PLBY Group, Inc.
PLBY Group, Inc. PLBY Peers
See (PLBY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLBY | $1.61 | -0.62% | 150.3M | -1.76 | -$0.91 | N/A |
| CCL | $29.49 | +4.85% | 37.2B | 15.00 | $1.91 | N/A |
| CUK | $26.71 | +4.68% | 33.5B | 13.64 | $1.91 | N/A |
| AS | $38.10 | -1.70% | 20.9B | 101.84 | $0.37 | N/A |
| HAS | $77.88 | +5.49% | 10.8B | 25.41 | $3.03 | +3.61% |
| PLNT | $106.28 | -2.54% | 8.9B | 50.48 | $2.11 | N/A |
| MAT | $20.59 | +4.42% | 6.5B | 13.13 | $1.54 | N/A |
| LTH | $29.37 | -3.18% | 6.5B | 30.68 | $0.96 | N/A |
| GOLF | $76.54 | +5.11% | 4.4B | 20.38 | $3.64 | +1.21% |
| ELY | $21.33 | -2.82% | 4B | 41.82 | $0.51 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PLBY vs CCL Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while CCL trades at $29.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to CCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs CUK Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, CUK has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while CUK trades at $26.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas CUK's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to CUK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to CUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs AS Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, AS has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while AS trades at $38.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AS's P/E ratio is 101.84. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to AS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs HAS Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, HAS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while HAS trades at $77.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas HAS's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to HAS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to HAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs PLNT Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, PLNT has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while PLNT trades at $106.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas PLNT's P/E ratio is 50.48. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to PLNT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to PLNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs MAT Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, MAT has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while MAT trades at $20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas MAT's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to MAT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to MAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs LTH Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, LTH has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while LTH trades at $29.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas LTH's P/E ratio is 30.68. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to LTH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to LTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs GOLF Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, GOLF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while GOLF trades at $76.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas GOLF's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to GOLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to GOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs ELY Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, ELY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while ELY trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ELY's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to ELY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to ELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs FUN Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, FUN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while FUN trades at $32.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas FUN's P/E ratio is -11.41. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to FUN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to FUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs SEAS Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, SEAS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while SEAS trades at $50.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SEAS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to SEAS's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to SEAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs YETI Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, YETI has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while YETI trades at $33.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas YETI's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to YETI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to YETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs SIX Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, SIX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while SIX trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SIX's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to SIX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to SIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs PRKS Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, PRKS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while PRKS trades at $49.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas PRKS's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to PRKS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to PRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs VSTO Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, VSTO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while VSTO trades at $44.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas VSTO's P/E ratio is -234.89. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to VSTO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to VSTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs PTON Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, PTON has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while PTON trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas PTON's P/E ratio is -15.35. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to PTON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to PTON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs OSW Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, OSW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while OSW trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas OSW's P/E ratio is 32.92. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to OSW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to OSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs MODG Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, MODG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while MODG trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas MODG's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to MODG's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to MODG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs LUCK Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, LUCK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while LUCK trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas LUCK's P/E ratio is -133.86. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to LUCK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to LUCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs GEAR Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, GEAR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while GEAR trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas GEAR's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to GEAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to GEAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs XPOF Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, XPOF has a market cap of 357.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while XPOF trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas XPOF's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to XPOF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to XPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs JOUT Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, JOUT has a market cap of 318.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while JOUT trades at $31.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas JOUT's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to JOUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to JOUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs CNXA Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, CNXA has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while CNXA trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas CNXA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to CNXA's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to CNXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs FNKO Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, FNKO has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while FNKO trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas FNKO's P/E ratio is -13.40. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to FNKO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to FNKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs JAKK Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, JAKK has a market cap of 230.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while JAKK trades at $20.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas JAKK's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to JAKK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to JAKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs ESCA Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, ESCA has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while ESCA trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ESCA's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to ESCA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to ESCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs DOGZ Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, DOGZ has a market cap of 162.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while DOGZ trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas DOGZ's P/E ratio is -32.69. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to DOGZ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to DOGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs CLAR Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, CLAR has a market cap of 134.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while CLAR trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas CLAR's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to CLAR's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to CLAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs AOUT Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, AOUT has a market cap of 133.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while AOUT trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AOUT's P/E ratio is -1046.00. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to AOUT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to AOUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs SRM Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, SRM has a market cap of 120.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while SRM trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SRM's P/E ratio is -29.21. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to SRM's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to SRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs BTN Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, BTN has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while BTN trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas BTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to BTN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to BTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs ISPO Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, ISPO has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while ISPO trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ISPO's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to ISPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to ISPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs ISPOW Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, ISPOW has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while ISPOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ISPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to ISPOW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to ISPOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs NLS Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, NLS has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while NLS trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas NLS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to NLS's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to NLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs FGH Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, FGH has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while FGH trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas FGH's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to FGH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to FGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs MMA Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, MMA has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while MMA trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas MMA's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to MMA's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to MMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs YYAI Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, YYAI has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while YYAI trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas YYAI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to YYAI's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to YYAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs HWH Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, HWH has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while HWH trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas HWH's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to HWH's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to HWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs AGH Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, AGH has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while AGH trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AGH's P/E ratio is -28.62. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to AGH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to AGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs FXLV Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, FXLV has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while FXLV trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas FXLV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to FXLV's ROE of -4.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to FXLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs NWTG Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, NWTG has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while NWTG trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas NWTG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to NWTG's ROE of -6.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to NWTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs GDHG Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, GDHG has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while GDHG trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas GDHG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to GDHG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to GDHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs SPGC Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, SPGC has a market cap of 891.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while SPGC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SPGC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to SPGC's ROE of -6.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to SPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs BBIG Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, BBIG has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while BBIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas BBIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to BBIG's ROE of -11.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to BBIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs DS Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, DS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while DS trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas DS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to DS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to DS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs DS-PC Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, DS-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while DS-PC trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas DS-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to DS-PC's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to DS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs DVD Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, DVD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while DVD trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas DVD's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to DVD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to DVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs DS-PB Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, DS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while DS-PB trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas DS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to DS-PB's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to DS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs BWL-A Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, BWL-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while BWL-A trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas BWL-A's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to BWL-A's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is more volatile compared to BWL-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.
PLBY vs DS-PD Comparison
PLBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLBY stands at 150.3M. In comparison, DS-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLBY is priced at $1.61, while DS-PD trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLBY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas DS-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLBY's ROE is +286.25%, compared to DS-PD's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PLBY is less volatile compared to DS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLBY.