Pan American Silver Corp.
Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PAAS.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Silver Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAAS.TO | CA$38.61 | -1.35% | 14.2B | 33.40 | CA$1.17 | +1.44% |
| AG.TO | CA$11.32 | -1.31% | 5.6B | -30.45 | -CA$0.38 | +0.24% |
| MAG.TO | CA$28.87 | -0.79% | 3B | 24.31 | CA$1.20 | +2.79% |
| FVI.TO | CA$9.18 | +0.11% | 2.9B | 13.54 | CA$0.69 | N/A |
| DSV.TO | CA$3.18 | -4.79% | 2.7B | -47.57 | -CA$0.07 | N/A |
| FR.TO | CA$8.27 | +3.25% | 2.4B | -37.59 | -CA$0.22 | +0.24% |
| AYA.TO | CA$12.42 | -4.97% | 1.8B | -75.24 | -CA$0.17 | N/A |
| SVM.TO | CA$6.23 | -1.58% | 1.4B | 16.89 | CA$0.38 | +0.54% |
| BIG.V | CA$0.71 | -13.41% | 193.8M | -10.57 | -CA$0.07 | N/A |
| SVRS.V | CA$0.18 | -7.69% | 127.1M | -6.25 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PAAS.TO vs AG.TO Comparison July 2025
PAAS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAAS.TO stands at 14.2B. In comparison, AG.TO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAAS.TO is priced at CA$38.61, while AG.TO trades at CA$11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAAS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.40, whereas AG.TO's P/E ratio is -30.45. In terms of profitability, PAAS.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AG.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAAS.TO is less volatile compared to AG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAAS.TO.Check AG.TO's competition here
PAAS.TO vs MAG.TO Comparison July 2025
PAAS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAAS.TO stands at 14.2B. In comparison, MAG.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAAS.TO is priced at CA$38.61, while MAG.TO trades at CA$28.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAAS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.40, whereas MAG.TO's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, PAAS.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAG.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PAAS.TO is more volatile compared to MAG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAAS.TO.Check MAG.TO's competition here
PAAS.TO vs FVI.TO Comparison July 2025
PAAS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAAS.TO stands at 14.2B. In comparison, FVI.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAAS.TO is priced at CA$38.61, while FVI.TO trades at CA$9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAAS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.40, whereas FVI.TO's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, PAAS.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FVI.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAAS.TO is less volatile compared to FVI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAAS.TO.Check FVI.TO's competition here
PAAS.TO vs DSV.TO Comparison July 2025
PAAS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAAS.TO stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DSV.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAAS.TO is priced at CA$38.61, while DSV.TO trades at CA$3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAAS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.40, whereas DSV.TO's P/E ratio is -47.57. In terms of profitability, PAAS.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DSV.TO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PAAS.TO is less volatile compared to DSV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAAS.TO.Check DSV.TO's competition here
PAAS.TO vs FR.TO Comparison July 2025
PAAS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAAS.TO stands at 14.2B. In comparison, FR.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAAS.TO is priced at CA$38.61, while FR.TO trades at CA$8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAAS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.40, whereas FR.TO's P/E ratio is -37.59. In terms of profitability, PAAS.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FR.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAAS.TO is less volatile compared to FR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAAS.TO.Check FR.TO's competition here
PAAS.TO vs AYA.TO Comparison July 2025
PAAS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAAS.TO stands at 14.2B. In comparison, AYA.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAAS.TO is priced at CA$38.61, while AYA.TO trades at CA$12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAAS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.40, whereas AYA.TO's P/E ratio is -75.24. In terms of profitability, PAAS.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AYA.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAAS.TO is less volatile compared to AYA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAAS.TO.Check AYA.TO's competition here
PAAS.TO vs SVM.TO Comparison July 2025
PAAS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAAS.TO stands at 14.2B. In comparison, SVM.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAAS.TO is priced at CA$38.61, while SVM.TO trades at CA$6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAAS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.40, whereas SVM.TO's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, PAAS.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SVM.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAAS.TO is less volatile compared to SVM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAAS.TO.Check SVM.TO's competition here
PAAS.TO vs BIG.V Comparison July 2025
PAAS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAAS.TO stands at 14.2B. In comparison, BIG.V has a market cap of 193.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAAS.TO is priced at CA$38.61, while BIG.V trades at CA$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAAS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.40, whereas BIG.V's P/E ratio is -10.57. In terms of profitability, PAAS.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BIG.V's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PAAS.TO is less volatile compared to BIG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAAS.TO.Check BIG.V's competition here
PAAS.TO vs SVRS.V Comparison July 2025
PAAS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAAS.TO stands at 14.2B. In comparison, SVRS.V has a market cap of 127.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAAS.TO is priced at CA$38.61, while SVRS.V trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAAS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.40, whereas SVRS.V's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, PAAS.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SVRS.V's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PAAS.TO is less volatile compared to SVRS.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAAS.TO.Check SVRS.V's competition here
PAAS.TO vs BNKR.V Comparison July 2025
PAAS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAAS.TO stands at 14.2B. In comparison, BNKR.V has a market cap of 106.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAAS.TO is priced at CA$38.61, while BNKR.V trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAAS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.40, whereas BNKR.V's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, PAAS.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNKR.V's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PAAS.TO is less volatile compared to BNKR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAAS.TO.Check BNKR.V's competition here
PAAS.TO vs KUYA.CN Comparison July 2025
PAAS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAAS.TO stands at 14.2B. In comparison, KUYA.CN has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAAS.TO is priced at CA$38.61, while KUYA.CN trades at CA$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAAS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.40, whereas KUYA.CN's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, PAAS.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KUYA.CN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PAAS.TO is less volatile compared to KUYA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAAS.TO.Check KUYA.CN's competition here
PAAS.TO vs BNKR.CN Comparison July 2025
PAAS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAAS.TO stands at 14.2B. In comparison, BNKR.CN has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAAS.TO is priced at CA$38.61, while BNKR.CN trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAAS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.40, whereas BNKR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, PAAS.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNKR.CN's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PAAS.TO is less volatile compared to BNKR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAAS.TO.Check BNKR.CN's competition here
PAAS.TO vs SBR.TO Comparison July 2025
PAAS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAAS.TO stands at 14.2B. In comparison, SBR.TO has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAAS.TO is priced at CA$38.61, while SBR.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAAS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.40, whereas SBR.TO's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, PAAS.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBR.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAAS.TO is more volatile compared to SBR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAAS.TO.Check SBR.TO's competition here
PAAS.TO vs MSV.TO Comparison July 2025
PAAS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAAS.TO stands at 14.2B. In comparison, MSV.TO has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAAS.TO is priced at CA$38.61, while MSV.TO trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAAS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.40, whereas MSV.TO's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, PAAS.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MSV.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAAS.TO is less volatile compared to MSV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAAS.TO.Check MSV.TO's competition here
PAAS.TO vs HAMR.CN Comparison July 2025
PAAS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAAS.TO stands at 14.2B. In comparison, HAMR.CN has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAAS.TO is priced at CA$38.61, while HAMR.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAAS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.40, whereas HAMR.CN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, PAAS.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAMR.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAAS.TO is more volatile compared to HAMR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAAS.TO.Check HAMR.CN's competition here
PAAS.TO vs KTRI.V Comparison July 2025
PAAS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAAS.TO stands at 14.2B. In comparison, KTRI.V has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAAS.TO is priced at CA$38.61, while KTRI.V trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAAS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.40, whereas KTRI.V's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, PAAS.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KTRI.V's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAAS.TO is more volatile compared to KTRI.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAAS.TO.Check KTRI.V's competition here
PAAS.TO vs CSS.CN Comparison July 2025
PAAS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAAS.TO stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CSS.CN has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAAS.TO is priced at CA$38.61, while CSS.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAAS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.40, whereas CSS.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PAAS.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CSS.CN's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PAAS.TO is more volatile compared to CSS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAAS.TO.Check CSS.CN's competition here