Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra (DR) UCITS ETF
Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra (DR) UCITS ETF (P58.SI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (P58.SI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P58.SI | SGD 9.82 | +0.00% | 502.4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ES3.SI | SGD 4.91 | +0.20% | 2.9B | 14.92 | SGD 0.33 | +3.55% |
| LG9.SI | SGD 18.35 | -4.38% | 2.2B | 12.13 | SGD 1.51 | N/A |
| HKB.SI | SGD 3.60 | +0.00% | 1.5B | 7.50 | SGD 0.48 | N/A |
| 0P0001EF2T.SI | SGD 31.01 | +0.00% | 1.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| P15.SI | SGD 0.50 | +0.00% | 1.3B | -48.50 | -SGD 0.01 | +16.82% |
| YF8.SI | SGD 0.25 | +0.00% | 870.1M | -6.25 | -SGD 0.04 | +13.80% |
| CLR.SI | SGD 0.80 | +0.25% | 867.1M | N/A | N/A | +5.60% |
| CFA.SI | SGD 0.79 | -0.13% | 695.8M | 9.53 | SGD 0.08 | +5.55% |
| P60.SI | SGD 6.33 | +0.00% | 353.6M | 11.86 | SGD 0.53 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
P58.SI vs ES3.SI Comparison April 2026
P58.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P58.SI stands at 502.4M. In comparison, ES3.SI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, P58.SI is priced at SGD 9.82, while ES3.SI trades at SGD 4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P58.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ES3.SI's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, P58.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ES3.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P58.SI is less volatile compared to ES3.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P58.SI.Check ES3.SI's competition here
P58.SI vs LG9.SI Comparison April 2026
P58.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P58.SI stands at 502.4M. In comparison, LG9.SI has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, P58.SI is priced at SGD 9.82, while LG9.SI trades at SGD 18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P58.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LG9.SI's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, P58.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LG9.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P58.SI is less volatile compared to LG9.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P58.SI.Check LG9.SI's competition here
P58.SI vs HKB.SI Comparison April 2026
P58.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P58.SI stands at 502.4M. In comparison, HKB.SI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, P58.SI is priced at SGD 9.82, while HKB.SI trades at SGD 3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P58.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKB.SI's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, P58.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HKB.SI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, P58.SI is less volatile compared to HKB.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P58.SI.Check HKB.SI's competition here
P58.SI vs 0P0001EF2T.SI Comparison April 2026
P58.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P58.SI stands at 502.4M. In comparison, 0P0001EF2T.SI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, P58.SI is priced at SGD 9.82, while 0P0001EF2T.SI trades at SGD 31.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P58.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001EF2T.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, P58.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE of +111.71%. Regarding short-term risk, P58.SI is more volatile compared to 0P0001EF2T.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P58.SI.Check 0P0001EF2T.SI's competition here
P58.SI vs P15.SI Comparison April 2026
P58.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P58.SI stands at 502.4M. In comparison, P15.SI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, P58.SI is priced at SGD 9.82, while P15.SI trades at SGD 0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P58.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P15.SI's P/E ratio is -48.50. In terms of profitability, P58.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P15.SI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, P58.SI is less volatile compared to P15.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P58.SI.Check P15.SI's competition here
P58.SI vs YF8.SI Comparison April 2026
P58.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P58.SI stands at 502.4M. In comparison, YF8.SI has a market cap of 870.1M. Regarding current trading prices, P58.SI is priced at SGD 9.82, while YF8.SI trades at SGD 0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P58.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YF8.SI's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, P58.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YF8.SI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P58.SI is less volatile compared to YF8.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P58.SI.Check YF8.SI's competition here
P58.SI vs CLR.SI Comparison April 2026
P58.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P58.SI stands at 502.4M. In comparison, CLR.SI has a market cap of 867.1M. Regarding current trading prices, P58.SI is priced at SGD 9.82, while CLR.SI trades at SGD 0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P58.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLR.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, P58.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLR.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P58.SI is more volatile compared to CLR.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P58.SI.Check CLR.SI's competition here
P58.SI vs CFA.SI Comparison April 2026
P58.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P58.SI stands at 502.4M. In comparison, CFA.SI has a market cap of 695.8M. Regarding current trading prices, P58.SI is priced at SGD 9.82, while CFA.SI trades at SGD 0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P58.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFA.SI's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, P58.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFA.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P58.SI is less volatile compared to CFA.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P58.SI.Check CFA.SI's competition here
P58.SI vs P60.SI Comparison April 2026
P58.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P58.SI stands at 502.4M. In comparison, P60.SI has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, P58.SI is priced at SGD 9.82, while P60.SI trades at SGD 6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P58.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P60.SI's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, P58.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P60.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P58.SI is less volatile compared to P60.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P58.SI.Check P60.SI's competition here
P58.SI vs B73.SI Comparison April 2026
P58.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P58.SI stands at 502.4M. In comparison, B73.SI has a market cap of 214.1M. Regarding current trading prices, P58.SI is priced at SGD 9.82, while B73.SI trades at SGD 0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P58.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas B73.SI's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, P58.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to B73.SI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, P58.SI is more volatile compared to B73.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P58.SI.Check B73.SI's competition here
P58.SI vs SRT.SI Comparison April 2026
P58.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P58.SI stands at 502.4M. In comparison, SRT.SI has a market cap of 136.6M. Regarding current trading prices, P58.SI is priced at SGD 9.82, while SRT.SI trades at SGD 0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P58.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRT.SI's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, P58.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRT.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P58.SI is less volatile compared to SRT.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P58.SI.Check SRT.SI's competition here
P58.SI vs BLS.SI Comparison April 2026
P58.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P58.SI stands at 502.4M. In comparison, BLS.SI has a market cap of 134.7M. Regarding current trading prices, P58.SI is priced at SGD 9.82, while BLS.SI trades at SGD 1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P58.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLS.SI's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, P58.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLS.SI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P58.SI is less volatile compared to BLS.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P58.SI.Check BLS.SI's competition here
P58.SI vs O9A.SI Comparison April 2026
P58.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P58.SI stands at 502.4M. In comparison, O9A.SI has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, P58.SI is priced at SGD 9.82, while O9A.SI trades at SGD 2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P58.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas O9A.SI's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, P58.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to O9A.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P58.SI is less volatile compared to O9A.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P58.SI.Check O9A.SI's competition here
P58.SI vs 42T.SI Comparison April 2026
P58.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P58.SI stands at 502.4M. In comparison, 42T.SI has a market cap of 81.5M. Regarding current trading prices, P58.SI is priced at SGD 9.82, while 42T.SI trades at SGD 0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P58.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 42T.SI's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, P58.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 42T.SI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, P58.SI is less volatile compared to 42T.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P58.SI.Check 42T.SI's competition here
P58.SI vs KJ7.SI Comparison April 2026
P58.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P58.SI stands at 502.4M. In comparison, KJ7.SI has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, P58.SI is priced at SGD 9.82, while KJ7.SI trades at SGD 10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P58.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KJ7.SI's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, P58.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KJ7.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P58.SI is less volatile compared to KJ7.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P58.SI.Check KJ7.SI's competition here
P58.SI vs 5SY.SI Comparison April 2026
P58.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P58.SI stands at 502.4M. In comparison, 5SY.SI has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, P58.SI is priced at SGD 9.82, while 5SY.SI trades at SGD 0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P58.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 5SY.SI's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, P58.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 5SY.SI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, P58.SI is less volatile compared to 5SY.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P58.SI.Check 5SY.SI's competition here
P58.SI vs BRS.SI Comparison April 2026
P58.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P58.SI stands at 502.4M. In comparison, BRS.SI has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, P58.SI is priced at SGD 9.82, while BRS.SI trades at SGD 0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P58.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRS.SI's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, P58.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRS.SI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, P58.SI is more volatile compared to BRS.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P58.SI.Check BRS.SI's competition here
P58.SI vs 0P00006FYT.SI Comparison April 2026
P58.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P58.SI stands at 502.4M. In comparison, 0P00006FYT.SI has a market cap of 39.3K. Regarding current trading prices, P58.SI is priced at SGD 9.82, while 0P00006FYT.SI trades at SGD 3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P58.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00006FYT.SI's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, P58.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00006FYT.SI's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, P58.SI is more volatile compared to 0P00006FYT.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P58.SI.Check 0P00006FYT.SI's competition here
P58.SI vs YLD.SI Comparison April 2026
P58.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P58.SI stands at 502.4M. In comparison, YLD.SI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, P58.SI is priced at SGD 9.82, while YLD.SI trades at SGD 1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P58.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YLD.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, P58.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YLD.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P58.SI is less volatile compared to YLD.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P58.SI.Check YLD.SI's competition here
P58.SI vs 0P0001AF7Z.SI Comparison April 2026
P58.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P58.SI stands at 502.4M. In comparison, 0P0001AF7Z.SI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, P58.SI is priced at SGD 9.82, while 0P0001AF7Z.SI trades at SGD 32.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P58.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001AF7Z.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, P58.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001AF7Z.SI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, P58.SI is more volatile compared to 0P0001AF7Z.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P58.SI.Check 0P0001AF7Z.SI's competition here