Nova Minerals Limited
Nova Minerals Limited (NVAWW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NVAWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVAWW | $5.45 | +0.93% | 105.7M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NEM | $67.92 | -1.67% | 75.8B | 12.50 | $5.52 | +1.45% |
| AEM | $135.42 | -0.27% | 68.1B | 23.06 | $5.88 | +1.17% |
| WPM | $98.57 | -1.22% | 45.7B | 74.06 | $1.36 | +0.63% |
| GOLD | $21.16 | +1.37% | 36.4B | 16.03 | $1.32 | +1.89% |
| FNV | $171.05 | -0.24% | 33.1B | 53.45 | $3.21 | +0.86% |
| AU | $58.28 | +0.41% | 28.9B | 16.17 | $3.55 | +1.42% |
| GFI | $30.77 | -1.16% | 28B | 22.67 | $1.38 | +1.74% |
| KGC | $18.71 | -0.35% | 23.1B | 15.31 | $1.24 | +0.63% |
| RGLD | $161.33 | -2.42% | 11.1B | 24.74 | $6.83 | +1.03% |
Stock Comparison
NVAWW vs NEM Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 75.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while NEM trades at $67.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check NEM's competition here
NVAWW vs AEM Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while AEM trades at $135.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check AEM's competition here
NVAWW vs WPM Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while WPM trades at $98.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 74.06. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check WPM's competition here
NVAWW vs GOLD Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while GOLD trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check GOLD's competition here
NVAWW vs FNV Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while FNV trades at $171.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 53.45. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check FNV's competition here
NVAWW vs AU Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while AU trades at $58.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check AU's competition here
NVAWW vs GFI Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while GFI trades at $30.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check GFI's competition here
NVAWW vs KGC Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while KGC trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check KGC's competition here
NVAWW vs RGLD Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while RGLD trades at $161.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check RGLD's competition here
NVAWW vs AGI Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while AGI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check AGI's competition here
NVAWW vs HMY Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while HMY trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check HMY's competition here
NVAWW vs CDE Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while CDE trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 29.13. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check CDE's competition here
NVAWW vs SBSW Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while SBSW trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check SBSW's competition here
NVAWW vs OR Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while OR trades at $29.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 72.43. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check OR's competition here
NVAWW vs AUY Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check AUY's competition here
NVAWW vs HL Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while HL trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check HL's competition here
NVAWW vs EQX Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while EQX trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check EQX's competition here
NVAWW vs BTG Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while BTG trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check BTG's competition here
NVAWW vs EGO Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while EGO trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check EGO's competition here
NVAWW vs IAG Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while IAG trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check IAG's competition here
NVAWW vs HL-PB Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while HL-PB trades at $50.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 1700.67. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check HL-PB's competition here
NVAWW vs NGD Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while NGD trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check NGD's competition here
NVAWW vs ORLA Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while ORLA trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 37.41. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check ORLA's competition here
NVAWW vs SSRM Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while SSRM trades at $15.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check SSRM's competition here
NVAWW vs SAND Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while SAND trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 104.15. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check SAND's competition here
NVAWW vs NG Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while NG trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -21.79. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NG's ROE of -14.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check NG's competition here
NVAWW vs SA Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while SA trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -149.00. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check SA's competition here
NVAWW vs CGAU Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while CGAU trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check CGAU's competition here
NVAWW vs ARMN Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while ARMN trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 46.56. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check ARMN's competition here
NVAWW vs DRD Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while DRD trades at $16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check DRD's competition here
NVAWW vs CNL Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 807.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while CNL trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CNL's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check CNL's competition here
NVAWW vs IAUX Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 488.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while IAUX trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check IAUX's competition here
NVAWW vs DC Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 458.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while DC trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -13.16. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check DC's competition here
NVAWW vs CMCL Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 451.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while CMCL trades at $22.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check CMCL's competition here
NVAWW vs GSS Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check GSS's competition here
NVAWW vs GAU Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 388.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while GAU trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -21.57. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GAU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check GAU's competition here
NVAWW vs NFGC Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 360.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while NFGC trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -9.24. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check NFGC's competition here
NVAWW vs IDR Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while IDR trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 39.73. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check IDR's competition here
NVAWW vs ODV Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 345.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while ODV trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check ODV's competition here
NVAWW vs THM Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 292.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while THM trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -70.25. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check THM's competition here
NVAWW vs CTGO Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 249.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while CTGO trades at $19.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CTGO's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check CTGO's competition here
NVAWW vs DC-WT Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 224.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while DC-WT trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check DC-WT's competition here
NVAWW vs USAU Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 168.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while USAU trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -6.68. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check USAU's competition here
NVAWW vs GLDG Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 159.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while GLDG trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check GLDG's competition here
NVAWW vs GSV Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check GSV's competition here
NVAWW vs HYMC Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 135.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while HYMC trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HYMC's ROE of +1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check HYMC's competition here
NVAWW vs VGZ Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 128M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while VGZ trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VGZ's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check VGZ's competition here
NVAWW vs TRX Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 104.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while TRX trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TRX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check TRX's competition here
NVAWW vs GORO Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 67.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while GORO trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check GORO's competition here
NVAWW vs PZG Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while PZG trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check PZG's competition here
NVAWW vs ODVWZ Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while ODVWZ trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check ODVWZ's competition here
NVAWW vs AAU Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AAU's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check AAU's competition here
NVAWW vs AUST Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while AUST trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check AUST's competition here
NVAWW vs HYMCL Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 332.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while HYMCL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check HYMCL's competition here
NVAWW vs HYMCW Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check HYMCW's competition here
NVAWW vs HYMCZ Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of +1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check HYMCZ's competition here
NVAWW vs PVG Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check PVG's competition here
NVAWW vs GPL Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check GPL's competition here
NVAWW vs KL Comparison August 2025
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 105.7M. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $5.45, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.Check KL's competition here