Pondy Oxides And Chemicals Limited
Pondy Oxides And Chemicals Limited (POCL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (POCL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POCL.BO | ₹1,161.50 | +4.40% | 35.1B | 30.81 | ₹37.36 | +0.30% |
| ASIANPAINT.NS | ₹2,394.90 | -0.75% | 2.3T | 60.27 | ₹40.09 | +1.04% |
| ASIANPAINT.BO | ₹2,395.00 | -0.76% | 2.3T | 60.06 | ₹40.22 | +1.04% |
| PIDILITIND.BO | ₹1,516.90 | +2.43% | 1.5T | 66.68 | ₹22.48 | +1.00% |
| PIDILITIND.NS | ₹1,516.90 | +2.46% | 1.5T | 66.53 | ₹22.51 | +1.00% |
| SOLARINDS.BO | ₹13,742.05 | +3.42% | 1.2T | 83.91 | ₹160.41 | +0.07% |
| SOLARINDS.NS | ₹13,755.00 | +3.58% | 1.2T | 83.89 | ₹160.44 | +0.07% |
| SRF.NS | ₹2,617.20 | +1.30% | 775.1B | 43.63 | ₹59.94 | +0.34% |
| SRF.BO | ₹2,617.25 | +1.35% | 774.7B | 43.45 | ₹60.15 | +0.34% |
| LINDEINDIA.BO | ₹6,894.25 | +3.82% | 572.7B | 96.81 | ₹69.37 | +0.18% |
Stock Comparison
POCL.BO vs ASIANPAINT.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, ASIANPAINT.NS has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while ASIANPAINT.NS trades at ₹2,394.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ASIANPAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 60.27. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASIANPAINT.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to ASIANPAINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check ASIANPAINT.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs ASIANPAINT.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, ASIANPAINT.BO has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while ASIANPAINT.BO trades at ₹2,395.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ASIANPAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 60.06. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASIANPAINT.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to ASIANPAINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check ASIANPAINT.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs PIDILITIND.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, PIDILITIND.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while PIDILITIND.BO trades at ₹1,516.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas PIDILITIND.BO's P/E ratio is 66.68. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PIDILITIND.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to PIDILITIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check PIDILITIND.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs PIDILITIND.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, PIDILITIND.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while PIDILITIND.NS trades at ₹1,516.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas PIDILITIND.NS's P/E ratio is 66.53. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PIDILITIND.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to PIDILITIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check PIDILITIND.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs SOLARINDS.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SOLARINDS.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while SOLARINDS.BO trades at ₹13,742.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas SOLARINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 83.91. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOLARINDS.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to SOLARINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check SOLARINDS.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs SOLARINDS.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SOLARINDS.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while SOLARINDS.NS trades at ₹13,755.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas SOLARINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 83.89. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOLARINDS.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to SOLARINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check SOLARINDS.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs SRF.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SRF.NS has a market cap of 775.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while SRF.NS trades at ₹2,617.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas SRF.NS's P/E ratio is 43.63. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SRF.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to SRF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check SRF.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs SRF.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SRF.BO has a market cap of 774.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while SRF.BO trades at ₹2,617.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas SRF.BO's P/E ratio is 43.45. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SRF.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to SRF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check SRF.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs LINDEINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, LINDEINDIA.BO has a market cap of 572.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while LINDEINDIA.BO trades at ₹6,894.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas LINDEINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 96.81. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LINDEINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to LINDEINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check LINDEINDIA.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs LINDEINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, LINDEINDIA.NS has a market cap of 572.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while LINDEINDIA.NS trades at ₹6,895.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas LINDEINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 96.67. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LINDEINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to LINDEINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check LINDEINDIA.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs BERGEPAINT.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, BERGEPAINT.NS has a market cap of 531.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while BERGEPAINT.NS trades at ₹459.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas BERGEPAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 50.56. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BERGEPAINT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to BERGEPAINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check BERGEPAINT.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs BERGEPAINT.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, BERGEPAINT.BO has a market cap of 531.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while BERGEPAINT.BO trades at ₹458.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas BERGEPAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 49.15. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BERGEPAINT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to BERGEPAINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check BERGEPAINT.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs FLUOROCHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, FLUOROCHEM.BO has a market cap of 383.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while FLUOROCHEM.BO trades at ₹3,440.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas FLUOROCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 58.39. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLUOROCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to FLUOROCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check FLUOROCHEM.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs HSCL.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, HSCL.NS has a market cap of 243.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while HSCL.NS trades at ₹483.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas HSCL.NS's P/E ratio is 34.11. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HSCL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to HSCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check HSCL.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs HSCL.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, HSCL.BO has a market cap of 243.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while HSCL.BO trades at ₹483.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas HSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 34.07. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HSCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to HSCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check HSCL.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs ATUL.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, ATUL.NS has a market cap of 192.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while ATUL.NS trades at ₹6,528.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ATUL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.41. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATUL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to ATUL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check ATUL.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs ATUL.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, ATUL.BO has a market cap of 192.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while ATUL.BO trades at ₹6,536.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ATUL.BO's P/E ratio is 32.40. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATUL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to ATUL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check ATUL.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs ACUTAAS.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, ACUTAAS.NS has a market cap of 177.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while ACUTAAS.NS trades at ₹2,185.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ACUTAAS.NS's P/E ratio is 61.94. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACUTAAS.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to ACUTAAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check ACUTAAS.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs ACUTAAS.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, ACUTAAS.BO has a market cap of 177.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while ACUTAAS.BO trades at ₹2,185.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ACUTAAS.BO's P/E ratio is 61.89. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACUTAAS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to ACUTAAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check ACUTAAS.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs DCMSHRIRAM.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, DCMSHRIRAM.NS has a market cap of 165.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while DCMSHRIRAM.NS trades at ₹1,063.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas DCMSHRIRAM.NS's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DCMSHRIRAM.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to DCMSHRIRAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check DCMSHRIRAM.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs AARTIIND.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, AARTIIND.NS has a market cap of 165.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while AARTIIND.NS trades at ₹455.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas AARTIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 43.84. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AARTIIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to AARTIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check AARTIIND.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs DCMSHRIRAM.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, DCMSHRIRAM.BO has a market cap of 165.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while DCMSHRIRAM.BO trades at ₹1,064.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas DCMSHRIRAM.BO's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DCMSHRIRAM.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to DCMSHRIRAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check DCMSHRIRAM.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs AARTIIND.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, AARTIIND.BO has a market cap of 165.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while AARTIIND.BO trades at ₹455.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas AARTIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 43.75. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AARTIIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to AARTIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check AARTIIND.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs KANSAINER.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, KANSAINER.BO has a market cap of 163B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while KANSAINER.BO trades at ₹200.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas KANSAINER.BO's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KANSAINER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to KANSAINER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check KANSAINER.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs KANSAINER.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, KANSAINER.NS has a market cap of 162.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while KANSAINER.NS trades at ₹200.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas KANSAINER.NS's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KANSAINER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to KANSAINER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check KANSAINER.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs VINATIORGA.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, VINATIORGA.BO has a market cap of 156.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while VINATIORGA.BO trades at ₹1,503.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas VINATIORGA.BO's P/E ratio is 35.38. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VINATIORGA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to VINATIORGA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check VINATIORGA.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs VINATIORGA.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, VINATIORGA.NS has a market cap of 156.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while VINATIORGA.NS trades at ₹1,501.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas VINATIORGA.NS's P/E ratio is 35.33. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VINATIORGA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to VINATIORGA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check VINATIORGA.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs BASF.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, BASF.NS has a market cap of 152.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while BASF.NS trades at ₹3,529.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas BASF.NS's P/E ratio is 40.30. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BASF.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to BASF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check BASF.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs BASF.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, BASF.BO has a market cap of 152.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while BASF.BO trades at ₹3,522.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas BASF.BO's P/E ratio is 40.62. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BASF.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to BASF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check BASF.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs FINEORG.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, FINEORG.BO has a market cap of 150B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while FINEORG.BO trades at ₹4,708.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas FINEORG.BO's P/E ratio is 37.77. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FINEORG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to FINEORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check FINEORG.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs FINEORG.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, FINEORG.NS has a market cap of 149.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while FINEORG.NS trades at ₹4,709.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas FINEORG.NS's P/E ratio is 37.68. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FINEORG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to FINEORG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check FINEORG.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs ANURAS.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, ANURAS.NS has a market cap of 144.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while ANURAS.NS trades at ₹1,251.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ANURAS.NS's P/E ratio is 82.70. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ANURAS.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to ANURAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check ANURAS.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs ANURAS.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, ANURAS.BO has a market cap of 144.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while ANURAS.BO trades at ₹1,253.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ANURAS.BO's P/E ratio is 82.05. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ANURAS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to ANURAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check ANURAS.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs AKZOINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, AKZOINDIA.NS has a market cap of 140.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while AKZOINDIA.NS trades at ₹3,028.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas AKZOINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AKZOINDIA.NS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to AKZOINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check AKZOINDIA.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs AKZOINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, AKZOINDIA.BO has a market cap of 140.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while AKZOINDIA.BO trades at ₹3,029.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas AKZOINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AKZOINDIA.BO's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to AKZOINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check AKZOINDIA.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs AETHER.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, AETHER.NS has a market cap of 128.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while AETHER.NS trades at ₹961.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas AETHER.NS's P/E ratio is 59.67. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AETHER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to AETHER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check AETHER.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs AETHER.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, AETHER.BO has a market cap of 127.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while AETHER.BO trades at ₹958.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas AETHER.BO's P/E ratio is 59.17. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AETHER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to AETHER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check AETHER.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs SPLPETRO.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SPLPETRO.BO has a market cap of 121.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while SPLPETRO.BO trades at ₹649.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas SPLPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 45.49. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPLPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to SPLPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check SPLPETRO.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs PCBL.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, PCBL.NS has a market cap of 120.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while PCBL.NS trades at ₹300.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas PCBL.NS's P/E ratio is 45.41. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PCBL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to PCBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check PCBL.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs PCBL.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, PCBL.BO has a market cap of 120.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while PCBL.BO trades at ₹300.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas PCBL.BO's P/E ratio is 45.33. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PCBL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to PCBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check PCBL.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs PRIVISCL.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, PRIVISCL.BO has a market cap of 116B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while PRIVISCL.BO trades at ₹2,995.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas PRIVISCL.BO's P/E ratio is 38.61. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PRIVISCL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to PRIVISCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check PRIVISCL.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs PRIVISCL.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, PRIVISCL.NS has a market cap of 115.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while PRIVISCL.NS trades at ₹2,997.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas PRIVISCL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.56. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PRIVISCL.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to PRIVISCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check PRIVISCL.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs AMIORG.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, AMIORG.NS has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while AMIORG.NS trades at ₹1,176.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas AMIORG.NS's P/E ratio is 119.06. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMIORG.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to AMIORG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check AMIORG.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs AMIORG.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, AMIORG.BO has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while AMIORG.BO trades at ₹1,176.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas AMIORG.BO's P/E ratio is 118.95. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMIORG.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to AMIORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check AMIORG.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs JUBLINGREA.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, JUBLINGREA.BO has a market cap of 93.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while JUBLINGREA.BO trades at ₹593.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas JUBLINGREA.BO's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JUBLINGREA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to JUBLINGREA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check JUBLINGREA.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs GRWRHITECH.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, GRWRHITECH.BO has a market cap of 93.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while GRWRHITECH.BO trades at ₹4,097.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas GRWRHITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 30.38. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GRWRHITECH.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to GRWRHITECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check GRWRHITECH.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs GRWRHITECH.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, GRWRHITECH.NS has a market cap of 93.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while GRWRHITECH.NS trades at ₹4,107.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas GRWRHITECH.NS's P/E ratio is 30.41. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GRWRHITECH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to GRWRHITECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check GRWRHITECH.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs SHAILY.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SHAILY.BO has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while SHAILY.BO trades at ₹1,990.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas SHAILY.BO's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHAILY.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to SHAILY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check SHAILY.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs CLEAN.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, CLEAN.NS has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while CLEAN.NS trades at ₹722.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas CLEAN.NS's P/E ratio is 31.22. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CLEAN.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to CLEAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check CLEAN.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs CLEAN.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, CLEAN.BO has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while CLEAN.BO trades at ₹722.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas CLEAN.BO's P/E ratio is 31.16. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CLEAN.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to CLEAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check CLEAN.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs ALKYLAMINE.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, ALKYLAMINE.NS has a market cap of 76.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while ALKYLAMINE.NS trades at ₹1,491.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ALKYLAMINE.NS's P/E ratio is 42.30. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALKYLAMINE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to ALKYLAMINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check ALKYLAMINE.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs ALKYLAMINE.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, ALKYLAMINE.BO has a market cap of 76B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while ALKYLAMINE.BO trades at ₹1,489.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ALKYLAMINE.BO's P/E ratio is 42.18. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALKYLAMINE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to ALKYLAMINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check ALKYLAMINE.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs SUDARSCHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SUDARSCHEM.BO has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while SUDARSCHEM.BO trades at ₹887.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas SUDARSCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 132.14. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SUDARSCHEM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to SUDARSCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check SUDARSCHEM.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs SUDARSCHEM.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SUDARSCHEM.NS has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while SUDARSCHEM.NS trades at ₹886.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas SUDARSCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is -112.19. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SUDARSCHEM.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to SUDARSCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check SUDARSCHEM.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs GALAXYSURF.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, GALAXYSURF.NS has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while GALAXYSURF.NS trades at ₹1,970.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas GALAXYSURF.NS's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GALAXYSURF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to GALAXYSURF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check GALAXYSURF.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs GALAXYSURF.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, GALAXYSURF.BO has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while GALAXYSURF.BO trades at ₹1,971.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas GALAXYSURF.BO's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GALAXYSURF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to GALAXYSURF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check GALAXYSURF.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs KINGFA.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, KINGFA.BO has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while KINGFA.BO trades at ₹4,355.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas KINGFA.BO's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KINGFA.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to KINGFA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check KINGFA.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs KINGFA.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, KINGFA.NS has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while KINGFA.NS trades at ₹4,377.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas KINGFA.NS's P/E ratio is 35.17. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KINGFA.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to KINGFA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check KINGFA.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs GULFOILLUB.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, GULFOILLUB.BO has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while GULFOILLUB.BO trades at ₹1,093.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas GULFOILLUB.BO's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GULFOILLUB.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to GULFOILLUB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check GULFOILLUB.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs GULFOILLUB.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, GULFOILLUB.NS has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while GULFOILLUB.NS trades at ₹1,093.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas GULFOILLUB.NS's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GULFOILLUB.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to GULFOILLUB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check GULFOILLUB.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs RESPONIND.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, RESPONIND.NS has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while RESPONIND.NS trades at ₹176.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas RESPONIND.NS's P/E ratio is 26.40. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RESPONIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to RESPONIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check RESPONIND.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs RESPONIND.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, RESPONIND.BO has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while RESPONIND.BO trades at ₹176.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas RESPONIND.BO's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RESPONIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to RESPONIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check RESPONIND.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs INDIGOPNTS.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, INDIGOPNTS.BO has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while INDIGOPNTS.BO trades at ₹946.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas INDIGOPNTS.BO's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INDIGOPNTS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to INDIGOPNTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check INDIGOPNTS.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs INDIGOPNTS.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, INDIGOPNTS.NS has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while INDIGOPNTS.NS trades at ₹947.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas INDIGOPNTS.NS's P/E ratio is 31.45. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INDIGOPNTS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to INDIGOPNTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check INDIGOPNTS.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs TANFACIND.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TANFACIND.BO has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while TANFACIND.BO trades at ₹4,151.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas TANFACIND.BO's P/E ratio is 55.55. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TANFACIND.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to TANFACIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check TANFACIND.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs LXCHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, LXCHEM.BO has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while LXCHEM.BO trades at ₹131.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas LXCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 45.59. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LXCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to LXCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check LXCHEM.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs LXCHEM.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, LXCHEM.NS has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while LXCHEM.NS trades at ₹130.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas LXCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 45.67. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LXCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to LXCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check LXCHEM.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs BALAMINES.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, BALAMINES.BO has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while BALAMINES.BO trades at ₹1,091.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas BALAMINES.BO's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BALAMINES.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to BALAMINES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check BALAMINES.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs BALAMINES.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, BALAMINES.NS has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while BALAMINES.NS trades at ₹1,088.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas BALAMINES.NS's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BALAMINES.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to BALAMINES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check BALAMINES.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs NEOGEN.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, NEOGEN.NS has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while NEOGEN.NS trades at ₹1,451.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas NEOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 178.53. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NEOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to NEOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check NEOGEN.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs POCL.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, POCL.NS has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while POCL.NS trades at ₹1,164.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas POCL.NS's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to POCL.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to POCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check POCL.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs NEOGEN.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, NEOGEN.BO has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while NEOGEN.BO trades at ₹1,446.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas NEOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 177.03. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NEOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to NEOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check NEOGEN.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs VISHNU.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, VISHNU.NS has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while VISHNU.NS trades at ₹509.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas VISHNU.NS's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VISHNU.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to VISHNU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check VISHNU.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs VISHNU.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, VISHNU.BO has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while VISHNU.BO trades at ₹508.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas VISHNU.BO's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VISHNU.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to VISHNU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check VISHNU.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs ADVENZYMES.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, ADVENZYMES.NS has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while ADVENZYMES.NS trades at ₹300.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ADVENZYMES.NS's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADVENZYMES.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to ADVENZYMES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check ADVENZYMES.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs ADVENZYMES.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, ADVENZYMES.BO has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while ADVENZYMES.BO trades at ₹300.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ADVENZYMES.BO's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADVENZYMES.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to ADVENZYMES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check ADVENZYMES.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs GRAUWEIL.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, GRAUWEIL.BO has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while GRAUWEIL.BO trades at ₹64.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas GRAUWEIL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.89. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GRAUWEIL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to GRAUWEIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check GRAUWEIL.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs GRAUWEIL.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, GRAUWEIL.NS has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while GRAUWEIL.NS trades at ₹117.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas GRAUWEIL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GRAUWEIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to GRAUWEIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check GRAUWEIL.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs DDEVPLSTIK.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, DDEVPLSTIK.NS has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while DDEVPLSTIK.NS trades at ₹275.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas DDEVPLSTIK.NS's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DDEVPLSTIK.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to DDEVPLSTIK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check DDEVPLSTIK.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs DDEVPLSTIK.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, DDEVPLSTIK.BO has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while DDEVPLSTIK.BO trades at ₹275.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas DDEVPLSTIK.BO's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DDEVPLSTIK.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to DDEVPLSTIK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check DDEVPLSTIK.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs TATVA.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TATVA.NS has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while TATVA.NS trades at ₹1,236.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas TATVA.NS's P/E ratio is 86.90. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TATVA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to TATVA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check TATVA.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs TATVA.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TATVA.BO has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while TATVA.BO trades at ₹1,232.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas TATVA.BO's P/E ratio is 86.88. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TATVA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to TATVA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check TATVA.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs JINDALPOLY.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, JINDALPOLY.BO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while JINDALPOLY.BO trades at ₹595.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas JINDALPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -21.63. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JINDALPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to JINDALPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check JINDALPOLY.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs JINDALPOLY.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, JINDALPOLY.NS has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while JINDALPOLY.NS trades at ₹595.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas JINDALPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -13.15. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JINDALPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to JINDALPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check JINDALPOLY.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs PRINCEPIPE.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.NS has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while PRINCEPIPE.NS trades at ₹251.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas PRINCEPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 63.68. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check PRINCEPIPE.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs PREMEXPLN.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, PREMEXPLN.NS has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while PREMEXPLN.NS trades at ₹541.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas PREMEXPLN.NS's P/E ratio is 64.09. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PREMEXPLN.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to PREMEXPLN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check PREMEXPLN.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs PREMEXPLN.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, PREMEXPLN.BO has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while PREMEXPLN.BO trades at ₹541.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas PREMEXPLN.BO's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PREMEXPLN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to PREMEXPLN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check PREMEXPLN.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs JUBLCPL.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, JUBLCPL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while JUBLCPL.NS trades at ₹1,876.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas JUBLCPL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JUBLCPL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to JUBLCPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check JUBLCPL.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs ROSSARI.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, ROSSARI.BO has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while ROSSARI.BO trades at ₹493.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ROSSARI.BO's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ROSSARI.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to ROSSARI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check ROSSARI.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs ROSSARI.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, ROSSARI.NS has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while ROSSARI.NS trades at ₹494.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ROSSARI.NS's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ROSSARI.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to ROSSARI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check ROSSARI.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs KIRIINDUS.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, KIRIINDUS.BO has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while KIRIINDUS.BO trades at ₹456.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas KIRIINDUS.BO's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KIRIINDUS.BO's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to KIRIINDUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check KIRIINDUS.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs KIRIINDUS.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, KIRIINDUS.NS has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while KIRIINDUS.NS trades at ₹456.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas KIRIINDUS.NS's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KIRIINDUS.NS's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to KIRIINDUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check KIRIINDUS.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs JUBLCPL.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, JUBLCPL.BO has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while JUBLCPL.BO trades at ₹1,914.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas JUBLCPL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JUBLCPL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to JUBLCPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check JUBLCPL.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs CAMLINFINE.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, CAMLINFINE.BO has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while CAMLINFINE.BO trades at ₹139.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas CAMLINFINE.BO's P/E ratio is -180.77. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CAMLINFINE.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to CAMLINFINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check CAMLINFINE.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs CAMLINFINE.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, CAMLINFINE.NS has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while CAMLINFINE.NS trades at ₹139.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas CAMLINFINE.NS's P/E ratio is -176.25. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CAMLINFINE.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to CAMLINFINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check CAMLINFINE.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs SIRCA.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SIRCA.BO has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while SIRCA.BO trades at ₹458.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas SIRCA.BO's P/E ratio is 41.59. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SIRCA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is more volatile compared to SIRCA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check SIRCA.BO's competition here
POCL.BO vs SIRCA.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SIRCA.NS has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while SIRCA.NS trades at ₹458.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas SIRCA.NS's P/E ratio is 41.57. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SIRCA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO and SIRCA.NS have similar daily volatility (3.00).Check SIRCA.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs POLYPLEX.NS Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, POLYPLEX.NS has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while POLYPLEX.NS trades at ₹839.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas POLYPLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 85.79. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to POLYPLEX.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to POLYPLEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check POLYPLEX.NS's competition here
POCL.BO vs POLYPLEX.BO Comparison February 2026
POCL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POCL.BO stands at 35.1B. In comparison, POLYPLEX.BO has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POCL.BO is priced at ₹1,161.50, while POLYPLEX.BO trades at ₹834.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POCL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas POLYPLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 85.30. In terms of profitability, POCL.BO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to POLYPLEX.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POCL.BO is less volatile compared to POLYPLEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POCL.BO.Check POLYPLEX.BO's competition here