Praemium Limited (PPS.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PPS.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPS.AX | A$0.73 | -0.68% | 355.9M | 18.25 | A$0.04 | +3.40% |
| MQG.AX | A$237.47 | -0.24% | 90.5B | 24.46 | A$9.71 | +2.94% |
| CPU.AX | A$36.23 | +1.57% | 21B | 25.16 | A$1.44 | +2.89% |
| NWL.AX | A$21.66 | -0.14% | 5.3B | 94.17 | A$0.23 | +1.94% |
| WHF.AX | A$4.51 | -1.10% | 545M | 23.74 | A$0.19 | +4.61% |
| BFG.AX | A$1.38 | -0.72% | 441M | 12.50 | A$0.11 | +6.83% |
| COG.AX | A$1.45 | -1.69% | 308.2M | 14.45 | A$0.10 | +4.41% |
| OFX.AX | A$0.56 | -0.88% | 129.8M | 8.00 | A$0.07 | N/A |
| PWL.AX | A$0.33 | +0.00% | 68.3M | -40.63 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| SWF.AX | A$0.28 | +0.00% | 64M | 27.70 | A$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PPS.AX vs MQG.AX Comparison June 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 355.9M. In comparison, MQG.AX has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.73, while MQG.AX trades at A$237.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.25, whereas MQG.AX's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MQG.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to MQG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check MQG.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs CPU.AX Comparison June 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 355.9M. In comparison, CPU.AX has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.73, while CPU.AX trades at A$36.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.25, whereas CPU.AX's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CPU.AX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to CPU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check CPU.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs NWL.AX Comparison June 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 355.9M. In comparison, NWL.AX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.73, while NWL.AX trades at A$21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.25, whereas NWL.AX's P/E ratio is 94.17. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NWL.AX's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to NWL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check NWL.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs WHF.AX Comparison June 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 355.9M. In comparison, WHF.AX has a market cap of 545M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.73, while WHF.AX trades at A$4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.25, whereas WHF.AX's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WHF.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to WHF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check WHF.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs BFG.AX Comparison June 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 355.9M. In comparison, BFG.AX has a market cap of 441M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.73, while BFG.AX trades at A$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.25, whereas BFG.AX's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BFG.AX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to BFG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check BFG.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs COG.AX Comparison June 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 355.9M. In comparison, COG.AX has a market cap of 308.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.73, while COG.AX trades at A$1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.25, whereas COG.AX's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COG.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to COG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check COG.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs OFX.AX Comparison June 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 355.9M. In comparison, OFX.AX has a market cap of 129.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.73, while OFX.AX trades at A$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.25, whereas OFX.AX's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OFX.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to OFX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check OFX.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs PWL.AX Comparison June 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 355.9M. In comparison, PWL.AX has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.73, while PWL.AX trades at A$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.25, whereas PWL.AX's P/E ratio is -40.63. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PWL.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to PWL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check PWL.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs SWF.AX Comparison June 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 355.9M. In comparison, SWF.AX has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.73, while SWF.AX trades at A$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.25, whereas SWF.AX's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWF.AX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to SWF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check SWF.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs RZI.AX Comparison June 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 355.9M. In comparison, RZI.AX has a market cap of 58M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.73, while RZI.AX trades at A$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.25, whereas RZI.AX's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RZI.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to RZI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check RZI.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs AFA.AX Comparison June 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 355.9M. In comparison, AFA.AX has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.73, while AFA.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.25, whereas AFA.AX's P/E ratio is 1.58. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFA.AX's ROE of +15.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to AFA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check AFA.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs ASW.AX Comparison June 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 355.9M. In comparison, ASW.AX has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.73, while ASW.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.25, whereas ASW.AX's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASW.AX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to ASW.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check ASW.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs BIR.AX Comparison June 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 355.9M. In comparison, BIR.AX has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.73, while BIR.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.25, whereas BIR.AX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BIR.AX's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to BIR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check BIR.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs FNX.AX Comparison June 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 355.9M. In comparison, FNX.AX has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.73, while FNX.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.25, whereas FNX.AX's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FNX.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to FNX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check FNX.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs FFG.AX Comparison June 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 355.9M. In comparison, FFG.AX has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.73, while FFG.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.25, whereas FFG.AX's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FFG.AX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is less volatile compared to FFG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check FFG.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs EQS.AX Comparison June 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 355.9M. In comparison, EQS.AX has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.73, while EQS.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.25, whereas EQS.AX's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EQS.AX's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to EQS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check EQS.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs ABE.AX Comparison June 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 355.9M. In comparison, ABE.AX has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.73, while ABE.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.25, whereas ABE.AX's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABE.AX's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to ABE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check ABE.AX's competition here