Paul Mueller Company (MUEL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MUEL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUEL | $455.50 | -3.82% | 588.5M | 2.54 | $179.07 | +0.26% |
| BEKAY | $4.94 | +0.00% | 24.1B | 32.93 | $0.15 | +4.58% |
| TKAMY | $12.62 | -3.37% | 7.9B | 1262.00 | $0.01 | +34.89% |
| TYEKF | $12.50 | -4.76% | 7.8B | 1250.00 | $0.01 | +1.42% |
| BEKSF | $50.20 | +17.56% | 2.5B | 12.81 | $3.92 | +4.52% |
| RMGNF | $42.01 | +0.00% | 2B | 12.58 | $3.34 | +5.01% |
| NOEJF | $19.25 | +13.91% | 613.4M | -9.87 | -$1.95 | +2.32% |
| FEIOF | $21.04 | +0.00% | 309.7M | 15.70 | $1.34 | N/A |
| ADFJF | $9.54 | +23.26% | 272.4M | 14.24 | $0.67 | +0.30% |
| LQMT | $0.21 | +10.77% | 194.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MUEL vs BEKAY Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, BEKAY has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while BEKAY trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas BEKAY's P/E ratio is 32.93. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BEKAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to BEKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check BEKAY's competition here
MUEL vs TKAMY Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, TKAMY has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while TKAMY trades at $12.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas TKAMY's P/E ratio is 1262.00. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TKAMY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to TKAMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check TKAMY's competition here
MUEL vs TYEKF Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, TYEKF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while TYEKF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas TYEKF's P/E ratio is 1250.00. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TYEKF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to TYEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check TYEKF's competition here
MUEL vs BEKSF Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, BEKSF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while BEKSF trades at $50.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas BEKSF's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BEKSF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to BEKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check BEKSF's competition here
MUEL vs RMGNF Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, RMGNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while RMGNF trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas RMGNF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RMGNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to RMGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check RMGNF's competition here
MUEL vs NOEJF Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, NOEJF has a market cap of 613.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while NOEJF trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas NOEJF's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NOEJF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to NOEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check NOEJF's competition here
MUEL vs FEIOF Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, FEIOF has a market cap of 309.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while FEIOF trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas FEIOF's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FEIOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to FEIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check FEIOF's competition here
MUEL vs ADFJF Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, ADFJF has a market cap of 272.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while ADFJF trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas ADFJF's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ADFJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to ADFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check ADFJF's competition here
MUEL vs LQMT Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, LQMT has a market cap of 194.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while LQMT trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas LQMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LQMT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to LQMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check LQMT's competition here
MUEL vs ARCW Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, ARCW has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while ARCW trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas ARCW's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ARCW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to ARCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check ARCW's competition here
MUEL vs OLNCF Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, OLNCF has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while OLNCF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas OLNCF's P/E ratio is 44.50. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OLNCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to OLNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check OLNCF's competition here
MUEL vs IAALF Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, IAALF has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while IAALF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas IAALF's P/E ratio is -12.15. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IAALF's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to IAALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check IAALF's competition here
MUEL vs RMTO Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, RMTO has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while RMTO trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas RMTO's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RMTO's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to RMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check RMTO's competition here
MUEL vs CYMHF Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, CYMHF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while CYMHF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas CYMHF's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CYMHF's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to CYMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check CYMHF's competition here
MUEL vs ERILF Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, ERILF has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while ERILF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas ERILF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ERILF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to ERILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check ERILF's competition here
MUEL vs THRR Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, THRR has a market cap of 100K. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while THRR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas THRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to THRR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to THRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check THRR's competition here
MUEL vs MTRT Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, MTRT has a market cap of 24.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while MTRT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas MTRT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MTRT's ROE of +10.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to MTRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check MTRT's competition here
MUEL vs TIMNF Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, TIMNF has a market cap of 19.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while TIMNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas TIMNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TIMNF's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to TIMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check TIMNF's competition here
MUEL vs RIVT Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, RIVT has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while RIVT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas RIVT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RIVT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to RIVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check RIVT's competition here
MUEL vs ELNX Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, ELNX has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while ELNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas ELNX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ELNX's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to ELNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check ELNX's competition here
MUEL vs AMGY Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, AMGY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while AMGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas AMGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AMGY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to AMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check AMGY's competition here
MUEL vs TDYT Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, TDYT has a market cap of 629. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while TDYT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas TDYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TDYT's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to TDYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check TDYT's competition here
MUEL vs CHTM Comparison June 2026
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 588.5M. In comparison, CHTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $455.50, while CHTM trades at $1,452.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.54, whereas CHTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CHTM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to CHTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.Check CHTM's competition here