FDC Limited (FDC.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FDC.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDC.BO | ₹415.00 | +6.59% | 65.6B | 23.32 | ₹17.29 | +1.24% |
| SUNPHARMA.BO | ₹1,862.00 | +1.35% | 4.5T | 40.95 | ₹45.50 | +0.89% |
| SUNPHARMA.NS | ₹1,868.00 | +1.62% | 4.5T | 38.97 | ₹47.80 | +0.89% |
| DIVISLAB.NS | ₹6,747.00 | +0.06% | 1.8T | 70.40 | ₹96.42 | +0.44% |
| DIVISLAB.BO | ₹6,743.15 | +0.03% | 1.8T | 69.90 | ₹97.07 | +0.44% |
| TORNTPHARM.BO | ₹4,514.15 | +1.98% | 1.5T | 70.48 | ₹63.25 | +0.79% |
| TORNTPHARM.NS | ₹4,514.10 | +1.90% | 1.5T | 69.87 | ₹63.79 | +0.79% |
| ZYDUSLIFE.BO | ₹1,112.10 | +3.85% | 1.1T | 21.64 | ₹50.12 | +1.01% |
| ZYDUSLIFE.NS | ₹1,112.20 | +3.87% | 1.1T | 21.66 | ₹50.11 | +1.01% |
| DRREDDY.BO | ₹1,301.30 | +2.34% | 1.1T | 19.03 | ₹67.84 | +0.62% |
Stock Comparison
FDC.BO vs SUNPHARMA.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, SUNPHARMA.BO has a market cap of 4.5T. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while SUNPHARMA.BO trades at ₹1,862.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas SUNPHARMA.BO's P/E ratio is 40.95. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUNPHARMA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to SUNPHARMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check SUNPHARMA.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs SUNPHARMA.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, SUNPHARMA.NS has a market cap of 4.5T. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while SUNPHARMA.NS trades at ₹1,868.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas SUNPHARMA.NS's P/E ratio is 38.97. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUNPHARMA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to SUNPHARMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check SUNPHARMA.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs DIVISLAB.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, DIVISLAB.NS has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while DIVISLAB.NS trades at ₹6,747.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas DIVISLAB.NS's P/E ratio is 70.40. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DIVISLAB.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to DIVISLAB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check DIVISLAB.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs DIVISLAB.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, DIVISLAB.BO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while DIVISLAB.BO trades at ₹6,743.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas DIVISLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 69.90. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DIVISLAB.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to DIVISLAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check DIVISLAB.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs TORNTPHARM.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, TORNTPHARM.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while TORNTPHARM.BO trades at ₹4,514.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas TORNTPHARM.BO's P/E ratio is 70.48. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TORNTPHARM.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to TORNTPHARM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check TORNTPHARM.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs TORNTPHARM.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, TORNTPHARM.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while TORNTPHARM.NS trades at ₹4,514.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas TORNTPHARM.NS's P/E ratio is 69.87. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TORNTPHARM.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to TORNTPHARM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check TORNTPHARM.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs ZYDUSLIFE.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, ZYDUSLIFE.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while ZYDUSLIFE.BO trades at ₹1,112.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas ZYDUSLIFE.BO's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZYDUSLIFE.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to ZYDUSLIFE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check ZYDUSLIFE.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs ZYDUSLIFE.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, ZYDUSLIFE.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while ZYDUSLIFE.NS trades at ₹1,112.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas ZYDUSLIFE.NS's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZYDUSLIFE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to ZYDUSLIFE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check ZYDUSLIFE.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs DRREDDY.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, DRREDDY.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while DRREDDY.BO trades at ₹1,301.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas DRREDDY.BO's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRREDDY.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to DRREDDY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check DRREDDY.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs DRREDDY.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, DRREDDY.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while DRREDDY.NS trades at ₹1,301.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas DRREDDY.NS's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRREDDY.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to DRREDDY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check DRREDDY.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs LUPIN.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, LUPIN.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while LUPIN.NS trades at ₹2,357.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas LUPIN.NS's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LUPIN.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to LUPIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check LUPIN.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs LUPIN.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, LUPIN.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while LUPIN.BO trades at ₹2,356.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas LUPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LUPIN.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to LUPIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check LUPIN.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs MANKIND.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, MANKIND.NS has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while MANKIND.NS trades at ₹2,528.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas MANKIND.NS's P/E ratio is 54.76. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MANKIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to MANKIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check MANKIND.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs MANKIND.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, MANKIND.BO has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while MANKIND.BO trades at ₹2,529.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas MANKIND.BO's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MANKIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to MANKIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check MANKIND.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs AUROPHARMA.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, AUROPHARMA.NS has a market cap of 858.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while AUROPHARMA.NS trades at ₹1,534.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas AUROPHARMA.NS's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUROPHARMA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to AUROPHARMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check AUROPHARMA.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs AUROPHARMA.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, AUROPHARMA.BO has a market cap of 858.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while AUROPHARMA.BO trades at ₹1,535.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas AUROPHARMA.BO's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUROPHARMA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO and AUROPHARMA.BO have similar daily volatility (3.88).Check AUROPHARMA.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs LAURUSLABS.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, LAURUSLABS.BO has a market cap of 775.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while LAURUSLABS.BO trades at ₹1,480.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas LAURUSLABS.BO's P/E ratio is 87.63. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAURUSLABS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to LAURUSLABS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check LAURUSLABS.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs LAURUSLABS.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, LAURUSLABS.NS has a market cap of 775.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while LAURUSLABS.NS trades at ₹1,481.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas LAURUSLABS.NS's P/E ratio is 87.61. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAURUSLABS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to LAURUSLABS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check LAURUSLABS.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs ALKEM.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, ALKEM.NS has a market cap of 641.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while ALKEM.NS trades at ₹5,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas ALKEM.NS's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALKEM.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to ALKEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check ALKEM.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs ALKEM.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, ALKEM.BO has a market cap of 641.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while ALKEM.BO trades at ₹5,411.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas ALKEM.BO's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALKEM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to ALKEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check ALKEM.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs GLENMARK.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, GLENMARK.BO has a market cap of 621.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while GLENMARK.BO trades at ₹2,180.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas GLENMARK.BO's P/E ratio is 45.36. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLENMARK.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to GLENMARK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check GLENMARK.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs GLENMARK.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, GLENMARK.NS has a market cap of 618.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while GLENMARK.NS trades at ₹2,179.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas GLENMARK.NS's P/E ratio is 45.42. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLENMARK.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to GLENMARK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check GLENMARK.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs SUVENPHAR.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, SUVENPHAR.NS has a market cap of 412.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while SUVENPHAR.NS trades at ₹1,078.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas SUVENPHAR.NS's P/E ratio is 98.90. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUVENPHAR.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to SUVENPHAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check SUVENPHAR.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs SUVENPHAR.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, SUVENPHAR.BO has a market cap of 411.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while SUVENPHAR.BO trades at ₹1,075.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas SUVENPHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 98.29. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUVENPHAR.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to SUVENPHAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check SUVENPHAR.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs IPCALAB.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, IPCALAB.NS has a market cap of 402.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while IPCALAB.NS trades at ₹1,625.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas IPCALAB.NS's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IPCALAB.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to IPCALAB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check IPCALAB.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs IPCALAB.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, IPCALAB.BO has a market cap of 402.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while IPCALAB.BO trades at ₹1,623.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas IPCALAB.BO's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IPCALAB.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to IPCALAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check IPCALAB.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs AJANTPHARM.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, AJANTPHARM.NS has a market cap of 398.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while AJANTPHARM.NS trades at ₹3,187.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas AJANTPHARM.NS's P/E ratio is 37.70. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AJANTPHARM.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to AJANTPHARM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check AJANTPHARM.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs AJANTPHARM.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, AJANTPHARM.BO has a market cap of 396.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while AJANTPHARM.BO trades at ₹3,188.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas AJANTPHARM.BO's P/E ratio is 39.31. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AJANTPHARM.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to AJANTPHARM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check AJANTPHARM.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs JBCHEPHARM.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, JBCHEPHARM.NS has a market cap of 352.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while JBCHEPHARM.NS trades at ₹2,237.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas JBCHEPHARM.NS's P/E ratio is 49.28. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JBCHEPHARM.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to JBCHEPHARM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check JBCHEPHARM.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs JBCHEPHARM.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, JBCHEPHARM.BO has a market cap of 351.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while JBCHEPHARM.BO trades at ₹2,234.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas JBCHEPHARM.BO's P/E ratio is 49.19. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JBCHEPHARM.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to JBCHEPHARM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check JBCHEPHARM.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs EMCURE.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, EMCURE.NS has a market cap of 339.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while EMCURE.NS trades at ₹1,814.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas EMCURE.NS's P/E ratio is 36.67. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMCURE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to EMCURE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check EMCURE.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs WOCKPHARMA.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, WOCKPHARMA.BO has a market cap of 327.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while WOCKPHARMA.BO trades at ₹2,010.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas WOCKPHARMA.BO's P/E ratio is 154.04. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WOCKPHARMA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to WOCKPHARMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check WOCKPHARMA.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs WOCKPHARMA.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, WOCKPHARMA.NS has a market cap of 327.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while WOCKPHARMA.NS trades at ₹2,010.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas WOCKPHARMA.NS's P/E ratio is 154.09. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WOCKPHARMA.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to WOCKPHARMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check WOCKPHARMA.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs PEL.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, PEL.NS has a market cap of 254.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while PEL.NS trades at ₹1,124.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas PEL.NS's P/E ratio is 44.24. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to PEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check PEL.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs NEULANDLAB.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, NEULANDLAB.NS has a market cap of 221B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while NEULANDLAB.NS trades at ₹18,102.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas NEULANDLAB.NS's P/E ratio is 60.55. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEULANDLAB.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to NEULANDLAB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check NEULANDLAB.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs NEULANDLAB.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, NEULANDLAB.BO has a market cap of 219.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while NEULANDLAB.BO trades at ₹18,082.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas NEULANDLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 60.46. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEULANDLAB.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to NEULANDLAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check NEULANDLAB.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs ASTRAZEN.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, ASTRAZEN.NS has a market cap of 214.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while ASTRAZEN.NS trades at ₹8,513.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas ASTRAZEN.NS's P/E ratio is 114.17. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASTRAZEN.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to ASTRAZEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check ASTRAZEN.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs ASTRAZEN.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, ASTRAZEN.BO has a market cap of 214.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while ASTRAZEN.BO trades at ₹8,503.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas ASTRAZEN.BO's P/E ratio is 114.36. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASTRAZEN.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to ASTRAZEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check ASTRAZEN.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs PPLPHARMA.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, PPLPHARMA.NS has a market cap of 210.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while PPLPHARMA.NS trades at ₹168.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas PPLPHARMA.NS's P/E ratio is -64.43. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PPLPHARMA.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to PPLPHARMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check PPLPHARMA.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs PPLPHARMA.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, PPLPHARMA.BO has a market cap of 209.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while PPLPHARMA.BO trades at ₹168.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas PPLPHARMA.BO's P/E ratio is -64.49. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PPLPHARMA.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to PPLPHARMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check PPLPHARMA.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs ERIS.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, ERIS.NS has a market cap of 199.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while ERIS.NS trades at ₹1,461.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas ERIS.NS's P/E ratio is 31.79. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ERIS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to ERIS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check ERIS.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs ERIS.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, ERIS.BO has a market cap of 198.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while ERIS.BO trades at ₹1,459.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas ERIS.BO's P/E ratio is 31.68. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ERIS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to ERIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check ERIS.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs GRANULES.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, GRANULES.BO has a market cap of 193B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while GRANULES.BO trades at ₹787.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas GRANULES.BO's P/E ratio is 34.62. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRANULES.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to GRANULES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check GRANULES.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs GRANULES.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, GRANULES.NS has a market cap of 192.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while GRANULES.NS trades at ₹788.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas GRANULES.NS's P/E ratio is 31.81. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRANULES.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to GRANULES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check GRANULES.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs CAPLIPOINT.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, CAPLIPOINT.NS has a market cap of 192.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while CAPLIPOINT.NS trades at ₹2,490.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas CAPLIPOINT.NS's P/E ratio is 30.16. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CAPLIPOINT.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to CAPLIPOINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check CAPLIPOINT.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs CAPLIPOINT.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, CAPLIPOINT.BO has a market cap of 192.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while CAPLIPOINT.BO trades at ₹2,492.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas CAPLIPOINT.BO's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CAPLIPOINT.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to CAPLIPOINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check CAPLIPOINT.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs NATCOPHARM.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, NATCOPHARM.NS has a market cap of 158.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while NATCOPHARM.NS trades at ₹892.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas NATCOPHARM.NS's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NATCOPHARM.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to NATCOPHARM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check NATCOPHARM.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs NATCOPHARM.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, NATCOPHARM.BO has a market cap of 158.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while NATCOPHARM.BO trades at ₹892.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas NATCOPHARM.BO's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NATCOPHARM.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to NATCOPHARM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check NATCOPHARM.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs COHANCE.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, COHANCE.BO has a market cap of 155.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while COHANCE.BO trades at ₹458.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas COHANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 86.99. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COHANCE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to COHANCE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check COHANCE.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs COHANCE.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, COHANCE.NS has a market cap of 155B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while COHANCE.NS trades at ₹457.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas COHANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 86.78. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COHANCE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to COHANCE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check COHANCE.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs JUBLPHARMA.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, JUBLPHARMA.NS has a market cap of 154.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while JUBLPHARMA.NS trades at ₹972.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas JUBLPHARMA.NS's P/E ratio is 38.81. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JUBLPHARMA.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to JUBLPHARMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check JUBLPHARMA.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs JUBLPHARMA.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, JUBLPHARMA.BO has a market cap of 154.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while JUBLPHARMA.BO trades at ₹973.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas JUBLPHARMA.BO's P/E ratio is 38.83. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JUBLPHARMA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to JUBLPHARMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check JUBLPHARMA.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs APLLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, APLLTD.NS has a market cap of 153.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while APLLTD.NS trades at ₹777.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas APLLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APLLTD.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to APLLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check APLLTD.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs APLLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, APLLTD.BO has a market cap of 153.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while APLLTD.BO trades at ₹776.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas APLLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APLLTD.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to APLLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check APLLTD.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs GLS.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, GLS.NS has a market cap of 133.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while GLS.NS trades at ₹1,086.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas GLS.NS's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLS.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to GLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check GLS.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs GLS.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, GLS.BO has a market cap of 133B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while GLS.BO trades at ₹1,085.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas GLS.BO's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to GLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check GLS.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs ALIVUS.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, ALIVUS.BO has a market cap of 132.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while ALIVUS.BO trades at ₹1,118.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas ALIVUS.BO's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALIVUS.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to ALIVUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check ALIVUS.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs ALIVUS.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, ALIVUS.NS has a market cap of 132.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while ALIVUS.NS trades at ₹1,118.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas ALIVUS.NS's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALIVUS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to ALIVUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check ALIVUS.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs VIYASH.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, VIYASH.NS has a market cap of 118.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while VIYASH.NS trades at ₹267.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas VIYASH.NS's P/E ratio is 67.80. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIYASH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to VIYASH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check VIYASH.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs CAPPL.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, CAPPL.BO has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while CAPPL.BO trades at ₹1,446.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas CAPPL.BO's P/E ratio is 50.30. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CAPPL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to CAPPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check CAPPL.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs SHILPAMED.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, SHILPAMED.NS has a market cap of 107.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while SHILPAMED.NS trades at ₹586.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas SHILPAMED.NS's P/E ratio is 43.98. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHILPAMED.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to SHILPAMED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check SHILPAMED.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs PGHL.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, PGHL.NS has a market cap of 104.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while PGHL.NS trades at ₹6,200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas PGHL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.06. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PGHL.NS's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to PGHL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check PGHL.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs PGHL.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, PGHL.BO has a market cap of 104.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while PGHL.BO trades at ₹6,200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas PGHL.BO's P/E ratio is 31.97. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PGHL.BO's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to PGHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check PGHL.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs STAR.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, STAR.BO has a market cap of 103.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while STAR.BO trades at ₹1,104.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas STAR.BO's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STAR.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to STAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check STAR.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs STAR.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, STAR.NS has a market cap of 102.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while STAR.NS trades at ₹1,110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas STAR.NS's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STAR.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to STAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check STAR.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs AKUMS.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, AKUMS.NS has a market cap of 94.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while AKUMS.NS trades at ₹620.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas AKUMS.NS's P/E ratio is 36.98. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKUMS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to AKUMS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check AKUMS.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs SUDEEPPHRM.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, SUDEEPPHRM.NS has a market cap of 93.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while SUDEEPPHRM.NS trades at ₹838.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas SUDEEPPHRM.NS's P/E ratio is 55.71. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUDEEPPHRM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to SUDEEPPHRM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check SUDEEPPHRM.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs SPARC.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, SPARC.NS has a market cap of 77.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while SPARC.NS trades at ₹234.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas SPARC.NS's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPARC.NS's ROE of +11.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to SPARC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check SPARC.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs SPARC.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, SPARC.BO has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while SPARC.BO trades at ₹235.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas SPARC.BO's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPARC.BO's ROE of +11.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to SPARC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check SPARC.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs FDC.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, FDC.NS has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while FDC.NS trades at ₹417.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas FDC.NS's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FDC.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to FDC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check FDC.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs AARTIPHARM.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, AARTIPHARM.BO has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while AARTIPHARM.BO trades at ₹702.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas AARTIPHARM.BO's P/E ratio is 35.13. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AARTIPHARM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to AARTIPHARM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check AARTIPHARM.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs AARTIPHARM.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, AARTIPHARM.NS has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while AARTIPHARM.NS trades at ₹707.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas AARTIPHARM.NS's P/E ratio is 35.26. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AARTIPHARM.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to AARTIPHARM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check AARTIPHARM.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs SUVEN.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, SUVEN.NS has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while SUVEN.NS trades at ₹258.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas SUVEN.NS's P/E ratio is -21.87. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUVEN.NS's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to SUVEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check SUVEN.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs SUVEN.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, SUVEN.BO has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while SUVEN.BO trades at ₹260.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas SUVEN.BO's P/E ratio is -21.56. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUVEN.BO's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to SUVEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check SUVEN.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs INNOVACAP.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, INNOVACAP.NS has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while INNOVACAP.NS trades at ₹942.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas INNOVACAP.NS's P/E ratio is 38.62. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INNOVACAP.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to INNOVACAP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check INNOVACAP.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs SHILPAMED.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, SHILPAMED.BO has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while SHILPAMED.BO trades at ₹584.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas SHILPAMED.BO's P/E ratio is 43.85. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHILPAMED.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to SHILPAMED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check SHILPAMED.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs SEQUENT.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, SEQUENT.BO has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while SEQUENT.BO trades at ₹202.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas SEQUENT.BO's P/E ratio is 123.41. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEQUENT.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to SEQUENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check SEQUENT.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs SEQUENT.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, SEQUENT.NS has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while SEQUENT.NS trades at ₹202.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas SEQUENT.NS's P/E ratio is 124.17. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEQUENT.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to SEQUENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check SEQUENT.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs BLISSGVS.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, BLISSGVS.NS has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while BLISSGVS.NS trades at ₹469.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas BLISSGVS.NS's P/E ratio is 39.40. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLISSGVS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to BLISSGVS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check BLISSGVS.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs BLISSGVS.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, BLISSGVS.BO has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while BLISSGVS.BO trades at ₹469.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas BLISSGVS.BO's P/E ratio is 39.38. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLISSGVS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to BLISSGVS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check BLISSGVS.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs ORCHPHARMA.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, ORCHPHARMA.NS has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while ORCHPHARMA.NS trades at ₹1,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas ORCHPHARMA.NS's P/E ratio is 238.94. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ORCHPHARMA.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to ORCHPHARMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check ORCHPHARMA.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs ORCHPHARMA.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, ORCHPHARMA.BO has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while ORCHPHARMA.BO trades at ₹989.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas ORCHPHARMA.BO's P/E ratio is 237.95. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ORCHPHARMA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to ORCHPHARMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check ORCHPHARMA.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs GUJTHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, GUJTHEM.NS has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while GUJTHEM.NS trades at ₹402.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas GUJTHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 93.56. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GUJTHEM.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to GUJTHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check GUJTHEM.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs RPGLIFE.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, RPGLIFE.BO has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while RPGLIFE.BO trades at ₹2,295.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas RPGLIFE.BO's P/E ratio is 33.47. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RPGLIFE.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to RPGLIFE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check RPGLIFE.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs RPGLIFE.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, RPGLIFE.NS has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while RPGLIFE.NS trades at ₹2,307.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas RPGLIFE.NS's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RPGLIFE.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to RPGLIFE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check RPGLIFE.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs IOLCP.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, IOLCP.BO has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while IOLCP.BO trades at ₹133.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas IOLCP.BO's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IOLCP.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to IOLCP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check IOLCP.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs IOLCP.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, IOLCP.NS has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while IOLCP.NS trades at ₹133.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas IOLCP.NS's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IOLCP.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to IOLCP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check IOLCP.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs NOVARTIND.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, NOVARTIND.NS has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while NOVARTIND.NS trades at ₹1,481.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas NOVARTIND.NS's P/E ratio is 39.48. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOVARTIND.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to NOVARTIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check NOVARTIND.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs NOVARTIND.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, NOVARTIND.BO has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while NOVARTIND.BO trades at ₹1,472.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas NOVARTIND.BO's P/E ratio is 39.47. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOVARTIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to NOVARTIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check NOVARTIND.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs GUFICBIO.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, GUFICBIO.BO has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while GUFICBIO.BO trades at ₹372.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas GUFICBIO.BO's P/E ratio is 56.41. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GUFICBIO.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to GUFICBIO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check GUFICBIO.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs GUFICBIO.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, GUFICBIO.NS has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while GUFICBIO.NS trades at ₹370.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas GUFICBIO.NS's P/E ratio is 56.31. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GUFICBIO.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to GUFICBIO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check GUFICBIO.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs AARTIDRUGS.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, AARTIDRUGS.NS has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while AARTIDRUGS.NS trades at ₹374.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas AARTIDRUGS.NS's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AARTIDRUGS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to AARTIDRUGS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check AARTIDRUGS.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs AARTIDRUGS.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, AARTIDRUGS.BO has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while AARTIDRUGS.BO trades at ₹376.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas AARTIDRUGS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AARTIDRUGS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is more volatile compared to AARTIDRUGS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check AARTIDRUGS.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs UNICHEMLAB.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, UNICHEMLAB.NS has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while UNICHEMLAB.NS trades at ₹436.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas UNICHEMLAB.NS's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNICHEMLAB.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to UNICHEMLAB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check UNICHEMLAB.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs UNICHEMLAB.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, UNICHEMLAB.BO has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while UNICHEMLAB.BO trades at ₹434.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas UNICHEMLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNICHEMLAB.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to UNICHEMLAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check UNICHEMLAB.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs SOLARA.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, SOLARA.NS has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while SOLARA.NS trades at ₹576.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas SOLARA.NS's P/E ratio is -347.13. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOLARA.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to SOLARA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check SOLARA.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs SOLARA.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, SOLARA.BO has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while SOLARA.BO trades at ₹583.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas SOLARA.BO's P/E ratio is -346.89. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOLARA.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to SOLARA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check SOLARA.BO's competition here
FDC.BO vs MOREPENLAB.NS Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, MOREPENLAB.NS has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while MOREPENLAB.NS trades at ₹52.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas MOREPENLAB.NS's P/E ratio is 28.98. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOREPENLAB.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to MOREPENLAB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check MOREPENLAB.NS's competition here
FDC.BO vs MOREPENLAB.BO Comparison June 2026
FDC.BO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDC.BO stands at 65.6B. In comparison, MOREPENLAB.BO has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDC.BO is priced at ₹415.00, while MOREPENLAB.BO trades at ₹52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.32, whereas MOREPENLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, FDC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOREPENLAB.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FDC.BO is less volatile compared to MOREPENLAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDC.BO.Check MOREPENLAB.BO's competition here