OCI N.V.
OCI N.V. (OCINF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (OCINF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCINF | $5.69 | -3.56% | 1.2B | -7.29 | -$0.78 | +417.12% |
| AIQUF | $210.35 | -1.70% | 121.5B | 30.49 | $6.91 | +1.75% |
| AIQUY | $41.79 | -2.31% | 120.5B | 30.28 | $1.38 | +1.73% |
| PTCAY | $56.00 | +0.00% | 48.4B | 31.82 | $1.76 | +0.06% |
| PTPIF | $0.53 | +0.00% | 45.6B | 26.33 | $0.02 | +0.07% |
| GVDBF | $4,238.23 | +0.59% | 39.1B | 29.68 | $142.82 | +1.87% |
| GVDNY | $84.29 | -1.38% | 38.9B | 28.77 | $2.93 | +1.84% |
| SKFOF | $236.71 | -0.96% | 38B | 25.02 | $9.46 | +1.74% |
| SXYAY | $23.42 | -1.31% | 37.6B | 24.67 | $0.95 | +1.77% |
| AKZOY | $23.40 | -1.64% | 36.1B | 25.20 | $0.93 | +3.16% |
Stock Comparison
OCINF vs AIQUF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AIQUF has a market cap of 121.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while AIQUF trades at $210.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas AIQUF's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIQUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to AIQUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check AIQUF's competition here
OCINF vs AIQUY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AIQUY has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while AIQUY trades at $41.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas AIQUY's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIQUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to AIQUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check AIQUY's competition here
OCINF vs PTCAY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PTCAY has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while PTCAY trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas PTCAY's P/E ratio is 31.82. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PTCAY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to PTCAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check PTCAY's competition here
OCINF vs PTPIF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PTPIF has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while PTPIF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas PTPIF's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PTPIF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to PTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check PTPIF's competition here
OCINF vs GVDBF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GVDBF has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while GVDBF trades at $4,238.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas GVDBF's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GVDBF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to GVDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check GVDBF's competition here
OCINF vs GVDNY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GVDNY has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while GVDNY trades at $84.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas GVDNY's P/E ratio is 28.77. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GVDNY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to GVDNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check GVDNY's competition here
OCINF vs SKFOF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SKFOF has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while SKFOF trades at $236.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas SKFOF's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SKFOF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to SKFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check SKFOF's competition here
OCINF vs SXYAY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SXYAY has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while SXYAY trades at $23.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas SXYAY's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SXYAY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to SXYAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check SXYAY's competition here
OCINF vs AKZOY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AKZOY has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while AKZOY trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas AKZOY's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AKZOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to AKZOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check AKZOY's competition here
OCINF vs NVZMY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NVZMY has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while NVZMY trades at $62.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas NVZMY's P/E ratio is 43.94. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NVZMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to NVZMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check NVZMY's competition here
OCINF vs NVZMF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NVZMF has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while NVZMF trades at $62.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas NVZMF's P/E ratio is 43.99. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NVZMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to NVZMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check NVZMF's competition here
OCINF vs NPCPF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NPCPF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while NPCPF trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas NPCPF's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NPCPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to NPCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check NPCPF's competition here
OCINF vs EMSHF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EMSHF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while EMSHF trades at $764.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas EMSHF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EMSHF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to EMSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check EMSHF's competition here
OCINF vs NDEKF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NDEKF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while NDEKF trades at $22.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas NDEKF's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NDEKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to NDEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check NDEKF's competition here
OCINF vs SYIEF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SYIEF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while SYIEF trades at $99.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas SYIEF's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SYIEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to SYIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check SYIEF's competition here
OCINF vs SYIEY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SYIEY has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while SYIEY trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas SYIEY's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SYIEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to SYIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check SYIEY's competition here
OCINF vs CVVTF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CVVTF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while CVVTF trades at $70.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas CVVTF's P/E ratio is -30.21. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CVVTF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to CVVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check CVVTF's competition here
OCINF vs COVTY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COVTY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while COVTY trades at $35.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas COVTY's P/E ratio is -30.03. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COVTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to COVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check COVTY's competition here
OCINF vs AKZOF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AKZOF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while AKZOF trades at $69.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas AKZOF's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AKZOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to AKZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check AKZOF's competition here
OCINF vs CRTSF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRTSF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while CRTSF trades at $79.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas CRTSF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRTSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to CRTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check CRTSF's competition here
OCINF vs CHYHY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CHYHY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while CHYHY trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas CHYHY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHYHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to CHYHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check CHYHY's competition here
OCINF vs EVKIY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EVKIY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while EVKIY trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas EVKIY's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EVKIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to EVKIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check EVKIY's competition here
OCINF vs BNTGF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BNTGF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while BNTGF trades at $64.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas BNTGF's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BNTGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to BNTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check BNTGF's competition here
OCINF vs BNTGY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BNTGY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while BNTGY trades at $12.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas BNTGY's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BNTGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to BNTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check BNTGY's competition here
OCINF vs EVKIF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EVKIF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while EVKIF trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas EVKIF's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EVKIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to EVKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check EVKIF's competition here
OCINF vs SCVUF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SCVUF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while SCVUF trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas SCVUF's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCVUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to SCVUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check SCVUF's competition here
OCINF vs IMDZF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IMDZF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while IMDZF trades at $133.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas IMDZF's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IMDZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to IMDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check IMDZF's competition here
OCINF vs ASGLY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ASGLY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while ASGLY trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ASGLY's P/E ratio is 28.77. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASGLY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to ASGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check ASGLY's competition here
OCINF vs OCLDY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OCLDY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while OCLDY trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas OCLDY's P/E ratio is 115.83. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OCLDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to OCLDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check OCLDY's competition here
OCINF vs FUPBY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FUPBY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while FUPBY trades at $12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas FUPBY's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FUPBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to FUPBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check FUPBY's competition here
OCINF vs ASGLF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ASGLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while ASGLF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ASGLF's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASGLF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to ASGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check ASGLF's competition here
OCINF vs NDEKY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NDEKY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while NDEKY trades at $22.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas NDEKY's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NDEKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to NDEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check NDEKY's competition here
OCINF vs SCVPY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SCVPY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while SCVPY trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas SCVPY's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCVPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to SCVPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check SCVPY's competition here
OCINF vs OCLDF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OCLDF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while OCLDF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas OCLDF's P/E ratio is 102.08. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OCLDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to OCLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check OCLDF's competition here
OCINF vs FUPEF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FUPEF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while FUPEF trades at $39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas FUPEF's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FUPEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to FUPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check FUPEF's competition here
OCINF vs ARKAY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ARKAY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while ARKAY trades at $73.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ARKAY's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARKAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to ARKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check ARKAY's competition here
OCINF vs ARKAF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ARKAF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while ARKAF trades at $70.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ARKAF's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARKAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to ARKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check ARKAF's competition here
OCINF vs COIHF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COIHF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while COIHF trades at $35.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas COIHF's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COIHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to COIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check COIHF's competition here
OCINF vs COIHY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COIHY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while COIHY trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas COIHY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COIHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to COIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check COIHY's competition here
OCINF vs MITUY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MITUY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while MITUY trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas MITUY's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MITUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to MITUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check MITUY's competition here
OCINF vs JMPLY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JMPLY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while JMPLY trades at $50.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas JMPLY's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JMPLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to JMPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check JMPLY's competition here
OCINF vs FUPPF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FUPPF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while FUPPF trades at $42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas FUPPF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FUPPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to FUPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check FUPPF's competition here
OCINF vs KDSKF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KDSKF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while KDSKF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas KDSKF's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KDSKF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to KDSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check KDSKF's competition here
OCINF vs MITUF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MITUF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while MITUF trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas MITUF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MITUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to MITUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check MITUF's competition here
OCINF vs JMPLF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JMPLF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while JMPLF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas JMPLF's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JMPLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to JMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check JMPLF's competition here
OCINF vs WKCMF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WKCMF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while WKCMF trades at $78.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas WKCMF's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WKCMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to WKCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check WKCMF's competition here
OCINF vs AZLGF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AZLGF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while AZLGF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas AZLGF's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AZLGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to AZLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check AZLGF's competition here
OCINF vs SASOF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SASOF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while SASOF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas SASOF's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SASOF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to SASOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check SASOF's competition here
OCINF vs CLZNF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CLZNF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while CLZNF trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas CLZNF's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLZNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to CLZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check CLZNF's competition here
OCINF vs CLZNY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CLZNY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while CLZNY trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas CLZNY's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLZNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to CLZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check CLZNY's competition here
OCINF vs AWTRF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AWTRF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while AWTRF trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas AWTRF's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AWTRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to AWTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check AWTRF's competition here
OCINF vs HXXPY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HXXPY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while HXXPY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas HXXPY's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HXXPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to HXXPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check HXXPY's competition here
OCINF vs NOFCF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NOFCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while NOFCF trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas NOFCF's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NOFCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to NOFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check NOFCF's competition here
OCINF vs MBGCF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MBGCF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while MBGCF trades at $16.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas MBGCF's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MBGCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to MBGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check MBGCF's competition here
OCINF vs KPTCY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KPTCY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while KPTCY trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas KPTCY's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KPTCY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to KPTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check KPTCY's competition here
OCINF vs ICPVF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ICPVF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while ICPVF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ICPVF's P/E ratio is -32.40. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ICPVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to ICPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check ICPVF's competition here
OCINF vs HXPLF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HXPLF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while HXPLF trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas HXPLF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HXPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to HXPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check HXPLF's competition here
OCINF vs INCZY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, INCZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while INCZY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas INCZY's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INCZY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to INCZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check INCZY's competition here
OCINF vs KSANF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KSANF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while KSANF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas KSANF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KSANF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to KSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check KSANF's competition here
OCINF vs LNXSY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LNXSY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while LNXSY trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas LNXSY's P/E ratio is -13.55. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LNXSY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to LNXSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check LNXSY's competition here
OCINF vs LNXSF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LNXSF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while LNXSF trades at $29.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas LNXSF's P/E ratio is -13.27. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LNXSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to LNXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check LNXSF's competition here
OCINF vs TKKYY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TKKYY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while TKKYY trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas TKKYY's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TKKYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to TKKYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check TKKYY's competition here
OCINF vs DACHF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DACHF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while DACHF trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas DACHF's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DACHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to DACHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check DACHF's competition here
OCINF vs IRLCF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IRLCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while IRLCF trades at $275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas IRLCF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IRLCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to IRLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check IRLCF's competition here
OCINF vs ZEOOY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZEOOY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while ZEOOY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ZEOOY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZEOOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to ZEOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check ZEOOY's competition here
OCINF vs ZEOOF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZEOOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while ZEOOF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ZEOOF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZEOOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to ZEOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check ZEOOF's competition here
OCINF vs BRRDF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BRRDF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while BRRDF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas BRRDF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRRDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to BRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check BRRDF's competition here
OCINF vs KPLIF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KPLIF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while KPLIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas KPLIF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KPLIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to KPLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check KPLIF's competition here
OCINF vs TKYMY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TKYMY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while TKYMY trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas TKYMY's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TKYMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to TKYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check TKYMY's competition here
OCINF vs KANKF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KANKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while KANKF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas KANKF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KANKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to KANKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check KANKF's competition here
OCINF vs ALZCF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ALZCF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while ALZCF trades at $152.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ALZCF's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALZCF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to ALZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check ALZCF's competition here
OCINF vs ELKEF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ELKEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while ELKEF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ELKEF's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELKEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to ELKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check ELKEF's competition here
OCINF vs ELMTY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ELMTY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while ELMTY trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ELMTY's P/E ratio is -31.79. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELMTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to ELMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check ELMTY's competition here
OCINF vs EMNSF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EMNSF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while EMNSF trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas EMNSF's P/E ratio is -32.29. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EMNSF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to EMNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check EMNSF's competition here
OCINF vs TKCBF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TKCBF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while TKCBF trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas TKCBF's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TKCBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to TKCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check TKCBF's competition here
OCINF vs TKCBY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TKCBY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while TKCBY trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas TKCBY's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TKCBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to TKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check TKCBY's competition here
OCINF vs HUABF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HUABF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while HUABF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas HUABF's P/E ratio is -18.69. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HUABF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to HUABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check HUABF's competition here
OCINF vs CSNVY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CSNVY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while CSNVY trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas CSNVY's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CSNVY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to CSNVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check CSNVY's competition here
OCINF vs CUYRF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CUYRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while CUYRF trades at $70.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas CUYRF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CUYRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to CUYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check CUYRF's competition here
OCINF vs CSNVF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CSNVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while CSNVF trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas CSNVF's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CSNVF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to CSNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check CSNVF's competition here
OCINF vs ALPKF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ALPKF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while ALPKF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ALPKF's P/E ratio is -13.17. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALPKF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to ALPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check ALPKF's competition here
OCINF vs TKYMF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TKYMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while TKYMF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas TKYMF's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TKYMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to TKYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check TKYMF's competition here
OCINF vs LNTEF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LNTEF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while LNTEF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas LNTEF's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LNTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to LNTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check LNTEF's competition here
OCINF vs FPLSF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FPLSF has a market cap of 994.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while FPLSF trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas FPLSF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FPLSF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to FPLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check FPLSF's competition here
OCINF vs HUIHY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HUIHY has a market cap of 943.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while HUIHY trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas HUIHY's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HUIHY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to HUIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check HUIHY's competition here
OCINF vs AECLY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AECLY has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while AECLY trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas AECLY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AECLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to AECLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check AECLY's competition here
OCINF vs SKKAF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SKKAF has a market cap of 812.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while SKKAF trades at $60.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas SKKAF's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SKKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to SKKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check SKKAF's competition here
OCINF vs HASGF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HASGF has a market cap of 809.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while HASGF trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas HASGF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HASGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to HASGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check HASGF's competition here
OCINF vs VTXPF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VTXPF has a market cap of 799.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while VTXPF trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas VTXPF's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VTXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to VTXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check VTXPF's competition here
OCINF vs VBVBF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VBVBF has a market cap of 771M. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while VBVBF trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas VBVBF's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VBVBF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to VBVBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check VBVBF's competition here
OCINF vs DALQF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DALQF has a market cap of 757.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while DALQF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas DALQF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DALQF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to DALQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check DALQF's competition here
OCINF vs SYCHF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SYCHF has a market cap of 720.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while SYCHF trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas SYCHF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SYCHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to SYCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check SYCHF's competition here
OCINF vs DLNDY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DLNDY has a market cap of 712.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while DLNDY trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas DLNDY's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to DLNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check DLNDY's competition here
OCINF vs TYOBY Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TYOBY has a market cap of 604M. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while TYOBY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas TYOBY's P/E ratio is 171.25. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TYOBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to TYOBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check TYOBY's competition here
OCINF vs NOPMF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NOPMF has a market cap of 514.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while NOPMF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas NOPMF's P/E ratio is -49.60. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NOPMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is less volatile compared to NOPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check NOPMF's competition here
OCINF vs FLRAF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FLRAF has a market cap of 448M. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while FLRAF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas FLRAF's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FLRAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to FLRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check FLRAF's competition here
OCINF vs TNMAF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TNMAF has a market cap of 407.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while TNMAF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas TNMAF's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TNMAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to TNMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check TNMAF's competition here
OCINF vs NCRBF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NCRBF has a market cap of 331.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while NCRBF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas NCRBF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NCRBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to NCRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check NCRBF's competition here
OCINF vs SYYYF Comparison August 2025
OCINF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCINF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SYYYF has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCINF is priced at $5.69, while SYYYF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCINF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas SYYYF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, OCINF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SYYYF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCINF is more volatile compared to SYYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCINF.Check SYYYF's competition here