New Momentum Corporation
New Momentum Corporation NNAX Peers
See (NNAX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NNAX | $0.00 | -16.67% | 412931.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TRPCF | $57.11 | -12.12% | 37.31B | 16.60 | $3.44 | +0.53% |
| AMADF | $82.23 | +4.04% | 36.24B | 25.78 | $3.19 | +1.39% |
| AMADY | $80.97 | +0.64% | 35.43B | 25.15 | $3.22 | +1.36% |
| TNGCF | $2.30 | -6.52% | 5.29B | 19.17 | $0.12 | N/A |
| DRTGF | $22.70 | -1.30% | 4.81B | 8.11 | $2.80 | +0.65% |
| TUIFF | $8.44 | N/A | 4.28B | 7.09 | $1.19 | N/A |
| LGDDF | $22.26 | +7.23% | 3.15B | 16.61 | $1.34 | +3.41% |
| FGETF | $13.37 | N/A | 2.96B | 40.52 | $0.33 | +1.19% |
| TNLIY | $8.55 | -2.62% | 1.79B | 29.48 | $0.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NNAX vs TRPCF Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, TRPCF has a market cap of 37.31B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while TRPCF trades at $57.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRPCF's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TRPCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to TRPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs AMADF Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, AMADF has a market cap of 36.24B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while AMADF trades at $82.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMADF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMADF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to AMADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs AMADY Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, AMADY has a market cap of 35.43B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while AMADY trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMADY's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMADY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to AMADY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs TNGCF Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, TNGCF has a market cap of 5.29B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while TNGCF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNGCF's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TNGCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to TNGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs DRTGF Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, DRTGF has a market cap of 4.81B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while DRTGF trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRTGF's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DRTGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to DRTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs TUIFF Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, TUIFF has a market cap of 4.28B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while TUIFF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUIFF's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TUIFF's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to TUIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs LGDDF Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, LGDDF has a market cap of 3.15B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while LGDDF trades at $22.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGDDF's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LGDDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to LGDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs FGETF Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, FGETF has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while FGETF trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGETF's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FGETF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to FGETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs TNLIY Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, TNLIY has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while TNLIY trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNLIY's P/E ratio is 29.48. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TNLIY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to TNLIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs CTMLF Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, CTMLF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while CTMLF trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTMLF's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CTMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to CTMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs EDDRF Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, EDDRF has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while EDDRF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDDRF's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EDDRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to EDDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs WEBJF Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, WEBJF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while WEBJF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEBJF's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WEBJF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is less volatile compared to WEBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs WEJTY Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, WEJTY has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while WEJTY trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEJTY's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WEJTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is less volatile compared to WEJTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs OOBHF Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, OOBHF has a market cap of 430.30M. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while OOBHF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OOBHF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OOBHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to OOBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs EOVBF Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, EOVBF has a market cap of 291.11M. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while EOVBF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EOVBF's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EOVBF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to EOVBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs LSMNF Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, LSMNF has a market cap of 254.25M. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while LSMNF trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSMNF's P/E ratio is 34.07. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LSMNF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to LSMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs HSWLF Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, HSWLF has a market cap of 190.92M. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while HSWLF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSWLF's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HSWLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to HSWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs HWGG Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, HWGG has a market cap of 165.22M. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while HWGG trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWGG's P/E ratio is -335.00. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HWGG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to HWGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs TRZBF Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, TRZBF has a market cap of 48.25M. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while TRZBF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRZBF's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TRZBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to TRZBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs ONVC Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, ONVC has a market cap of 27.85M. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while ONVC trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONVC's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ONVC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to ONVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs ZMWYF Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, ZMWYF has a market cap of 992732.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while ZMWYF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMWYF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZMWYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to ZMWYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs CDNO Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, CDNO has a market cap of 240000.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while CDNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CDNO's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is less volatile compared to CDNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs ARMV Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, ARMV has a market cap of 61200.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while ARMV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARMV's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ARMV's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to ARMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs GWYT Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, GWYT has a market cap of 17727.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while GWYT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWYT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GWYT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to GWYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.
NNAX vs WESC Comparison
NNAX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAX stands at 412931.00. In comparison, WESC has a market cap of 13009.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNAX is priced at $0.00, while WESC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WESC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAX's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WESC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAX is more volatile compared to WESC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAX.