Pacific Current Group Limited (PAC.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PAC.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAC.AX | A$11.20 | -2.18% | 313.5M | -13.96 | -A$0.80 | +4.19% |
| NDQ.AX | A$60.00 | +0.76% | 10.2B | 32.63 | A$1.84 | +1.51% |
| A200.AX | A$146.54 | -0.03% | 10B | 20.84 | A$7.03 | +3.31% |
| AFI.AX | A$6.86 | -0.72% | 8.4B | 31.18 | A$0.22 | +4.92% |
| VEU.AX | A$117.44 | +0.71% | 7.5B | 4.68 | A$25.12 | +2.69% |
| ARG.AX | A$8.96 | -0.11% | 6.7B | 25.48 | A$0.35 | +4.29% |
| GOLD.AX | A$53.05 | +1.51% | 5.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AMP.AX | A$2.11 | +0.96% | 5.1B | 21.31 | A$0.10 | +1.91% |
| JHG.AX | A$39.49 | +0.33% | 4.9B | 12.86 | A$3.07 | +5.95% |
| PNI.AX | A$17.00 | -2.19% | 4B | 30.49 | A$0.56 | +3.22% |
Stock Comparison
PAC.AX vs NDQ.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, NDQ.AX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while NDQ.AX trades at A$60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas NDQ.AX's P/E ratio is 32.63. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NDQ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to NDQ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check NDQ.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs A200.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, A200.AX has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while A200.AX trades at A$146.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas A200.AX's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to A200.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to A200.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check A200.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs AFI.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, AFI.AX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while AFI.AX trades at A$6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas AFI.AX's P/E ratio is 31.18. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AFI.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to AFI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check AFI.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs VEU.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, VEU.AX has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while VEU.AX trades at A$117.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas VEU.AX's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VEU.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to VEU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check VEU.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs ARG.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, ARG.AX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while ARG.AX trades at A$8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas ARG.AX's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ARG.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to ARG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check ARG.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs GOLD.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, GOLD.AX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while GOLD.AX trades at A$53.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas GOLD.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GOLD.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to GOLD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check GOLD.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs AMP.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, AMP.AX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while AMP.AX trades at A$2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas AMP.AX's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AMP.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to AMP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check AMP.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs JHG.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, JHG.AX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while JHG.AX trades at A$39.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas JHG.AX's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to JHG.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to JHG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check JHG.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs PNI.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, PNI.AX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while PNI.AX trades at A$17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas PNI.AX's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PNI.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to PNI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check PNI.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs IFL.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, IFL.AX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while IFL.AX trades at A$4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas IFL.AX's P/E ratio is 28.18. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IFL.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to IFL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check IFL.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs MFF.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, MFF.AX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while MFF.AX trades at A$5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas MFF.AX's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MFF.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to MFF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check MFF.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs VAP.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, VAP.AX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while VAP.AX trades at A$91.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas VAP.AX's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VAP.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to VAP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check VAP.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs HBRD.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, HBRD.AX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while HBRD.AX trades at A$10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas HBRD.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HBRD.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to HBRD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check HBRD.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs PPT.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, PPT.AX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while PPT.AX trades at A$19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas PPT.AX's P/E ratio is 56.02. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PPT.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to PPT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check PPT.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs WLE.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, WLE.AX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while WLE.AX trades at A$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas WLE.AX's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WLE.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to WLE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check WLE.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs CRED.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, CRED.AX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while CRED.AX trades at A$22.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas CRED.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CRED.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to CRED.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check CRED.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs MFG.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, MFG.AX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while MFG.AX trades at A$9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas MFG.AX's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MFG.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to MFG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check MFG.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs IAA.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, IAA.AX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while IAA.AX trades at A$192.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas IAA.AX's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IAA.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to IAA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check IAA.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs WAM.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, WAM.AX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while WAM.AX trades at A$1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas WAM.AX's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WAM.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to WAM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check WAM.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs IWLD.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, IWLD.AX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while IWLD.AX trades at A$69.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas IWLD.AX's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IWLD.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to IWLD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check IWLD.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs PMGOLD.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, PMGOLD.AX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while PMGOLD.AX trades at A$57.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas PMGOLD.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PMGOLD.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to PMGOLD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check PMGOLD.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs ASIA.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, ASIA.AX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while ASIA.AX trades at A$20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas ASIA.AX's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ASIA.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to ASIA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check ASIA.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs BKI.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, BKI.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while BKI.AX trades at A$1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas BKI.AX's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BKI.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to BKI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check BKI.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs IXJ.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, IXJ.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while IXJ.AX trades at A$138.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas IXJ.AX's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IXJ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to IXJ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check IXJ.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs AUI.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, AUI.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while AUI.AX trades at A$11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas AUI.AX's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AUI.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to AUI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check AUI.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs GDG.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, GDG.AX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while GDG.AX trades at A$3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas GDG.AX's P/E ratio is -34.25. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GDG.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to GDG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check GDG.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs ETPMAG.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, ETPMAG.AX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while ETPMAG.AX trades at A$76.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas ETPMAG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ETPMAG.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to ETPMAG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check ETPMAG.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs FLOT.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, FLOT.AX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while FLOT.AX trades at A$24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas FLOT.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FLOT.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to FLOT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check FLOT.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs BILL.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, BILL.AX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while BILL.AX trades at A$100.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas BILL.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BILL.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to BILL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check BILL.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs HACK.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, HACK.AX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while HACK.AX trades at A$16.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas HACK.AX's P/E ratio is 33.73. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HACK.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to HACK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check HACK.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs GDX.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, GDX.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while GDX.AX trades at A$90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas GDX.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GDX.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to GDX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check GDX.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs QAU.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, QAU.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while QAU.AX trades at A$30.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas QAU.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QAU.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to QAU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check QAU.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs MAF.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, MAF.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while MAF.AX trades at A$6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas MAF.AX's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MAF.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to MAF.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check MAF.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs DUI.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, DUI.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while DUI.AX trades at A$5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas DUI.AX's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DUI.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to DUI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check DUI.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs BBUS.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, BBUS.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while BBUS.AX trades at A$23.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas BBUS.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BBUS.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to BBUS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check BBUS.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs RPL.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, RPL.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while RPL.AX trades at A$2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas RPL.AX's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RPL.AX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to RPL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check RPL.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs IHWL.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, IHWL.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while IHWL.AX trades at A$63.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas IHWL.AX's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IHWL.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to IHWL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check IHWL.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs SEMI.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, SEMI.AX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while SEMI.AX trades at A$37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas SEMI.AX's P/E ratio is 35.52. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SEMI.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to SEMI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check SEMI.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs QLTY.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, QLTY.AX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while QLTY.AX trades at A$32.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas QLTY.AX's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QLTY.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to QLTY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check QLTY.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs VISM.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, VISM.AX has a market cap of 962.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while VISM.AX trades at A$74.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas VISM.AX's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VISM.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to VISM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check VISM.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs MOAT.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, MOAT.AX has a market cap of 933.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while MOAT.AX trades at A$115.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas MOAT.AX's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MOAT.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to MOAT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check MOAT.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs IJR.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, IJR.AX has a market cap of 903.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while IJR.AX trades at A$207.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas IJR.AX's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IJR.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to IJR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check IJR.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs CIN.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, CIN.AX has a market cap of 892.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while CIN.AX trades at A$33.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas CIN.AX's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CIN.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to CIN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check CIN.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs VAE.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, VAE.AX has a market cap of 879.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while VAE.AX trades at A$108.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas VAE.AX's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VAE.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to VAE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check VAE.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs BNDS.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, BNDS.AX has a market cap of 851.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while BNDS.AX trades at A$23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas BNDS.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BNDS.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to BNDS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check BNDS.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs MVA.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, MVA.AX has a market cap of 839.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while MVA.AX trades at A$23.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas MVA.AX's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MVA.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to MVA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check MVA.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs IHOO.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, IHOO.AX has a market cap of 791.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while IHOO.AX trades at A$239.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas IHOO.AX's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IHOO.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to IHOO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check IHOO.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs REIT.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, REIT.AX has a market cap of 788.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while REIT.AX trades at A$17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas REIT.AX's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to REIT.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to REIT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check REIT.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs DJW.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, DJW.AX has a market cap of 771.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while DJW.AX trades at A$2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas DJW.AX's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DJW.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to DJW.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check DJW.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs WXOZ.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, WXOZ.AX has a market cap of 753.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while WXOZ.AX trades at A$49.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas WXOZ.AX's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WXOZ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to WXOZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check WXOZ.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs HM1.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, HM1.AX has a market cap of 670.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while HM1.AX trades at A$2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas HM1.AX's P/E ratio is 34.65. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HM1.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to HM1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check HM1.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs VEQ.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, VEQ.AX has a market cap of 629.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while VEQ.AX trades at A$89.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas VEQ.AX's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VEQ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to VEQ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check VEQ.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs IVE.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, IVE.AX has a market cap of 616.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while IVE.AX trades at A$145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas IVE.AX's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IVE.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to IVE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check IVE.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs MIR.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, MIR.AX has a market cap of 597.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while MIR.AX trades at A$2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas MIR.AX's P/E ratio is 65.89. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MIR.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to MIR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check MIR.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs RG1.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, RG1.AX has a market cap of 595.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while RG1.AX trades at A$2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas RG1.AX's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RG1.AX's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to RG1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check RG1.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs YMAX.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, YMAX.AX has a market cap of 590.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while YMAX.AX trades at A$7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas YMAX.AX's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to YMAX.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to YMAX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check YMAX.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs WHF.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, WHF.AX has a market cap of 576.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while WHF.AX trades at A$4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas WHF.AX's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WHF.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to WHF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check WHF.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs GLS.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, GLS.AX has a market cap of 575.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while GLS.AX trades at A$2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas GLS.AX's P/E ratio is 61.60. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GLS.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to GLS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check GLS.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs OPH.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, OPH.AX has a market cap of 563.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while OPH.AX trades at A$2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas OPH.AX's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OPH.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to OPH.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check OPH.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs FGX.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, FGX.AX has a market cap of 558.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while FGX.AX trades at A$1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas FGX.AX's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FGX.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to FGX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check FGX.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs PMC.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, PMC.AX has a market cap of 523.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while PMC.AX trades at A$1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas PMC.AX's P/E ratio is 58.83. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PMC.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to PMC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check PMC.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs AEF.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, AEF.AX has a market cap of 519.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while AEF.AX trades at A$4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas AEF.AX's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AEF.AX's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to AEF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check AEF.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs FSF.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, FSF.AX has a market cap of 490.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while FSF.AX trades at A$4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas FSF.AX's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FSF.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to FSF.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check FSF.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs ACDC.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, ACDC.AX has a market cap of 485.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while ACDC.AX trades at A$124.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas ACDC.AX's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ACDC.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to ACDC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check ACDC.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs EQT.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, EQT.AX has a market cap of 485.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while EQT.AX trades at A$18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas EQT.AX's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EQT.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to EQT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check EQT.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs SLF.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, SLF.AX has a market cap of 482.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while SLF.AX trades at A$12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas SLF.AX's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SLF.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to SLF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check SLF.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs WQG.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, WQG.AX has a market cap of 464.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while WQG.AX trades at A$2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas WQG.AX's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WQG.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to WQG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check WQG.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs PIC.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, PIC.AX has a market cap of 448.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while PIC.AX trades at A$1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas PIC.AX's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PIC.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to PIC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check PIC.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs GGUS.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, GGUS.AX has a market cap of 423.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while GGUS.AX trades at A$59.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas GGUS.AX's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GGUS.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to GGUS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check GGUS.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs WMI.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, WMI.AX has a market cap of 419.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while WMI.AX trades at A$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas WMI.AX's P/E ratio is 3.95. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WMI.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to WMI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check WMI.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs QMIX.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, QMIX.AX has a market cap of 415.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while QMIX.AX trades at A$34.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas QMIX.AX's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QMIX.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to QMIX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check QMIX.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs QRE.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, QRE.AX has a market cap of 402.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while QRE.AX trades at A$9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas QRE.AX's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QRE.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to QRE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check QRE.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs GLDN.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, GLDN.AX has a market cap of 400.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while GLDN.AX trades at A$46.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas GLDN.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GLDN.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to GLDN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check GLDN.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs PE1.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, PE1.AX has a market cap of 400.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while PE1.AX trades at A$1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas PE1.AX's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PE1.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to PE1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check PE1.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs PTM.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, PTM.AX has a market cap of 386.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while PTM.AX trades at A$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas PTM.AX's P/E ratio is 69.50. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PTM.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to PTM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check PTM.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs PAI.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, PAI.AX has a market cap of 359.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while PAI.AX trades at A$0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas PAI.AX's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PAI.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to PAI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check PAI.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs RG8.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, RG8.AX has a market cap of 351.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while RG8.AX trades at A$2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas RG8.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RG8.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to RG8.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check RG8.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs ROBO.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, ROBO.AX has a market cap of 338.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while ROBO.AX trades at A$89.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas ROBO.AX's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ROBO.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to ROBO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check ROBO.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs PIA.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, PIA.AX has a market cap of 336.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while PIA.AX trades at A$1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas PIA.AX's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PIA.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to PIA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check PIA.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs VLC.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, VLC.AX has a market cap of 308.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while VLC.AX trades at A$89.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas VLC.AX's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VLC.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to VLC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check VLC.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs ESTX.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, ESTX.AX has a market cap of 301.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while ESTX.AX trades at A$106.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas ESTX.AX's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ESTX.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to ESTX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check ESTX.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs MRE.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, MRE.AX has a market cap of 293M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while MRE.AX trades at A$1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas MRE.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MRE.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to MRE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check MRE.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs AMH.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, AMH.AX has a market cap of 289.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while AMH.AX trades at A$0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas AMH.AX's P/E ratio is 40.49. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AMH.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to AMH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check AMH.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs HVST.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, HVST.AX has a market cap of 281.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while HVST.AX trades at A$13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas HVST.AX's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HVST.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to HVST.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check HVST.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs GXLD.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, GXLD.AX has a market cap of 278.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while GXLD.AX trades at A$57.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas GXLD.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GXLD.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to GXLD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check GXLD.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs RGB.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, RGB.AX has a market cap of 277.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while RGB.AX trades at A$18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas RGB.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RGB.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to RGB.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check RGB.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs SMLL.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, SMLL.AX has a market cap of 273.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while SMLL.AX trades at A$4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas SMLL.AX's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SMLL.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to SMLL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check SMLL.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs FID.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, FID.AX has a market cap of 265.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while FID.AX trades at A$8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas FID.AX's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FID.AX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to FID.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check FID.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs CDM.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, CDM.AX has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while CDM.AX trades at A$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas CDM.AX's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CDM.AX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to CDM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check CDM.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs OZR.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, OZR.AX has a market cap of 234.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while OZR.AX trades at A$16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas OZR.AX's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OZR.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to OZR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check OZR.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs BBOZ.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, BBOZ.AX has a market cap of 232.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while BBOZ.AX trades at A$21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas BBOZ.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BBOZ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to BBOZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check BBOZ.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs XARO.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, XARO.AX has a market cap of 227.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while XARO.AX trades at A$25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas XARO.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to XARO.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to XARO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check XARO.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs WAX.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, WAX.AX has a market cap of 223.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while WAX.AX trades at A$1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas WAX.AX's P/E ratio is -208.82. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WAX.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to WAX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check WAX.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs MNRS.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, MNRS.AX has a market cap of 216.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while MNRS.AX trades at A$11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas MNRS.AX's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MNRS.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to MNRS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check MNRS.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs QVE.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, QVE.AX has a market cap of 212.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while QVE.AX trades at A$0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas QVE.AX's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QVE.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to QVE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check QVE.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs CVC.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, CVC.AX has a market cap of 212.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while CVC.AX trades at A$1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas CVC.AX's P/E ratio is -46.26. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CVC.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to CVC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check CVC.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs MVS.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, MVS.AX has a market cap of 211.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while MVS.AX trades at A$20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas MVS.AX's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MVS.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is more volatile compared to MVS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check MVS.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs REP.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, REP.AX has a market cap of 210.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while REP.AX trades at A$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas REP.AX's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to REP.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to REP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check REP.AX's competition here
PAC.AX vs EZL.AX Comparison July 2026
PAC.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.AX stands at 313.5M. In comparison, EZL.AX has a market cap of 206.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.AX is priced at A$11.20, while EZL.AX trades at A$1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.96, whereas EZL.AX's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, PAC.AX's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EZL.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.AX is less volatile compared to EZL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.AX.Check EZL.AX's competition here