Dimensional EM LrgCap Core Eq SGD Acc (SES: 0P0001AF7Z.SI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 0P0001AF7Z.SI's competitors and their performance on the SES and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 0P0001AF7Z.SI and its SES peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0P0001AF7Z.SI | SGD 36.09 | -2.35% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| G3B.SI | SGD 5.76 | -0.64% | 1.5B | 17.45 | SGD 0.33 | +3.30% |
| 0P0001EF2T.SI | SGD 32.99 | -1.17% | 1.5B | 480.20 | SGD 0.07 | N/A |
| HKB.SI | SGD 3.49 | +0.00% | 1.4B | -874.69 | -SGD 0.00 | N/A |
| CLR.SI | SGD 0.83 | -0.48% | 873.3M | N/A | N/A | +2.78% |
| YF8.SI | SGD 0.21 | +0.00% | 730.9M | 2.19 | SGD 0.10 | N/A |
| P58.SI | SGD 9.82 | +0.00% | 502.4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| P60.SI | SGD 6.33 | +0.00% | 353.6M | 11.86 | SGD 0.53 | N/A |
| B73.SI | SGD 0.13 | +0.00% | 211.7M | 8.15 | SGD 0.02 | +6.25% |
| BLS.SI | SGD 1.60 | +0.63% | 151.7M | 17.78 | SGD 0.09 | +6.44% |
Stock Comparison
Amova Singapore STI ETF (SES: G3B.SI)
0P0001AF7Z.SI vs G3B.SI Comparison August 2026
Dimensional EM LrgCap Core Eq SGD Acc (SES: 0P0001AF7Z.SI) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001AF7Z.SI stands at 0. In comparison, G3B.SI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is priced at SGD 36.09 on the SES, while G3B.SI trades at SGD 5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001AF7Z.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas G3B.SI's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, 0P0001AF7Z.SI's ROE is N/A, compared to G3B.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is less volatile compared to G3B.SI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001AF7Z.SI.Check G3B.SI's competition here
Dimensional Pac Basin Sm Comp SGD Acc (SES: 0P0001EF2T.SI)
0P0001AF7Z.SI vs 0P0001EF2T.SI Comparison August 2026
Dimensional EM LrgCap Core Eq SGD Acc (SES: 0P0001AF7Z.SI) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001AF7Z.SI stands at 0. In comparison, 0P0001EF2T.SI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is priced at SGD 36.09 on the SES, while 0P0001EF2T.SI trades at SGD 32.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001AF7Z.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001EF2T.SI's P/E ratio is 480.20. In terms of profitability, 0P0001AF7Z.SI's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE of +111.71%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is similarly volatile compared to 0P0001EF2T.SI. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001AF7Z.SI.Check 0P0001EF2T.SI's competition here
AMTD IDEA Group (SES: HKB.SI)
0P0001AF7Z.SI vs HKB.SI Comparison August 2026
Dimensional EM LrgCap Core Eq SGD Acc (SES: 0P0001AF7Z.SI) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001AF7Z.SI stands at 0. In comparison, HKB.SI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is priced at SGD 36.09 on the SES, while HKB.SI trades at SGD 3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001AF7Z.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKB.SI's P/E ratio is -874.69. In terms of profitability, 0P0001AF7Z.SI's ROE is N/A, compared to HKB.SI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is less volatile compared to HKB.SI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001AF7Z.SI.Check HKB.SI's competition here
Lion-Phillip S-REIT ETF (SES: CLR.SI)
0P0001AF7Z.SI vs CLR.SI Comparison August 2026
Dimensional EM LrgCap Core Eq SGD Acc (SES: 0P0001AF7Z.SI) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001AF7Z.SI stands at 0. In comparison, CLR.SI has a market cap of 873.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is priced at SGD 36.09 on the SES, while CLR.SI trades at SGD 0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001AF7Z.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLR.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001AF7Z.SI's ROE is N/A, compared to CLR.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is less volatile compared to CLR.SI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001AF7Z.SI.Check CLR.SI's competition here
Yangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd. (SES: YF8.SI)
0P0001AF7Z.SI vs YF8.SI Comparison August 2026
Dimensional EM LrgCap Core Eq SGD Acc (SES: 0P0001AF7Z.SI) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001AF7Z.SI stands at 0. In comparison, YF8.SI has a market cap of 730.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is priced at SGD 36.09 on the SES, while YF8.SI trades at SGD 0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001AF7Z.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YF8.SI's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, 0P0001AF7Z.SI's ROE is N/A, compared to YF8.SI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is less volatile compared to YF8.SI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001AF7Z.SI.Check YF8.SI's competition here
Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra (DR) UCITS ETF (SES: P58.SI)
0P0001AF7Z.SI vs P58.SI Comparison August 2026
Dimensional EM LrgCap Core Eq SGD Acc (SES: 0P0001AF7Z.SI) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001AF7Z.SI stands at 0. In comparison, P58.SI has a market cap of 502.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is priced at SGD 36.09 on the SES, while P58.SI trades at SGD 9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001AF7Z.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P58.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001AF7Z.SI's ROE is N/A, compared to P58.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is less volatile compared to P58.SI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001AF7Z.SI.Check P58.SI's competition here
MULTI-UNITS LUXEMBOURG - Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF (SES: P60.SI)
0P0001AF7Z.SI vs P60.SI Comparison August 2026
Dimensional EM LrgCap Core Eq SGD Acc (SES: 0P0001AF7Z.SI) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001AF7Z.SI stands at 0. In comparison, P60.SI has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is priced at SGD 36.09 on the SES, while P60.SI trades at SGD 6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001AF7Z.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P60.SI's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, 0P0001AF7Z.SI's ROE is N/A, compared to P60.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is less volatile compared to P60.SI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001AF7Z.SI.Check P60.SI's competition here
Global Investments Limited (SES: B73.SI)
0P0001AF7Z.SI vs B73.SI Comparison August 2026
Dimensional EM LrgCap Core Eq SGD Acc (SES: 0P0001AF7Z.SI) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001AF7Z.SI stands at 0. In comparison, B73.SI has a market cap of 211.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is priced at SGD 36.09 on the SES, while B73.SI trades at SGD 0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001AF7Z.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas B73.SI's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, 0P0001AF7Z.SI's ROE is N/A, compared to B73.SI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is similarly volatile compared to B73.SI. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001AF7Z.SI.Check B73.SI's competition here
Hotung Investment Holdings Limited (SES: BLS.SI)
0P0001AF7Z.SI vs BLS.SI Comparison August 2026
Dimensional EM LrgCap Core Eq SGD Acc (SES: 0P0001AF7Z.SI) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001AF7Z.SI stands at 0. In comparison, BLS.SI has a market cap of 151.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is priced at SGD 36.09 on the SES, while BLS.SI trades at SGD 1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001AF7Z.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLS.SI's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, 0P0001AF7Z.SI's ROE is N/A, compared to BLS.SI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is less volatile compared to BLS.SI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001AF7Z.SI.Check BLS.SI's competition here
CSOP iEdge S-REIT Leaders Index ETF (SES: SRT.SI)
0P0001AF7Z.SI vs SRT.SI Comparison August 2026
Dimensional EM LrgCap Core Eq SGD Acc (SES: 0P0001AF7Z.SI) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001AF7Z.SI stands at 0. In comparison, SRT.SI has a market cap of 130.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is priced at SGD 36.09 on the SES, while SRT.SI trades at SGD 0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001AF7Z.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRT.SI's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, 0P0001AF7Z.SI's ROE is N/A, compared to SRT.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is less volatile compared to SRT.SI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001AF7Z.SI.Check SRT.SI's competition here
The Trendlines Group Ltd. (SES: 42T.SI)
0P0001AF7Z.SI vs 42T.SI Comparison August 2026
Dimensional EM LrgCap Core Eq SGD Acc (SES: 0P0001AF7Z.SI) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001AF7Z.SI stands at 0. In comparison, 42T.SI has a market cap of 83M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is priced at SGD 36.09 on the SES, while 42T.SI trades at SGD 0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001AF7Z.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 42T.SI's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, 0P0001AF7Z.SI's ROE is N/A, compared to 42T.SI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is less volatile compared to 42T.SI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001AF7Z.SI.Check 42T.SI's competition here
OneApex Limited (SES: 5SY.SI)
0P0001AF7Z.SI vs 5SY.SI Comparison August 2026
Dimensional EM LrgCap Core Eq SGD Acc (SES: 0P0001AF7Z.SI) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001AF7Z.SI stands at 0. In comparison, 5SY.SI has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is priced at SGD 36.09 on the SES, while 5SY.SI trades at SGD 0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001AF7Z.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 5SY.SI's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, 0P0001AF7Z.SI's ROE is N/A, compared to 5SY.SI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is less volatile compared to 5SY.SI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001AF7Z.SI.Check 5SY.SI's competition here
USP Group Limited (SES: BRS.SI)
0P0001AF7Z.SI vs BRS.SI Comparison August 2026
Dimensional EM LrgCap Core Eq SGD Acc (SES: 0P0001AF7Z.SI) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001AF7Z.SI stands at 0. In comparison, BRS.SI has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is priced at SGD 36.09 on the SES, while BRS.SI trades at SGD 0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001AF7Z.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRS.SI's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, 0P0001AF7Z.SI's ROE is N/A, compared to BRS.SI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is similarly volatile compared to BRS.SI. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001AF7Z.SI.Check BRS.SI's competition here
Infinity US 500 Stock Index SGD (SES: 0P00006FYT.SI)
0P0001AF7Z.SI vs 0P00006FYT.SI Comparison August 2026
Dimensional EM LrgCap Core Eq SGD Acc (SES: 0P0001AF7Z.SI) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001AF7Z.SI stands at 0. In comparison, 0P00006FYT.SI has a market cap of 45.4K. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is priced at SGD 36.09 on the SES, while 0P00006FYT.SI trades at SGD 4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001AF7Z.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00006FYT.SI's P/E ratio is -7.63. In terms of profitability, 0P0001AF7Z.SI's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00006FYT.SI's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001AF7Z.SI is similarly volatile compared to 0P00006FYT.SI. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001AF7Z.SI.Check 0P00006FYT.SI's competition here