NorthStar Asset Management Group

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, GEGGL has a market cap of 299.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while GEGGL trades at $24.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GEGGL's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to GEGGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check GEGGL's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, FUSVX has a market cap of 157B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while FUSVX trades at $95.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUSVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to FUSVX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NSAM has daily volatility of 2.85 and FUSVX has daily volatility of N/A.Check FUSVX's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 128.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while IBKR trades at $73.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check IBKR's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, BNJ has a market cap of 106.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while BNJ trades at $15.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BNJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to BNJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check BNJ's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, ICSFX has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while ICSFX trades at $32.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICSFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ICSFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to ICSFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check ICSFX's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, MGR has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while MGR trades at $21.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to MGR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to MGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check MGR's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, ABXL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while ABXL trades at $26.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABXL's P/E ratio is 325.22. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ABXL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to ABXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check ABXL's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, SFB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while SFB trades at $20.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SFB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to SFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check SFB's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, BDVL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while BDVL trades at $25.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDVL's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BDVL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to BDVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check BDVL's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, XPMSX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while XPMSX trades at $59.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPMSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XPMSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to XPMSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check XPMSX's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, TRINL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while TRINL trades at $25.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to TRINL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to TRINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check TRINL's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, CGBDL has a market cap of 990.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while CGBDL trades at $25.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGBDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CGBDL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to CGBDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check CGBDL's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, FCRX has a market cap of 933.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while FCRX trades at $25.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCRX's P/E ratio is 177.39. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to FCRX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to FCRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check FCRX's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 718.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while BULLW trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BULLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is less volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check BULLW's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, RPC has a market cap of 664.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while RPC trades at $8.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPC's P/E ratio is 65.50. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to RPC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is less volatile compared to RPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check RPC's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, WHFCL has a market cap of 591.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while WHFCL trades at $25.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHFCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to WHFCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to WHFCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check WHFCL's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, GLADZ has a market cap of 563.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while GLADZ trades at $25.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLADZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GLADZ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to GLADZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check GLADZ's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, MGRB has a market cap of 473.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while MGRB trades at $17.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to MGRB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to MGRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check MGRB's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, MGRD has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while MGRD trades at $15.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to MGRD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to MGRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check MGRD's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, SAJ has a market cap of 411.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while SAJ trades at $25.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SAJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to SAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check SAJ's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, SAZ has a market cap of 409.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while SAZ trades at $25.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SAZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to SAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check SAZ's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, SAY has a market cap of 407.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while SAY trades at $25.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to SAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check SAY's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, PMPEX has a market cap of 368.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while PMPEX trades at $15.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMPEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PMPEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to PMPEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check PMPEX's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, KCHVU has a market cap of 361.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while KCHVU trades at $10.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KCHVU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to KCHVU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to KCHVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check KCHVU's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, KCHV has a market cap of 349.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while KCHV trades at $10.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KCHV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to KCHV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to KCHV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check KCHV's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, RILYZ has a market cap of 235M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while RILYZ trades at $16.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to RILYZ's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to RILYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check RILYZ's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, OPPE has a market cap of 159.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while OPPE trades at $55.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPPE's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to OPPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to OPPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check OPPE's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, FFUT has a market cap of 131.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while FFUT trades at $55.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFUT's P/E ratio is 34.91. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to FFUT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to FFUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check FFUT's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, GECCZ has a market cap of 125.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while GECCZ trades at $25.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GECCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GECCZ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to GECCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check GECCZ's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, GPZ has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while GPZ trades at $23.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPZ's P/E ratio is 28.18. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GPZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is less volatile compared to GPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check GPZ's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, PLTZ has a market cap of 87M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while PLTZ trades at $37.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PLTZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is less volatile compared to PLTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check PLTZ's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, SYZ has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while SYZ trades at $27.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYZ's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SYZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to SYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check SYZ's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, BRKC has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while BRKC trades at $43.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRKC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BRKC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to BRKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check BRKC's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, CPSR has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while CPSR trades at $25.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CPSR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to CPSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check CPSR's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, STSB has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while STSB trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STSB's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to STSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to STSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check STSB's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, CPSU has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while CPSU trades at $27.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPSU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CPSU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to CPSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check CPSU's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, CAS has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while CAS trades at $26.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to CAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check CAS's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, FTBI has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while FTBI trades at $21.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTBI's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to FTBI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to FTBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check FTBI's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, INVG has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while INVG trades at $25.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to INVG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to INVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check INVG's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, EPEM has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while EPEM trades at $27.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPEM's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to EPEM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to EPEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check EPEM's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, EPIN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while EPIN trades at $25.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPIN's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to EPIN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to EPIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check EPIN's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, SPCT has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while SPCT trades at $27.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPCT's P/E ratio is 25.10. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SPCT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to SPCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check SPCT's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, ZBAI has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while ZBAI trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZBAI's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZBAI's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to ZBAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check ZBAI's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, TAVIR has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while TAVIR trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAVIR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to TAVIR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to TAVIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check TAVIR's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, BFJL has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while BFJL trades at $16.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFJL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BFJL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to BFJL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check BFJL's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, BTMWW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while BTMWW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTMWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BTMWW's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is less volatile compared to BTMWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check BTMWW's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, ABXB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while ABXB trades at $19.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABXB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ABXB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to ABXB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check ABXB's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, WILD has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while WILD trades at $19.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WILD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to WILD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to WILD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check WILD's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, RTXG has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while RTXG trades at $27.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTXG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to RTXG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is less volatile compared to RTXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check RTXG's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, HBTA has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while HBTA trades at $28.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBTA's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to HBTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to HBTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check HBTA's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, TERG has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while TERG trades at $46.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TERG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to TERG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is less volatile compared to TERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check TERG's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, SOFL has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while SOFL trades at $22.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SOFL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to SOFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check SOFL's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, THRV has a market cap of 625.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while THRV trades at $24.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THRV's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to THRV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to THRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check THRV's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, AURE has a market cap of 553.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while AURE trades at $2.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AURE's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to AURE's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is less volatile compared to AURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check AURE's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, ESLG has a market cap of 491.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while ESLG trades at $24.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESLG's P/E ratio is 34.87. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ESLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to ESLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check ESLG's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, SMYY has a market cap of 321.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while SMYY trades at $10.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMYY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SMYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to SMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check SMYY's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, OKTG has a market cap of 289.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while OKTG trades at $13.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to OKTG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to OKTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check OKTG's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, SNDS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while SNDS trades at $21.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SNDS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to SNDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check SNDS's competition here

NSAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSAM stands at 0. In comparison, GJH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSAM is priced at $15.84, while GJH trades at $9.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GJH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GJH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSAM is more volatile compared to GJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAM.Check GJH's competition here