Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.66, while BR trades at $176.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +1.90%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check BR's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, J has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.66, while J trades at $139.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas J's P/E ratio is 34.80. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +1.90%, compared to J's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to J. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check J's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TCGL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.66, while TCGL trades at $172.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas TCGL's P/E ratio is -5761.33. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +1.90%, compared to TCGL's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to TCGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check TCGL's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.66, while GIFT trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +1.90%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check GIFT's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, QCLS has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.66, while QCLS trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas QCLS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +1.90%, compared to QCLS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to QCLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check QCLS's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RPGL has a market cap of 236.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.66, while RPGL trades at $6.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas RPGL's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +1.90%, compared to RPGL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to RPGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check RPGL's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.66, while CRA trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas CRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +1.90%, compared to CRA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NTSK has daily volatility of 3.22 and CRA has daily volatility of N/A.Check CRA's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CRTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.66, while CRTN trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas CRTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +1.90%, compared to CRTN's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to CRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check CRTN's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PRGY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.66, while PRGY trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas PRGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +1.90%, compared to PRGY's ROE of +4.78%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NTSK has daily volatility of 3.22 and PRGY has daily volatility of N/A.Check PRGY's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CSC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.66, while CSC trades at $10.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas CSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +1.90%, compared to CSC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to CSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check CSC's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DWRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.66, while DWRE trades at $74.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas DWRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +1.90%, compared to DWRE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to DWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check DWRE's competition here