXR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, COLD has a market cap of 5.18B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while COLD trades at $18.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas COLD's P/E ratio is -55.18. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to COLD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to COLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, NSA-PA has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while NSA-PA trades at $22.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas NSA-PA's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NSA-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to NSA-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, NPONF has a market cap of 4.79B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while NPONF trades at $1,408.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas NPONF's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NPONF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to NPONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, MAPGF has a market cap of 4.29B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while MAPGF trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas MAPGF's P/E ratio is 28.20. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MAPGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to MAPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, MAPIF has a market cap of 4.19B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while MAPIF trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas MAPIF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MAPIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to MAPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PSA-PF has a market cap of 3.64B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PSA-PF trades at $20.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PSA-PF's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to PSA-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PSA-PG has a market cap of 3.61B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PSA-PG trades at $20.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PSA-PG's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to PSA-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PSA-PI has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PSA-PI trades at $19.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PSA-PI's P/E ratio is 1.91. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to PSA-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PSA-PJ has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PSA-PJ trades at $18.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PSA-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to PSA-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PSA-PL has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PSA-PL trades at $18.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PSA-PL's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to PSA-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PSA-PM has a market cap of 2.95B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PSA-PM trades at $16.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PSA-PM's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to PSA-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PSA-PP has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PSA-PP trades at $16.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PSA-PP's P/E ratio is 1.57. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to PSA-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PSA-PR has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PSA-PR trades at $16.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PSA-PR's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to PSA-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, GRP-UN has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while GRP-UN trades at $45.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas GRP-UN's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GRP-UN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to GRP-UN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PSA-PN has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PSA-PN trades at $15.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PSA-PN's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to PSA-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PSA-PQ has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PSA-PQ trades at $15.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PSA-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PQ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to PSA-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PSA-PO has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PSA-PO trades at $15.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PSA-PO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSA-PO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to PSA-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, NSA has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while NSA trades at $35.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas NSA's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NSA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to NSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, BYLOF has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while BYLOF trades at $13.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas BYLOF's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BYLOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to BYLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, LXP-PC has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while LXP-PC trades at $46.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas LXP-PC's P/E ratio is 37.92. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LXP-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to LXP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, LXP has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while LXP trades at $7.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas LXP's P/E ratio is 39.82. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LXP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to LXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, FRLOF has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while FRLOF trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas FRLOF's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FRLOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to FRLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, LXILF has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while LXILF trades at $1.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas LXILF's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LXILF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to LXILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, BUNNF has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while BUNNF trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas BUNNF's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BUNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to BUNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, DREUF has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while DREUF trades at $7.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas DREUF's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DREUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to DREUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, GRFFF has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while GRFFF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas GRFFF's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GRFFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to GRFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, SFSHF has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while SFSHF trades at $8.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas SFSHF's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SFSHF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to SFSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, IIPR-PA has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while IIPR-PA trades at $24.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas IIPR-PA's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IIPR-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to IIPR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, CBAOF has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while CBAOF trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas CBAOF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CBAOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to CBAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, IIPR has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while IIPR trades at $52.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas IIPR's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IIPR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to IIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, DBMBF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while DBMBF trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas DBMBF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DBMBF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to DBMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PMTU has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PMTU trades at $25.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PMTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PMTU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to PMTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, SCCD has a market cap of 984.82M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while SCCD trades at $21.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas SCCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SCCD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to SCCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, SCCE has a market cap of 920.68M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while SCCE trades at $19.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas SCCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SCCE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to SCCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PCILF has a market cap of 908.07M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PCILF trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PCILF's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PCILF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to PCILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, RCC has a market cap of 755.15M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while RCC trades at $24.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas RCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RCC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to RCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, LANDO has a market cap of 750.90M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while LANDO trades at $20.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas LANDO's P/E ratio is -72.05. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LANDO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to LANDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PLYM has a market cap of 694.38M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PLYM trades at $15.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PLYM's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLYM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to PLYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, EPCFF has a market cap of 630.80M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while EPCFF trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas EPCFF's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EPCFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to EPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, TFSA has a market cap of 592.42M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while TFSA trades at $24.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas TFSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TFSA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to TFSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, DHCNI has a market cap of 588.64M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while DHCNI trades at $14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas DHCNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DHCNI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to DHCNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, TPTA has a market cap of 432.80M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while TPTA trades at $17.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas TPTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TPTA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to TPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, NHPAP has a market cap of 400.39M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while NHPAP trades at $14.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas NHPAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NHPAP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to NHPAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, EFRTF has a market cap of 358.39M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while EFRTF trades at $5.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas EFRTF's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EFRTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to EFRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, LANDM has a market cap of 356.89M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while LANDM trades at $24.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas LANDM's P/E ratio is -224.09. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LANDM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to LANDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, LAND has a market cap of 339.41M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while LAND trades at $9.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas LAND's P/E ratio is -32.34. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to LAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, SBBSF has a market cap of 262.14M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while SBBSF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas SBBSF's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SBBSF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to SBBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, LPA has a market cap of 201.25M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while LPA trades at $6.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas LPA's P/E ratio is -6.76. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LPA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to LPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, ILPT has a market cap of 190.49M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while ILPT trades at $2.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas ILPT's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILPT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to ILPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PLYM-PA has a market cap of 186.61M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PLYM-PA trades at $24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PLYM-PA's P/E ratio is -27.36. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLYM-PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to PLYM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, CGIUF has a market cap of 153.27M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while CGIUF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas CGIUF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGIUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to CGIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, LVVP has a market cap of 146.76M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while LVVP trades at $7.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas LVVP's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LVVP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to LVVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, AJXA has a market cap of 140.85M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while AJXA trades at $25.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas AJXA's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AJXA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to AJXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, SCCB has a market cap of 116.72M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while SCCB trades at $24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas SCCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SCCB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to SCCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, SACC has a market cap of 99.02M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while SACC trades at $24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas SACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SACC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to SACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, DOLHF has a market cap of 69.11M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while DOLHF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas DOLHF's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DOLHF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to DOLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, SELF has a market cap of 58.62M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while SELF trades at $5.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas SELF's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SELF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to SELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, SCCF has a market cap of 48.37M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while SCCF trades at $19.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas SCCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SCCF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to SCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, RGGLF has a market cap of 29.58M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while RGGLF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas RGGLF's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RGGLF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to RGGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, PW-PA has a market cap of 3.67M. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while PW-PA trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas PW-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PW-PA's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to PW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, QTS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while QTS trades at $77.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas QTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QTS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to QTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, SMMCF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while SMMCF trades at $17.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas SMMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMMCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to SMMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, MNR-PC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while MNR-PC trades at $25.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas MNR-PC's P/E ratio is 81.65. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MNR-PC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to MNR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, DRE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while DRE trades at $48.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas DRE's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is less volatile compared to DRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, CONE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while CONE trades at $90.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas CONE's P/E ratio is 451.80. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CONE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to CONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, QTS-PA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while QTS-PA trades at $25.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas QTS-PA's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QTS-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to QTS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.

PSA-PS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PSA-PS stands at 2.88B. In comparison, QTS-PB comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PSA-PS is priced at $16.39, while QTS-PB trades at $172.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PSA-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.59, whereas QTS-PB's P/E ratio is -387.38. In terms of profitability, PSA-PS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QTS-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSA-PS is more volatile compared to QTS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSA-PS.