Nava Limited
Nava Limited (NAVA.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NAVA.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAVA.BO | ₹545.75 | +0.00% | 156.5B | 17.59 | ₹31.44 | +1.63% |
| TIINDIA.BO | ₹2,530.30 | +0.00% | 490.6B | 82.11 | ₹30.87 | +0.14% |
| 3MINDIA.NS | ₹32,980.00 | +0.00% | 363.5B | 95.93 | ₹336.40 | +1.66% |
| 3MINDIA.BO | ₹32,974.10 | +0.00% | 362.9B | 95.77 | ₹336.38 | +1.66% |
| GODREJIND.NS | ₹823.55 | +0.00% | 280.2B | 28.65 | ₹29.04 | N/A |
| GODREJIND.BO | ₹822.55 | +0.00% | 279.8B | 29.03 | ₹28.61 | N/A |
| JSWHL.BO | ₹16,002.35 | +0.00% | 168.5B | 118.24 | ₹128.39 | N/A |
| JSWHL.NS | ₹15,976.00 | +0.00% | 168.1B | 117.95 | ₹128.38 | N/A |
| NAVA.NS | ₹544.55 | +0.00% | 156.6B | 17.60 | ₹31.44 | +1.63% |
| CARBORUNIV.BO | ₹748.60 | +0.00% | 145.3B | 58.96 | ₹12.94 | +0.53% |
Stock Comparison
NAVA.BO vs TIINDIA.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, TIINDIA.BO has a market cap of 490.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while TIINDIA.BO trades at ₹2,530.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas TIINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 82.11. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to TIINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check TIINDIA.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs 3MINDIA.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, 3MINDIA.NS has a market cap of 363.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while 3MINDIA.NS trades at ₹32,980.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas 3MINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 95.93. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3MINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to 3MINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check 3MINDIA.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs 3MINDIA.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, 3MINDIA.BO has a market cap of 362.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while 3MINDIA.BO trades at ₹32,974.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas 3MINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 95.77. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3MINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to 3MINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check 3MINDIA.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs GODREJIND.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, GODREJIND.NS has a market cap of 280.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while GODREJIND.NS trades at ₹823.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas GODREJIND.NS's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GODREJIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to GODREJIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check GODREJIND.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs GODREJIND.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, GODREJIND.BO has a market cap of 279.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while GODREJIND.BO trades at ₹822.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas GODREJIND.BO's P/E ratio is 29.03. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GODREJIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to GODREJIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check GODREJIND.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs JSWHL.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, JSWHL.BO has a market cap of 168.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while JSWHL.BO trades at ₹16,002.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas JSWHL.BO's P/E ratio is 118.24. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JSWHL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to JSWHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check JSWHL.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs JSWHL.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, JSWHL.NS has a market cap of 168.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while JSWHL.NS trades at ₹15,976.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas JSWHL.NS's P/E ratio is 117.95. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JSWHL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to JSWHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check JSWHL.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs NAVA.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, NAVA.NS has a market cap of 156.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while NAVA.NS trades at ₹544.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas NAVA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NAVA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to NAVA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check NAVA.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs CARBORUNIV.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, CARBORUNIV.BO has a market cap of 145.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while CARBORUNIV.BO trades at ₹748.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas CARBORUNIV.BO's P/E ratio is 58.96. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CARBORUNIV.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to CARBORUNIV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check CARBORUNIV.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs CARBORUNIV.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, CARBORUNIV.NS has a market cap of 144.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while CARBORUNIV.NS trades at ₹748.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas CARBORUNIV.NS's P/E ratio is 58.36. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CARBORUNIV.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to CARBORUNIV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check CARBORUNIV.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs SWANCORP.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, SWANCORP.BO has a market cap of 99.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while SWANCORP.BO trades at ₹324.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas SWANCORP.BO's P/E ratio is -82.34. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWANCORP.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to SWANCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check SWANCORP.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs SWANCORP.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, SWANCORP.NS has a market cap of 99.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while SWANCORP.NS trades at ₹324.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas SWANCORP.NS's P/E ratio is -82.33. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWANCORP.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to SWANCORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check SWANCORP.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs CYIENT.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, CYIENT.NS has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while CYIENT.NS trades at ₹829.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas CYIENT.NS's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CYIENT.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to CYIENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check CYIENT.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs CYIENT.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, CYIENT.BO has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while CYIENT.BO trades at ₹831.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas CYIENT.BO's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CYIENT.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to CYIENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check CYIENT.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs MMTC.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, MMTC.NS has a market cap of 90.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while MMTC.NS trades at ₹60.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas MMTC.NS's P/E ratio is 34.11. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MMTC.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to MMTC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check MMTC.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs MMTC.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, MMTC.BO has a market cap of 89.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while MMTC.BO trades at ₹60.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas MMTC.BO's P/E ratio is 33.95. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MMTC.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to MMTC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check MMTC.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs NESCO.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, NESCO.NS has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while NESCO.NS trades at ₹1,043.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas NESCO.NS's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NESCO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to NESCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check NESCO.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs NESCO.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, NESCO.BO has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while NESCO.BO trades at ₹1,041.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas NESCO.BO's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NESCO.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to NESCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check NESCO.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs BEML.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, BEML.NS has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while BEML.NS trades at ₹1,500.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas BEML.NS's P/E ratio is 50.55. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BEML.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to BEML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check BEML.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs BEML.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, BEML.BO has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while BEML.BO trades at ₹1,501.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas BEML.BO's P/E ratio is 42.67. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BEML.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to BEML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check BEML.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs SINDHUTRAD.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, SINDHUTRAD.BO has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while SINDHUTRAD.BO trades at ₹24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas SINDHUTRAD.BO's P/E ratio is -93.72. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SINDHUTRAD.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to SINDHUTRAD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check SINDHUTRAD.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs SINDHUTRAD.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, SINDHUTRAD.NS has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while SINDHUTRAD.NS trades at ₹24.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas SINDHUTRAD.NS's P/E ratio is -145.50. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SINDHUTRAD.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to SINDHUTRAD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check SINDHUTRAD.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs MSTCLTD.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, MSTCLTD.BO has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while MSTCLTD.BO trades at ₹410.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas MSTCLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MSTCLTD.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to MSTCLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check MSTCLTD.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs MSTCLTD.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, MSTCLTD.NS has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while MSTCLTD.NS trades at ₹409.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas MSTCLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MSTCLTD.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to MSTCLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check MSTCLTD.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs BALMLAWRIE.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, BALMLAWRIE.BO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while BALMLAWRIE.BO trades at ₹162.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas BALMLAWRIE.BO's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BALMLAWRIE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to BALMLAWRIE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check BALMLAWRIE.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs BALMLAWRIE.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, BALMLAWRIE.NS has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while BALMLAWRIE.NS trades at ₹162.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas BALMLAWRIE.NS's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BALMLAWRIE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to BALMLAWRIE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check BALMLAWRIE.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs SBC.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, SBC.NS has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while SBC.NS trades at ₹31.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas SBC.NS's P/E ratio is 83.18. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBC.NS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to SBC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check SBC.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs SBC.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, SBC.BO has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while SBC.BO trades at ₹31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas SBC.BO's P/E ratio is 83.16. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBC.BO's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to SBC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check SBC.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs NIBE.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, NIBE.NS has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while NIBE.NS trades at ₹976.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas NIBE.NS's P/E ratio is -200.15. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NIBE.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to NIBE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check NIBE.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs KRYSTAL.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, KRYSTAL.NS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while KRYSTAL.NS trades at ₹554.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas KRYSTAL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KRYSTAL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to KRYSTAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check KRYSTAL.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs CAREERP.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, CAREERP.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while CAREERP.NS trades at ₹377.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas CAREERP.NS's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CAREERP.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to CAREERP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check CAREERP.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs ZUARIIND.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, ZUARIIND.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while ZUARIIND.NS trades at ₹228.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas ZUARIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZUARIIND.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to ZUARIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check ZUARIIND.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs CAREERP.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, CAREERP.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while CAREERP.BO trades at ₹376.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas CAREERP.BO's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CAREERP.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to CAREERP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check CAREERP.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs ZUARIIND.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, ZUARIIND.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while ZUARIIND.BO trades at ₹228.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas ZUARIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZUARIIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to ZUARIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check ZUARIIND.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs PVP.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, PVP.BO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while PVP.BO trades at ₹24.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas PVP.BO's P/E ratio is -78.75. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PVP.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to PVP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check PVP.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs PVP.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, PVP.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while PVP.NS trades at ₹24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas PVP.NS's P/E ratio is -78.44. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PVP.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to PVP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check PVP.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs STCINDIA.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, STCINDIA.NS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while STCINDIA.NS trades at ₹107.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas STCINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STCINDIA.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to STCINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check STCINDIA.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs STCINDIA.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, STCINDIA.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while STCINDIA.BO trades at ₹106.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas STCINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STCINDIA.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to STCINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check STCINDIA.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs JPASSOCIAT.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, JPASSOCIAT.NS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while JPASSOCIAT.NS trades at ₹2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas JPASSOCIAT.NS's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JPASSOCIAT.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to JPASSOCIAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check JPASSOCIAT.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs JPASSOCIAT.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, JPASSOCIAT.BO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while JPASSOCIAT.BO trades at ₹2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas JPASSOCIAT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JPASSOCIAT.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to JPASSOCIAT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check JPASSOCIAT.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs KOTHARIPRO.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, KOTHARIPRO.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while KOTHARIPRO.BO trades at ₹63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas KOTHARIPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KOTHARIPRO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to KOTHARIPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check KOTHARIPRO.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs KOTHARIPRO.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, KOTHARIPRO.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while KOTHARIPRO.NS trades at ₹63.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas KOTHARIPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KOTHARIPRO.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to KOTHARIPRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check KOTHARIPRO.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs ROSSELLIND.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, ROSSELLIND.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while ROSSELLIND.BO trades at ₹46.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas ROSSELLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROSSELLIND.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to ROSSELLIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check ROSSELLIND.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs ROSSELLIND.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, ROSSELLIND.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while ROSSELLIND.NS trades at ₹45.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas ROSSELLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROSSELLIND.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to ROSSELLIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check ROSSELLIND.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs SORILINFRA.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, SORILINFRA.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while SORILINFRA.NS trades at ₹65.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas SORILINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SORILINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to SORILINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check SORILINFRA.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs GILLANDERS.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, GILLANDERS.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while GILLANDERS.NS trades at ₹79.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas GILLANDERS.NS's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GILLANDERS.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to GILLANDERS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check GILLANDERS.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs GILLANDERS.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, GILLANDERS.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while GILLANDERS.BO trades at ₹79.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas GILLANDERS.BO's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GILLANDERS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to GILLANDERS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check GILLANDERS.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs EXCEL.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, EXCEL.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while EXCEL.NS trades at ₹1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas EXCEL.NS's P/E ratio is 103.00. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EXCEL.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to EXCEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check EXCEL.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs EXCEL.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, EXCEL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while EXCEL.BO trades at ₹1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas EXCEL.BO's P/E ratio is 102.00. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EXCEL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to EXCEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check EXCEL.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs IPRINGLTD.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, IPRINGLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while IPRINGLTD.BO trades at ₹110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas IPRINGLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 151.99. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPRINGLTD.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to IPRINGLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check IPRINGLTD.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs SIGIND.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, SIGIND.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while SIGIND.BO trades at ₹43.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas SIGIND.BO's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIGIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to SIGIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check SIGIND.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs INM.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, INM.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while INM.NS trades at ₹180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas INM.NS's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to INM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check INM.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs MSRINDIA.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, MSRINDIA.BO has a market cap of 428.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while MSRINDIA.BO trades at ₹6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas MSRINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 227.33. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MSRINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to MSRINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check MSRINDIA.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs ROLLT.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, ROLLT.NS has a market cap of 320.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while ROLLT.NS trades at ₹1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas ROLLT.NS's P/E ratio is 1.91. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROLLT.NS's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to ROLLT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check ROLLT.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs ROLLT.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, ROLLT.BO has a market cap of 312.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while ROLLT.BO trades at ₹1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas ROLLT.BO's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROLLT.BO's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to ROLLT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check ROLLT.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs BFFL.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, BFFL.BO has a market cap of 304.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while BFFL.BO trades at ₹63.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas BFFL.BO's P/E ratio is 50.36. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BFFL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to BFFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check BFFL.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs SFSL.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, SFSL.BO has a market cap of 210.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while SFSL.BO trades at ₹100.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas SFSL.BO's P/E ratio is 73.55. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SFSL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to SFSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check SFSL.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs ASINPET.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, ASINPET.BO has a market cap of 187.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while ASINPET.BO trades at ₹7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas ASINPET.BO's P/E ratio is 109.14. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASINPET.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to ASINPET.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check ASINPET.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs VASUDHAGAM.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, VASUDHAGAM.BO has a market cap of 75.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while VASUDHAGAM.BO trades at ₹1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas VASUDHAGAM.BO's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VASUDHAGAM.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to VASUDHAGAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check VASUDHAGAM.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs LEXORAA.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, LEXORAA.BO has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while LEXORAA.BO trades at ₹17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas LEXORAA.BO's P/E ratio is -43.03. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LEXORAA.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to LEXORAA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check LEXORAA.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs AMBIT.BO Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, AMBIT.BO has a market cap of 60.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while AMBIT.BO trades at ₹10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas AMBIT.BO's P/E ratio is 37.39. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMBIT.BO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to AMBIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check AMBIT.BO's competition here
NAVA.BO vs ALCHEM.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, ALCHEM.NS has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while ALCHEM.NS trades at ₹3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas ALCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is more volatile compared to ALCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check ALCHEM.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs NBVENTURES.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, NBVENTURES.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while NBVENTURES.NS trades at ₹200.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas NBVENTURES.NS's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NBVENTURES.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to NBVENTURES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check NBVENTURES.NS's competition here
NAVA.BO vs ZUARIGLOB.NS Comparison March 2026
NAVA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAVA.BO stands at 156.5B. In comparison, ZUARIGLOB.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAVA.BO is priced at ₹545.75, while ZUARIGLOB.NS trades at ₹145.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas ZUARIGLOB.NS's P/E ratio is -12.18. In terms of profitability, NAVA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZUARIGLOB.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAVA.BO is less volatile compared to ZUARIGLOB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAVA.BO.Check ZUARIGLOB.NS's competition here