NOF Corporation
NOF Corporation (NOFCF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NOFCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOFCF | $14.52 | +0.00% | 3.4B | 14.82 | $0.98 | +2.11% |
AIQUY | $42.78 | +0.61% | 123.4B | 31.03 | $1.38 | +1.70% |
AIQUF | $213.99 | +0.56% | 123.4B | 31.06 | $6.89 | +1.71% |
PTCAY | $56.00 | +0.00% | 48.4B | 31.82 | $1.76 | +0.06% |
PTPIF | $0.53 | +0.00% | 45.6B | 26.33 | $0.02 | +0.07% |
GVDNY | $85.47 | +1.48% | 39.5B | 29.34 | $2.92 | +1.81% |
GVDBF | $4,213.38 | +5.31% | 38.9B | 29.50 | $142.82 | +1.88% |
SKFOF | $239.00 | +2.12% | 38.3B | 25.32 | $9.44 | +1.70% |
SXYAY | $23.77 | +2.32% | 38.1B | 25.29 | $0.94 | +1.75% |
AKZOY | $23.79 | +7.62% | 36.7B | 25.62 | $0.93 | +3.12% |
Stock Comparison
NOFCF vs AIQUY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AIQUY has a market cap of 123.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while AIQUY trades at $42.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas AIQUY's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIQUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to AIQUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check AIQUY's competition here
NOFCF vs AIQUF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AIQUF has a market cap of 123.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while AIQUF trades at $213.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas AIQUF's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIQUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to AIQUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check AIQUF's competition here
NOFCF vs PTCAY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PTCAY has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while PTCAY trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas PTCAY's P/E ratio is 31.82. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTCAY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to PTCAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check PTCAY's competition here
NOFCF vs PTPIF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PTPIF has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while PTPIF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas PTPIF's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTPIF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to PTPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check PTPIF's competition here
NOFCF vs GVDNY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GVDNY has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while GVDNY trades at $85.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas GVDNY's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GVDNY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to GVDNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check GVDNY's competition here
NOFCF vs GVDBF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GVDBF has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while GVDBF trades at $4,213.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas GVDBF's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GVDBF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to GVDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check GVDBF's competition here
NOFCF vs SKFOF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SKFOF has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while SKFOF trades at $239.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SKFOF's P/E ratio is 25.32. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKFOF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to SKFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check SKFOF's competition here
NOFCF vs SXYAY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SXYAY has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while SXYAY trades at $23.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SXYAY's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SXYAY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to SXYAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check SXYAY's competition here
NOFCF vs AKZOY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AKZOY has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while AKZOY trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas AKZOY's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AKZOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to AKZOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check AKZOY's competition here
NOFCF vs NVZMY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NVZMY has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while NVZMY trades at $63.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas NVZMY's P/E ratio is 55.16. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NVZMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to NVZMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check NVZMY's competition here
NOFCF vs NVZMF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NVZMF has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while NVZMF trades at $62.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas NVZMF's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NVZMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to NVZMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check NVZMF's competition here
NOFCF vs NPCPF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NPCPF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while NPCPF trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas NPCPF's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NPCPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to NPCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check NPCPF's competition here
NOFCF vs EMSHF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, EMSHF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while EMSHF trades at $764.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas EMSHF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EMSHF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to EMSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check EMSHF's competition here
NOFCF vs NDEKF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NDEKF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while NDEKF trades at $22.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas NDEKF's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NDEKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to NDEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check NDEKF's competition here
NOFCF vs SYIEY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SYIEY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while SYIEY trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SYIEY's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SYIEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to SYIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check SYIEY's competition here
NOFCF vs SYIEF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SYIEF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while SYIEF trades at $96.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SYIEF's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SYIEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to SYIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check SYIEF's competition here
NOFCF vs COVTY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, COVTY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while COVTY trades at $35.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas COVTY's P/E ratio is -30.18. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COVTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to COVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check COVTY's competition here
NOFCF vs CVVTF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CVVTF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while CVVTF trades at $70.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas CVVTF's P/E ratio is -30.21. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CVVTF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to CVVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check CVVTF's competition here
NOFCF vs AKZOF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AKZOF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while AKZOF trades at $69.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas AKZOF's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AKZOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to AKZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check AKZOF's competition here
NOFCF vs CRTSF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CRTSF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while CRTSF trades at $79.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas CRTSF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRTSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to CRTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check CRTSF's competition here
NOFCF vs CHYHY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CHYHY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while CHYHY trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas CHYHY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHYHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to CHYHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check CHYHY's competition here
NOFCF vs BNTGY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BNTGY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while BNTGY trades at $12.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas BNTGY's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNTGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to BNTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check BNTGY's competition here
NOFCF vs BNTGF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BNTGF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while BNTGF trades at $64.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas BNTGF's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNTGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to BNTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check BNTGF's competition here
NOFCF vs EVKIY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, EVKIY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while EVKIY trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas EVKIY's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EVKIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to EVKIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check EVKIY's competition here
NOFCF vs EVKIF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, EVKIF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while EVKIF trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas EVKIF's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EVKIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to EVKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check EVKIF's competition here
NOFCF vs SCVUF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SCVUF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while SCVUF trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SCVUF's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCVUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to SCVUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check SCVUF's competition here
NOFCF vs IMDZF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, IMDZF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while IMDZF trades at $133.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas IMDZF's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IMDZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to IMDZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check IMDZF's competition here
NOFCF vs OCLDY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, OCLDY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while OCLDY trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas OCLDY's P/E ratio is 115.83. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OCLDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to OCLDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check OCLDY's competition here
NOFCF vs ASGLY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ASGLY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while ASGLY trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas ASGLY's P/E ratio is 28.18. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASGLY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to ASGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check ASGLY's competition here
NOFCF vs FUPBY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FUPBY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while FUPBY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas FUPBY's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FUPBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to FUPBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check FUPBY's competition here
NOFCF vs ASGLF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ASGLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while ASGLF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas ASGLF's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASGLF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to ASGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check ASGLF's competition here
NOFCF vs NDEKY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NDEKY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while NDEKY trades at $22.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas NDEKY's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NDEKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to NDEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check NDEKY's competition here
NOFCF vs SCVPY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SCVPY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while SCVPY trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SCVPY's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCVPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to SCVPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check SCVPY's competition here
NOFCF vs OCLDF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, OCLDF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while OCLDF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas OCLDF's P/E ratio is 102.08. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OCLDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to OCLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check OCLDF's competition here
NOFCF vs ARKAY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ARKAY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while ARKAY trades at $75.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas ARKAY's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARKAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to ARKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check ARKAY's competition here
NOFCF vs FUPEF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FUPEF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while FUPEF trades at $39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas FUPEF's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FUPEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to FUPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check FUPEF's competition here
NOFCF vs ARKAF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ARKAF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while ARKAF trades at $70.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas ARKAF's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARKAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to ARKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check ARKAF's competition here
NOFCF vs COIHY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, COIHY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while COIHY trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas COIHY's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COIHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to COIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check COIHY's competition here
NOFCF vs MITUY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MITUY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while MITUY trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas MITUY's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MITUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to MITUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check MITUY's competition here
NOFCF vs COIHF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, COIHF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while COIHF trades at $33.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas COIHF's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COIHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to COIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check COIHF's competition here
NOFCF vs JMPLY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, JMPLY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while JMPLY trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas JMPLY's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JMPLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to JMPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check JMPLY's competition here
NOFCF vs FUPPF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FUPPF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while FUPPF trades at $42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas FUPPF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FUPPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to FUPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check FUPPF's competition here
NOFCF vs KDSKF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KDSKF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while KDSKF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas KDSKF's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KDSKF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is less volatile compared to KDSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check KDSKF's competition here
NOFCF vs MITUF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MITUF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while MITUF trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas MITUF's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MITUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to MITUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check MITUF's competition here
NOFCF vs WKCMF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, WKCMF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while WKCMF trades at $78.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas WKCMF's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WKCMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to WKCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check WKCMF's competition here
NOFCF vs AZLGF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AZLGF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while AZLGF trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas AZLGF's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AZLGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to AZLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check AZLGF's competition here
NOFCF vs JMPLF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, JMPLF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while JMPLF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas JMPLF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JMPLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to JMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check JMPLF's competition here
NOFCF vs SASOF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SASOF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while SASOF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SASOF's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SASOF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to SASOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check SASOF's competition here
NOFCF vs CLZNF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CLZNF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while CLZNF trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas CLZNF's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLZNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to CLZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check CLZNF's competition here
NOFCF vs CLZNY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CLZNY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while CLZNY trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas CLZNY's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLZNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to CLZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check CLZNY's competition here
NOFCF vs AWTRF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AWTRF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while AWTRF trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas AWTRF's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AWTRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to AWTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check AWTRF's competition here
NOFCF vs HXXPY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HXXPY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while HXXPY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas HXXPY's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HXXPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to HXXPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check HXXPY's competition here
NOFCF vs MBGCF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MBGCF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while MBGCF trades at $16.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas MBGCF's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MBGCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to MBGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check MBGCF's competition here
NOFCF vs KPTCY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KPTCY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while KPTCY trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas KPTCY's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KPTCY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to KPTCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check KPTCY's competition here
NOFCF vs ICPVF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ICPVF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while ICPVF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas ICPVF's P/E ratio is -32.40. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ICPVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to ICPVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check ICPVF's competition here
NOFCF vs HXPLF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HXPLF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while HXPLF trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas HXPLF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HXPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to HXPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check HXPLF's competition here
NOFCF vs INCZY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, INCZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while INCZY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas INCZY's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INCZY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to INCZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check INCZY's competition here
NOFCF vs KSANF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KSANF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while KSANF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas KSANF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KSANF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to KSANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check KSANF's competition here
NOFCF vs LNXSF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LNXSF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while LNXSF trades at $29.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas LNXSF's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LNXSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to LNXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check LNXSF's competition here
NOFCF vs LNXSY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LNXSY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while LNXSY trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas LNXSY's P/E ratio is -13.34. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LNXSY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to LNXSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check LNXSY's competition here
NOFCF vs TKKYY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TKKYY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while TKKYY trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas TKKYY's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TKKYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to TKKYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check TKKYY's competition here
NOFCF vs DACHF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DACHF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while DACHF trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas DACHF's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DACHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to DACHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check DACHF's competition here
NOFCF vs IRLCF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, IRLCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while IRLCF trades at $275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas IRLCF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IRLCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to IRLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check IRLCF's competition here
NOFCF vs ZEOOY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ZEOOY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while ZEOOY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas ZEOOY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZEOOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to ZEOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check ZEOOY's competition here
NOFCF vs ZEOOF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ZEOOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while ZEOOF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas ZEOOF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZEOOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to ZEOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check ZEOOF's competition here
NOFCF vs BRRDF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BRRDF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while BRRDF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas BRRDF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BRRDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to BRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check BRRDF's competition here
NOFCF vs KPLIF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KPLIF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while KPLIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas KPLIF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KPLIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to KPLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check KPLIF's competition here
NOFCF vs TKYMY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TKYMY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while TKYMY trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas TKYMY's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TKYMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to TKYMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check TKYMY's competition here
NOFCF vs KANKF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KANKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while KANKF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas KANKF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KANKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to KANKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check KANKF's competition here
NOFCF vs ALZCF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ALZCF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while ALZCF trades at $152.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas ALZCF's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALZCF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to ALZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check ALZCF's competition here
NOFCF vs ELKEF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ELKEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while ELKEF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas ELKEF's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELKEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to ELKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check ELKEF's competition here
NOFCF vs ELMTY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ELMTY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while ELMTY trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas ELMTY's P/E ratio is -31.79. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELMTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to ELMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check ELMTY's competition here
NOFCF vs EMNSF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, EMNSF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while EMNSF trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas EMNSF's P/E ratio is -32.21. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EMNSF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to EMNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check EMNSF's competition here
NOFCF vs TKCBF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TKCBF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while TKCBF trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas TKCBF's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TKCBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to TKCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check TKCBF's competition here
NOFCF vs OCINF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, OCINF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while OCINF trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas OCINF's P/E ratio is -7.66. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OCINF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to OCINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check OCINF's competition here
NOFCF vs TKCBY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TKCBY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while TKCBY trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas TKCBY's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TKCBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to TKCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check TKCBY's competition here
NOFCF vs HUABF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HUABF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while HUABF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas HUABF's P/E ratio is -18.69. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HUABF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to HUABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check HUABF's competition here
NOFCF vs CSNVY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CSNVY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while CSNVY trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas CSNVY's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSNVY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to CSNVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check CSNVY's competition here
NOFCF vs CUYRF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CUYRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while CUYRF trades at $70.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas CUYRF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CUYRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to CUYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check CUYRF's competition here
NOFCF vs CSNVF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CSNVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while CSNVF trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas CSNVF's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSNVF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to CSNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check CSNVF's competition here
NOFCF vs ALPKF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ALPKF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while ALPKF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas ALPKF's P/E ratio is -13.17. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALPKF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to ALPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check ALPKF's competition here
NOFCF vs TKYMF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TKYMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while TKYMF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas TKYMF's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TKYMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to TKYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check TKYMF's competition here
NOFCF vs LNTEF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LNTEF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while LNTEF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas LNTEF's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LNTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to LNTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check LNTEF's competition here
NOFCF vs FPLSF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FPLSF has a market cap of 994.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while FPLSF trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas FPLSF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FPLSF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to FPLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check FPLSF's competition here
NOFCF vs HUIHY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HUIHY has a market cap of 943.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while HUIHY trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas HUIHY's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HUIHY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to HUIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check HUIHY's competition here
NOFCF vs AECLY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AECLY has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while AECLY trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas AECLY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AECLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to AECLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check AECLY's competition here
NOFCF vs SKKAF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SKKAF has a market cap of 812.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while SKKAF trades at $60.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SKKAF's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is less volatile compared to SKKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check SKKAF's competition here
NOFCF vs HASGF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HASGF has a market cap of 809.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while HASGF trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas HASGF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HASGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to HASGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check HASGF's competition here
NOFCF vs VTXPF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, VTXPF has a market cap of 799.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while VTXPF trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas VTXPF's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VTXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to VTXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check VTXPF's competition here
NOFCF vs VBVBF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, VBVBF has a market cap of 771M. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while VBVBF trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas VBVBF's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VBVBF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to VBVBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check VBVBF's competition here
NOFCF vs DALQF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DALQF has a market cap of 757.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while DALQF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas DALQF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DALQF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to DALQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check DALQF's competition here
NOFCF vs SYCHF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SYCHF has a market cap of 720.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while SYCHF trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SYCHF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SYCHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to SYCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check SYCHF's competition here
NOFCF vs DLNDY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DLNDY has a market cap of 712.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while DLNDY trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas DLNDY's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DLNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to DLNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check DLNDY's competition here
NOFCF vs TYOBY Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TYOBY has a market cap of 604M. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while TYOBY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas TYOBY's P/E ratio is 171.25. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TYOBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to TYOBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check TYOBY's competition here
NOFCF vs NOPMF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NOPMF has a market cap of 505.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while NOPMF trades at $12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas NOPMF's P/E ratio is -48.68. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NOPMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to NOPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check NOPMF's competition here
NOFCF vs FLRAF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FLRAF has a market cap of 448M. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while FLRAF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas FLRAF's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLRAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to FLRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check FLRAF's competition here
NOFCF vs TNMAF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TNMAF has a market cap of 407.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while TNMAF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas TNMAF's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TNMAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to TNMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check TNMAF's competition here
NOFCF vs NCRBF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NCRBF has a market cap of 331.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while NCRBF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas NCRBF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCRBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to NCRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check NCRBF's competition here
NOFCF vs SYYYF Comparison August 2025
NOFCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOFCF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SYYYF has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NOFCF is priced at $14.52, while SYYYF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SYYYF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, NOFCF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SYYYF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOFCF is more volatile compared to SYYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOFCF.Check SYYYF's competition here