Nova Minerals Limited
Nova Minerals Limited NVAWW Peers
See (NVAWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVAWW | $5.00 | -8.93% | 66.4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
NEM | $60.13 | +0.59% | 66.9B | 13.69 | $4.39 | +2.08% |
AEM | $119.88 | +1.46% | 60.6B | 25.50 | $4.70 | +1.67% |
WPM | $91.02 | +1.26% | 41.3B | 66.94 | $1.36 | +0.52% |
GOLD | $21.16 | +1.37% | 36.4B | 16.03 | $1.32 | +2.36% |
FNV | $159.62 | +0.42% | 30.8B | 49.90 | $3.20 | +1.15% |
AU | $47.11 | +1.25% | 23.7B | 21.60 | $2.18 | +0.73% |
GFI | $24.15 | +0.86% | 21.6B | 17.50 | $1.38 | +2.25% |
KGC | $15.55 | +1.40% | 19.1B | 15.87 | $0.98 | +0.97% |
AGI | $26.62 | +1.95% | 11.2B | 42.95 | $0.62 | +0.47% |
Stock Comparison
NVAWW vs NEM Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while NEM trades at $60.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs AEM Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 60.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while AEM trades at $119.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs WPM Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while WPM trades at $91.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 66.94. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs GOLD Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while GOLD trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs FNV Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while FNV trades at $159.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 49.90. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs AU Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while AU trades at $47.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs GFI Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while GFI trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs KGC Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while KGC trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs AGI Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while AGI trades at $26.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 42.95. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs RGLD Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while RGLD trades at $159.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs HMY Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while HMY trades at $14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs CDE Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while CDE trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 33.07. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs SBSW Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while SBSW trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -14.25. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs AUY Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs OR Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while OR trades at $27.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 164.06. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs EQX Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while EQX trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs BTG Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while BTG trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs EGO Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while EGO trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs IAG Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while IAG trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs HL Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while HL trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 52.67. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs NGD Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while NGD trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs HL-PB Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while HL-PB trades at $50.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 1687.00. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs ORLA Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while ORLA trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 41.54. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs SAND Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while SAND trades at $9.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 98.50. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs SSRM Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while SSRM trades at $12.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs NG Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while NG trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -18.52. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NG's ROE of -14.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs SA Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while SA trades at $15.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -142.73. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs CGAU Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while CGAU trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 40.58. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs ARMN Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while ARMN trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 43.94. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs DRD Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while DRD trades at $13.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs CNL Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 829.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while CNL trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -20.37. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNL's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs IAUX Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 501M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while IAUX trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs DC Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 459.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while DC trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -13.26. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs GSS Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs CMCL Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 400.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while CMCL trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs GAU Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 350.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while GAU trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -19.43. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs ODV Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 328.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while ODV trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs NFGC Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 308.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while NFGC trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -9.05. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs CTGO Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 255.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while CTGO trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -6.31. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTGO's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs IDR Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 234.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while IDR trades at $16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs DC-WT Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 228M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while DC-WT trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs THM Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 226.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while THM trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -54.50. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs USAU Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while USAU trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -8.94. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs GSV Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs GLDG Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 149.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while GLDG trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -7.64. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs HYMC Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 146.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while HYMC trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYMC's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs VGZ Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 124.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while VGZ trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGZ's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs HYMCL Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 100.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while HYMCL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs TRX Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while TRX trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -34.02. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs GORO Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while GORO trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs PZG Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while PZG trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs ODVWZ Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while ODVWZ trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs AAU Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAU's ROE of -11.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs AUST Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while AUST trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs HYMCW Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs KL Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs PVG Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs GPL Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs HYMCZ Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 66.4M. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.00, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.