Pace E-Commerce Ventures Ltd.
Pace E-Commerce Ventures Ltd. (PACE.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PACE.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PACE.BO | ₹16.20 | -2.70% | 369.3M | 9.01 | ₹1.82 | N/A |
| ETERNAL.BO | ₹271.95 | +1.12% | 2.4T | 1117.08 | ₹0.24 | N/A |
| ZOMATO.NS | ₹215.19 | +0.00% | 2T | 286.92 | ₹0.75 | N/A |
| ZOMATO.BO | ₹215.25 | +0.00% | 2T | 377.63 | ₹0.57 | N/A |
| SWIGGY.NS | ₹326.65 | +0.88% | 833.7B | -17.24 | -₹18.62 | N/A |
| SWIGGY.BO | ₹326.65 | +0.96% | 833.3B | -17.61 | -₹18.23 | N/A |
| NYKAA.NS | ₹267.46 | +0.71% | 763.6B | 555.69 | ₹0.48 | N/A |
| NYKAA.BO | ₹267.40 | +0.83% | 763.5B | 555.63 | ₹0.48 | N/A |
| REDTAPE.NS | ₹125.15 | -0.63% | 68.9B | 32.45 | ₹3.84 | +0.60% |
| AVL.NS | ₹490.70 | +0.93% | 62.8B | 56.80 | ₹8.56 | +0.23% |
Stock Comparison
PACE.BO vs ETERNAL.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, ETERNAL.BO has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while ETERNAL.BO trades at ₹271.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ETERNAL.BO's P/E ratio is 1117.08. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ETERNAL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to ETERNAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check ETERNAL.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs ZOMATO.NS Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, ZOMATO.NS has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while ZOMATO.NS trades at ₹215.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ZOMATO.NS's P/E ratio is 286.92. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZOMATO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to ZOMATO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check ZOMATO.NS's competition here
PACE.BO vs ZOMATO.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, ZOMATO.BO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while ZOMATO.BO trades at ₹215.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ZOMATO.BO's P/E ratio is 377.63. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZOMATO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to ZOMATO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check ZOMATO.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs SWIGGY.NS Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, SWIGGY.NS has a market cap of 833.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while SWIGGY.NS trades at ₹326.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas SWIGGY.NS's P/E ratio is -17.24. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SWIGGY.NS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to SWIGGY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check SWIGGY.NS's competition here
PACE.BO vs SWIGGY.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, SWIGGY.BO has a market cap of 833.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while SWIGGY.BO trades at ₹326.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas SWIGGY.BO's P/E ratio is -17.61. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SWIGGY.BO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to SWIGGY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check SWIGGY.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs NYKAA.NS Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, NYKAA.NS has a market cap of 763.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while NYKAA.NS trades at ₹267.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas NYKAA.NS's P/E ratio is 555.69. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NYKAA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to NYKAA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check NYKAA.NS's competition here
PACE.BO vs NYKAA.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, NYKAA.BO has a market cap of 763.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while NYKAA.BO trades at ₹267.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas NYKAA.BO's P/E ratio is 555.63. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NYKAA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to NYKAA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check NYKAA.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs REDTAPE.NS Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, REDTAPE.NS has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while REDTAPE.NS trades at ₹125.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas REDTAPE.NS's P/E ratio is 32.45. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REDTAPE.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is less volatile compared to REDTAPE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check REDTAPE.NS's competition here
PACE.BO vs AVL.NS Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, AVL.NS has a market cap of 62.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while AVL.NS trades at ₹490.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas AVL.NS's P/E ratio is 56.80. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AVL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to AVL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check AVL.NS's competition here
PACE.BO vs RTNINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, RTNINDIA.BO has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while RTNINDIA.BO trades at ₹32.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas RTNINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RTNINDIA.BO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is less volatile compared to RTNINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check RTNINDIA.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs EMIL.NS Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, EMIL.NS has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while EMIL.NS trades at ₹99.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas EMIL.NS's P/E ratio is 42.22. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EMIL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is less volatile compared to EMIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check EMIL.NS's competition here
PACE.BO vs EMIL.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, EMIL.BO has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while EMIL.BO trades at ₹99.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas EMIL.BO's P/E ratio is 42.15. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EMIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to EMIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check EMIL.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs GARGI.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, GARGI.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while GARGI.BO trades at ₹900.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas GARGI.BO's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GARGI.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to GARGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check GARGI.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs LOGICA.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, LOGICA.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while LOGICA.BO trades at ₹213.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas LOGICA.BO's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LOGICA.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to LOGICA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check LOGICA.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs PANORAMA.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, PANORAMA.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while PANORAMA.BO trades at ₹44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas PANORAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PANORAMA.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to PANORAMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check PANORAMA.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs KDML.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, KDML.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while KDML.BO trades at ₹132.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas KDML.BO's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KDML.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to KDML.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check KDML.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs COMPEAU.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, COMPEAU.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while COMPEAU.BO trades at ₹384.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas COMPEAU.BO's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COMPEAU.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to COMPEAU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check COMPEAU.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs AAYUSH.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, AAYUSH.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while AAYUSH.BO trades at ₹33.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas AAYUSH.BO's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AAYUSH.BO's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is less volatile compared to AAYUSH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check AAYUSH.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs PRAXIS.NS Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, PRAXIS.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while PRAXIS.NS trades at ₹7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas PRAXIS.NS's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRAXIS.NS's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is less volatile compared to PRAXIS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check PRAXIS.NS's competition here
PACE.BO vs PRAXIS.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, PRAXIS.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while PRAXIS.BO trades at ₹7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas PRAXIS.BO's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRAXIS.BO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is less volatile compared to PRAXIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check PRAXIS.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs ISFT.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, ISFT.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while ISFT.BO trades at ₹81.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ISFT.BO's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ISFT.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to ISFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check ISFT.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs ISFT.NS Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, ISFT.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while ISFT.NS trades at ₹80.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ISFT.NS's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ISFT.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to ISFT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check ISFT.NS's competition here
PACE.BO vs KEMP.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, KEMP.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while KEMP.BO trades at ₹945.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas KEMP.BO's P/E ratio is -91.75. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KEMP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO and KEMP.BO have similar daily volatility (4.88).Check KEMP.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs DIGIDRIVE.NS Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, DIGIDRIVE.NS has a market cap of 826.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while DIGIDRIVE.NS trades at ₹22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas DIGIDRIVE.NS's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DIGIDRIVE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to DIGIDRIVE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check DIGIDRIVE.NS's competition here
PACE.BO vs ARCHIES.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, ARCHIES.BO has a market cap of 541.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while ARCHIES.BO trades at ₹15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ARCHIES.BO's P/E ratio is -51.71. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARCHIES.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to ARCHIES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check ARCHIES.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs ARCHIES.NS Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, ARCHIES.NS has a market cap of 529M. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while ARCHIES.NS trades at ₹15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ARCHIES.NS's P/E ratio is -50.52. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARCHIES.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to ARCHIES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check ARCHIES.NS's competition here
PACE.BO vs DDIL.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, DDIL.BO has a market cap of 171M. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while DDIL.BO trades at ₹3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas DDIL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DDIL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to DDIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check DDIL.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs DUKEOFS.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, DUKEOFS.BO has a market cap of 156.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while DUKEOFS.BO trades at ₹15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas DUKEOFS.BO's P/E ratio is -7.01. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DUKEOFS.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is less volatile compared to DUKEOFS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check DUKEOFS.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs UHZAVERI.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, UHZAVERI.BO has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while UHZAVERI.BO trades at ₹15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas UHZAVERI.BO's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UHZAVERI.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is less volatile compared to UHZAVERI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check UHZAVERI.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs DARSHANORNA.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, DARSHANORNA.BO has a market cap of 134.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while DARSHANORNA.BO trades at ₹2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas DARSHANORNA.BO's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DARSHANORNA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is less volatile compared to DARSHANORNA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check DARSHANORNA.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs RAJPUTANA.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, RAJPUTANA.BO has a market cap of 101.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while RAJPUTANA.BO trades at ₹34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas RAJPUTANA.BO's P/E ratio is 42.31. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAJPUTANA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to RAJPUTANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check RAJPUTANA.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs VEERKRUPA.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, VEERKRUPA.BO has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while VEERKRUPA.BO trades at ₹0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas VEERKRUPA.BO's P/E ratio is 32.50. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VEERKRUPA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to VEERKRUPA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check VEERKRUPA.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs HARIAEXPO.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, HARIAEXPO.BO has a market cap of 82.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while HARIAEXPO.BO trades at ₹7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas HARIAEXPO.BO's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HARIAEXPO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is less volatile compared to HARIAEXPO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check HARIAEXPO.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs MHSGRMS.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, MHSGRMS.BO has a market cap of 52.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while MHSGRMS.BO trades at ₹6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas MHSGRMS.BO's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MHSGRMS.BO's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to MHSGRMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check MHSGRMS.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs JSHL.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, JSHL.BO has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while JSHL.BO trades at ₹8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas JSHL.BO's P/E ratio is -11.88. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JSHL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is more volatile compared to JSHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check JSHL.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs SPECTRA.BO Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, SPECTRA.BO has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while SPECTRA.BO trades at ₹5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas SPECTRA.BO's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPECTRA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is less volatile compared to SPECTRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check SPECTRA.BO's competition here
PACE.BO vs PRAXIS-RE.NS Comparison February 2026
PACE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACE.BO stands at 369.3M. In comparison, PRAXIS-RE.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PACE.BO is priced at ₹16.20, while PRAXIS-RE.NS trades at ₹15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas PRAXIS-RE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACE.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRAXIS-RE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACE.BO is less volatile compared to PRAXIS-RE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACE.BO.Check PRAXIS-RE.NS's competition here