Newmont Corporation

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while AEM trades at $208.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check AEM's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, B has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while B trades at $42.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas B's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to B's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check B's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while WPM trades at $138.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 63.57. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check WPM's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while FNV trades at $253.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 52.68. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check FNV's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while AU trades at $95.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check AU's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while GFI trades at $46.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check GFI's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while KGC trades at $30.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check KGC's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while HL-PB trades at $68.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 2270.33. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check HL-PB's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while AGI trades at $45.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check AGI's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while RGLD trades at $248.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 38.67. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check RGLD's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while HL trades at $19.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 39.98. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check HL's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while CDE trades at $20.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check CDE's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while IAG trades at $19.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check IAG's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while EQX trades at $14.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is -485.33. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check EQX's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while HMY trades at $15.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check HMY's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while SBSW trades at $13.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -27.92. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check SBSW's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while NGD trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 31.13. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check NGD's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while OR trades at $40.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check OR's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while EGO trades at $37.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check EGO's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while BTG trades at $4.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BTG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check BTG's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while SSRM trades at $28.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check SSRM's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while AUY trades at $5.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check AUY's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while ORLA trades at $16.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 102.13. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check ORLA's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, FSAGX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while FSAGX trades at $65.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas FSAGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FSAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to FSAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check FSAGX's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while NG trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NG's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check NG's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while ARMN trades at $22.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 81.93. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check ARMN's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, AAUC has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while AAUC trades at $31.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas AAUC's P/E ratio is -110.93. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AAUC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to AAUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check AAUC's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while SAND trades at $12.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 101.00. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check SAND's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while CGAU trades at $18.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check CGAU's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while HYMC trades at $39.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -40.35. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HYMC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check HYMC's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while SA trades at $30.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -78.40. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check SA's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while DRD trades at $30.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check DRD's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while IAUX trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -5.52. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check IAUX's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 709.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while DC trades at $5.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -22.08. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check DC's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 656M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while GAU trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -22.95. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GAU's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check GAU's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 567M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while NFGC trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -14.44. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check NFGC's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 549.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while IDR trades at $35.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 48.96. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check IDR's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 542.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while ODV trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check ODV's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 529.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while THM trades at $2.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -85.17. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to THM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check THM's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 485.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while CMCL trades at $25.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check CMCL's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 474.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while NVAWW trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check NVAWW's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 457.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while TRX trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -159.50. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check TRX's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while GSS trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check GSS's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 438.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while DC-WT trades at $3.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check DC-WT's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 297.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while GLDG trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -27.80. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check GLDG's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 286.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while CTGO trades at $22.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is 123.37. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CTGO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check CTGO's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 275.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while USAU trades at $17.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -10.01. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check USAU's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 262.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while VGZ trades at $2.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VGZ's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check VGZ's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 229.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while MINE trades at $3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -28.67. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MINE's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to MINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check MINE's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 174.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while PZG trades at $2.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -10.95. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check PZG's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 160.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while GORO trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check GORO's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while GSV trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check GSV's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, NAMM has a market cap of 144.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while NAMM trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas NAMM's P/E ratio is -8.15. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NAMM's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to NAMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check NAMM's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, BGL has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while BGL trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas BGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BGL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to BGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check BGL's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while ODVWZ trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check ODVWZ's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while AAU trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AAU's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check AAU's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while AUST trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check AUST's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, NAMMW has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while NAMMW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas NAMMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NAMMW's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to NAMMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check NAMMW's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, BGLWW has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while BGLWW trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas BGLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BGLWW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to BGLWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check BGLWW's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check HYMCZ's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 78.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while HYMCL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check HYMCL's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check HYMCW's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while GPL trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check GPL's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while KL trades at $38.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is more volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check KL's competition here

NEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEM stands at 119.6B. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEM is priced at $109.71, while PVG trades at $15.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NEM is less volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEM.Check PVG's competition here