Northrop Grumman Corporation
Northrop Grumman Corporation NOC Peers
See (NOC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOC | $479.30 | -0.69% | 68.98B | 18.93 | $25.32 | +1.73% |
| GE | $218.95 | +1.86% | 233.49B | 34.53 | $6.34 | +0.55% |
| RTX | $130.66 | +1.55% | 174.56B | 38.43 | $3.40 | +1.93% |
| BA | $198.47 | +1.86% | 149.65B | -11.05 | -$17.96 | N/A |
| LMT | $473.14 | -0.08% | 110.85B | 20.40 | $23.19 | +2.73% |
| TDG | $1,417.17 | +3.18% | 79.60B | 47.89 | $29.59 | +5.29% |
| GD | $276.24 | +1.72% | 74.14B | 19.16 | $14.42 | +2.09% |
| AXON | $693.10 | +1.24% | 53.96B | 144.10 | $4.81 | N/A |
| LHX | $218.98 | -0.19% | 40.94B | 25.95 | $8.44 | +2.14% |
| HEI-A | $212.92 | +1.73% | 32.66B | 52.44 | $4.06 | +0.08% |
Stock Comparison
NOC vs GE Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, GE has a market cap of 233.49B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while GE trades at $218.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas GE's P/E ratio is 34.53. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to GE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs RTX Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, RTX has a market cap of 174.56B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while RTX trades at $130.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas RTX's P/E ratio is 38.43. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RTX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to RTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs BA Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, BA has a market cap of 149.65B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while BA trades at $198.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas BA's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BA's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to BA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs LMT Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, LMT has a market cap of 110.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while LMT trades at $473.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas LMT's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LMT's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is more volatile compared to LMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs TDG Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, TDG has a market cap of 79.60B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while TDG trades at $1,417.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas TDG's P/E ratio is 47.89. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TDG's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to TDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs GD Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, GD has a market cap of 74.14B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while GD trades at $276.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas GD's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to GD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs AXON Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, AXON has a market cap of 53.96B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while AXON trades at $693.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas AXON's P/E ratio is 144.10. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AXON's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to AXON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs LHX Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, LHX has a market cap of 40.94B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while LHX trades at $218.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas LHX's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LHX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to LHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs HEI-A Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, HEI-A has a market cap of 32.66B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while HEI-A trades at $212.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas HEI-A's P/E ratio is 52.44. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HEI-A's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to HEI-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs HEI Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, HEI has a market cap of 32.63B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while HEI trades at $268.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas HEI's P/E ratio is 66.30. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HEI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to HEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs ESLT Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, ESLT has a market cap of 17.02B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while ESLT trades at $380.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas ESLT's P/E ratio is 53.07. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ESLT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to ESLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs CW Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, CW has a market cap of 14.59B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while CW trades at $387.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas CW's P/E ratio is 36.72. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to CW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs TXT Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, TXT has a market cap of 13.87B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while TXT trades at $76.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas TXT's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to TXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs WWD Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, WWD has a market cap of 11.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while WWD trades at $201.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas WWD's P/E ratio is 32.50. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WWD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to WWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs DRS Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, DRS has a market cap of 10.87B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while DRS trades at $40.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas DRS's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DRS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to DRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs RKLB Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, RKLB has a market cap of 9.81B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while RKLB trades at $21.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas RKLB's P/E ratio is -55.95. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RKLB's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to RKLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs BWXT Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, BWXT has a market cap of 9.78B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while BWXT trades at $107.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas BWXT's P/E ratio is 34.11. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BWXT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to BWXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs SARO Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, SARO has a market cap of 9.57B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while SARO trades at $28.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas SARO's P/E ratio is 715.63. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SARO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to SARO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs LOAR Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, LOAR has a market cap of 9.32B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while LOAR trades at $99.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas LOAR's P/E ratio is 415.00. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LOAR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to LOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs HII Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, HII has a market cap of 9.02B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while HII trades at $229.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas HII's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to HII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs ERJ Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, ERJ has a market cap of 8.82B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while ERJ trades at $48.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas ERJ's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ERJ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to ERJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs CAE Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, CAE has a market cap of 8.47B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while CAE trades at $26.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas CAE's P/E ratio is -49.94. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CAE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to CAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs AVAV Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, AVAV has a market cap of 7.63B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while AVAV trades at $167.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas AVAV's P/E ratio is 145.33. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AVAV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to AVAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs MOG-A Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, MOG-A has a market cap of 5.82B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while MOG-A trades at $184.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas MOG-A's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MOG-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to MOG-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs MOG-B Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, MOG-B has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while MOG-B trades at $169.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas MOG-B's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MOG-B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is more volatile compared to MOG-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs KTOS Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, KTOS has a market cap of 5.21B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while KTOS trades at $33.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas KTOS's P/E ratio is 308.45. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KTOS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to KTOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs KRMN Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, KRMN has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while KRMN trades at $39.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas KRMN's P/E ratio is 392.35. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KRMN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to KRMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs ACHR-WT Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, ACHR-WT has a market cap of 5.01B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while ACHR-WT trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas ACHR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ACHR-WT's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to ACHR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs ACHR Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, ACHR has a market cap of 4.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while ACHR trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas ACHR's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ACHR's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to ACHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs AJRD Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, AJRD has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while AJRD trades at $57.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas AJRD's P/E ratio is 63.03. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AJRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is more volatile compared to AJRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs HXL Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, HXL has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while HXL trades at $54.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas HXL's P/E ratio is 35.78. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HXL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is more volatile compared to HXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs SPR Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, SPR has a market cap of 4.33B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while SPR trades at $36.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas SPR's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SPR's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is more volatile compared to SPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs MRCY Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, MRCY has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while MRCY trades at $46.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas MRCY's P/E ratio is -41.87. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MRCY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to MRCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs POWWP Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, POWWP has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while POWWP trades at $23.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas POWWP's P/E ratio is 80.24. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to POWWP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is more volatile compared to POWWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs VSEC Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, VSEC has a market cap of 2.72B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while VSEC trades at $131.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas VSEC's P/E ratio is 68.10. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VSEC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to VSEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs AIR Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, AIR has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while AIR trades at $61.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas AIR's P/E ratio is -170.25. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AIR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is more volatile compared to AIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs TGI Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, TGI has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while TGI trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas TGI's P/E ratio is 134.79. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TGI's ROE of -5.58%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is more volatile compared to TGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs VVX Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, VVX has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while VVX trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas VVX's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VVX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to VVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs CDRE Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, CDRE has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while CDRE trades at $35.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas CDRE's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CDRE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to CDRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs KAMN Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, KAMN has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while KAMN trades at $45.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas KAMN's P/E ratio is 164.25. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KAMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is more volatile compared to KAMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs PL-WT Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, PL-WT has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while PL-WT trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas PL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PL-WT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to PL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs EVEX Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, EVEX has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while EVEX trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas EVEX's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EVEX's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to EVEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs PL Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, PL has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while PL trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas PL's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs LUNR Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, LUNR has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while LUNR trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas LUNR's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LUNR's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to LUNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs ATRO Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, ATRO has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while ATRO trades at $29.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas ATRO's P/E ratio is -63.46. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ATRO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to ATRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs EVEX-WT Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, EVEX-WT has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while EVEX-WT trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas EVEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EVEX-WT's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to EVEX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs VEC Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, VEC has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while VEC trades at $32.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas VEC's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VEC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is more volatile compared to VEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs DCO Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, DCO has a market cap of 989.37M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while DCO trades at $66.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas DCO's P/E ratio is 28.54. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to DCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs SKYH Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, SKYH has a market cap of 845.36M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while SKYH trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas SKYH's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SKYH's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is more volatile compared to SKYH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs RDW Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, RDW has a market cap of 813.99M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while RDW trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas RDW's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RDW's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to RDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs EH Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, EH has a market cap of 691.77M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while EH trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas EH's P/E ratio is -40.89. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EH's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to EH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs NPK Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, NPK has a market cap of 602.89M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while NPK trades at $84.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas NPK's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NPK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to NPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs RGR Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, RGR has a market cap of 602.44M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while RGR trades at $36.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas RGR's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RGR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to RGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs BYRN Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, BYRN has a market cap of 527.47M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while BYRN trades at $23.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas BYRN's P/E ratio is 37.53. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BYRN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to BYRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs SWBI Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, SWBI has a market cap of 425.51M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while SWBI trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas SWBI's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SWBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is more volatile compared to SWBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs EVTL Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, EVTL has a market cap of 400.78M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while EVTL trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas EVTL's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EVTL's ROE of +4.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to EVTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs TATT Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, TATT has a market cap of 352.06M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while TATT trades at $32.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas TATT's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TATT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to TATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs AZ Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, AZ has a market cap of 296.19M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while AZ trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas AZ's P/E ratio is -10.61. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AZ's ROE of -2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to AZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs PKE Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, PKE has a market cap of 269.59M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while PKE trades at $13.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas PKE's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PKE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to PKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs POWW Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, POWW has a market cap of 237.51M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while POWW trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas POWW's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to POWW's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to POWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs SPCE Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, SPCE has a market cap of 126.17M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while SPCE trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas SPCE's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SPCE's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to SPCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs ISSC Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, ISSC has a market cap of 123.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while ISSC trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas ISSC's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ISSC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is more volatile compared to ISSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs IVAC Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, IVAC has a market cap of 108.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while IVAC trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas IVAC's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IVAC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is more volatile compared to IVAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs CODA Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, CODA has a market cap of 75.58M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while CODA trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas CODA's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CODA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to CODA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs SKYH-WT Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, SKYH-WT has a market cap of 59.37M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while SKYH-WT trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas SKYH-WT's P/E ratio is -6.65. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SKYH-WT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to SKYH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs VTSI Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, VTSI has a market cap of 52.59M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while VTSI trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas VTSI's P/E ratio is 38.92. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VTSI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to VTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs LLAP Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, LLAP has a market cap of 51.22M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while LLAP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas LLAP's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LLAP's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is more volatile compared to LLAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs LLAP-WT Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, LLAP-WT has a market cap of 49.98M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while LLAP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas LLAP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LLAP-WT's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to LLAP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs CVU Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, CVU has a market cap of 47.06M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while CVU trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas CVU's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CVU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to CVU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs KITT Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, KITT has a market cap of 36.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while KITT trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas KITT's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KITT's ROE of +4.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to KITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs KITTW Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, KITTW has a market cap of 34.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while KITTW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas KITTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KITTW's ROE of +4.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to KITTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs LILM Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, LILM has a market cap of 31.76M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while LILM trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas LILM's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LILM's ROE of +11.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to LILM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs SIF Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, SIF has a market cap of 18.01M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while SIF trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas SIF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to SIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs SIDU Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, SIDU has a market cap of 16.26M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while SIDU trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas SIDU's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SIDU's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to SIDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs HOVR Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, HOVR has a market cap of 15.57M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while HOVR trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas HOVR's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HOVR's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to HOVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs PRZO Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, PRZO has a market cap of 13.81M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while PRZO trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas PRZO's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRZO's ROE of -7.67%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to PRZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs AIRI Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, AIRI has a market cap of 13.48M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while AIRI trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas AIRI's P/E ratio is -8.73. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AIRI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to AIRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs ASTR Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, ASTR has a market cap of 12.24M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while ASTR trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas ASTR's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ASTR's ROE of +5.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to ASTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs GPUS Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, GPUS has a market cap of 11.43M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while GPUS trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas GPUS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GPUS's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to GPUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs MNTSW Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, MNTSW has a market cap of 11.06M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while MNTSW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas MNTSW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MNTSW's ROE of +12.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to MNTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs DPRO Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, DPRO has a market cap of 10.10M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while DPRO trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas DPRO's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DPRO's ROE of -6.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to DPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs ASTC Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, ASTC has a market cap of 10.04M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while ASTC trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas ASTC's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ASTC's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is more volatile compared to ASTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs MNTS Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, MNTS has a market cap of 9.73M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while MNTS trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas MNTS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MNTS's ROE of +12.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to MNTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs AULT Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, AULT has a market cap of 8.35M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while AULT trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas AULT's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AULT's ROE of -2.76%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to AULT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs XTIA Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, XTIA has a market cap of 7.81M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while XTIA trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas XTIA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to XTIA's ROE of -3.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to XTIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs LILMW Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, LILMW has a market cap of 4.03M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while LILMW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas LILMW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LILMW's ROE of +11.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is more volatile compared to LILMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs KWE Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, KWE has a market cap of 2.97M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while KWE trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas KWE's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KWE's ROE of -4.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to KWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs KWESW Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, KWESW has a market cap of 1.95M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while KWESW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas KWESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KWESW's ROE of -4.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to KWESW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.
NOC vs HOVRW Comparison
NOC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOC stands at 68.98B. In comparison, HOVRW has a market cap of 1.22M. Regarding current trading prices, NOC is priced at $479.30, while HOVRW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas HOVRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HOVRW's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NOC is less volatile compared to HOVRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOC.