NioCorp Developments Ltd.
NioCorp Developments Ltd. NB.TO Peers
See (NB.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NB.TO | $3.43 | +12.09% | 124.35M | -1.94 | -$1.77 | N/A |
| TECK-B.TO | $50.97 | -1.70% | 25.34B | 728.14 | $0.07 | +1.97% |
| TECK-A.TO | $51.25 | -4.21% | 24.96B | 732.14 | $0.07 | +0.98% |
| IVN.TO | $14.25 | -1.72% | 19.27B | 31.67 | $0.45 | N/A |
| AKE.TO | $8.86 | -0.56% | 5.68B | 9.53 | $0.93 | N/A |
| FIL.TO | $32.25 | -1.01% | 4.37B | -31.01 | -$1.04 | N/A |
| NGEX.TO | $12.00 | +0.84% | 2.48B | -30.77 | -$0.39 | N/A |
| SKE.TO | $17.33 | +2.00% | 1.96B | -11.33 | -$1.53 | N/A |
| FOM.TO | $3.08 | -5.23% | 1.35B | -61.60 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| ALS.TO | $26.84 | +3.03% | 1.24B | 12.66 | $2.12 | +1.34% |
Stock Comparison
NB.TO vs TECK-B.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, TECK-B.TO has a market cap of 25.34B. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while TECK-B.TO trades at $50.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas TECK-B.TO's P/E ratio is 728.14. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to TECK-B.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to TECK-B.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs TECK-A.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, TECK-A.TO has a market cap of 24.96B. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while TECK-A.TO trades at $51.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas TECK-A.TO's P/E ratio is 732.14. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to TECK-A.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to TECK-A.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs IVN.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, IVN.TO has a market cap of 19.27B. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while IVN.TO trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas IVN.TO's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to IVN.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to IVN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs AKE.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, AKE.TO has a market cap of 5.68B. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while AKE.TO trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas AKE.TO's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to AKE.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to AKE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs FIL.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, FIL.TO has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while FIL.TO trades at $32.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas FIL.TO's P/E ratio is -31.01. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to FIL.TO's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to FIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs NGEX.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, NGEX.TO has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while NGEX.TO trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas NGEX.TO's P/E ratio is -30.77. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to NGEX.TO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to NGEX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs SKE.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, SKE.TO has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while SKE.TO trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas SKE.TO's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to SKE.TO's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to SKE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs FOM.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, FOM.TO has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while FOM.TO trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas FOM.TO's P/E ratio is -61.60. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to FOM.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to FOM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs ALS.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, ALS.TO has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while ALS.TO trades at $26.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas ALS.TO's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to ALS.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to ALS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs VZLA.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, VZLA.TO has a market cap of 977.26M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while VZLA.TO trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas VZLA.TO's P/E ratio is -112.33. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to VZLA.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to VZLA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs LAC.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, LAC.TO has a market cap of 960.86M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while LAC.TO trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas LAC.TO's P/E ratio is -15.14. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to LAC.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to LAC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs AII.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, AII.TO has a market cap of 709.09M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while AII.TO trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas AII.TO's P/E ratio is -41.33. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to AII.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to AII.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs NDM.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, NDM.TO has a market cap of 689.38M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while NDM.TO trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas NDM.TO's P/E ratio is -18.29. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to NDM.TO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to NDM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs MDI.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, MDI.TO has a market cap of 679.31M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while MDI.TO trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas MDI.TO's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to MDI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to MDI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs LAAC.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, LAAC.TO has a market cap of 633.14M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while LAAC.TO trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas LAAC.TO's P/E ratio is -39.10. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to LAAC.TO's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to LAAC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs POM.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, POM.TO has a market cap of 552.27M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while POM.TO trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas POM.TO's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to POM.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to POM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs USA.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, USA.TO has a market cap of 521.89M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while USA.TO trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas USA.TO's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to USA.TO's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to USA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs FVL.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, FVL.TO has a market cap of 491.44M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while FVL.TO trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas FVL.TO's P/E ratio is -93.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to FVL.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to FVL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs ETG.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, ETG.TO has a market cap of 474.95M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while ETG.TO trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas ETG.TO's P/E ratio is -32.71. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to ETG.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to ETG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs SOLG.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, SOLG.TO has a market cap of 405.15M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while SOLG.TO trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas SOLG.TO's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to SOLG.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to SOLG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs PMET.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, PMET.TO has a market cap of 353.58M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while PMET.TO trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas PMET.TO's P/E ratio is -56.25. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to PMET.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to PMET.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs LUCA.V Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, LUCA.V has a market cap of 328.37M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while LUCA.V trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas LUCA.V's P/E ratio is -15.87. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to LUCA.V's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to LUCA.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs ERD.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, ERD.TO has a market cap of 326.72M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while ERD.TO trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas ERD.TO's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to ERD.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to ERD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs LIRC.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, LIRC.TO has a market cap of 304.92M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while LIRC.TO trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas LIRC.TO's P/E ratio is -80.71. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to LIRC.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to LIRC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs WRN.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, WRN.TO has a market cap of 300.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while WRN.TO trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas WRN.TO's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to WRN.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to WRN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs TMQ.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, TMQ.TO has a market cap of 279.17M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while TMQ.TO trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas TMQ.TO's P/E ratio is -24.29. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to TMQ.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to TMQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs LIFT.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, LIFT.CN has a market cap of 275.99M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while LIFT.CN trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas LIFT.CN's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to LIFT.CN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to LIFT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs GLO.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, GLO.TO has a market cap of 271.10M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while GLO.TO trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas GLO.TO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to GLO.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to GLO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs ECOR.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, ECOR.TO has a market cap of 265.80M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while ECOR.TO trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas ECOR.TO's P/E ratio is -21.40. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to ECOR.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to ECOR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs MNO.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, MNO.TO has a market cap of 249.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while MNO.TO trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas MNO.TO's P/E ratio is -8.87. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to MNO.TO's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to MNO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs SMT.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, SMT.TO has a market cap of 243.90M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while SMT.TO trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas SMT.TO's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to SMT.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to SMT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs TLG.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, TLG.TO has a market cap of 237.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while TLG.TO trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas TLG.TO's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to TLG.TO's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to TLG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs PRYM.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, PRYM.TO has a market cap of 189.89M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while PRYM.TO trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas PRYM.TO's P/E ratio is -8.47. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to PRYM.TO's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to PRYM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs FAR.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, FAR.TO has a market cap of 182.58M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while FAR.TO trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas FAR.TO's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to FAR.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to FAR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs LAM.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, LAM.TO has a market cap of 162.38M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while LAM.TO trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas LAM.TO's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to LAM.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to LAM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs GEO.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, GEO.TO has a market cap of 160.35M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while GEO.TO trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas GEO.TO's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to GEO.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to GEO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs AMC.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, AMC.TO has a market cap of 157.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while AMC.TO trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas AMC.TO's P/E ratio is -5.48. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to AMC.TO's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to AMC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs IBAT.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, IBAT.CN has a market cap of 156.54M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while IBAT.CN trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas IBAT.CN's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to IBAT.CN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to IBAT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs ARA.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, ARA.TO has a market cap of 142.99M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while ARA.TO trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas ARA.TO's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to ARA.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to ARA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs TLO.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, TLO.TO has a market cap of 140.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while TLO.TO trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas TLO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to TLO.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to TLO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs AOT.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, AOT.TO has a market cap of 126.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while AOT.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas AOT.TO's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to AOT.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to AOT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs CDPR.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, CDPR.CN has a market cap of 125.81M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while CDPR.CN trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas CDPR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to CDPR.CN's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to CDPR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs LGO.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, LGO.TO has a market cap of 124.38M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while LGO.TO trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas LGO.TO's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to LGO.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to LGO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs MOLY.NE Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, MOLY.NE has a market cap of 104.09M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while MOLY.NE trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas MOLY.NE's P/E ratio is -21.75. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to MOLY.NE's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to MOLY.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs FSY.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, FSY.TO has a market cap of 103.23M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while FSY.TO trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas FSY.TO's P/E ratio is -49.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to FSY.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to FSY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs TI.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, TI.TO has a market cap of 80.46M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while TI.TO trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas TI.TO's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to TI.TO's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to TI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs FURY.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, FURY.TO has a market cap of 79.36M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while FURY.TO trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas FURY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to FURY.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to FURY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs GMX.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, GMX.TO has a market cap of 78.53M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while GMX.TO trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas GMX.TO's P/E ratio is 70.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to GMX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to GMX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs SLR.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, SLR.TO has a market cap of 74.40M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while SLR.TO trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas SLR.TO's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to SLR.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to SLR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs S.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, S.TO has a market cap of 69.48M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while S.TO trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas S.TO's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to S.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to S.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs SAU.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, SAU.TO has a market cap of 65.74M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while SAU.TO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas SAU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to SAU.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to SAU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs NVLH.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, NVLH.CN has a market cap of 62.26M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while NVLH.CN trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas NVLH.CN's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to NVLH.CN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to NVLH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs WM.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, WM.TO has a market cap of 54.99M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while WM.TO trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas WM.TO's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to WM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to WM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs TSK.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, TSK.TO has a market cap of 54.90M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while TSK.TO trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas TSK.TO's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to TSK.TO's ROE of -4.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to TSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs OGD.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, OGD.TO has a market cap of 47.38M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while OGD.TO trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas OGD.TO's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to OGD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to OGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs FOX.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, FOX.CN has a market cap of 44.75M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while FOX.CN trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas FOX.CN's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to FOX.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to FOX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs MIN.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, MIN.TO has a market cap of 44.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while MIN.TO trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas MIN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to MIN.TO's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to MIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs VROY.V Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, VROY.V has a market cap of 43.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while VROY.V trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas VROY.V's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to VROY.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to VROY.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs GENM.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, GENM.TO has a market cap of 42.66M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while GENM.TO trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas GENM.TO's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to GENM.TO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to GENM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs RUA.V Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, RUA.V has a market cap of 42.11M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while RUA.V trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas RUA.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to RUA.V's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to RUA.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs RUA.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, RUA.CN has a market cap of 40.46M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while RUA.CN trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas RUA.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to RUA.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to RUA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs RTG.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, RTG.TO has a market cap of 39.50M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while RTG.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas RTG.TO's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to RTG.TO's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to RTG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs VALU.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, VALU.CN has a market cap of 39.24M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while VALU.CN trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas VALU.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to VALU.CN's ROE of +10.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to VALU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs BKI.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, BKI.TO has a market cap of 38.02M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while BKI.TO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas BKI.TO's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to BKI.TO's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to BKI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs ARS.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, ARS.CN has a market cap of 37.86M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while ARS.CN trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas ARS.CN's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to ARS.CN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to ARS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs TOC.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, TOC.CN has a market cap of 37.45M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while TOC.CN trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas TOC.CN's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to TOC.CN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to TOC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs NEXT.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, NEXT.TO has a market cap of 36.98M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while NEXT.TO trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas NEXT.TO's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to NEXT.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to NEXT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs NCF.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, NCF.TO has a market cap of 36.42M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while NCF.TO trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas NCF.TO's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to NCF.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to NCF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs FT.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, FT.TO has a market cap of 34.33M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while FT.TO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas FT.TO's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to FT.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to FT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs EGFV.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, EGFV.CN has a market cap of 27.30M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while EGFV.CN trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas EGFV.CN's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to EGFV.CN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to EGFV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs AMPS.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, AMPS.CN has a market cap of 26.85M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while AMPS.CN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas AMPS.CN's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to AMPS.CN's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to AMPS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs NICO.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, NICO.CN has a market cap of 24.83M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while NICO.CN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas NICO.CN's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to NICO.CN's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to NICO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs AAN.V Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, AAN.V has a market cap of 22.30M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while AAN.V trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas AAN.V's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to AAN.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to AAN.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs URNM.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, URNM.CN has a market cap of 19.36M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while URNM.CN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas URNM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to URNM.CN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to URNM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs ASND.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, ASND.TO has a market cap of 18.57M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while ASND.TO trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas ASND.TO's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to ASND.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to ASND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs EXN.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, EXN.TO has a market cap of 18.47M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while EXN.TO trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas EXN.TO's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to EXN.TO's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to EXN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs LVL.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, LVL.CN has a market cap of 18.44M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while LVL.CN trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas LVL.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to LVL.CN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NB.TO has daily volatility of 23.60 and LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
NB.TO vs TN.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, TN.CN has a market cap of 18.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while TN.CN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas TN.CN's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to TN.CN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to TN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs VOY.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, VOY.CN has a market cap of 18.22M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while VOY.CN trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas VOY.CN's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to VOY.CN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to VOY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs SAM.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, SAM.TO has a market cap of 17.72M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while SAM.TO trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas SAM.TO's P/E ratio is -6.62. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to SAM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to SAM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs SX.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, SX.CN has a market cap of 16.84M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while SX.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas SX.CN's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to SX.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to SX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs WRX.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, WRX.TO has a market cap of 16.36M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while WRX.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas WRX.TO's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to WRX.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to WRX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs AVL.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, AVL.TO has a market cap of 15.37M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while AVL.TO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas AVL.TO's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to AVL.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to AVL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs SUPR.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, SUPR.CN has a market cap of 15.04M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while SUPR.CN trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas SUPR.CN's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to SUPR.CN's ROE of -116.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to SUPR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs TICO.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, TICO.CN has a market cap of 14.98M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while TICO.CN trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas TICO.CN's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to TICO.CN's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to TICO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs SLV.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, SLV.CN has a market cap of 14.89M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while SLV.CN trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas SLV.CN's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to SLV.CN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to SLV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs COSA.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, COSA.CN has a market cap of 14.25M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while COSA.CN trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas COSA.CN's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to COSA.CN's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to COSA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs TTX.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, TTX.CN has a market cap of 13.18M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while TTX.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas TTX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to TTX.CN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to TTX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs SCY.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, SCY.TO has a market cap of 12.46M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while SCY.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas SCY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to SCY.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to SCY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs MAXX.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, MAXX.CN has a market cap of 12.26M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while MAXX.CN trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas MAXX.CN's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to MAXX.CN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to MAXX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs PM.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, PM.CN has a market cap of 11.64M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while PM.CN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas PM.CN's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to PM.CN's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to PM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs PEK.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, PEK.CN has a market cap of 11.32M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while PEK.CN trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas PEK.CN's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to PEK.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to PEK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs NXU.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, NXU.CN has a market cap of 10.76M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while NXU.CN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas NXU.CN's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to NXU.CN's ROE of -16.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to NXU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs LIM.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, LIM.CN has a market cap of 9.87M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while LIM.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas LIM.CN's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to LIM.CN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to LIM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs GAMA.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, GAMA.CN has a market cap of 9.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while GAMA.CN trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas GAMA.CN's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to GAMA.CN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to GAMA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs LFLR.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, LFLR.CN has a market cap of 9.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while LFLR.CN trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas LFLR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to LFLR.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is less volatile compared to LFLR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs GDIG.CN Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, GDIG.CN has a market cap of 9.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while GDIG.CN trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas GDIG.CN's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to GDIG.CN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to GDIG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs SVB.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, SVB.TO has a market cap of 9.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while SVB.TO trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas SVB.TO's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to SVB.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to SVB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.
NB.TO vs ELEF.TO Comparison
NB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NB.TO stands at 124.35M. In comparison, ELEF.TO has a market cap of 8.71M. Regarding current trading prices, NB.TO is priced at $3.43, while ELEF.TO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas ELEF.TO's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, NB.TO's ROE is +2.25%, compared to ELEF.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NB.TO is more volatile compared to ELEF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NB.TO.