Wag! Group Co.
Wag! Group Co. PET Peers
See (PET) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PET | $0.16 | -8.81% | 9.1M | -0.47 | -$0.38 | N/A |
| SAP | $302.64 | -2.98% | 357.5B | 53.38 | $5.74 | +1.70% |
| CRM | $259.17 | -4.34% | 252.2B | 41.22 | $6.40 | +0.77% |
| INTU | $749.97 | -2.55% | 208.5B | 60.98 | $12.26 | +0.67% |
| UBER | $96.09 | -0.57% | 201.5B | 17.03 | $5.66 | N/A |
| NOW | $947.72 | -6.51% | 200.4B | 131.28 | $7.37 | N/A |
| SHOP | $113.37 | -0.83% | 149.3B | 94.41 | $1.22 | N/A |
| APP | $336.91 | -4.49% | 117.2B | 62.64 | $5.53 | N/A |
| MSTR | $431.93 | +3.98% | 115.3B | -18.97 | -$22.23 | N/A |
| CDNS | $322.57 | -0.11% | 88.1B | 81.70 | $3.95 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PET vs SAP Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 357.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while SAP trades at $302.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 53.38. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs CRM Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 252.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while CRM trades at $259.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 41.22. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs INTU Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 208.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while INTU trades at $749.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 60.98. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs UBER Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 201.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while UBER trades at $96.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs NOW Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 200.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while NOW trades at $947.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 131.28. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs SHOP Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 149.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while SHOP trades at $113.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 94.41. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs APP Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 117.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while APP trades at $336.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 62.64. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs MSTR Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 115.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while MSTR trades at $431.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -18.97. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs CDNS Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while CDNS trades at $322.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 81.70. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs SNOW Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while SNOW trades at $211.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -51.05. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs WDAY Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while WDAY trades at $224.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 128.10. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs ADSK Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while ADSK trades at $282.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 61.54. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs TEAM Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while TEAM trades at $191.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -121.24. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs DDOG Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while DDOG trades at $138.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 292.62. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs FICO Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while FICO trades at $1,560.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 68.32. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs TTD Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while TTD trades at $75.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 93.72. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs ANSS Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while ANSS trades at $377.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.71. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs STRK Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while STRK trades at $122.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs STRF Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while STRF trades at $122.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs HUBS Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while HUBS trades at $535.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1231.07. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs TYL Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while TYL trades at $554.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 84.18. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs PTC Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while PTC trades at $196.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 53.46. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs ZM Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while ZM trades at $74.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs SSNC Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while SSNC trades at $82.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs GRAB Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while GRAB trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 492.00. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs GWRE Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while GWRE trades at $221.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 548.54. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs DUOL Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while DUOL trades at $372.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 188.28. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs AZPN Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs BSY Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while BSY trades at $56.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 72.67. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs DT Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while DT trades at $51.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 33.21. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs DOCU Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while DOCU trades at $74.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs MNDY Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while MNDY trades at $288.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 298.73. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs QXO Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while QXO trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -61.17. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs PAYC Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while PAYC trades at $224.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 32.59. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs MANH Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while MANH trades at $197.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 57.05. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs U Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while U trades at $29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas U's P/E ratio is -26.03. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs BKI Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs XM Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs PCOR Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while PCOR trades at $72.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -84.84. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs CDAY Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs NICE Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while NICE trades at $155.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs PCTY Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while PCTY trades at $180.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 45.62. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs TTAN Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while TTAN trades at $108.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -29.80. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs DAY Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while DAY trades at $56.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 364.06. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs SRAD Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while SRAD trades at $28.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 145.90. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs DSGX Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while DSGX trades at $101.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 63.28. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs ESTC Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while ESTC trades at $84.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -81.41. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs APPF Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while APPF trades at $239.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 45.70. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs PEGA Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while PEGA trades at $50.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 47.80. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs NATI Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs SMAR Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs OTEX Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while OTEX trades at $28.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs CVLT Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while CVLT trades at $166.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 100.66. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs GTLB Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while GTLB trades at $43.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 500.78. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs LYFT Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while LYFT trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 102.13. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs CWAN Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while CWAN trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs COUP Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs IDCC Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while IDCC trades at $228.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs BULL Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while BULL trades at $12.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs QTWO Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while QTWO trades at $90.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -272.44. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs VERX Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while VERX trades at $35.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -123.59. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs SOUN Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while SOUN trades at $11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -20.16. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs LIF Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while LIF trades at $63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 494.46. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs BILL Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while BILL trades at $45.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2319.50. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs FROG Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while FROG trades at $40.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -57.07. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs RIOT Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while RIOT trades at $12.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -9.19. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs FRSH Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while FRSH trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -61.38. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs DAVEW Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while DAVEW trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -7.72. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs ETWO-WT Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs RUMBW Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while RUMBW trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs CVT Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs GRND Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while GRND trades at $21.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -35.48. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs PYCR Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs RUM Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while RUM trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs WK Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while WK trades at $68.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -60.41. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs PWSC Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs INTA Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while INTA trades at $45.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -195.63. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs ZI Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs CLSK Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while CLSK trades at $12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -11.63. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs AYX Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs COMP Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while COMP trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -51.92. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs ZETA Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while ZETA trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -59.72. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs ENV Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs BL Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while BL trades at $54.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 40.60. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs INST Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs ASAN Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while ASAN trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs NCNO Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while NCNO trades at $28.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -115.44. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs CALX Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while CALX trades at $50.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -98.13. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs AGYS Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while AGYS trades at $114.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 140.57. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs BLKB Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while BLKB trades at $64.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.76. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs GBTG Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while GBTG trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -66.00. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs ALIT Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while ALIT trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -98.83. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs KC Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while KC trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs ALKT Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while ALKT trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -81.62. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs BRZE Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while BRZE trades at $26.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -27.62. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs DAVE Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while DAVE trades at $218.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 64.66. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs PAR Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while PAR trades at $69.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -27.29. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs ALRM Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while ALRM trades at $55.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.
PET vs YOU Comparison
PET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PET stands at 9.1M. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PET is priced at $0.16, while YOU trades at $28.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PET currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, PET's ROE is +21.64%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PET is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PET.