Nitro Software Limited
Nitro Software Limited (NTO.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NTO.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTO.AX | A$2.19 | +0.00% | 559.5M | -9.95 | -A$0.22 | N/A |
| WTC.AX | A$43.67 | +5.71% | 14.4B | 62.82 | A$0.68 | +0.50% |
| XRO.AX | A$80.33 | +1.30% | 13.7B | 53.72 | A$1.49 | N/A |
| TNE.AX | A$27.77 | -2.94% | 9.2B | 66.64 | A$0.42 | +1.31% |
| ALU.AX | A$68.33 | +0.07% | 9B | 84.36 | A$0.81 | +0.86% |
| 360.AX | A$20.01 | -1.62% | 4.9B | 24.62 | A$0.82 | N/A |
| IRE.AX | A$6.65 | -0.75% | 1.2B | 16.37 | A$0.41 | +3.58% |
| RUL.AX | A$4.99 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 166.33 | A$0.03 | N/A |
| OCL.AX | A$11.49 | +0.61% | 1.1B | 30.05 | A$0.38 | +2.28% |
| HSN.AX | A$4.94 | -2.47% | 1B | 15.69 | A$0.32 | +1.99% |
Stock Comparison
NTO.AX vs WTC.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, WTC.AX has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while WTC.AX trades at A$43.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas WTC.AX's P/E ratio is 62.82. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to WTC.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to WTC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check WTC.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs XRO.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, XRO.AX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while XRO.AX trades at A$80.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas XRO.AX's P/E ratio is 53.72. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to XRO.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to XRO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check XRO.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs TNE.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, TNE.AX has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while TNE.AX trades at A$27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas TNE.AX's P/E ratio is 66.64. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to TNE.AX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to TNE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check TNE.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs ALU.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, ALU.AX has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while ALU.AX trades at A$68.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas ALU.AX's P/E ratio is 84.36. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to ALU.AX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to ALU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check ALU.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs 360.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, 360.AX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while 360.AX trades at A$20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas 360.AX's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to 360.AX's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to 360.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check 360.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs IRE.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, IRE.AX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while IRE.AX trades at A$6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas IRE.AX's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to IRE.AX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to IRE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check IRE.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs RUL.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, RUL.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while RUL.AX trades at A$4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas RUL.AX's P/E ratio is 166.33. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to RUL.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to RUL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check RUL.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs OCL.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, OCL.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while OCL.AX trades at A$11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas OCL.AX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to OCL.AX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to OCL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check OCL.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs HSN.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, HSN.AX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while HSN.AX trades at A$4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas HSN.AX's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to HSN.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to HSN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check HSN.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs FCL.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, FCL.AX has a market cap of 975.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while FCL.AX trades at A$2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas FCL.AX's P/E ratio is -283.00. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to FCL.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to FCL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check FCL.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs BVS.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, BVS.AX has a market cap of 950.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while BVS.AX trades at A$2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas BVS.AX's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to BVS.AX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to BVS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check BVS.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs C79.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, C79.AX has a market cap of 874.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while C79.AX trades at A$7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas C79.AX's P/E ratio is -187.75. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to C79.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to C79.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check C79.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs IFM.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, IFM.AX has a market cap of 640.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while IFM.AX trades at A$1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas IFM.AX's P/E ratio is 42.38. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to IFM.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to IFM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check IFM.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs EIQ.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, EIQ.AX has a market cap of 617.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while EIQ.AX trades at A$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas EIQ.AX's P/E ratio is -31.17. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to EIQ.AX's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to EIQ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check EIQ.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs NXL.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, NXL.AX has a market cap of 509.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while NXL.AX trades at A$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas NXL.AX's P/E ratio is 37.63. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to NXL.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to NXL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check NXL.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs ELO.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, ELO.AX has a market cap of 483.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while ELO.AX trades at A$4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas ELO.AX's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to ELO.AX's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to ELO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check ELO.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs EOL.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, EOL.AX has a market cap of 456.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while EOL.AX trades at A$14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas EOL.AX's P/E ratio is 63.04. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to EOL.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to EOL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check EOL.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs DSE.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, DSE.AX has a market cap of 418.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while DSE.AX trades at A$5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas DSE.AX's P/E ratio is 588.00. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to DSE.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to DSE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check DSE.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs VGL.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, VGL.AX has a market cap of 357.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while VGL.AX trades at A$1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas VGL.AX's P/E ratio is 149.50. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to VGL.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to VGL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check VGL.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs SPZ.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, SPZ.AX has a market cap of 357M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while SPZ.AX trades at A$0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas SPZ.AX's P/E ratio is 86.00. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to SPZ.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to SPZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check SPZ.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs AND.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, AND.AX has a market cap of 235M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while AND.AX trades at A$2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas AND.AX's P/E ratio is -249.00. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to AND.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to AND.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check AND.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs SYM.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, SYM.AX has a market cap of 226.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while SYM.AX trades at A$2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas SYM.AX's P/E ratio is 131.50. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to SYM.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to SYM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check SYM.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs BTH.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, BTH.AX has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while BTH.AX trades at A$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas BTH.AX's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to BTH.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to BTH.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check BTH.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs RDY.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, RDY.AX has a market cap of 166.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while RDY.AX trades at A$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas RDY.AX's P/E ratio is 135.00. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to RDY.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to RDY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check RDY.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs EVS.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, EVS.AX has a market cap of 130.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while EVS.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas EVS.AX's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to EVS.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to EVS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check EVS.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs LME.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, LME.AX has a market cap of 116.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while LME.AX trades at A$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas LME.AX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to LME.AX's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to LME.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check LME.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs RC1.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, RC1.AX has a market cap of 116.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while RC1.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas RC1.AX's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to RC1.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to RC1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check RC1.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs YOJ.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, YOJ.AX has a market cap of 115.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while YOJ.AX trades at A$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas YOJ.AX's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to YOJ.AX's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to YOJ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check YOJ.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs HPG.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, HPG.AX has a market cap of 113.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while HPG.AX trades at A$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas HPG.AX's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to HPG.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to HPG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check HPG.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs MSL.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, MSL.AX has a market cap of 108.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while MSL.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas MSL.AX's P/E ratio is -49.17. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to MSL.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to MSL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check MSL.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs IOD.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, IOD.AX has a market cap of 107.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while IOD.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas IOD.AX's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to IOD.AX's ROE of +4.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to IOD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check IOD.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs VNL.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, VNL.AX has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while VNL.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas VNL.AX's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to VNL.AX's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to VNL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check VNL.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs PTG.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, PTG.AX has a market cap of 90.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while PTG.AX trades at A$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas PTG.AX's P/E ratio is -29.75. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to PTG.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to PTG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check PTG.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs ESK.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, ESK.AX has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while ESK.AX trades at A$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas ESK.AX's P/E ratio is -62.50. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to ESK.AX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to ESK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check ESK.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs IHR.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, IHR.AX has a market cap of 81.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while IHR.AX trades at A$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas IHR.AX's P/E ratio is -11.75. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to IHR.AX's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to IHR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check IHR.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs WSP.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, WSP.AX has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while WSP.AX trades at A$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas WSP.AX's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to WSP.AX's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to WSP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check WSP.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs NVU.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, NVU.AX has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while NVU.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas NVU.AX's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to NVU.AX's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to NVU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check NVU.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs DTC.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, DTC.AX has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while DTC.AX trades at A$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas DTC.AX's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to DTC.AX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to DTC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check DTC.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs ROC.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, ROC.AX has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while ROC.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas ROC.AX's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to ROC.AX's ROE of -8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to ROC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check ROC.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs IRI.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, IRI.AX has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while IRI.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas IRI.AX's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to IRI.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to IRI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check IRI.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs RKN.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, RKN.AX has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while RKN.AX trades at A$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas RKN.AX's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to RKN.AX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to RKN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check RKN.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs UBN.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, UBN.AX has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while UBN.AX trades at A$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas UBN.AX's P/E ratio is -21.67. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to UBN.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to UBN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check UBN.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs SKK.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, SKK.AX has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while SKK.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas SKK.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to SKK.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to SKK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check SKK.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs VR1.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, VR1.AX has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while VR1.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas VR1.AX's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to VR1.AX's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to VR1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check VR1.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs K2F.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, K2F.AX has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while K2F.AX trades at A$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas K2F.AX's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to K2F.AX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to K2F.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check K2F.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs ADA.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, ADA.AX has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while ADA.AX trades at A$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas ADA.AX's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to ADA.AX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to ADA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check ADA.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs JAN.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, JAN.AX has a market cap of 32.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while JAN.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas JAN.AX's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to JAN.AX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to JAN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check JAN.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs DUB.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, DUB.AX has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while DUB.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas DUB.AX's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to DUB.AX's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to DUB.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check DUB.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs IOV.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, IOV.AX has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while IOV.AX trades at A$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas IOV.AX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to IOV.AX's ROE of +11.76%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to IOV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check IOV.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs SNS.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, SNS.AX has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while SNS.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas SNS.AX's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to SNS.AX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to SNS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check SNS.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs XF1.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, XF1.AX has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while XF1.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas XF1.AX's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to XF1.AX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to XF1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check XF1.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs VIG.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, VIG.AX has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while VIG.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas VIG.AX's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to VIG.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to VIG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check VIG.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs JXT.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, JXT.AX has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while JXT.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas JXT.AX's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to JXT.AX's ROE of -5.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to JXT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check JXT.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs AHI.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, AHI.AX has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while AHI.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas AHI.AX's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to AHI.AX's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to AHI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check AHI.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs 3DP.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, 3DP.AX has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while 3DP.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas 3DP.AX's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to 3DP.AX's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to 3DP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check 3DP.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs GTI.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, GTI.AX has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while GTI.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas GTI.AX's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to GTI.AX's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to GTI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check GTI.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs AMX.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, AMX.AX has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while AMX.AX trades at A$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas AMX.AX's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to AMX.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to AMX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check AMX.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs AR9.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, AR9.AX has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while AR9.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas AR9.AX's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to AR9.AX's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to AR9.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check AR9.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs LVH.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, LVH.AX has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while LVH.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas LVH.AX's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to LVH.AX's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to LVH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check LVH.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs ICE.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, ICE.AX has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while ICE.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas ICE.AX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to ICE.AX's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to ICE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check ICE.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs CXZ.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, CXZ.AX has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while CXZ.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas CXZ.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to CXZ.AX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to CXZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check CXZ.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs FLX.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, FLX.AX has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while FLX.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas FLX.AX's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to FLX.AX's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to FLX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check FLX.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs SCL.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, SCL.AX has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while SCL.AX trades at A$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas SCL.AX's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to SCL.AX's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to SCL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check SCL.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs LNU.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, LNU.AX has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while LNU.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas LNU.AX's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to LNU.AX's ROE of +2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to LNU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check LNU.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs UNT.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, UNT.AX has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while UNT.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas UNT.AX's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to UNT.AX's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to UNT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check UNT.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs LOC.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, LOC.AX has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while LOC.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas LOC.AX's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to LOC.AX's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to LOC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check LOC.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs JCS.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, JCS.AX has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while JCS.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas JCS.AX's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to JCS.AX's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to JCS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check JCS.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs 1CG.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, 1CG.AX has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while 1CG.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas 1CG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to 1CG.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to 1CG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check 1CG.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs RCL.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, RCL.AX has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while RCL.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas RCL.AX's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to RCL.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to RCL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check RCL.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs HTG.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, HTG.AX has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while HTG.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas HTG.AX's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to HTG.AX's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to HTG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check HTG.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs CF1.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, CF1.AX has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while CF1.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas CF1.AX's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to CF1.AX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to CF1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check CF1.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs Z2U.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, Z2U.AX has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while Z2U.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas Z2U.AX's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to Z2U.AX's ROE of -2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to Z2U.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check Z2U.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs NVQ.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, NVQ.AX has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while NVQ.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas NVQ.AX's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to NVQ.AX's ROE of +15.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to NVQ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check NVQ.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs OLL.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, OLL.AX has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while OLL.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas OLL.AX's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to OLL.AX's ROE of +4.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to OLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check OLL.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs CAG.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, CAG.AX has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while CAG.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas CAG.AX's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to CAG.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to CAG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check CAG.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs MRI.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, MRI.AX has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while MRI.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas MRI.AX's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to MRI.AX's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to MRI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check MRI.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs OOK.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, OOK.AX has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while OOK.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas OOK.AX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to OOK.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to OOK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check OOK.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs PRO.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, PRO.AX has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while PRO.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas PRO.AX's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to PRO.AX's ROE of +7.84%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to PRO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check PRO.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs SIS.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, SIS.AX has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while SIS.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas SIS.AX's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to SIS.AX's ROE of +2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to SIS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check SIS.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs RLG.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, RLG.AX has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while RLG.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas RLG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to RLG.AX's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to RLG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check RLG.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs KNM.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, KNM.AX has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while KNM.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas KNM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to KNM.AX's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to KNM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check KNM.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs AER.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, AER.AX has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while AER.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas AER.AX's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to AER.AX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to AER.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check AER.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs LVT.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, LVT.AX has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while LVT.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas LVT.AX's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to LVT.AX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to LVT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check LVT.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs SYT.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, SYT.AX has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while SYT.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas SYT.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to SYT.AX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to SYT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check SYT.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs 8CO.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, 8CO.AX has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while 8CO.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas 8CO.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to 8CO.AX's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to 8CO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check 8CO.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs ID8.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, ID8.AX has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while ID8.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas ID8.AX's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to ID8.AX's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to ID8.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check ID8.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs TYM.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, TYM.AX has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while TYM.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas TYM.AX's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to TYM.AX's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to TYM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check TYM.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs WOO.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, WOO.AX has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while WOO.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas WOO.AX's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to WOO.AX's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to WOO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check WOO.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs OPA.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, OPA.AX has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while OPA.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas OPA.AX's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to OPA.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to OPA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check OPA.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs HAL.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, HAL.AX has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while HAL.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas HAL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to HAL.AX's ROE of +2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to HAL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check HAL.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs PFM.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, PFM.AX has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while PFM.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas PFM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to PFM.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to PFM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check PFM.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs DCL.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, DCL.AX has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while DCL.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas DCL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to DCL.AX's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to DCL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check DCL.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs BGE.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, BGE.AX has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while BGE.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas BGE.AX's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to BGE.AX's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to BGE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check BGE.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs PHL.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, PHL.AX has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while PHL.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas PHL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to PHL.AX's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to PHL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check PHL.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs AO1.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, AO1.AX has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while AO1.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas AO1.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to AO1.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to AO1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check AO1.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs QTG.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, QTG.AX has a market cap of 600.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while QTG.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas QTG.AX's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to QTG.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is more volatile compared to QTG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check QTG.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs GFN.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, GFN.AX has a market cap of 513.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while GFN.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas GFN.AX's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to GFN.AX's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to GFN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check GFN.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs CWL.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, CWL.AX has a market cap of 277.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while CWL.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas CWL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to CWL.AX's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to CWL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check CWL.AX's competition here
NTO.AX vs 1TT.AX Comparison May 2026
NTO.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTO.AX stands at 559.5M. In comparison, 1TT.AX has a market cap of 101.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NTO.AX is priced at A$2.19, while 1TT.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.95, whereas 1TT.AX's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NTO.AX's ROE is -0.37%, compared to 1TT.AX's ROE of -5.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NTO.AX is less volatile compared to 1TT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTO.AX.Check 1TT.AX's competition here