Praemium Limited
Praemium Limited (PPS.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PPS.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPS.AX | A$0.69 | +4.89% | 312M | 16.00 | A$0.04 | +3.91% |
| MQG.AX | A$239.89 | -0.45% | 86.5B | 24.31 | A$9.71 | +2.96% |
| CPU.AX | A$34.21 | +3.29% | 19.4B | 23.26 | A$1.44 | +3.08% |
| NWL.AX | A$22.57 | +1.64% | 5.4B | 95.26 | A$0.23 | +1.92% |
| WHF.AX | A$4.81 | -0.41% | 577.7M | 25.16 | A$0.19 | +4.39% |
| BFG.AX | A$1.38 | -4.51% | 439.4M | 12.45 | A$0.11 | +6.93% |
| COG.AX | A$1.51 | -5.22% | 319.9M | 15.00 | A$0.10 | +4.33% |
| OFX.AX | A$0.57 | +6.60% | 126.3M | 7.79 | A$0.07 | N/A |
| PWL.AX | A$0.33 | +0.00% | 68.3M | -40.63 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| SWF.AX | A$0.28 | +0.00% | 64M | 27.70 | A$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PPS.AX vs MQG.AX Comparison May 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 312M. In comparison, MQG.AX has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.69, while MQG.AX trades at A$239.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas MQG.AX's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MQG.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to MQG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check MQG.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs CPU.AX Comparison May 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 312M. In comparison, CPU.AX has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.69, while CPU.AX trades at A$34.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas CPU.AX's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CPU.AX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to CPU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check CPU.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs NWL.AX Comparison May 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 312M. In comparison, NWL.AX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.69, while NWL.AX trades at A$22.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas NWL.AX's P/E ratio is 95.26. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NWL.AX's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to NWL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check NWL.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs WHF.AX Comparison May 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 312M. In comparison, WHF.AX has a market cap of 577.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.69, while WHF.AX trades at A$4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas WHF.AX's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WHF.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to WHF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check WHF.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs BFG.AX Comparison May 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 312M. In comparison, BFG.AX has a market cap of 439.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.69, while BFG.AX trades at A$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas BFG.AX's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BFG.AX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to BFG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check BFG.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs COG.AX Comparison May 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 312M. In comparison, COG.AX has a market cap of 319.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.69, while COG.AX trades at A$1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas COG.AX's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COG.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to COG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check COG.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs OFX.AX Comparison May 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 312M. In comparison, OFX.AX has a market cap of 126.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.69, while OFX.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas OFX.AX's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OFX.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is less volatile compared to OFX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check OFX.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs PWL.AX Comparison May 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 312M. In comparison, PWL.AX has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.69, while PWL.AX trades at A$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas PWL.AX's P/E ratio is -40.63. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PWL.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to PWL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check PWL.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs SWF.AX Comparison May 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 312M. In comparison, SWF.AX has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.69, while SWF.AX trades at A$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas SWF.AX's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWF.AX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to SWF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check SWF.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs RZI.AX Comparison May 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 312M. In comparison, RZI.AX has a market cap of 61.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.69, while RZI.AX trades at A$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas RZI.AX's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RZI.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to RZI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check RZI.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs AFA.AX Comparison May 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 312M. In comparison, AFA.AX has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.69, while AFA.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas AFA.AX's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFA.AX's ROE of +15.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to AFA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check AFA.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs ASW.AX Comparison May 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 312M. In comparison, ASW.AX has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.69, while ASW.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas ASW.AX's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASW.AX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to ASW.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check ASW.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs BIR.AX Comparison May 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 312M. In comparison, BIR.AX has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.69, while BIR.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas BIR.AX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BIR.AX's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to BIR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check BIR.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs FNX.AX Comparison May 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 312M. In comparison, FNX.AX has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.69, while FNX.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas FNX.AX's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FNX.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to FNX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check FNX.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs FFG.AX Comparison May 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 312M. In comparison, FFG.AX has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.69, while FFG.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas FFG.AX's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FFG.AX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is less volatile compared to FFG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check FFG.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs EQS.AX Comparison May 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 312M. In comparison, EQS.AX has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.69, while EQS.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas EQS.AX's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EQS.AX's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to EQS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check EQS.AX's competition here
PPS.AX vs ABE.AX Comparison May 2026
PPS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.AX stands at 312M. In comparison, ABE.AX has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.AX is priced at A$0.69, while ABE.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas ABE.AX's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, PPS.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABE.AX's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.AX is more volatile compared to ABE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.AX.Check ABE.AX's competition here