Newmont Corporation
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for NEM
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for NEM
Newmont Corporation (NEM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NEM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEM | $112.81 | -1.09% | 122.7B | 17.65 | $6.39 | +0.89% |
| AEM | $208.59 | +0.02% | 104.5B | 23.54 | $8.86 | +0.79% |
| B | $41.08 | -1.34% | 68.8B | 14.02 | $2.93 | +2.03% |
| WPM | $134.10 | -1.08% | 60.9B | 41.39 | $3.24 | +0.51% |
| AU | $101.53 | +0.31% | 51.3B | 18.98 | $5.35 | +3.52% |
| FNV | $256.60 | -0.44% | 49.5B | 44.63 | $5.75 | +0.61% |
| GFI | $46.67 | -1.91% | 41.8B | 11.85 | $3.94 | +2.97% |
| KGC | $31.38 | -0.43% | 37.7B | 16.09 | $1.95 | +0.43% |
| HL-PB | $69.47 | +3.15% | 33.4B | 2315.67 | $0.03 | +0.08% |
| AGI | $46.30 | +0.63% | 19.4B | 22.05 | $2.10 | +0.25% |
Stock Comparison
NEM vs AEM Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 104.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while AEM trades at $208.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check AEM's competition here
NEM vs B Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, B has a market cap of 68.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while B trades at $41.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas B's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to B's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check B's competition here
NEM vs WPM Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while WPM trades at $134.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 41.39. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check WPM's competition here
NEM vs AU Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while AU trades at $101.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check AU's competition here
NEM vs FNV Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while FNV trades at $256.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 44.63. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check FNV's competition here
NEM vs GFI Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while GFI trades at $46.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check GFI's competition here
NEM vs KGC Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while KGC trades at $31.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check KGC's competition here
NEM vs HL-PB Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while HL-PB trades at $69.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 2315.67. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check HL-PB's competition here
NEM vs AGI Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while AGI trades at $46.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check AGI's competition here
NEM vs RGLD Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while RGLD trades at $260.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check RGLD's competition here
NEM vs HL Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while HL trades at $19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 39.01. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check HL's competition here
NEM vs CDE Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while CDE trades at $18.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check CDE's competition here
NEM vs EQX Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while EQX trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is -486.50. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check EQX's competition here
NEM vs IAG Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while IAG trades at $18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check IAG's competition here
NEM vs HMY Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while HMY trades at $15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check HMY's competition here
NEM vs SBSW Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while SBSW trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -29.03. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check SBSW's competition here
NEM vs OR Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while OR trades at $39.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 36.50. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check OR's competition here
NEM vs NGD Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while NGD trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check NGD's competition here
NEM vs EGO Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while EGO trades at $35.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check EGO's competition here
NEM vs SSRM Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while SSRM trades at $31.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check SSRM's competition here
NEM vs BTG Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while BTG trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BTG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check BTG's competition here
NEM vs ORLA Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while ORLA trades at $17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 58.13. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check ORLA's competition here
NEM vs AUY Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check AUY's competition here
NEM vs FSAGX Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, FSAGX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while FSAGX trades at $65.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas FSAGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FSAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to FSAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check FSAGX's competition here
NEM vs NG Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while NG trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -34.81. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check NG's competition here
NEM vs AAUC Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, AAUC has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while AAUC trades at $31.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas AAUC's P/E ratio is -69.31. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AAUC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to AAUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check AAUC's competition here
NEM vs ARMN Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while ARMN trades at $18.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 68.78. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check ARMN's competition here
NEM vs CGAU Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while CGAU trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check CGAU's competition here
NEM vs SAND Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while SAND trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 101.00. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check SAND's competition here
NEM vs HYMC Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while HYMC trades at $35.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -38.29. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HYMC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check HYMC's competition here
NEM vs SA Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while SA trades at $30.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -80.53. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check SA's competition here
NEM vs DRD Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while DRD trades at $30.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check DRD's competition here
NEM vs IAUX Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while IAUX trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check IAUX's competition here
NEM vs DC Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 697M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while DC trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -19.33. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check DC's competition here
NEM vs GAU Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 660.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while GAU trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GAU's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check GAU's competition here
NEM vs IDR Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 547.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while IDR trades at $34.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check IDR's competition here
NEM vs NVAWW Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 504.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while NVAWW trades at $31.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check NVAWW's competition here
NEM vs THM Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 484.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while THM trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -117.00. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check THM's competition here
NEM vs ODV Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 478.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while ODV trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check ODV's competition here
NEM vs CMCL Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 462.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while CMCL trades at $23.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 798.67. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check CMCL's competition here
NEM vs GSS Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check GSS's competition here
NEM vs NFGC Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 447.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while NFGC trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check NFGC's competition here
NEM vs TRX Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 443.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while TRX trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check TRX's competition here
NEM vs DC-WT Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 438.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while DC-WT trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check DC-WT's competition here
NEM vs KOR Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, KOR has a market cap of 415.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while KOR trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KOR's P/E ratio is -20.58. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KOR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to KOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check KOR's competition here
NEM vs VGZ Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 296.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while VGZ trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is -34.08. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VGZ's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check VGZ's competition here
NEM vs GLDG Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 258.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while GLDG trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -24.20. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check GLDG's competition here
NEM vs USAU Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 254.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while USAU trades at $15.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -10.49. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to USAU's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check USAU's competition here
NEM vs CTGO Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 236.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while CTGO trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CTGO's ROE of -2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check CTGO's competition here
NEM vs MINE Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 206.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while MINE trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -25.75. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MINE's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to MINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check MINE's competition here
NEM vs GORO Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while GORO trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -24.70. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GORO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check GORO's competition here
NEM vs GSV Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check GSV's competition here
NEM vs PZG Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 142.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while PZG trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check PZG's competition here
NEM vs NAMM Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, NAMM has a market cap of 121.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while NAMM trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas NAMM's P/E ratio is 1.23. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NAMM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to NAMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check NAMM's competition here
NEM vs BGL Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, BGL has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while BGL trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas BGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BGL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to BGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check BGL's competition here
NEM vs ODVWZ Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while ODVWZ trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check ODVWZ's competition here
NEM vs AUST Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while AUST trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -12.25. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check AUST's competition here
NEM vs AAU Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AAU's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check AAU's competition here
NEM vs ATCX Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, ATCX has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while ATCX trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ATCX's P/E ratio is -29.81. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ATCX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to ATCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check ATCX's competition here
NEM vs NAMMW Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, NAMMW has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while NAMMW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas NAMMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NAMMW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to NAMMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check NAMMW's competition here
NEM vs BGLWW Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, BGLWW has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while BGLWW trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas BGLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BGLWW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to BGLWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check BGLWW's competition here
NEM vs HYMCZ Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check HYMCZ's competition here
NEM vs HYMCL Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 78.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while HYMCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check HYMCL's competition here
NEM vs HYMCW Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check HYMCW's competition here
NEM vs KL Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check KL's competition here
NEM vs KLDX Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, KLDX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while KLDX trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KLDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KLDX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to KLDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check KLDX's competition here
NEM vs GPL Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check GPL's competition here
NEM vs PVG Comparison April 2026
NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 122.7B. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $112.81, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check PVG's competition here