Procter & Gamble Health Limited
Procter & Gamble Health Limited (PGHL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PGHL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGHL.NS | ₹5,652.50 | +1.79% | 95B | 40.12 | ₹142.71 | +3.58% |
| SUNPHARMA.BO | ₹1,840.55 | -0.25% | 4.4T | 40.47 | ₹45.50 | +0.90% |
| SUNPHARMA.NS | ₹1,840.80 | -0.21% | 4.4T | 38.52 | ₹47.78 | +0.90% |
| DIVISLAB.BO | ₹6,753.30 | -1.91% | 1.8T | 72.51 | ₹93.22 | +0.44% |
| DIVISLAB.NS | ₹6,753.00 | -1.95% | 1.8T | 72.14 | ₹93.66 | +0.44% |
| TORNTPHARM.NS | ₹4,452.10 | -0.76% | 1.5T | 71.78 | ₹63.70 | +0.77% |
| TORNTPHARM.BO | ₹4,451.20 | -0.73% | 1.5T | 72.28 | ₹63.25 | +0.77% |
| DRREDDY.BO | ₹1,329.35 | +1.70% | 1.1T | 19.64 | ₹67.84 | +0.60% |
| DRREDDY.NS | ₹1,327.90 | +1.58% | 1.1T | 26.45 | ₹50.33 | +0.60% |
| ZYDUSLIFE.BO | ₹1,078.95 | +3.85% | 1.1T | 21.43 | ₹50.07 | +1.03% |
Stock Comparison
PGHL.NS vs SUNPHARMA.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, SUNPHARMA.BO has a market cap of 4.4T. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while SUNPHARMA.BO trades at ₹1,840.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas SUNPHARMA.BO's P/E ratio is 40.47. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SUNPHARMA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to SUNPHARMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check SUNPHARMA.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs SUNPHARMA.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, SUNPHARMA.NS has a market cap of 4.4T. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while SUNPHARMA.NS trades at ₹1,840.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas SUNPHARMA.NS's P/E ratio is 38.52. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SUNPHARMA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to SUNPHARMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check SUNPHARMA.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs DIVISLAB.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, DIVISLAB.BO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while DIVISLAB.BO trades at ₹6,753.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas DIVISLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 72.51. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DIVISLAB.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to DIVISLAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check DIVISLAB.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs DIVISLAB.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, DIVISLAB.NS has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while DIVISLAB.NS trades at ₹6,753.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas DIVISLAB.NS's P/E ratio is 72.14. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DIVISLAB.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to DIVISLAB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check DIVISLAB.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs TORNTPHARM.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, TORNTPHARM.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while TORNTPHARM.NS trades at ₹4,452.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas TORNTPHARM.NS's P/E ratio is 71.78. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TORNTPHARM.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to TORNTPHARM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check TORNTPHARM.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs TORNTPHARM.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, TORNTPHARM.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while TORNTPHARM.BO trades at ₹4,451.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas TORNTPHARM.BO's P/E ratio is 72.28. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TORNTPHARM.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to TORNTPHARM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check TORNTPHARM.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs DRREDDY.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, DRREDDY.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while DRREDDY.BO trades at ₹1,329.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas DRREDDY.BO's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DRREDDY.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to DRREDDY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check DRREDDY.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs DRREDDY.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, DRREDDY.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while DRREDDY.NS trades at ₹1,327.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas DRREDDY.NS's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DRREDDY.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to DRREDDY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check DRREDDY.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs ZYDUSLIFE.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, ZYDUSLIFE.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while ZYDUSLIFE.BO trades at ₹1,078.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas ZYDUSLIFE.BO's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ZYDUSLIFE.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to ZYDUSLIFE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check ZYDUSLIFE.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs ZYDUSLIFE.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, ZYDUSLIFE.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while ZYDUSLIFE.NS trades at ₹1,079.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas ZYDUSLIFE.NS's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ZYDUSLIFE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to ZYDUSLIFE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check ZYDUSLIFE.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs LUPIN.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, LUPIN.NS has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while LUPIN.NS trades at ₹2,266.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas LUPIN.NS's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LUPIN.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to LUPIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check LUPIN.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs LUPIN.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, LUPIN.BO has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while LUPIN.BO trades at ₹2,263.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas LUPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LUPIN.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to LUPIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check LUPIN.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs MANKIND.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, MANKIND.NS has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while MANKIND.NS trades at ₹2,423.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas MANKIND.NS's P/E ratio is 53.01. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MANKIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to MANKIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check MANKIND.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs MANKIND.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, MANKIND.BO has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while MANKIND.BO trades at ₹2,418.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas MANKIND.BO's P/E ratio is 52.99. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MANKIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to MANKIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check MANKIND.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs AUROPHARMA.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, AUROPHARMA.NS has a market cap of 844.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while AUROPHARMA.NS trades at ₹1,461.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas AUROPHARMA.NS's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AUROPHARMA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to AUROPHARMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check AUROPHARMA.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs AUROPHARMA.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, AUROPHARMA.BO has a market cap of 844.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while AUROPHARMA.BO trades at ₹1,463.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas AUROPHARMA.BO's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AUROPHARMA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to AUROPHARMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check AUROPHARMA.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs LAURUSLABS.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, LAURUSLABS.BO has a market cap of 733B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while LAURUSLABS.BO trades at ₹1,373.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas LAURUSLABS.BO's P/E ratio is 87.14. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LAURUSLABS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to LAURUSLABS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check LAURUSLABS.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs LAURUSLABS.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, LAURUSLABS.NS has a market cap of 732.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while LAURUSLABS.NS trades at ₹1,373.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas LAURUSLABS.NS's P/E ratio is 87.05. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LAURUSLABS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to LAURUSLABS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check LAURUSLABS.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs GLENMARK.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, GLENMARK.NS has a market cap of 659.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while GLENMARK.NS trades at ₹2,351.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas GLENMARK.NS's P/E ratio is 61.94. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GLENMARK.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to GLENMARK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check GLENMARK.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs GLENMARK.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, GLENMARK.BO has a market cap of 659.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while GLENMARK.BO trades at ₹2,351.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas GLENMARK.BO's P/E ratio is 62.02. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GLENMARK.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to GLENMARK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check GLENMARK.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs ALKEM.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, ALKEM.NS has a market cap of 645.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while ALKEM.NS trades at ₹5,380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas ALKEM.NS's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ALKEM.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to ALKEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check ALKEM.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs ALKEM.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, ALKEM.BO has a market cap of 645.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while ALKEM.BO trades at ₹5,379.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas ALKEM.BO's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ALKEM.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to ALKEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check ALKEM.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs SUVENPHAR.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, SUVENPHAR.NS has a market cap of 412.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while SUVENPHAR.NS trades at ₹1,078.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas SUVENPHAR.NS's P/E ratio is 98.90. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SUVENPHAR.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to SUVENPHAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check SUVENPHAR.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs SUVENPHAR.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, SUVENPHAR.BO has a market cap of 411.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while SUVENPHAR.BO trades at ₹1,075.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas SUVENPHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 98.29. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SUVENPHAR.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to SUVENPHAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check SUVENPHAR.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs IPCALAB.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, IPCALAB.BO has a market cap of 399.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while IPCALAB.BO trades at ₹1,576.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas IPCALAB.BO's P/E ratio is 43.94. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to IPCALAB.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to IPCALAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check IPCALAB.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs IPCALAB.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, IPCALAB.NS has a market cap of 398.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while IPCALAB.NS trades at ₹1,578.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas IPCALAB.NS's P/E ratio is 43.77. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to IPCALAB.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to IPCALAB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check IPCALAB.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs AJANTPHARM.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, AJANTPHARM.BO has a market cap of 385.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while AJANTPHARM.BO trades at ₹3,094.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas AJANTPHARM.BO's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AJANTPHARM.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to AJANTPHARM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check AJANTPHARM.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs AJANTPHARM.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, AJANTPHARM.NS has a market cap of 385B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while AJANTPHARM.NS trades at ₹3,097.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas AJANTPHARM.NS's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AJANTPHARM.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to AJANTPHARM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check AJANTPHARM.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs JBCHEPHARM.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, JBCHEPHARM.NS has a market cap of 357.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while JBCHEPHARM.NS trades at ₹2,190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas JBCHEPHARM.NS's P/E ratio is 50.07. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to JBCHEPHARM.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to JBCHEPHARM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check JBCHEPHARM.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs JBCHEPHARM.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, JBCHEPHARM.BO has a market cap of 357.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while JBCHEPHARM.BO trades at ₹2,188.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas JBCHEPHARM.BO's P/E ratio is 50.10. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to JBCHEPHARM.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to JBCHEPHARM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check JBCHEPHARM.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs EMCURE.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, EMCURE.NS has a market cap of 329.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while EMCURE.NS trades at ₹1,698.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas EMCURE.NS's P/E ratio is 35.59. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EMCURE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to EMCURE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check EMCURE.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs WOCKPHARMA.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, WOCKPHARMA.BO has a market cap of 266.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while WOCKPHARMA.BO trades at ₹1,703.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas WOCKPHARMA.BO's P/E ratio is 125.33. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WOCKPHARMA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to WOCKPHARMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check WOCKPHARMA.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs WOCKPHARMA.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, WOCKPHARMA.NS has a market cap of 266.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while WOCKPHARMA.NS trades at ₹1,700.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas WOCKPHARMA.NS's P/E ratio is 125.20. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WOCKPHARMA.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to WOCKPHARMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check WOCKPHARMA.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs PEL.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, PEL.NS has a market cap of 254.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while PEL.NS trades at ₹1,124.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas PEL.NS's P/E ratio is 44.24. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PEL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to PEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check PEL.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs PPLPHARMA.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, PPLPHARMA.NS has a market cap of 237.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while PPLPHARMA.NS trades at ₹178.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas PPLPHARMA.NS's P/E ratio is -72.95. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PPLPHARMA.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to PPLPHARMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check PPLPHARMA.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs PPLPHARMA.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, PPLPHARMA.BO has a market cap of 237.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while PPLPHARMA.BO trades at ₹178.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas PPLPHARMA.BO's P/E ratio is -73.20. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PPLPHARMA.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to PPLPHARMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check PPLPHARMA.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs ASTRAZEN.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, ASTRAZEN.NS has a market cap of 220B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while ASTRAZEN.NS trades at ₹8,962.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas ASTRAZEN.NS's P/E ratio is 109.02. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ASTRAZEN.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to ASTRAZEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check ASTRAZEN.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs ASTRAZEN.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, ASTRAZEN.BO has a market cap of 219.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while ASTRAZEN.BO trades at ₹8,984.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas ASTRAZEN.BO's P/E ratio is 109.68. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ASTRAZEN.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to ASTRAZEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check ASTRAZEN.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs NEULANDLAB.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, NEULANDLAB.NS has a market cap of 215B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while NEULANDLAB.NS trades at ₹17,071.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas NEULANDLAB.NS's P/E ratio is 59.05. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NEULANDLAB.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to NEULANDLAB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check NEULANDLAB.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs NEULANDLAB.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, NEULANDLAB.BO has a market cap of 214.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while NEULANDLAB.BO trades at ₹17,056.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas NEULANDLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 59.01. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NEULANDLAB.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to NEULANDLAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check NEULANDLAB.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs NATCOPHARM.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, NATCOPHARM.NS has a market cap of 210.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while NATCOPHARM.NS trades at ₹1,186.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas NATCOPHARM.NS's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NATCOPHARM.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to NATCOPHARM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check NATCOPHARM.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs NATCOPHARM.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, NATCOPHARM.BO has a market cap of 210.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while NATCOPHARM.BO trades at ₹1,187.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas NATCOPHARM.BO's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NATCOPHARM.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to NATCOPHARM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check NATCOPHARM.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs GRANULES.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, GRANULES.NS has a market cap of 187.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while GRANULES.NS trades at ₹756.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas GRANULES.NS's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GRANULES.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to GRANULES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check GRANULES.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs ERIS.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, ERIS.NS has a market cap of 187.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while ERIS.NS trades at ₹1,361.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas ERIS.NS's P/E ratio is 29.89. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ERIS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to ERIS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check ERIS.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs ERIS.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, ERIS.BO has a market cap of 187.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while ERIS.BO trades at ₹1,361.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas ERIS.BO's P/E ratio is 29.91. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ERIS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to ERIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check ERIS.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs GRANULES.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, GRANULES.BO has a market cap of 184B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while GRANULES.BO trades at ₹756.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas GRANULES.BO's P/E ratio is 33.71. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GRANULES.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to GRANULES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check GRANULES.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs COHANCE.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, COHANCE.NS has a market cap of 166.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while COHANCE.NS trades at ₹434.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas COHANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 92.72. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to COHANCE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to COHANCE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check COHANCE.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs COHANCE.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, COHANCE.BO has a market cap of 166.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while COHANCE.BO trades at ₹434.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas COHANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 92.71. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to COHANCE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to COHANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check COHANCE.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs JUBLPHARMA.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, JUBLPHARMA.NS has a market cap of 159.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while JUBLPHARMA.NS trades at ₹985.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas JUBLPHARMA.NS's P/E ratio is 40.19. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to JUBLPHARMA.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to JUBLPHARMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check JUBLPHARMA.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs JUBLPHARMA.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, JUBLPHARMA.BO has a market cap of 159.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while JUBLPHARMA.BO trades at ₹985.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas JUBLPHARMA.BO's P/E ratio is 40.09. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to JUBLPHARMA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to JUBLPHARMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check JUBLPHARMA.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs CAPLIPOINT.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, CAPLIPOINT.NS has a market cap of 157.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while CAPLIPOINT.NS trades at ₹2,035.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas CAPLIPOINT.NS's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CAPLIPOINT.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to CAPLIPOINT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check CAPLIPOINT.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs CAPLIPOINT.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, CAPLIPOINT.BO has a market cap of 157.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while CAPLIPOINT.BO trades at ₹2,035.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas CAPLIPOINT.BO's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CAPLIPOINT.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to CAPLIPOINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check CAPLIPOINT.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs APLLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, APLLTD.BO has a market cap of 149.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while APLLTD.BO trades at ₹758.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas APLLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to APLLTD.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to APLLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check APLLTD.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs APLLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, APLLTD.NS has a market cap of 149.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while APLLTD.NS trades at ₹759.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas APLLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to APLLTD.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to APLLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check APLLTD.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs GLS.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, GLS.NS has a market cap of 133.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while GLS.NS trades at ₹1,086.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas GLS.NS's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GLS.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to GLS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check GLS.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs GLS.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, GLS.BO has a market cap of 133B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while GLS.BO trades at ₹1,085.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas GLS.BO's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GLS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to GLS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check GLS.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs ALIVUS.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, ALIVUS.NS has a market cap of 128.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while ALIVUS.NS trades at ₹1,090.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas ALIVUS.NS's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ALIVUS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to ALIVUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check ALIVUS.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs ALIVUS.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, ALIVUS.BO has a market cap of 128.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while ALIVUS.BO trades at ₹1,088.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas ALIVUS.BO's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ALIVUS.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to ALIVUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check ALIVUS.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs VIYASH.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, VIYASH.NS has a market cap of 113.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while VIYASH.NS trades at ₹257.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas VIYASH.NS's P/E ratio is 65.08. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VIYASH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to VIYASH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check VIYASH.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs STAR.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, STAR.BO has a market cap of 109.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while STAR.BO trades at ₹1,168.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas STAR.BO's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to STAR.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to STAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check STAR.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs STAR.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, STAR.NS has a market cap of 109.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while STAR.NS trades at ₹1,169.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas STAR.NS's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to STAR.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to STAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check STAR.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs CAPPL.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, CAPPL.BO has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while CAPPL.BO trades at ₹1,446.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas CAPPL.BO's P/E ratio is 50.30. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CAPPL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to CAPPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check CAPPL.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs SHILPAMED.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, SHILPAMED.NS has a market cap of 100.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while SHILPAMED.NS trades at ₹504.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas SHILPAMED.NS's P/E ratio is 41.14. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SHILPAMED.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to SHILPAMED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check SHILPAMED.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs PGHL.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, PGHL.BO has a market cap of 95B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while PGHL.BO trades at ₹5,651.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas PGHL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.19. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PGHL.BO's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to PGHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check PGHL.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs AKUMS.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, AKUMS.NS has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while AKUMS.NS trades at ₹532.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas AKUMS.NS's P/E ratio is 31.22. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AKUMS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to AKUMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check AKUMS.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs SUDEEPPHRM.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, SUDEEPPHRM.NS has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while SUDEEPPHRM.NS trades at ₹697.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas SUDEEPPHRM.NS's P/E ratio is 46.83. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SUDEEPPHRM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to SUDEEPPHRM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check SUDEEPPHRM.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs SPARC.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, SPARC.BO has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while SPARC.BO trades at ₹234.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas SPARC.BO's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SPARC.BO's ROE of +11.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to SPARC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check SPARC.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs SPARC.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, SPARC.NS has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while SPARC.NS trades at ₹235.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas SPARC.NS's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SPARC.NS's ROE of +11.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to SPARC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check SPARC.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs AARTIPHARM.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, AARTIPHARM.BO has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while AARTIPHARM.BO trades at ₹695.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas AARTIPHARM.BO's P/E ratio is 31.12. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AARTIPHARM.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to AARTIPHARM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check AARTIPHARM.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs AARTIPHARM.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, AARTIPHARM.NS has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while AARTIPHARM.NS trades at ₹694.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas AARTIPHARM.NS's P/E ratio is 31.13. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AARTIPHARM.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to AARTIPHARM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check AARTIPHARM.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs SUVEN.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, SUVEN.BO has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while SUVEN.BO trades at ₹274.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas SUVEN.BO's P/E ratio is -22.02. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SUVEN.BO's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to SUVEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check SUVEN.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs SUVEN.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, SUVEN.NS has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while SUVEN.NS trades at ₹273.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas SUVEN.NS's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SUVEN.NS's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to SUVEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check SUVEN.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs FDC.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, FDC.BO has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while FDC.BO trades at ₹403.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas FDC.BO's P/E ratio is 27.84. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FDC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to FDC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check FDC.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs FDC.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, FDC.NS has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while FDC.NS trades at ₹403.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas FDC.NS's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FDC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to FDC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check FDC.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs SEQUENT.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, SEQUENT.BO has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while SEQUENT.BO trades at ₹202.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas SEQUENT.BO's P/E ratio is 123.41. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SEQUENT.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to SEQUENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check SEQUENT.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs SEQUENT.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, SEQUENT.NS has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while SEQUENT.NS trades at ₹202.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas SEQUENT.NS's P/E ratio is 124.17. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SEQUENT.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to SEQUENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check SEQUENT.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs SHILPAMED.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, SHILPAMED.BO has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while SHILPAMED.BO trades at ₹505.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas SHILPAMED.BO's P/E ratio is 41.22. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SHILPAMED.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to SHILPAMED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check SHILPAMED.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs INNOVACAP.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, INNOVACAP.NS has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while INNOVACAP.NS trades at ₹843.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas INNOVACAP.NS's P/E ratio is 34.76. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to INNOVACAP.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to INNOVACAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check INNOVACAP.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs GUJTHEM.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, GUJTHEM.NS has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while GUJTHEM.NS trades at ₹367.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas GUJTHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 88.69. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GUJTHEM.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to GUJTHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check GUJTHEM.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs RPGLIFE.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, RPGLIFE.BO has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while RPGLIFE.BO trades at ₹2,211.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas RPGLIFE.BO's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to RPGLIFE.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to RPGLIFE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check RPGLIFE.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs RPGLIFE.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, RPGLIFE.NS has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while RPGLIFE.NS trades at ₹2,213.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas RPGLIFE.NS's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to RPGLIFE.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to RPGLIFE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check RPGLIFE.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs IOLCP.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, IOLCP.BO has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while IOLCP.BO trades at ₹136.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas IOLCP.BO's P/E ratio is 31.41. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to IOLCP.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to IOLCP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check IOLCP.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs IOLCP.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, IOLCP.NS has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while IOLCP.NS trades at ₹136.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas IOLCP.NS's P/E ratio is 31.39. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to IOLCP.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to IOLCP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check IOLCP.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs ORCHPHARMA.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, ORCHPHARMA.BO has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while ORCHPHARMA.BO trades at ₹721.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas ORCHPHARMA.BO's P/E ratio is 189.83. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ORCHPHARMA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to ORCHPHARMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check ORCHPHARMA.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs ORCHPHARMA.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, ORCHPHARMA.NS has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while ORCHPHARMA.NS trades at ₹724.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas ORCHPHARMA.NS's P/E ratio is 191.27. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ORCHPHARMA.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to ORCHPHARMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check ORCHPHARMA.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs AARTIDRUGS.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, AARTIDRUGS.NS has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while AARTIDRUGS.NS trades at ₹394.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas AARTIDRUGS.NS's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AARTIDRUGS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to AARTIDRUGS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check AARTIDRUGS.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs AARTIDRUGS.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, AARTIDRUGS.BO has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while AARTIDRUGS.BO trades at ₹394.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas AARTIDRUGS.BO's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AARTIDRUGS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to AARTIDRUGS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check AARTIDRUGS.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs NOVARTIND.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, NOVARTIND.BO has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while NOVARTIND.BO trades at ₹1,414.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas NOVARTIND.BO's P/E ratio is 36.08. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NOVARTIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to NOVARTIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check NOVARTIND.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs BLISSGVS.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, BLISSGVS.BO has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while BLISSGVS.BO trades at ₹381.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas BLISSGVS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BLISSGVS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to BLISSGVS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check BLISSGVS.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs BLISSGVS.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, BLISSGVS.NS has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while BLISSGVS.NS trades at ₹381.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas BLISSGVS.NS's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BLISSGVS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to BLISSGVS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check BLISSGVS.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs NOVARTIND.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, NOVARTIND.NS has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while NOVARTIND.NS trades at ₹1,415.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas NOVARTIND.NS's P/E ratio is 36.10. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NOVARTIND.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to NOVARTIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check NOVARTIND.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs GUFICBIO.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, GUFICBIO.BO has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while GUFICBIO.BO trades at ₹318.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas GUFICBIO.BO's P/E ratio is 65.26. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GUFICBIO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to GUFICBIO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check GUFICBIO.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs GUFICBIO.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, GUFICBIO.NS has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while GUFICBIO.NS trades at ₹318.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas GUFICBIO.NS's P/E ratio is 65.14. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GUFICBIO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to GUFICBIO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check GUFICBIO.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs SOLARA.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, SOLARA.BO has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while SOLARA.BO trades at ₹562.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas SOLARA.BO's P/E ratio is -114.96. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SOLARA.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to SOLARA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check SOLARA.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs SOLARA.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, SOLARA.NS has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while SOLARA.NS trades at ₹558.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas SOLARA.NS's P/E ratio is -114.99. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SOLARA.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to SOLARA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check SOLARA.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs HIKAL.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, HIKAL.NS has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while HIKAL.NS trades at ₹218.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas HIKAL.NS's P/E ratio is -200.06. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to HIKAL.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to HIKAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check HIKAL.NS's competition here
PGHL.NS vs HIKAL.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, HIKAL.BO has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while HIKAL.BO trades at ₹217.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas HIKAL.BO's P/E ratio is 267.06. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to HIKAL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is less volatile compared to HIKAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check HIKAL.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs UNICHEMLAB.BO Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, UNICHEMLAB.BO has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while UNICHEMLAB.BO trades at ₹357.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas UNICHEMLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to UNICHEMLAB.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to UNICHEMLAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check UNICHEMLAB.BO's competition here
PGHL.NS vs UNICHEMLAB.NS Comparison May 2026
PGHL.NS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGHL.NS stands at 95B. In comparison, UNICHEMLAB.NS has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGHL.NS is priced at ₹5,652.50, while UNICHEMLAB.NS trades at ₹356.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGHL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.12, whereas UNICHEMLAB.NS's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, PGHL.NS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to UNICHEMLAB.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGHL.NS is more volatile compared to UNICHEMLAB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGHL.NS.Check UNICHEMLAB.NS's competition here