Dimensional Pac Basin Sm Comp SGD Acc (0P0001EF2T.SI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0P0001EF2T.SI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0P0001EF2T.SI | SGD 34.41 | +0.82% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HKB.SI | SGD 3.49 | +0.00% | 1.4B | 34.90 | SGD 0.10 | N/A |
| P15.SI | SGD 0.47 | +0.00% | 1.2B | -46.50 | -SGD 0.01 | +12.26% |
| CLR.SI | SGD 0.82 | -0.12% | 873.9M | N/A | N/A | +5.47% |
| YF8.SI | SGD 0.23 | +2.22% | 765.7M | -5.50 | -SGD 0.04 | N/A |
| P58.SI | SGD 9.82 | +0.00% | 502.4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| P60.SI | SGD 6.33 | +0.00% | 353.6M | 11.86 | SGD 0.53 | N/A |
| B73.SI | SGD 0.13 | +0.00% | 210.2M | 12.60 | SGD 0.01 | +6.35% |
| BLS.SI | SGD 1.67 | +0.60% | 158.4M | 18.56 | SGD 0.09 | +6.17% |
| SRT.SI | SGD 0.74 | -0.14% | 126M | 3.85 | SGD 0.19 | +5.95% |
Stock Comparison
0P0001EF2T.SI vs HKB.SI Comparison June 2026
0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HKB.SI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at SGD 34.41, while HKB.SI trades at SGD 3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKB.SI's P/E ratio is 34.90. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to HKB.SI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to HKB.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.Check HKB.SI's competition here
0P0001EF2T.SI vs P15.SI Comparison June 2026
0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.6B. In comparison, P15.SI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at SGD 34.41, while P15.SI trades at SGD 0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P15.SI's P/E ratio is -46.50. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to P15.SI's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to P15.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.Check P15.SI's competition here
0P0001EF2T.SI vs CLR.SI Comparison June 2026
0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CLR.SI has a market cap of 873.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at SGD 34.41, while CLR.SI trades at SGD 0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLR.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to CLR.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to CLR.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.Check CLR.SI's competition here
0P0001EF2T.SI vs YF8.SI Comparison June 2026
0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.6B. In comparison, YF8.SI has a market cap of 765.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at SGD 34.41, while YF8.SI trades at SGD 0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YF8.SI's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to YF8.SI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to YF8.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.Check YF8.SI's competition here
0P0001EF2T.SI vs P58.SI Comparison June 2026
0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.6B. In comparison, P58.SI has a market cap of 502.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at SGD 34.41, while P58.SI trades at SGD 9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P58.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to P58.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to P58.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.Check P58.SI's competition here
0P0001EF2T.SI vs P60.SI Comparison June 2026
0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.6B. In comparison, P60.SI has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at SGD 34.41, while P60.SI trades at SGD 6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P60.SI's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to P60.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to P60.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.Check P60.SI's competition here
0P0001EF2T.SI vs B73.SI Comparison June 2026
0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.6B. In comparison, B73.SI has a market cap of 210.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at SGD 34.41, while B73.SI trades at SGD 0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas B73.SI's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to B73.SI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to B73.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.Check B73.SI's competition here
0P0001EF2T.SI vs BLS.SI Comparison June 2026
0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BLS.SI has a market cap of 158.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at SGD 34.41, while BLS.SI trades at SGD 1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLS.SI's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to BLS.SI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to BLS.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.Check BLS.SI's competition here
0P0001EF2T.SI vs SRT.SI Comparison June 2026
0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SRT.SI has a market cap of 126M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at SGD 34.41, while SRT.SI trades at SGD 0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRT.SI's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to SRT.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to SRT.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.Check SRT.SI's competition here
0P0001EF2T.SI vs 42T.SI Comparison June 2026
0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 42T.SI has a market cap of 87.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at SGD 34.41, while 42T.SI trades at SGD 0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 42T.SI's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to 42T.SI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to 42T.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.Check 42T.SI's competition here
0P0001EF2T.SI vs 5SY.SI Comparison June 2026
0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 5SY.SI has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at SGD 34.41, while 5SY.SI trades at SGD 0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 5SY.SI's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to 5SY.SI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to 5SY.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.Check 5SY.SI's competition here
0P0001EF2T.SI vs BRS.SI Comparison June 2026
0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRS.SI has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at SGD 34.41, while BRS.SI trades at SGD 0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRS.SI's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to BRS.SI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI and BRS.SI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRS.SI's competition here
0P0001EF2T.SI vs 0P00006FYT.SI Comparison June 2026
0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 0P00006FYT.SI has a market cap of 45.6K. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at SGD 34.41, while 0P00006FYT.SI trades at SGD 4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00006FYT.SI's P/E ratio is 29.12. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to 0P00006FYT.SI's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI and 0P00006FYT.SI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P00006FYT.SI's competition here
0P0001EF2T.SI vs 0P0001AF7Z.SI Comparison June 2026
0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 0P0001AF7Z.SI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at SGD 34.41, while 0P0001AF7Z.SI trades at SGD 40.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001AF7Z.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to 0P0001AF7Z.SI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI and 0P0001AF7Z.SI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P0001AF7Z.SI's competition here