Albany International Corp. (AIN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AIN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIN | $76.29 | +1.64% | 2.2B | 36.13 | $2.11 | +1.48% |
| RL | $411.16 | +0.26% | 25.1B | 24.80 | $16.58 | +0.90% |
| LEVI | $24.54 | +2.29% | 9.7B | 17.67 | $1.39 | +2.28% |
| GIL | $52.82 | -1.23% | 8.1B | 15.74 | $3.36 | +1.80% |
| VFC | $17.37 | +2.42% | 6.8B | 31.01 | $0.56 | +2.09% |
| KTB | $83.29 | +4.24% | 4.6B | 14.04 | $5.93 | +2.55% |
| ZGN | $13.15 | +1.94% | 3.5B | 27.28 | $0.48 | +1.09% |
| PVH | $74.38 | +3.29% | 3.4B | 6.65 | $11.18 | +0.20% |
| COLM | $64.51 | +1.02% | 3.3B | 17.92 | $3.60 | +1.87% |
| UAA | $6.30 | +3.62% | 2.7B | 52.38 | $0.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AIN vs RL Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RL has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while RL trades at $411.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas RL's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is more volatile compared to RL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check RL's competition here
AIN vs LEVI Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LEVI has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while LEVI trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas LEVI's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LEVI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to LEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check LEVI's competition here
AIN vs GIL Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GIL has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while GIL trades at $52.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas GIL's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GIL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is more volatile compared to GIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check GIL's competition here
AIN vs VFC Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VFC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while VFC trades at $17.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas VFC's P/E ratio is 31.01. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VFC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to VFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check VFC's competition here
AIN vs KTB Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KTB has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while KTB trades at $83.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas KTB's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KTB's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to KTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check KTB's competition here
AIN vs ZGN Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ZGN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while ZGN trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas ZGN's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ZGN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is more volatile compared to ZGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check ZGN's competition here
AIN vs PVH Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PVH has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while PVH trades at $74.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas PVH's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PVH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to PVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check PVH's competition here
AIN vs COLM Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, COLM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while COLM trades at $64.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas COLM's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to COLM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is more volatile compared to COLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check COLM's competition here
AIN vs UAA Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, UAA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while UAA trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas UAA's P/E ratio is 52.38. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to UAA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to UAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check UAA's competition here
AIN vs UA Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, UA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while UA trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas UA's P/E ratio is 50.42. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to UA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to UA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check UA's competition here
AIN vs HBI Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HBI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while HBI trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas HBI's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HBI's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to HBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check HBI's competition here
AIN vs FIGS Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FIGS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while FIGS trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas FIGS's P/E ratio is 52.73. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FIGS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to FIGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check FIGS's competition here
AIN vs GIII Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GIII has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while GIII trades at $34.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas GIII's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GIII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is more volatile compared to GIII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check GIII's competition here
AIN vs GOOS Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GOOS has a market cap of 938.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while GOOS trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas GOOS's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GOOS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to GOOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check GOOS's competition here
AIN vs OXM Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, OXM has a market cap of 535.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while OXM trades at $35.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas OXM's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OXM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to OXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check OXM's competition here
AIN vs MAGN Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MAGN has a market cap of 447M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while MAGN trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas MAGN's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MAGN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is more volatile compared to MAGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check MAGN's competition here
AIN vs SGC Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SGC has a market cap of 199.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while SGC trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas SGC's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SGC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to SGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check SGC's competition here
AIN vs VNCE Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VNCE has a market cap of 99.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while VNCE trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas VNCE's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VNCE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to VNCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check VNCE's competition here
AIN vs FFFZ Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FFFZ has a market cap of 68.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while FFFZ trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas FFFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FFFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is more volatile compared to FFFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check FFFZ's competition here
AIN vs JRSH Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JRSH has a market cap of 57.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while JRSH trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas JRSH's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JRSH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is more volatile compared to JRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check JRSH's competition here
AIN vs CULP Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CULP has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while CULP trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas CULP's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CULP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to CULP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check CULP's competition here
AIN vs JL Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JL has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while JL trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas JL's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JL's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to JL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check JL's competition here
AIN vs LLL Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LLL has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while LLL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas LLL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LLL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to LLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check LLL's competition here
AIN vs XELB Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, XELB has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while XELB trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas XELB's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to XELB's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to XELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check XELB's competition here
AIN vs PMNT Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PMNT has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while PMNT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas PMNT's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PMNT's ROE of -10.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to PMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check PMNT's competition here
AIN vs NCI Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NCI has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while NCI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas NCI's P/E ratio is 141.50. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NCI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to NCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check NCI's competition here
AIN vs JXJT Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JXJT has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while JXJT trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas JXJT's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JXJT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to JXJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check JXJT's competition here
AIN vs DLA Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DLA has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while DLA trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas DLA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DLA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to DLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check DLA's competition here
AIN vs SQBG Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SQBG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while SQBG trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas SQBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SQBG's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to SQBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check SQBG's competition here
AIN vs KBSF Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KBSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while KBSF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas KBSF's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KBSF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to KBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check KBSF's competition here
AIN vs PERY Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PERY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while PERY trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas PERY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PERY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is more volatile compared to PERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check PERY's competition here
AIN vs EVK Comparison June 2026
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EVK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $76.29, while EVK trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.13, whereas EVK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EVK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to EVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check EVK's competition here