MULTI-UNITS LUXEMBOURG - Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF
MULTI-UNITS LUXEMBOURG - Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF (P60.SI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (P60.SI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P60.SI | SGD 6.33 | +0.00% | 353.6M | 11.86 | SGD 0.53 | N/A |
| ES3.SI | SGD 4.94 | +1.06% | 2.9B | 15.20 | SGD 0.33 | +3.49% |
| LG9.SI | SGD 18.69 | +1.85% | 2.2B | 12.36 | SGD 1.51 | N/A |
| HKB.SI | SGD 3.60 | +0.00% | 1.5B | 7.50 | SGD 0.48 | N/A |
| 0P0001EF2T.SI | SGD 31.01 | +0.00% | 1.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| P15.SI | SGD 0.51 | +4.12% | 1.3B | -50.50 | -SGD 0.01 | +16.16% |
| YF8.SI | SGD 0.25 | +0.00% | 887.5M | -6.37 | -SGD 0.04 | +13.53% |
| CLR.SI | SGD 0.81 | +0.37% | 880.1M | N/A | N/A | +5.54% |
| CFA.SI | SGD 0.78 | -0.51% | 694.9M | 9.52 | SGD 0.08 | +5.38% |
| P58.SI | SGD 9.82 | +0.00% | 502.4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
P60.SI vs ES3.SI Comparison April 2026
P60.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P60.SI stands at 353.6M. In comparison, ES3.SI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, P60.SI is priced at SGD 6.33, while ES3.SI trades at SGD 4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P60.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas ES3.SI's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, P60.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ES3.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P60.SI is less volatile compared to ES3.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P60.SI.Check ES3.SI's competition here
P60.SI vs LG9.SI Comparison April 2026
P60.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P60.SI stands at 353.6M. In comparison, LG9.SI has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, P60.SI is priced at SGD 6.33, while LG9.SI trades at SGD 18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P60.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas LG9.SI's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, P60.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LG9.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P60.SI is less volatile compared to LG9.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P60.SI.Check LG9.SI's competition here
P60.SI vs HKB.SI Comparison April 2026
P60.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P60.SI stands at 353.6M. In comparison, HKB.SI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, P60.SI is priced at SGD 6.33, while HKB.SI trades at SGD 3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P60.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas HKB.SI's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, P60.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HKB.SI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, P60.SI is less volatile compared to HKB.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P60.SI.Check HKB.SI's competition here
P60.SI vs 0P0001EF2T.SI Comparison April 2026
P60.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P60.SI stands at 353.6M. In comparison, 0P0001EF2T.SI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, P60.SI is priced at SGD 6.33, while 0P0001EF2T.SI trades at SGD 31.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P60.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas 0P0001EF2T.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, P60.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE of +111.71%. Regarding short-term risk, P60.SI is more volatile compared to 0P0001EF2T.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P60.SI.Check 0P0001EF2T.SI's competition here
P60.SI vs P15.SI Comparison April 2026
P60.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P60.SI stands at 353.6M. In comparison, P15.SI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, P60.SI is priced at SGD 6.33, while P15.SI trades at SGD 0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P60.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas P15.SI's P/E ratio is -50.50. In terms of profitability, P60.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P15.SI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, P60.SI is less volatile compared to P15.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P60.SI.Check P15.SI's competition here
P60.SI vs YF8.SI Comparison April 2026
P60.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P60.SI stands at 353.6M. In comparison, YF8.SI has a market cap of 887.5M. Regarding current trading prices, P60.SI is priced at SGD 6.33, while YF8.SI trades at SGD 0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P60.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas YF8.SI's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, P60.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YF8.SI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P60.SI is less volatile compared to YF8.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P60.SI.Check YF8.SI's competition here
P60.SI vs CLR.SI Comparison April 2026
P60.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P60.SI stands at 353.6M. In comparison, CLR.SI has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, P60.SI is priced at SGD 6.33, while CLR.SI trades at SGD 0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P60.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas CLR.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, P60.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLR.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P60.SI is less volatile compared to CLR.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P60.SI.Check CLR.SI's competition here
P60.SI vs CFA.SI Comparison April 2026
P60.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P60.SI stands at 353.6M. In comparison, CFA.SI has a market cap of 694.9M. Regarding current trading prices, P60.SI is priced at SGD 6.33, while CFA.SI trades at SGD 0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P60.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas CFA.SI's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, P60.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFA.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P60.SI is less volatile compared to CFA.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P60.SI.Check CFA.SI's competition here
P60.SI vs P58.SI Comparison April 2026
P60.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P60.SI stands at 353.6M. In comparison, P58.SI has a market cap of 502.4M. Regarding current trading prices, P60.SI is priced at SGD 6.33, while P58.SI trades at SGD 9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P60.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas P58.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, P60.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P58.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P60.SI is more volatile compared to P58.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P60.SI.Check P58.SI's competition here
P60.SI vs B73.SI Comparison April 2026
P60.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P60.SI stands at 353.6M. In comparison, B73.SI has a market cap of 214.1M. Regarding current trading prices, P60.SI is priced at SGD 6.33, while B73.SI trades at SGD 0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P60.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas B73.SI's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, P60.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to B73.SI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, P60.SI is more volatile compared to B73.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P60.SI.Check B73.SI's competition here
P60.SI vs SRT.SI Comparison April 2026
P60.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P60.SI stands at 353.6M. In comparison, SRT.SI has a market cap of 137.7M. Regarding current trading prices, P60.SI is priced at SGD 6.33, while SRT.SI trades at SGD 0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P60.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas SRT.SI's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, P60.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRT.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P60.SI is less volatile compared to SRT.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P60.SI.Check SRT.SI's competition here
P60.SI vs BLS.SI Comparison April 2026
P60.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P60.SI stands at 353.6M. In comparison, BLS.SI has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, P60.SI is priced at SGD 6.33, while BLS.SI trades at SGD 1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P60.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas BLS.SI's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, P60.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLS.SI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P60.SI is less volatile compared to BLS.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P60.SI.Check BLS.SI's competition here
P60.SI vs O9A.SI Comparison April 2026
P60.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P60.SI stands at 353.6M. In comparison, O9A.SI has a market cap of 101.3M. Regarding current trading prices, P60.SI is priced at SGD 6.33, while O9A.SI trades at SGD 2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P60.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas O9A.SI's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, P60.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to O9A.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P60.SI is more volatile compared to O9A.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P60.SI.Check O9A.SI's competition here
P60.SI vs 42T.SI Comparison April 2026
P60.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P60.SI stands at 353.6M. In comparison, 42T.SI has a market cap of 75.7M. Regarding current trading prices, P60.SI is priced at SGD 6.33, while 42T.SI trades at SGD 0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P60.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas 42T.SI's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, P60.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 42T.SI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, P60.SI is less volatile compared to 42T.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P60.SI.Check 42T.SI's competition here
P60.SI vs KJ7.SI Comparison April 2026
P60.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P60.SI stands at 353.6M. In comparison, KJ7.SI has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, P60.SI is priced at SGD 6.33, while KJ7.SI trades at SGD 10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P60.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas KJ7.SI's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, P60.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KJ7.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P60.SI is less volatile compared to KJ7.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P60.SI.Check KJ7.SI's competition here
P60.SI vs 5SY.SI Comparison April 2026
P60.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P60.SI stands at 353.6M. In comparison, 5SY.SI has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, P60.SI is priced at SGD 6.33, while 5SY.SI trades at SGD 0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P60.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas 5SY.SI's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, P60.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 5SY.SI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, P60.SI is less volatile compared to 5SY.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P60.SI.Check 5SY.SI's competition here
P60.SI vs BRS.SI Comparison April 2026
P60.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P60.SI stands at 353.6M. In comparison, BRS.SI has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, P60.SI is priced at SGD 6.33, while BRS.SI trades at SGD 0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P60.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas BRS.SI's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, P60.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRS.SI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, P60.SI is more volatile compared to BRS.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P60.SI.Check BRS.SI's competition here
P60.SI vs 0P00006FYT.SI Comparison April 2026
P60.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P60.SI stands at 353.6M. In comparison, 0P00006FYT.SI has a market cap of 39.3K. Regarding current trading prices, P60.SI is priced at SGD 6.33, while 0P00006FYT.SI trades at SGD 3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P60.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas 0P00006FYT.SI's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, P60.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00006FYT.SI's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, P60.SI is more volatile compared to 0P00006FYT.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P60.SI.Check 0P00006FYT.SI's competition here
P60.SI vs YLD.SI Comparison April 2026
P60.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P60.SI stands at 353.6M. In comparison, YLD.SI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, P60.SI is priced at SGD 6.33, while YLD.SI trades at SGD 1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P60.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas YLD.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, P60.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YLD.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P60.SI is less volatile compared to YLD.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P60.SI.Check YLD.SI's competition here
P60.SI vs 0P0001AF7Z.SI Comparison April 2026
P60.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P60.SI stands at 353.6M. In comparison, 0P0001AF7Z.SI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, P60.SI is priced at SGD 6.33, while 0P0001AF7Z.SI trades at SGD 32.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P60.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas 0P0001AF7Z.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, P60.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001AF7Z.SI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, P60.SI is more volatile compared to 0P0001AF7Z.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P60.SI.Check 0P0001AF7Z.SI's competition here