Prysmian S.p.A.
Prysmian S.p.A. PRYMF Peers
See (PRYMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRYMF | $61.15 | N/A | 17.50B | 21.46 | $2.85 | +1.33% |
| ABBNY | $56.14 | +1.54% | 102.88B | 25.06 | $2.24 | +1.77% |
| ABLZF | $55.30 | -1.31% | 101.34B | 24.69 | $2.24 | +1.84% |
| DLEGF | $4.35 | N/A | 52.50B | 87.00 | $0.05 | +0.32% |
| MIELY | $38.51 | -2.83% | 40.24B | 17.75 | $2.17 | +0.86% |
| MIELF | $18.35 | -10.75% | 38.08B | 16.99 | $1.08 | +1.84% |
| LGRDY | $24.24 | +1.69% | 31.78B | 23.77 | $1.02 | +1.86% |
| LGRVF | $104.29 | -0.42% | 27.34B | 20.49 | $5.09 | +1.94% |
| PRYMY | $31.34 | +4.02% | 17.96B | 21.92 | $1.43 | +0.85% |
| FELTY | $11.59 | -0.94% | 6.62B | 10.35 | $1.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PRYMF vs ABBNY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, ABBNY has a market cap of 102.88B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while ABBNY trades at $56.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas ABBNY's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABBNY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to ABBNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs ABLZF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, ABLZF has a market cap of 101.34B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while ABLZF trades at $55.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas ABLZF's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABLZF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to ABLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs DLEGF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, DLEGF has a market cap of 52.50B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while DLEGF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas DLEGF's P/E ratio is 87.00. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DLEGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to DLEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs MIELY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, MIELY has a market cap of 40.24B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while MIELY trades at $38.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas MIELY's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MIELY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to MIELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs MIELF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, MIELF has a market cap of 38.08B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while MIELF trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas MIELF's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MIELF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to MIELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs LGRDY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, LGRDY has a market cap of 31.78B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while LGRDY trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas LGRDY's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LGRDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to LGRDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs LGRVF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, LGRVF has a market cap of 27.34B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while LGRVF trades at $104.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas LGRVF's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LGRVF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to LGRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs PRYMY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, PRYMY has a market cap of 17.96B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while PRYMY trades at $31.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas PRYMY's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRYMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to PRYMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs FELTY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, FELTY has a market cap of 6.62B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while FELTY trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas FELTY's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FELTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to FELTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs FELTF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, FELTF has a market cap of 6.56B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while FELTF trades at $44.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas FELTF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FELTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to FELTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs YASKF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, YASKF has a market cap of 5.71B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while YASKF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas YASKF's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YASKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to YASKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs PHPPY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, PHPPY has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while PHPPY trades at $11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas PHPPY's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PHPPY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to PHPPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs OSAGF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, OSAGF has a market cap of 5.18B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while OSAGF trades at $53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas OSAGF's P/E ratio is -157.35. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OSAGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to OSAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs NEXNY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, NEXNY has a market cap of 5.06B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while NEXNY trades at $57.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas NEXNY's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to NEXNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs NXPRF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, NXPRF has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while NXPRF trades at $110.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas NXPRF's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NXPRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to NXPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs OSAGY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, OSAGY has a market cap of 4.65B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while OSAGY trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas OSAGY's P/E ratio is -8.24. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OSAGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to OSAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs NRKBF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, NRKBF has a market cap of 4.19B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while NRKBF trades at $78.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas NRKBF's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NRKBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to NRKBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs FUWAF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, FUWAF has a market cap of 3.40B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while FUWAF trades at $48.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas FUWAF's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FUWAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to FUWAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs YASKY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, YASKY has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while YASKY trades at $46.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas YASKY's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YASKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to YASKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs LMHDF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, LMHDF has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while LMHDF trades at $2,548.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas LMHDF's P/E ratio is 40.16. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LMHDF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to LMHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs SFFYF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, SFFYF has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while SFFYF trades at $21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas SFFYF's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SFFYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to SFFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs FUWAY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, FUWAY has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while FUWAY trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas FUWAY's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FUWAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to FUWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs LGYRF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, LGYRF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while LGYRF trades at $63.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas LGYRF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LGYRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to LGYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs GYUAF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, GYUAF has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while GYUAF trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas GYUAF's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GYUAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to GYUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs LDGYY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, LDGYY has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while LDGYY trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas LDGYY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LDGYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to LDGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs HMDPF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, HMDPF has a market cap of 891.80M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while HMDPF trades at $74.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas HMDPF's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HMDPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to HMDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs ALFNF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, ALFNF has a market cap of 884.77M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while ALFNF trades at $40.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas ALFNF's P/E ratio is 92.50. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALFNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to ALFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs VARGF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, VARGF has a market cap of 861.36M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while VARGF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas VARGF's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VARGF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to VARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs HOIEF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, HOIEF has a market cap of 633.04M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while HOIEF trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas HOIEF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HOIEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to HOIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs VLXGF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, VLXGF has a market cap of 597.41M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while VLXGF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas VLXGF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VLXGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to VLXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs EFLVF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, EFLVF has a market cap of 591.85M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while EFLVF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas EFLVF's P/E ratio is -179.50. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EFLVF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to EFLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs CBLNF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, CBLNF has a market cap of 586.63M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while CBLNF trades at $24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas CBLNF's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBLNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to CBLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs CBLNY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, CBLNY has a market cap of 557.59M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while CBLNY trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas CBLNY's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBLNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to CBLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs WSPCF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, WSPCF has a market cap of 536.07M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while WSPCF trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas WSPCF's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WSPCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to WSPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs RNRTY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, RNRTY has a market cap of 513.82M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while RNRTY trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas RNRTY's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RNRTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to RNRTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs ZMTBY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, ZMTBY has a market cap of 417.28M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while ZMTBY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas ZMTBY's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZMTBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to ZMTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs COSXF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, COSXF has a market cap of 343.06M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while COSXF trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas COSXF's P/E ratio is 52.13. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to COSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs XPPLF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, XPPLF has a market cap of 279.67M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while XPPLF trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas XPPLF's P/E ratio is -18.56. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XPPLF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to XPPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs ABHBY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, ABHBY has a market cap of 260.87M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while ABHBY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas ABHBY's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABHBY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to ABHBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs NVNXF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, NVNXF has a market cap of 211.43M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while NVNXF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas NVNXF's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NVNXF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to NVNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs CPWHF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, CPWHF has a market cap of 202.07M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while CPWHF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas CPWHF's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPWHF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to CPWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs CRPHY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, CRPHY has a market cap of 193.50M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while CRPHY trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas CRPHY's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRPHY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to CRPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs PCELF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, PCELF has a market cap of 152.84M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while PCELF trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas PCELF's P/E ratio is -18.86. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCELF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to PCELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs TNPOF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, TNPOF has a market cap of 115.40M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while TNPOF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas TNPOF's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TNPOF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to TNPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs AFGYF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, AFGYF has a market cap of 113.69M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while AFGYF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas AFGYF's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFGYF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to AFGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs FCELB Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, FCELB has a market cap of 103.59M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while FCELB trades at $325.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas FCELB's P/E ratio is -1055.19. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FCELB's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to FCELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs TGEN Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 97.94M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while TGEN trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -20.63. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs VARTY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, VARTY has a market cap of 89.55M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while VARTY trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas VARTY's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VARTY's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to VARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs ONMBF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, ONMBF has a market cap of 84.33M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while ONMBF trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas ONMBF's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ONMBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to ONMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs ILIKF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, ILIKF has a market cap of 80.36M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while ILIKF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas ILIKF's P/E ratio is -15.93. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ILIKF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to ILIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs TNTLF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, TNTLF has a market cap of 60.63M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while TNTLF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas TNTLF's P/E ratio is -59.63. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TNTLF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to TNTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs DIALF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, DIALF has a market cap of 56.81M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while DIALF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas DIALF's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DIALF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to DIALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs EXROF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, EXROF has a market cap of 49.52M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while EXROF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas EXROF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXROF's ROE of -3.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to EXROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs ARTGF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, ARTGF has a market cap of 45.84M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while ARTGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas ARTGF's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARTGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to ARTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs GELNF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, GELNF has a market cap of 41.56M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while GELNF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas GELNF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GELNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to GELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs MNSEF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, MNSEF has a market cap of 19.30M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while MNSEF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas MNSEF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MNSEF's ROE of -3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to MNSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs NHHHF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, NHHHF has a market cap of 16.52M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while NHHHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas NHHHF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NHHHF's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to NHHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs QBAK Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, QBAK has a market cap of 13.19M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while QBAK trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas QBAK's P/E ratio is -18.42. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QBAK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to QBAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs IHGP Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, IHGP has a market cap of 12.67M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while IHGP trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas IHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IHGP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to IHGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs LPSIF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, LPSIF has a market cap of 10.50M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while LPSIF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas LPSIF's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LPSIF's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to LPSIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs ORBT Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, ORBT has a market cap of 9.01M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while ORBT trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas ORBT's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORBT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to ORBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs SSCFF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, SSCFF has a market cap of 8.12M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while SSCFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas SSCFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SSCFF's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to SSCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs DFEL Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, DFEL has a market cap of 5.25M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while DFEL trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas DFEL's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DFEL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to DFEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs ASTO Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, ASTO has a market cap of 4.86M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while ASTO trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas ASTO's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASTO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to ASTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs LNNNF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, LNNNF has a market cap of 3.54M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while LNNNF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas LNNNF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LNNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to LNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs GPGC Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, GPGC has a market cap of 3.39M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while GPGC trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas GPGC's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to GPGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs CECBF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, CECBF has a market cap of 3.36M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while CECBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas CECBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CECBF's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to CECBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs HYEG Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, HYEG has a market cap of 3.18M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while HYEG trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas HYEG's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYEG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to HYEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs LPENF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, LPENF has a market cap of 2.75M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while LPENF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas LPENF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LPENF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to LPENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs OZSC Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, OZSC has a market cap of 2.54M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while OZSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas OZSC's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OZSC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to OZSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs EGTYF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, EGTYF has a market cap of 2.44M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while EGTYF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas EGTYF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EGTYF's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to EGTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs ENEVF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, ENEVF has a market cap of 1.77M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while ENEVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas ENEVF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ENEVF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to ENEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs GBLTF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, GBLTF has a market cap of 1.62M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while GBLTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas GBLTF's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GBLTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to GBLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs ZAIRF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, ZAIRF has a market cap of 1.60M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while ZAIRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas ZAIRF's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZAIRF's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to ZAIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs TOGI Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, TOGI has a market cap of 1.32M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while TOGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas TOGI's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TOGI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to TOGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs BSTK Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, BSTK has a market cap of 1.02M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while BSTK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas BSTK's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BSTK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to BSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs LNNNY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, LNNNY has a market cap of 980070.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while LNNNY trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas LNNNY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LNNNY's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to LNNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs CAPC Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, CAPC has a market cap of 976538.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while CAPC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas CAPC's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAPC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to CAPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs KRFG Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, KRFG has a market cap of 665079.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while KRFG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas KRFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRFG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to KRFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs SGLN Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, SGLN has a market cap of 569012.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while SGLN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas SGLN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGLN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to SGLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs USLG Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, USLG has a market cap of 561605.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while USLG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas USLG's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to USLG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to USLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs PSTO Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, PSTO has a market cap of 357398.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while PSTO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas PSTO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSTO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to PSTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs IMHCW Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, IMHCW has a market cap of 203961.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while IMHCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas IMHCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IMHCW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to IMHCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs AIPG Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, AIPG has a market cap of 40246.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while AIPG trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas AIPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIPG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to AIPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs DCFCQ Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, DCFCQ has a market cap of 30251.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while DCFCQ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas DCFCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DCFCQ's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to DCFCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs TRUL Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, TRUL has a market cap of 21391.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while TRUL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas TRUL's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRUL's ROE of +7.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to TRUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs EIPC Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, EIPC has a market cap of 20735.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while EIPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas EIPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EIPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to EIPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs IDGC Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, IDGC has a market cap of 18437.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while IDGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas IDGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IDGC's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to IDGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs DLYT Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, DLYT has a market cap of 13607.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while DLYT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas DLYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DLYT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to DLYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs CHGI Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, CHGI has a market cap of 12993.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while CHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas CHGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to CHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs FDEI Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, FDEI has a market cap of 11283.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while FDEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas FDEI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FDEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to FDEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs LSCG Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, LSCG has a market cap of 6534.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while LSCG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas LSCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LSCG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to LSCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs GNAL Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, GNAL has a market cap of 6061.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while GNAL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas GNAL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GNAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to GNAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs GCHT Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, GCHT has a market cap of 5947.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while GCHT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas GCHT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GCHT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to GCHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs USGA Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, USGA has a market cap of 4373.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while USGA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas USGA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to USGA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to USGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs GCLL Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, GCLL has a market cap of 3249.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while GCLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas GCLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GCLL's ROE of +3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to GCLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs HLXW Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, HLXW has a market cap of 2652.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while HLXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas HLXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLXW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to HLXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs XNNHQ Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, XNNHQ has a market cap of 2631.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while XNNHQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas XNNHQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XNNHQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to XNNHQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs TMGY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 17.50B. In comparison, TMGY has a market cap of 2347.00. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $61.15, while TMGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas TMGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is more volatile compared to TMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.