NORMA Group SE
NORMA Group SE NOEJF Peers
See (NOEJF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOEJF | $20.15 | N/A | 642.03M | 23.71 | $0.85 | N/A |
| BEKAY | $3.50 | N/A | 18.22B | 6.86 | $0.51 | N/A |
| TKAMY | $10.67 | -7.38% | 6.64B | -4.72 | -$2.26 | +1.02% |
| TYEKF | $10.48 | -13.78% | 6.53B | -4.64 | -$2.26 | +1.61% |
| BEKSF | $41.50 | N/A | 2.16B | 8.45 | $4.91 | N/A |
| RMGNF | $42.01 | -0.00% | 1.99B | 12.58 | $3.34 | +4.89% |
| MUEL | $299.00 | +3.82% | 386.31M | 2.93 | $102.04 | +0.31% |
| RYBIF | $10.70 | -14.06% | 346.34M | 7.18 | $1.49 | +4.84% |
| ADFJF | $5.50 | +11.56% | 156.50M | 4.14 | $1.33 | +0.40% |
| LQMT | $0.11 | -2.75% | 98.12M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NOEJF vs BEKAY Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, BEKAY has a market cap of 18.22B. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while BEKAY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas BEKAY's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BEKAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is more volatile compared to BEKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs TKAMY Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, TKAMY has a market cap of 6.64B. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while TKAMY trades at $10.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas TKAMY's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TKAMY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is more volatile compared to TKAMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs TYEKF Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, TYEKF has a market cap of 6.53B. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while TYEKF trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas TYEKF's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TYEKF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is more volatile compared to TYEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs BEKSF Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, BEKSF has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while BEKSF trades at $41.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas BEKSF's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BEKSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is more volatile compared to BEKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs RMGNF Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, RMGNF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while RMGNF trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas RMGNF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RMGNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is more volatile compared to RMGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs MUEL Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, MUEL has a market cap of 386.31M. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while MUEL trades at $299.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas MUEL's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MUEL's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is more volatile compared to MUEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs RYBIF Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, RYBIF has a market cap of 346.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while RYBIF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas RYBIF's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RYBIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is more volatile compared to RYBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs ADFJF Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, ADFJF has a market cap of 156.50M. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while ADFJF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas ADFJF's P/E ratio is 4.14. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADFJF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is more volatile compared to ADFJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs LQMT Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, LQMT has a market cap of 98.12M. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while LQMT trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas LQMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LQMT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is more volatile compared to LQMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs TPCS Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, TPCS has a market cap of 31.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while TPCS trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas TPCS's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TPCS's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is more volatile compared to TPCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs ARCW Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, ARCW has a market cap of 24.96M. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while ARCW trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas ARCW's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARCW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is more volatile compared to ARCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs OLNCF Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, OLNCF has a market cap of 12.07M. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while OLNCF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas OLNCF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OLNCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is more volatile compared to OLNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs IAALF Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, IAALF has a market cap of 7.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while IAALF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas IAALF's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IAALF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is more volatile compared to IAALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs CYMHF Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, CYMHF has a market cap of 5.26M. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while CYMHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas CYMHF's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CYMHF's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is more volatile compared to CYMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs ERILF Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, ERILF has a market cap of 2.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while ERILF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas ERILF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ERILF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is more volatile compared to ERILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs ELNX Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, ELNX has a market cap of 1.59M. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while ELNX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas ELNX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELNX's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is more volatile compared to ELNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs MTRT Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, MTRT has a market cap of 1.07M. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while MTRT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas MTRT's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTRT's ROE of +10.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is less volatile compared to MTRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs THRR Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, THRR has a market cap of 99979.00. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while THRR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas THRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to THRR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is less volatile compared to THRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs TIMNF Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, TIMNF has a market cap of 19855.00. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while TIMNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas TIMNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TIMNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is less volatile compared to TIMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs RIVT Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, RIVT has a market cap of 7040.00. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while RIVT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas RIVT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RIVT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is less volatile compared to RIVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs AMGY Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, AMGY has a market cap of 1201.00. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while AMGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas AMGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMGY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is less volatile compared to AMGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.
NOEJF vs TDYT Comparison
NOEJF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOEJF stands at 642.03M. In comparison, TDYT has a market cap of 629.00. Regarding current trading prices, NOEJF is priced at $20.15, while TDYT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOEJF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.71, whereas TDYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOEJF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TDYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NOEJF is less volatile compared to TDYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOEJF.