Prysmian S.p.A.
Prysmian S.p.A. PRYMF Peers
See (PRYMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRYMF | $67.17 | -1.29% | 19.3B | 24.97 | $2.69 | +1.15% |
| ABBNY | $57.43 | +0.21% | 105.6B | 25.64 | $2.24 | +1.72% |
| ABLZF | $58.16 | +2.45% | 105.6B | 25.96 | $2.24 | +1.80% |
| DLEGF | $4.35 | N/A | 54.3B | 87.00 | $0.05 | +0.32% |
| MIELF | $21.08 | +1.59% | 43.7B | 19.52 | $1.08 | +1.63% |
| MIELY | $40.79 | +0.37% | 42.4B | 18.71 | $2.18 | +0.81% |
| LGRDY | $24.99 | +1.59% | 32.8B | 24.50 | $1.02 | +1.95% |
| LGRVF | $123.11 | N/A | 32.3B | 24.14 | $5.10 | +1.63% |
| PRYMY | $33.32 | +0.53% | 19.1B | 24.32 | $1.37 | +1.20% |
| OSAGY | $51.10 | N/A | 14.8B | -26.34 | -$1.94 | +3.69% |
Stock Comparison
PRYMF vs ABBNY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, ABBNY has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while ABBNY trades at $57.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas ABBNY's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABBNY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to ABBNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs ABLZF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, ABLZF has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while ABLZF trades at $58.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas ABLZF's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABLZF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to ABLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs DLEGF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, DLEGF has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while DLEGF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas DLEGF's P/E ratio is 87.00. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLEGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to DLEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs MIELF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, MIELF has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while MIELF trades at $21.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas MIELF's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MIELF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to MIELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs MIELY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, MIELY has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while MIELY trades at $40.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas MIELY's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MIELY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to MIELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs LGRDY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, LGRDY has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while LGRDY trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas LGRDY's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGRDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to LGRDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs LGRVF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, LGRVF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while LGRVF trades at $123.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas LGRVF's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGRVF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to LGRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs PRYMY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, PRYMY has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while PRYMY trades at $33.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas PRYMY's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRYMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to PRYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs OSAGY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, OSAGY has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while OSAGY trades at $51.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas OSAGY's P/E ratio is -26.34. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OSAGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to OSAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs FELTF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, FELTF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while FELTF trades at $44.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas FELTF's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FELTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to FELTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs FELTY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, FELTY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while FELTY trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas FELTY's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FELTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to FELTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs PHPPY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, PHPPY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while PHPPY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas PHPPY's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PHPPY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and PHPPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs YASKF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, YASKF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while YASKF trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas YASKF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YASKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and YASKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs OSAGF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, OSAGF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while OSAGF trades at $53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas OSAGF's P/E ratio is -157.35. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OSAGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to OSAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs NEXNY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, NEXNY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while NEXNY trades at $57.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas NEXNY's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to NEXNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs NXPRF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, NXPRF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while NXPRF trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas NXPRF's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NXPRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to NXPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs NRKBF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, NRKBF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while NRKBF trades at $78.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas NRKBF's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NRKBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to NRKBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs FUWAF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, FUWAF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while FUWAF trades at $48.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas FUWAF's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FUWAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and FUWAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs FUWAY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, FUWAY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while FUWAY trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas FUWAY's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FUWAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and FUWAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs SFFYF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, SFFYF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while SFFYF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas SFFYF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SFFYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and SFFYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs LMHDF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, LMHDF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while LMHDF trades at $2,548.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas LMHDF's P/E ratio is 40.16. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LMHDF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and LMHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs YASKY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, YASKY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while YASKY trades at $42.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas YASKY's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YASKY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to YASKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs LGYRF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, LGYRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while LGYRF trades at $61.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas LGYRF's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGYRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to LGYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs GYUAF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, GYUAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while GYUAF trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas GYUAF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GYUAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to GYUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs LDGYY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, LDGYY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while LDGYY trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas LDGYY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LDGYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to LDGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs HMDPF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, HMDPF has a market cap of 956M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while HMDPF trades at $80.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas HMDPF's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HMDPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to HMDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs ALFNF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, ALFNF has a market cap of 884.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while ALFNF trades at $40.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas ALFNF's P/E ratio is -29.28. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALFNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and ALFNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs VARGF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, VARGF has a market cap of 861.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while VARGF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas VARGF's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VARGF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and VARGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs HOIEF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, HOIEF has a market cap of 633M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while HOIEF trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas HOIEF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HOIEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to HOIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs VLXGF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, VLXGF has a market cap of 597.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while VLXGF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas VLXGF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VLXGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to VLXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs EFLVF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, EFLVF has a market cap of 591.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while EFLVF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas EFLVF's P/E ratio is -179.50. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EFLVF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to EFLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs CBLNF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CBLNF has a market cap of 586.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while CBLNF trades at $24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas CBLNF's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBLNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to CBLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs CBLNY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CBLNY has a market cap of 561.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while CBLNY trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas CBLNY's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBLNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to CBLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs WSPCF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, WSPCF has a market cap of 536.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while WSPCF trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas WSPCF's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WSPCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to WSPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs RNRTY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, RNRTY has a market cap of 513.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while RNRTY trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas RNRTY's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RNRTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and RNRTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs ZMTBY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, ZMTBY has a market cap of 417.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while ZMTBY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas ZMTBY's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZMTBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to ZMTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs COSXF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, COSXF has a market cap of 343.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while COSXF trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas COSXF's P/E ratio is 52.13. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to COSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs XPPLF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, XPPLF has a market cap of 277.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while XPPLF trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas XPPLF's P/E ratio is -18.06. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XPPLF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to XPPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs ABHBY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, ABHBY has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while ABHBY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas ABHBY's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABHBY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to ABHBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs CPWHF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CPWHF has a market cap of 213.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while CPWHF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas CPWHF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPWHF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and CPWHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs CRPHY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CRPHY has a market cap of 193.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while CRPHY trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas CRPHY's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRPHY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to CRPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs NVNXF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, NVNXF has a market cap of 171.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while NVNXF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas NVNXF's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NVNXF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to NVNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs TGEN Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 150.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while TGEN trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -33.17. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs PCELF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, PCELF has a market cap of 149.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while PCELF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas PCELF's P/E ratio is -18.46. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCELF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to PCELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs AFGYF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, AFGYF has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while AFGYF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas AFGYF's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFGYF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and AFGYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs FCELB Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, FCELB has a market cap of 121M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while FCELB trades at $327.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas FCELB's P/E ratio is -1063.31. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FCELB's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to FCELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs TNPOF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, TNPOF has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while TNPOF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas TNPOF's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNPOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to TNPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs VARTY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, VARTY has a market cap of 89.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while VARTY trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas VARTY's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VARTY's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to VARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs ONMBF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, ONMBF has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while ONMBF trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas ONMBF's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ONMBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to ONMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs ILIKF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, ILIKF has a market cap of 79.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while ILIKF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas ILIKF's P/E ratio is -14.68. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ILIKF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to ILIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs TNTLF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, TNTLF has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while TNTLF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas TNTLF's P/E ratio is -59.63. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNTLF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to TNTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs DIALF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, DIALF has a market cap of 56.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while DIALF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas DIALF's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DIALF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to DIALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs ARTGF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, ARTGF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while ARTGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas ARTGF's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARTGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to ARTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs GELNF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, GELNF has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while GELNF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas GELNF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GELNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and GELNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs EXROF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, EXROF has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while EXROF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas EXROF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EXROF's ROE of -3.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to EXROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs NHHHF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, NHHHF has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while NHHHF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas NHHHF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NHHHF's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to NHHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs QBAK Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, QBAK has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while QBAK trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas QBAK's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QBAK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to QBAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs IHGP Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, IHGP has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while IHGP trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas IHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IHGP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to IHGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs LPSIF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, LPSIF has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while LPSIF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas LPSIF's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LPSIF's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to LPSIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs MNSEF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, MNSEF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while MNSEF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas MNSEF's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MNSEF's ROE of -3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and MNSEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs ORBT Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, ORBT has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while ORBT trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas ORBT's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ORBT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to ORBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs SSCFF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, SSCFF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while SSCFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas SSCFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SSCFF's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to SSCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs DFEL Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, DFEL has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while DFEL trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas DFEL's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DFEL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to DFEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs ASTO Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, ASTO has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while ASTO trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas ASTO's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASTO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to ASTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs HYEG Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, HYEG has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while HYEG trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas HYEG's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HYEG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to HYEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs LNNNF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, LNNNF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while LNNNF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas LNNNF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LNNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and LNNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs GPGC Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, GPGC has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while GPGC trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas GPGC's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and GPGC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs CECBF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CECBF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while CECBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas CECBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CECBF's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to CECBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs LPENF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, LPENF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while LPENF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas LPENF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LPENF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to LPENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs EGTYF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, EGTYF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while EGTYF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas EGTYF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EGTYF's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and EGTYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs IDGC Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, IDGC has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while IDGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas IDGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IDGC's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and IDGC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs ENEVF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, ENEVF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while ENEVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas ENEVF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENEVF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to ENEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs OZSC Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, OZSC has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while OZSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas OZSC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OZSC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to OZSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs GBLTF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, GBLTF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while GBLTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas GBLTF's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GBLTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and GBLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs ZAIRF Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, ZAIRF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while ZAIRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas ZAIRF's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZAIRF's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and ZAIRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs TOGI Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, TOGI has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while TOGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas TOGI's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TOGI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to TOGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs CAPC Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CAPC has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while CAPC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas CAPC's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CAPC's ROE of -2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to CAPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs KRFG Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, KRFG has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while KRFG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas KRFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KRFG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to KRFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs LNNNY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, LNNNY has a market cap of 980.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while LNNNY trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas LNNNY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LNNNY's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to LNNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs BSTK Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BSTK has a market cap of 580.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while BSTK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas BSTK's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BSTK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to BSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs SGLN Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, SGLN has a market cap of 569K. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while SGLN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas SGLN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SGLN's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to SGLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs PSTO Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, PSTO has a market cap of 357.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while PSTO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas PSTO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PSTO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to PSTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs USLG Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, USLG has a market cap of 337K. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while USLG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas USLG's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to USLG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and USLG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs IMHCW Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, IMHCW has a market cap of 204K. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while IMHCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas IMHCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IMHCW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to IMHCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs EIPC Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, EIPC has a market cap of 20.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while EIPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas EIPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EIPC's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to EIPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs AIPG Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, AIPG has a market cap of 20K. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while AIPG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas AIPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIPG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and AIPG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs DLYT Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, DLYT has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while DLYT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas DLYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLYT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and DLYT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs CHGI Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CHGI has a market cap of 13K. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while CHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas CHGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and CHGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs FDEI Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, FDEI has a market cap of 11.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while FDEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas FDEI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FDEI's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to FDEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs LSCG Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, LSCG has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while LSCG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas LSCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LSCG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to LSCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs GNAL Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, GNAL has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while GNAL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas GNAL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GNAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and GNAL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs GCHT Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, GCHT has a market cap of 5.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while GCHT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas GCHT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GCHT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to GCHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs USGA Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, USGA has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while USGA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas USGA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to USGA's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to USGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs DCFCQ Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, DCFCQ has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while DCFCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas DCFCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCFCQ's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to DCFCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs GCLL Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, GCLL has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while GCLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas GCLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GCLL's ROE of +3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF is less volatile compared to GCLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYMF.
PRYMF vs HLXW Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, HLXW has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while HLXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas HLXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLXW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and HLXW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs XNNHQ Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, XNNHQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while XNNHQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas XNNHQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XNNHQ's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and XNNHQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs TMGY Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, TMGY has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while TMGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas TMGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TMGY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and TMGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRYMF vs AXPWQ Comparison
PRYMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYMF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, AXPWQ has a market cap of 960. Regarding current trading prices, PRYMF is priced at $67.17, while AXPWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYMF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.97, whereas AXPWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AXPWQ's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYMF and AXPWQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).