Nova Minerals Limited
Nova Minerals Limited NVAWW Peers
See (NVAWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVAWW | $6.41 | +4.06% | 77.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NEM | $58.53 | +0.71% | 65.1B | 13.15 | $4.45 | +1.70% |
| AEM | $123.87 | -0.11% | 62.6B | 25.91 | $4.78 | +1.29% |
| WPM | $91.30 | -0.64% | 41.4B | 66.64 | $1.37 | +0.52% |
| GOLD | $21.37 | -0.19% | 36.7B | 17.52 | $1.22 | +1.87% |
| FNV | $169.05 | -1.55% | 32.6B | 52.66 | $3.21 | +0.87% |
| AU | $48.33 | -2.72% | 24.3B | 22.17 | $2.18 | +0.72% |
| GFI | $24.28 | -2.18% | 21.7B | 17.59 | $1.38 | +2.24% |
| KGC | $15.63 | +0.29% | 19.2B | 15.94 | $0.98 | +0.77% |
| RGLD | $179.80 | +0.06% | 11.8B | 29.82 | $6.03 | +0.94% |
Stock Comparison
NVAWW vs NEM Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while NEM trades at $58.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs AEM Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while AEM trades at $123.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs WPM Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while WPM trades at $91.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 66.64. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs GOLD Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while GOLD trades at $21.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs FNV Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while FNV trades at $169.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 52.66. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs AU Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while AU trades at $48.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs GFI Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while GFI trades at $24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs KGC Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while KGC trades at $15.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs RGLD Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while RGLD trades at $179.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs AGI Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while AGI trades at $26.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 43.27. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs HMY Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while HMY trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs CDE Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while CDE trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 31.81. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs AUY Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs OR Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while OR trades at $26.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 153.71. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs BTG Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while BTG trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs SBSW Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while SBSW trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -11.77. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs EGO Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while EGO trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs IAG Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while IAG trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs NGD Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while NGD trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs HL Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while HL trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 50.71. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs ORLA Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while ORLA trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 42.00. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs HL-PB Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while HL-PB trades at $50.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 1687.67. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs EQX Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while EQX trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs SAND Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while SAND trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 92.10. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs SSRM Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while SSRM trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 31.37. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs NG Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while NG trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -31.36. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NG's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs SA Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while SA trades at $14.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -134.64. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs CGAU Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while CGAU trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs DRD Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while DRD trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs ARMN Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while ARMN trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 42.84. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs CNL Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 834M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while CNL trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -20.48. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNL's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs IAUX Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 556M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while IAUX trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs GSS Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs DC Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 438M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while DC trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -12.63. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs CMCL Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 379.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while CMCL trades at $19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs GAU Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 356.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while GAU trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -19.79. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs ODV Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 293.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while ODV trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs NFGC Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 290.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while NFGC trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs CTGO Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 258.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while CTGO trades at $20.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTGO's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs DC-WT Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 212.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while DC-WT trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs IDR Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 201M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while IDR trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs THM Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 187.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while THM trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -45.12. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs USAU Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while USAU trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -8.77. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs GSV Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs GLDG Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 149.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while GLDG trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -7.64. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs VGZ Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while VGZ trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGZ's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs TRX Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 95.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while TRX trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -33.99. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs GORO Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 84.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while GORO trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs HYMC Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 78.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while HYMC trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYMC's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs PZG Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while PZG trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs AUST Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while AUST trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs AAU Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAU's ROE of -11.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs ODVWZ Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while ODVWZ trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs HYMCL Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 382.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while HYMCL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs HYMCW Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs KL Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs GPL Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs HYMCZ Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.
NVAWW vs PVG Comparison
NVAWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVAWW stands at 77.9M. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NVAWW is priced at $6.41, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVAWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVAWW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVAWW is more volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVAWW.